Hellenistic India -what needs to happen?

What chain of events do you think need to transpire for a Hellenistic India to happen? Here's my thinking:

1. King Philip II of Macedon is not assassinated, and having made public claims that the Persians (having known of his ambitions) were behind the attempt, he embarks with his son Alexander and his generals on his long-planned invasion of the declining Achaemenid Persian Empire in 335 BC.

2. Having conquered all the entire western provinces of the empire from Anatolia to Egypt to Mesopotamia, as well as killing Darius III in a final great battle that saw the virtual destruction of the Persian army, Philip pauses in Babylon to consolidate his gains in 330 BC, but not before seizing the treasuries of the fallen realm in Susa and Persepolis, and bringing them back to Babylon.

3. After reinforcing and resupplying his army, as well as releasing many of his veterans to their families, and organizing the administration of the newly conquered territories and making them part of his new Greco-Macedonian Empire, Philip once more turns his attentions eastward. Drawing up plans for the conquest of all the eastern territories of the former Persian Empire right to the Indus, he is assassinated by one of his bodyguards before having a chance to put his plans into action. Alexander succeeds him as the next King of Macedon, Greece, Egypt, and Asia. The year is 328 BC.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thoughts before I continue?
 
Last edited:
Yes. That "organizing the administration" task is...colossal. Unless he just replaces the King of Kings with himself, which would still be quite a task to make stick properly.

Heck, even ensuring his position at home is secure isn't going to be the easiest thing in the world - and unlike Alexander, Philip is likely to care about Macedon's fate.

Not to mention stop short of Total Conquest, but this is easier to change.

I don't want to rain on your parade, but what was accomplished OTL was beyond the capacities of the Macedonian state (as opposed to the army), and I'm not seeing where this changes just because Philip takes a breather between conquering up to western Iran and the eastern campaign (aborted by his death).
 
Indeed i agreed for a conquest of India it was necessary a more stable Kingdom, but we are not sure about the fact if Philip survived he will gave the crown to Alexander, or if he will didn't adopt Persian uses like his son...
 
continuing with my outline:

4. After consolidating his rule, Alexander continues the invasion of Persia that his father had planned in 327 BC. It takes ten years before the rest of the Achaemenid realm is brought under Macedonian control. He reaches the Indus river in 316 BC when he is confronted by a newly-created empire under the control of Chandragupta Maurya, a leader who is -at the least- Alexander's equal in military prowess.

5. After a hard-fought battle between the two sides that resulted in a bloody stalemate, both Alexander and Chandragupta Maurya negotiate a peace, in which all the land west of the River Indus would be under the control of Alexander and his heirs, whilst the land east would be under the domain of the Mauryan Empire. Alexander also marries off his daughter, Olympia (daughter of Parysatis II and granddaughter of Artaxerxes III of Persia, and named after his mother) to Chandragupta.

6. With peace concluded, Alexander moves his army down the west bank of the Indus until he reaches the site of the present-day city of Karachi. There he builds a city and port in his name. Leaving a garrison along with some colonists there, he moves his army with the assistance of Nearchus' navy back to Babylon.

7. After five years rehabilitating his army with new recruits and retiring his veterans back to their homes and families, Alexander then began his Arabian campaign in 310 BC which would prove to be his last -but not before the inhabited and arable areas of the peninsula was securely under Macedonian control. In 305 BC, with an infected wound and a fever with a body weakened due to numerous past wounds and drinking bouts, he died at the age of 51. His heir is Alexander IV, son of Alexander III (the Great) and his wife, Stateira II (daughter of the late Persian King Darius III and his wife Stateira I). He would later spend much of his life trying to consolidate his father's conquests into a cohesive empire while fending off the encroachments of Carthage, Meroe, and the Mauryans.

8. Shortly after the death of his illustrious father, Alexander IV spent two years putting down a rebellion in Arabia centered around Mecca, with yet another rebellion among the Greek city states also flaring up while he was still in Arabia. He sent one of his father's trusted generals, Seleucus, to put it down. Given that the source of the Greek revolt was Sparta, he gave that city the Theban treatment by razing it to the ground, slaughtering/executing all Spartan males of military age, and selling the women and children into slavery. Sparta remained uninhabited for centuries afterward.

9. Having finally put down both revolts, Alexander IV came to Macedon and the ancestral capital, Pella, where he had himself crowned King of Macedon, Greece, Asia, Egypt, Babylon, Persia, and Arabia in 300 BC. There he remained for the rest of his life, giving his generals (who had served Alexander III and Philip II before him) command over each satrapy.
 
Last edited:
Top