Hellenistic Zoroastrianism

During the period of greek rule over modern day Iran, there was a process of religious sincretism that came about during the Hellenistic periode. After the Parthian conquest, the greek cultural influence began to fade over time and attempts to purge what remained was even done by the Sassanians.

My question is had the greek cultural influence lasted longer in the region,(by having a longer greek rule) lasting up to at list the beginning of the first century AD

How would this affect Zoroastrianism, and how different would it be from that of Achaemenid times?
 
I think it would have had been better had Seleucus or a different satrap had maintained control of only Persia and Mesopotamia instead of trying to control everything from Anatolia to India. This way their attention would have been focused on the Parthian problem instead of being divided between Rome, Parthia, the Ptolemy's, etc.. Of course the Parthians are still a major problem as their style of fighting would be difficult for any Macedonian satrap to challenge in open conflict.
 
This is basically OTL. Post-Alexander Iranic religion as we know it can be considered Hellenistic, at least to a comparable (though probably lesser) degree than Egyptian, Levantine and Mesopotamian religions of the same periods. The difference is that we know really a lot of stuff about those three religious traditions before Alexander, and thus we can make safe comparisons. We have far less in the way of reliably datable written sources about Mazdeism and Iranic faith in general in the pre-Hellenistic period (and to be fair, even the Parthian period is very hard to document) so it is harder to say anything about what changed and what did not. Leaving us with Sasanian claims to have "restored" an original form of Mazdeism, for example. Now, linguistic evidence shows that the Avesta, or what is left of it, predates Hellenism by centuries. And we have enough evidence from Achaemenid times showing that a form (or many) of Mazdeism existed then (and probably earlier) and was known across the width of sedentary Iranian peoples since that period with official endorsement (how common and how deep, we do not really know). But the written versions of the Iranic religious tradition that have come down to us* reflect a largely Late Antique cultural milieu with a strong Hellenistic imprint.

* Usually put into writing in the present form in the early Islamic period, though some texts are earlier.
 
Last edited:
Top