The thought of a Bush getting beat by a Clinton for a second time sounds interesting but Hillary wouldn't be able to handle Karl Rove's rock-solid "get-out-the-vote" strategy - not matter how bad Bush is.
Karl Rove learned the mistakes from 1992 and was prepared not to let it happen again...
It's very true. But this raises the question of what happens if things are too easy for the Republicans. Clearly IOTL we're at a point where Rove and the like have successfully created a division in the country, "us vs them" and all that. The problem is, people seem to be deciding that they are a "them" after all.
If Clinton makes Rove's job easier and he delineates the two sides more fully ITTL, might that turn people off the Republicans sooner?
The Republicans trump up a culture war in 2004 and IOTL voters think "better safe than sorry, let's go with Bush." ITTL, they see the writing on the wall more clearly, they see Rove's personal attacks as too damning, and in Hillary they see their wives, mothers and daughters insulted beyond all decency and decide that clearly the Republicans are trying to dupe them.
Maybe...just throwing it out as a possibility.