Hail Britannia: A Timeline

Hail Britannia


A Timeline by Zoidberg12

320px-Flag_of_the_United_Kingdom.svg.png


Chapter One: The American Rebellion (1775-1778)


320px-Benjamin_Franklin_-_Join_or_Die.jpg

Prelude:

From “The American Rebellion”, by Reginald Allan McGuiness, New Boston Historical Press, 1890

“As a result of her victory in the Seven Years War (1756-1763) the British Empire, under the reign of King George II, and later in the war, under King George III, had her status assured as the dominant world power in North America, India and elsewhere around the globe. [….] She had annexed most of France’s possessions in the New World, Bengal in India, and Florida from Spain. [….] Surely it had seemed as if nothing could go wrong for Great Britain and her new Empire.

However, things would go indeed go wrong for Great Britain. [….] Britain had taxed the colonists during the 1760’s in an effort to pay off her increasing war debts. [….] These acts included the Stamp Acts, the Townsend Acts, and the Intolerable Acts. [….] Many American believed that these taxations were illegal as they had only virtual representation in Parliament. [….] In response to the rejection by local governments of the Committees of Correspondence, the First Continental Congress meets in 1774. [….] The British would shut down the local government. [….] The American Rebellion officially began on 19 April 1775, after the Battles of Lexington and Concord [1]. [….]”

The Battles of Saratoga; a turning point:

From “The Wars of the British Empire”, by Professor Sebastian Reynaldo, Madrid Historical Press, 1903

“The majority of historians agree that the turning point and single most pivotal battle of the Rebellion was none other than the Battle of Saratoga. [….] The Battles of Saratoga lasted from 19 September 1777 to 12 October 1777.

[….] For quite some time, many major European powers, France in particular, had been sympathetic to the colonist’s plight. This was mainly because of the want for revenge against the British Empire. [….] France’s defeat in the Seven Years War was humiliating to say the least. [….] For two years before the battle, France had been secretly supporting the American Rebels. [….] Other nations sympathetic, and in many cases assistive of the Rebels were Kingdom of Spain, the Dutch Republic and the Russian Empire. [….]

[….] The rebels had suffered a demoralizing string of defeats at New York City, Albany and Philadelphia [2]. [….] Another demoralizing event was the joint deaths of Generals Richard Montgomery and Benedict Arnold during the Battle of Quebec. [….] General Arnold participated in the Siege of Quebec on New Year’s Eve of 1775, and died only days after as a result of a fatal shot to the chest during the siege [3].

[….] At Saratoga, British General John Burgoyne (1722-1792), nicknamed “Gentlemen Johnny”, defeated the rebel army under General Horatio Gates [4]. [….] At the Second Battle of Saratoga, known as the Battle of Bemis Heights, General Gates was reluctant to attack the British Army, which included soldiers from the German states of Brunswick-Wolfenbüttel and Hesse-Hanau, directly. Thus the American Army remained on the offensive [5]. [….] This would prove a grave mistake, as it would give the British Army the upper hand in the battle.

[….] Burgoyne, along with Lord Balcarres and Hessian Heinrich von Breymann, attacked the fortified American Army at Bemis Heights on 10 October, after reinforcements arrived north from General Henry Clinton [6].[….] Gates men were left surprised by the attack. [….] The ensuing counter-attack was a disaster for the Americans. [….] General Enoch Poor’s Brigade, in General Benjamin Lincoln’s division on the left of the American line, came under fire from the British grenadier battalion of the British center. [….] Although the British grenadier battalion was broken by the Americans, the British Army continued to advance. [….] Ebenezer Learned was fighting alongside Daniel Morgan and Enoch Poor. [….] The center of the British Army was held by Hessian troops. [….] The Hessians were barely able to break the enemy lines [6]. General Daniel Morgan’s Virginia sharpshooters got the British light infantry trapped in crossfire between themselves and Henry Dearborn's regiment. [….] British troops were rallied by General Simon Fraser and managed to successfully repel the Americans [7]. [….] Saratoga was a victory for the British. [….] Eventually, the American Army was forced to retreat, and General Gates surrendered his army to General Burgoyne at Saratoga on 12 October, 1777.


general%20john%20burgoyne%201766.jpg


General John “Gentleman Johnny” Burgoyne, the Hero of Saratoga


As a result of Britain’s victory at Saratoga, European powers such as France, Spain, the Netherlands, and Russia, knew it would be foolish at this point to assist the colonists in their rebellion against British rule. [….] Although these powers continued to support, supply, and/or trade with the rebels, it would do little to assist them in the long run. [….] It had become more than clear to these European Powers that what would become known as “The American Rebellion” was but a lost cause.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

[1] This is the same as OTL.

