Depends on how far they try to explorei think we are getting ahead of ourselves
Yah there no way they are getting as far as the cape of good hope on first try the absolute best they could possibly hope for is upper west AfricaDepends on how far they try to explore
1 million, for logistical reasons, but Ostia is bigger than OTL and could almost be seen as an extension of the capital (although it's 25km or a good 5h walk from the walls of Rome to Ostia Antica and there is no full connurbation, but the area between the two is densely populated and about to get even more densely populated thanks to the train line and some other public works I plan on doing)How large and populous is the city of rome?
1 million, for logistical reasons, but Ostia is bigger than OTL and could almost be seen as an extension of the capital (although it's 25km or a good 5h walk from the walls of Rome to Ostia Antica and there is no full connurbation, but the area between the two is densely populated and about to get even more densely populated thanks to the train line and some other public works I plan on doing)
Not really. If this succeeds and trade missions become common it is only a matter of time before someone gets blown off course to South America.i think we are getting ahead of ourselves
excpet their are major difference than otlNot really. If this succeeds and trade missions become common it is only a matter of time before someone gets blown off course to South America.
I was so excited on the first read-through that I hadn't realized it was heading West into the Atlantic! The odds of getting blown off course are quite high, but they'd have the (slight) advantage of getting stranded far away from home with at least the supplies for such a situation. It wouldn't shock me if the first European settlement in the Americas is an accidental and precarious landing on the tip of Brazil opposite West Africa; but that's a pretty remote possibility still (there's still about a 95% chance that if they get stranded they will die without being able to tell anyone in Rome what happened).
I think there are two big things that could make it happen: IIRC they've already discovered the compass, so the chances of getting lost or blown so far off course they can't get back is much, much lower; they're embarking with considerable supplies for surviving any accidents of that type.
I'm not saying your wrong but you are making some assumptions as well. Considering the experience they've gained traveling to and from China as well as just in general their ships are probably fairly high quality so there is little evidence they're worse off than the Portuguese or Columbus. While exploration isn't a huge driving force that's kinda the whole point of this expedition if i'm not mistaken, if it's successful why wouldn't they send more farther afield? further south and possibly eventually west, either by mistake or purposefully? Colonization wasn't the original drive for Europeans during the age of exploration, trade was, seems to me like that's what the Romans want too. As for your last point that's up to our Author, who knows how ambitious people might get after a successful expedition to west Africa or further south? As for the Americas, storms in the Atlantic can get crazy, who's to say if one of these expeditions gets caught in a hurricane and ends up in Brazil? I for one am looking forward to see where this is going even more now.excpet their are major difference than otl
1. they have worst ships
2. they aren't in total exploraers mode they don't have the movations the portugease had otl to explore explore, they are just here to see what south while exploring but they aren't gonna go on giant expedtions these are treasure ships like zheng in china, they have no motivation to beyond west africa most likely they will establish some trade connections and get to trading
3 they are not here to colonze as well
4 since no one directly going west that highly unlikely and the porutgueas took 40 years to reach cape of good hope which will slower than otl cause of the ship durning that time they never got blown to the americas sure eventully they would have but they didn't
so I think we are getting ahead of ourselve
I agree for the most part. There is nothing inevitable about this. The Romans have no reason to take big risks. Their mission is to venture down the coast and they will probably stick to it - they'd rather row than brave the ocean. Especially in bad weather.excpet their are major difference than otl
1. they have worst ships
2. they aren't in total exploraers mode they don't have the movations the portugease had otl to explore explore, they are just here to see what south while exploring but they aren't gonna go on giant expedtions these are treasure ships like zheng in china, they have no motivation to beyond west africa most likely they will establish some trade connections and get to trading
3 they are not here to colonze as well
4 since no one directly going west that highly unlikely and the porutgueas took 40 years to reach cape of good hope which will slower than otl cause of the ship durning that time they never got blown to the americas sure eventully they would have but they didn't
so I think we are getting ahead of ourselve
No, there has never been and in the late Republic pirates kidnapping people on the road between the two cities were a factor in launching Pompey's famous cleanup operationI can't quite recall, but were there any walls connecting Ostia to imperial Rome as there were between Piraeus and classical Athens?
AFRICA
Not currently on the scope. You do have some town criers who shout what authorities want them to shout, you have some news delivered at the theatre before a spectacle, you have messages pinned to the forum's walls or a temple's door, you have the rumor mill, and you have private letters, that's it for now.@Hecatee How close is the advent of modern journalism in Rome? I am guessing it would only take one clever man with connections to the state to buy his way into abusing the telegraph network to do it. And it would be a huge hit, people would be fascinated to be able to know things that happened on the other side of the Empire yesterday in their newspapers. Things like this amazing mission and possible status updates/conclusion.
I think that it certainly could have been problematic if the emperors that reigned directly after Hadrian had biological heirs, however since Antoninus Pius didn't have sons, and considering that what Hadrian did was less introducing an entirely new concept and more institutionalizing something previous emperors had already did IOTL, I believe it's plausible that by the time we reach Marcus Aurelius and Comodus the rules of succesion have acumulated enough institutional inertia for it to work.Do you guys believe this succession system for the imperial throne is feasible? I can't see a successful roman emperor don't trying to have his son/nephew/grandson/brother succeed him.
The republican system had more inertia than this sucession institution and Caesar and Augustus ended it.I think that it certainly could have been problematic if the emperors that reigned directly after Hadrian had biological heirs, however since Antoninus Pius didn't have sons, and considering that what Hadrian did was less introducing an entirely new concept and more institutionalizing something previous emperors had already did IOTL, I believe it's plausible that by the time we reach Marcus Aurelius and Comodus the rules of succesion have acumulated enough institutional inertia for it to work.
The republican system had so much inertia that it survived formally well into the imperial era, and Augustus especially was careful to pay lip service to the system precisely to avoid Ceaser's fate.The republican system had more inertia than this sucession institution and Caesar and Augustus ended it.