You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly. You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
alternatehistory.com
In a satire (the translation is a bit old but meh) in 361, Julian the Apostate features Alexander the Great, Julius Caesar, Augustus, Trajan, Marcus Aurelius, and Constantine participating in a contest before the Olympians. The Olympians are voting on which of the six emperors were the worthiest mortal. After each of the five say a few words on what makes them great, Hermes asks each mortal what the point of his life was (followed by the gods pointing out how each mortal failed):
Alexander: "To conquer the world."
Julius Caesar: "To hold the first place in my own country and neither to be nor to be thought second to any man."
Augustus: "To govern well."
Trajan: "My aims were the same as Alexander's but I acted with more prudence."
Marcus Aurelius: "To imitate the gods."
Constantine: "To amass great wealth, and then to spend it liberally so as to gratify my own desires and the desires of my friends."
The gods vote Marcus Aurelius as the worthiest mortal, then let each of the six choose their guardian god in the afterlife.
Alexander and Trajan choose Heracles/Hercules.
Augustus chooses Apollo.
Caesar "wanders about for a long time and runs hither and thither" before being finally summoned by Ares and Aphrodite.
Marcus Aurelius chooses Zeus and Kronos.
Constantine chooses the unnamed Goddess of Pleasure. Pleasure takes Constantine to the Land of Incontinence, where he finds Jesus in the afterlife, preaching that every sin is permissible because baptism will wash them all away. Jesus and Constantine are then both punished until Zeus takes pity.
The text ends with Hermes saying that Julian can choose Mithras as his guardian when he dies.
Julian's slander of the Christian emperor aside, how accurate is this satire to the actual personalities of the characters involved?