[2] See above.

[3] The POD. IOTL Arnold had his leg shattered.

[4] As a result of the POD. More on this below.

[5] IOTL Arnold charged against the British in defiance of Gate's orders.

[6] IOTL Burgoyne attacked on the 7th, too late for Clinton's reinforcements to arrive. IITL, he waits for the reinforcements, knowing Gates will not attack.

[7] IOTL Arnold came onto the field and encouraged Learned's men. Both men then led a joint charge on the Hessian positions. Without Arnold's encouragement, the Hessians are able to successfully attack.

[8] IOTL Fraser encouraged his men to hold fire when Benedict Arnold arrived. Without reinforcements, and without Arnold, the attack is successful.
 
Last edited:
Basically, this Timeline started as a rough draft I wrote up about four months ago. Sure its a bit of an AH cliche, but I decided to put my own spin on it. Basically, it'll explore the world, partially dominated by the British, from the late 18th century to the present.

Even thought it was a little difficult writing about the battles, I felt I did a good job. This is only one of my first timelines so keep that in mind. Feedback is more than welcome.
 
No responses? Oh, well, here's an update. :D I'll just be posting sub-chpaters separately, as otherwise the post may be too long.

The twilight of the Rebellion:

From "1777" by William Pitt Haroldson, Belfast Publishers House, 1951

The Battle of Red Bank was fought on 22 October 1777, only ten days after the humiliating American defeat at Saratoga. [….] The colonials, the ground forces under Colonel Christopher Green (third cousin of Nathanael Greene) and the naval forces under Commodore John Hazelwood, defeated the Hessian force under Colonel Carl von Donop, despite the formers far inferior numbers. [….] Colonel Von Donop was fatally wounded at the battle, and died two days later [9]. [….] In the long run, this victory would do little to rasie the colonials moral.

The Battle of White Marsh proved to be another humiliating defeat for the Americans rebels. [….] Only months before was Washington and the Conintental Ar,my defeated at the Battle of Germantown. [….] Burgoyne’s Army, fresh from his victory at Saratoga only two months previously, meet up with the armies of Generals William Howe and Charles Cornwallis, the former the Commander in Chief of British. This would be the last attempt for the British army to destroy Washington’s army before the winter of 1777-1778 set it. [….]

Ultimately, the battle, which began on 5 December 1777, would turn out to be a major British Victory. [….] The Continental Army was overwhelmed by the three pronged British attack of Howe, Burgoyne and Cornwallis was too much for the Continental Army to bear. The Battle would become little more than a battle of attrition, with the rebels noticeably losing. [….] Only a day after the battle began, on 6 December 1777, General Washington was forced to surrender the Continental Army to the British. Washington was taken a prisoner of war soon after, and imprisoned at the Livingston Sugar House in British-occupied New York. [….]

[….] Soon after, Cornwallis would fight against the Pennsylvania militia at the Battle of Matson's Ford on December 10 [10]. The result was a British victory. By the end of the year, nearly all of Pennsylvania would be under British occupation.

This string of defeats was undoubtedly the most crushing blow to the rebel cause as of yet. [….] With the Continental Army captured by the British, any chances of the colonials regaining lost ground in the Northeastern colonies were rendered impossible. [….]

When news arrived of the American defeat at White Marsh and British occupation of Pennsylvania to the Second Continental Congress, meeting in York, Pennsylvania, the reaction was as expected. The delegates were simply horrified. They knew, without a shadow of a doubt, that their cause was done for. [….] Washington and his army were done for and in British hands, and by this point, no European Power would dare assist them.

As if to make matters even worse, on November 15 the Congress began to ratify a new American government. This new Constitution was known as "The Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union" [11]. [….] In the midst of such an important ratification process, these defeats were the last thing the congress needed. [….] They knew that the Constitution would be doomed to failure and lose much credibility with the recent string of defeats. [….] The British, as well as American loyalists, saw the new Constitution as a desperate attempt for the rebels to gain some sort of legitimacy. [….]

