Just a crazy idea I got.
While reading about the Spanish civil war, it struck me that Francos army where in part black, containing tribal warriors recruited in North Africa. Thus Hitler, beeing a racist, should side with the Republic, fearing that the black soldiers would rape white women.
Not to mention that he claimed beeing a socialist (see party name) and a secondary objective where keeping the other countries pre-occupied while he did and planed what he did.
I'm sure I get something wrong, and use to much logic and reason. However, WI Hitler did side with the republic after a few month (I think it would have been hard moving troops over the Med if the Germans opposed it)?
While reading about the Spanish civil war, it struck me that Francos army where in part black, containing tribal warriors recruited in North Africa. Thus Hitler, beeing a racist, should side with the Republic, fearing that the black soldiers would rape white women.
Not to mention that he claimed beeing a socialist (see party name) and a secondary objective where keeping the other countries pre-occupied while he did and planed what he did.
I'm sure I get something wrong, and use to much logic and reason. However, WI Hitler did side with the republic after a few month (I think it would have been hard moving troops over the Med if the Germans opposed it)?