To be frank, what you're suggesting is a scenario in which Germany prepares for a war in early 1940's while the Allies do likewise. A German scheme for European domination during late 1940's would press for different priorities than OTL's dash for massive re-armament as soon as possible.
This ignores the basic fact that the world is not a vacuum.
The first rule of military doctrine is that when your neighbor starts building tons of weapons and starts gearing up for war, it's best to not assume that they just like having incredibly expensive lawn ornaments.
If the Germans start building tons of tanks and planes and ships, the French and British are going to go "oh, well here we go again" and start doing likewise. Stalin, being Stalin, will look at all the war production and assume that either one of two situations is going to happen. Either the Western powers are getting ready to dogpile on the Soviet Union, or that they are getting ready to start pounding on each other. Either way he would most definitely want to be ready to either take advantage of the opportunity or defend himself.
The militarists may, or may not, elect to declare war on Western powers. There's fair chance of internal revolution, Soviet intervention and other things which will not lead into a war between Japan and Western powers. Even a war with Western powers may well be more disastrous to France and UK as a large scale colonial war might not be all that popular.
The fact that the Empire of Japan under the militarists was clearly heading toward self destruction failed to elicit a coup by less hawkish elements in Japan IOTL should indicate that the Japanese were not likely. As traditional as Japanese society was(and very much still is), a revolution would require an incredibly large upheaval in Japanese society, a TL where the Germans decide to hold off for a decade will be less turbulent, not more.
Yes, and the Soviet Navy as well.
What's your point?
More useless battlewagons RN and MN will build better it is for the Axis.
Considering that the British actually had the resources to waste on such "useless" battlewagons than the Germans ever did and that they could make far better use of them than the Germans ever could means that the balance still falls in the Allies' favor.
Sure.
Is that sarcasm or agreement? I can't tell.
Compared to Stalin & bunch all he did before WW II was small potatoes. Better than commies for most of the West.
The West is still going to act with horror at the atrocities the Nazis will be perpetrating on its own people. Mind you without a war to distract him, and with the continual progression of Parkinson's disease with his increased amphetamines habit means that Hitler's actions will only become more irrational as time goes by, not less.
Compared to UK's WW I era ships and rifles and the French artillery park of WW I which will just get more modern as time goes by.
The Allies' R&D surrounding the creation of their own military equipment was far more well rounded and thoroughly grounded than that of the Germans and wasn't handicapped by the need to maintain ideological purity. This was only compounded by the German tendency to create these overengineered, overly expensive, and completely impractical weapons which were rarely as reliable as their Allied counterparts. For a nation that has serious issues with both money and access to valuable natural resources, this is a huge problem.
After some ten years of aggressive state led industrial expansion, which would surely have been the route if delayed aggression has been thought out, this might not be the case. After all, in OTL 1960 East and West Germany combined had GDP of 558 billion (1990 int GKD), while France had 344 and UK 452 billions. Add in Austria for some 45 billions and your GDP is almost twice that of France and much more than UK's. This was after all the terrible losses of WW II in both manpower, capital investment and land and with the disaster that fell upon East Germany.
First off, 1990 East and West Germany were a very far cry from 1939 Nazi Germany, and comparisons seem rather silly.
Secondly, source?