[….] The question remained; what to do next?

~~~~~~

[9] This is the same as OTL.

[10] A day earlier than OTL.

[11] Again, pretty much the same as OTL. Also, "The Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union" is the formal name of the Articles of Confederation.
 
Last edited:
I am looking forward to seeing a continent of red telephone boxes, bad teeth and a rational attitude to firearms!
 
Interesting. I was just reading up on a "Britain beats the American Rebellion" that Winston Churchill apparently wrote. Suggested the diehards would flee west and set up pseudo-Boer Republics. Even if he wasn't involved an interesting idea.

Keep it up!
 
Very interesting. Keep up the good work. Two comments I'd like to make: One, while certainly the colonists have to lose in this timeline, having Washington just surrender, even after crushing defeats seems unlikely. He knows he'll probably be hung as a traitor, and understood that the only hope the colonists had was to somehow have an army in the field. Even if that army is completely smashed. Since he didn't surrender after losing multiple battles in NY, why would he do so now? Unless of course he is completely surrounded with no avenue of retreat, but that seems unlikely in open battle during the ARW. I do see though after such a brutal defeat that many soldiers would just pack up and go home, despite Washington's OTL harshness with deserters, especially those in militia units. No one wanted to be put on a British prison hulk.

Two, you have a typo with Colonel Christopher Greene (you accidentally typed Nat's name twice).

Again very enjoyable timeline, it looks promising.
 
Interesting. I was just reading up on a "Britain beats the American Rebellion" that Winston Churchill apparently wrote. Suggested the diehards would flee west and set up pseudo-Boer Republics. Even if he wasn't involved an interesting idea.

Keep it up!

That book sounds fascinating. You though are the only source I could find mentioning it. Where did you find such a gem?
 
Interesting. I was just reading up on a "Britain beats the American Rebellion" that Winston Churchill apparently wrote. Suggested the diehards would flee west and set up pseudo-Boer Republics. Even if he wasn't involved an interesting idea.

Keep it up!

No, but he was involved in the Boer Wars, which may have influenced his perspective on the likelihood of that happening...

Interested in this, though I will be curious to see which way this TL goes re: the generally-accepted assertions on this forum that any ARW which resulted in a British victory would only be followed by a second ARW, and a third and fourth until one finally resulted in independence for the colonies.
 
No, but he was involved in the Boer Wars, which may have influenced his perspective on the likelihood of that happening...

Interested in this, though I will be curious to see which way this TL goes re: the generally-accepted assertions on this forum that any ARW which resulted in a British victory would only be followed by a second ARW, and a third and fourth until one finally resulted in independence for the colonies.

Isn't that just patriotic Americans (I.e. Almost all of them) applying a deterministic approach to independance. In fact there were more loyalists than revolutionaries at the start of the war. Also a large minority of the movers and shakers in the revolution were somewhat "shady" (Hancock et al revolting primarily to protect their smuggling business).

I think its perfectly possible, if perhaps not likely given the probable leadership in Britain, for the 13 colonies to be integrated into a workable British system with a parallel to dominion status developing overtime. Canada, Oz and New Zealand developed overtime without open rebellion.
 
Very interesting. Keep up the good work. Two comments I'd like to make: One, while certainly the colonists have to lose in this timeline, having Washington just surrender, even after crushing defeats seems unlikely. He knows he'll probably be hung as a traitor, and understood that the only hope the colonists had was to somehow have an army in the field. Even if that army is completely smashed. Since he didn't surrender after losing multiple battles in NY, why would he do so now? Unless of course he is completely surrounded with no avenue of retreat, but that seems unlikely in open battle during the ARW. I do see though after such a brutal defeat that many soldiers would just pack up and go home, despite Washington's OTL harshness with deserters, especially those in militia units. No one wanted to be put on a British prison hulk.

Two, you have a typo with Colonel Christopher Greene (you accidentally typed Nat's name twice).

Again very enjoyable timeline, it looks promising.

Glad your enjoying it. Plus I fixed that typo a while ago.

About the plausibility of Washington's surrender, we''ll this is only one of my first timelines so I had a feeling something like this might happen. :p It's okay thought, it'll all work out. I could just fix it, or explain in it more later in a final version, but for now I feel its good enough.

Interesting. I was just reading up on a "Britain beats the American Rebellion" that Winston Churchill apparently wrote. Suggested the diehards would flee west and set up pseudo-Boer Republics. Even if he wasn't involved an interesting idea.

Some die-hards will maybe set up sort off "republics", but they will pretty much be a total farce, like OTL micronations. One or two will be proclaimed, but that's all they'll every be, just proclaimed, not to mention they'll die out fast.

