Deleted member 67076
Normally I hate these colonialism PODs but I found one to be very interesting due to demographics and the potential impact on Western Africa.
Portuguese Guinea-Bissau was one of the least populated colonies on Earth, having less than 600,000 people in 1950. At the same time Portugal was trying to heavily export people to settle her colonies up until the Carnation Revolution. So, I'm wondering if its reasonable for Portugal to pull the whole settler colonialism card, at least far more successfully than in Angola. That said, Angola had a very large amount of settlement, with around 400,000 Portuguese at the eve of decolonization, and an additional 100,000 mixed race individuals out of a total population of 6 million by 1973.
Would it be possible to get similar levels of settlement in Portuguese Guinea? Or to resettle the Portuguese Angolans to Guinea before or after decolonization? And what would be the effects of such a thing?
I know the problem is the rebellions and that PAIGC got control of vast swaths of the country despite Portugal having a larger military on the ground due to the terrain, the undeveloped economy and heavy Soviet/Cuban/Chinese/Swedish arms, but I suppose with better settlement Portugal could manage to alter the demographics enough where they can hold onto most of the country and defeat the insurgency.
As for the 'why' factor in settlement. Well, Guinea Bissau's got good farmland, its got a number of deep water ports (although Bissau is the only one worth anything even today and with that said then, its a pretty underdeveloped port). Its a small area to hold on in comparison to every other colony, and thus, easier to secure.
Critically, Senegal would not like it, but its not like they're in a position where they can do anything. Similarly, left wing governments around the world would protest but again I don't think they can do much.
Thoughts?
Portuguese Guinea-Bissau was one of the least populated colonies on Earth, having less than 600,000 people in 1950. At the same time Portugal was trying to heavily export people to settle her colonies up until the Carnation Revolution. So, I'm wondering if its reasonable for Portugal to pull the whole settler colonialism card, at least far more successfully than in Angola. That said, Angola had a very large amount of settlement, with around 400,000 Portuguese at the eve of decolonization, and an additional 100,000 mixed race individuals out of a total population of 6 million by 1973.
Would it be possible to get similar levels of settlement in Portuguese Guinea? Or to resettle the Portuguese Angolans to Guinea before or after decolonization? And what would be the effects of such a thing?
I know the problem is the rebellions and that PAIGC got control of vast swaths of the country despite Portugal having a larger military on the ground due to the terrain, the undeveloped economy and heavy Soviet/Cuban/Chinese/Swedish arms, but I suppose with better settlement Portugal could manage to alter the demographics enough where they can hold onto most of the country and defeat the insurgency.
As for the 'why' factor in settlement. Well, Guinea Bissau's got good farmland, its got a number of deep water ports (although Bissau is the only one worth anything even today and with that said then, its a pretty underdeveloped port). Its a small area to hold on in comparison to every other colony, and thus, easier to secure.
Critically, Senegal would not like it, but its not like they're in a position where they can do anything. Similarly, left wing governments around the world would protest but again I don't think they can do much.
Thoughts?