One more thing, the revolutionaries will be somewhat romanticized by a number of people in the coming decades. Think how the Jacobite's were romanticized and you have a pretty good picture.

I think its perfectly possible, if perhaps not likely given the probable leadership in Britain, for the 13 colonies to be integrated into a workable British system with a parallel to dominion status developing overtime. Canada, Oz and New Zealand developed overtime without open rebellion.

You read my mind! :D


Working on update as we speak. :cool:
 
Here it is. Next sub-chapter will be on the Boston Trails. Sometimes I may post multiple sub chapters, but for now, enjoy! :D

The Surrender:

From "American History" by Jon Lowell, Ontario Publishing, 1980

Debate raged within the Second Continental Congress on what action to take. [….] Most agreed that with Washington’s surrender and capture, it was “high time to throw in the towel”. [….] The delegates of the Continental Congress knew more than well that surrendering to the British more than likely meant execution for treason. However many prominent delegates of the Congress, including Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and Benjamin Franklin, advocated for a so called “Surrender with Honor”, as coined by Jefferson, on the grounds that the British might be willing to address the grievances of the colonists. They argued that the British obviously not want another rebellion in the future, and more problems to pile up along with it, so they would have to be smart enough to reach some sort of agreement with the colonists. [….]

220px-Alexander_Hamilton_portrait_by_John_Trumbull_1806.jpg

[….] “It would be foolish to continue to fight the British forces. Our only window of escape is surrender with honor. Perhaps they will resolve our grievances, or perhaps they will oppress us further. However, I can say, that if we continue to fight, the British will be more inclined to the later. If we lay down our arms know, there is a chance, no matter how small, our troubles will be resolved. They may not be refused immediately, but they may be resolved in the long term.”

Alexander Hamilton, in a speech to the Second Continental Congress: January 4, 1779 [….]


Many delegates were swayed by this persuasive argument. [….] In short, the basic view was; Surrender know, and things just might be better for the colonies in the long run. We may die, but we will die anywhere if we continue to fight, so what is the point. [….]

However, not all were on board with this proposed plan of action. Some of the most prominent critics of the proposed “Surrender with Honor” including Samuel Adams, his cousin John Adams, John Hancock and Patrick Henry, all members of the Son's of Liberty, which would later be considered a radical organization. [….] They gave the counter argument that the British would never agree to negotiate with the colonists, and that any notion of them doing so was wishful thinking. [….] Other arguments were that "the Colonists made a commitment to fighting for their total independence, and should stay true to said commitment until they no longer can do so", as was stated by Samuel Adams.

Madison famously responded to Adams. "That exact time you mentioned has come". [….] Thomas Paine, then the secretary of the Congressional Committee on Foreign Affairs, sided with Adams. [….] Paine argued to Franklin; "If we can continue to fight, and the opportunity to gain our Independence is still in reach, why would we want to surrender". [….]

220px-Patrick_henry.JPG

[….] “Give me Liberty or Give me Death. I may have uttered these words over a decade ago, but they hold up ever so true today. I refuse to surrender, and will fight the British until I am no more.”

Patrick Henry, in a speech to the Second Continental Congress, December 28, 1778 [….]


In the end, the lions share of the delegation was opposed to keeping up the fight. [….] In the Rebel armies, morale began to fall dramatically since new's of Washington's defeat. [….] Desertions, as well as defections to the British were becoming more and more common by the day. [….] Many defected in the fear that they would be executed when the rebellion would eventually end. [….] The time had come to give up the ship, and the Continentals had to come to terms with that. No matter how hard grasping this notion was to do, they had to accept it. [….]

Thus, the decision was finalized. [….] On February 1, 1778, the Second Continental Congress surrendered to the British. The American Rebellion was officially over. [….] Despite this, minor rebellions mostly in New England and the South, would continue up until late 1779. [….] Not to mention, their remained one last rebel bastion in the former Thirteen Colonies, a "thorn in the Tories behind" as said by General Burgoyne to Cornwallis. This "thorn" was none other than the Republic of Vermont. [….]
 
Last edited:
Sneak Preview

Sneak Preview! :cool: I don't want to give to much away, but here's just a little bit. Make of these what you will, hopefully they'll give at least a snippet of what I have planned. ;)

dead-rabbit-riot.jpg


Pro-Slavery protesters riot in Charleston after announcement of the Manumission.


Green_harp_flag_of_Ireland_17th_century.svg


Flag of the Society of United Irishman, a parliamentary organization in Ireland which would become highly influential in lobbying for the Reform Act.

220px-Carlos_IV_de_rojo.jpg


Carlos VI, King of Spain during the signing of the Onís-Burr Treaty.


800px-Flag_of_the_Russian-American_Company.svg.png


Flag of Russian Amerika, which would extend to the Baranov River by 1840.
 
Top