Pretty much this is the issue. However, events in Russia is drastically going to change the calculus of France.Problem is, that's also coming to a high cost, low benefit solution.
Yes, if France was going full pell mell against Haiti, they'd win.
It's just going to be costly as shit.
Well I don't want give too much away but Charles X will double down which will lead his downfall. A second French Revolution will happen and be more bloody than the first since he is a hardcore absolute monarchist. So things are going to be messy,messy,messy for France.And I don't think Charles is stupid enough to drain his treasury to overkill a sugar producing island. Pragmatism's gotta kick in at some point.
Pretty much this is the issue. However, events in Russia is drastically going to change the calculus of France.
Well I don't want give too much away but Charles X will double down which will lead his downfall. A second French Revolution will happen and be more bloody than the first since he is a hardcore absolute monarchist. So things are going to be messy,messy,messy for France.
Well the US will effected heavily. The war in Haiti and the upcoming Russian revolutionary wars is going to bankrupt France. A second bloodier French Revolution is going to occur. Let us say when the revolutionaries take power they spread the spirit of the Revolution to Spain and Portugal by supporting revolutionaries in those countries.How will this affect the United States?
IIRC, it's 1825. At this point, they're not really too concerned about Haiti, so realistically, if they keep at this level, no worries.How will this affect the United States?
But big changes are gonna come very soon to North America.IIRC, it's 1825. At this point, they're not really too concerned about Haiti, so realistically, if they keep at this level, no worries.
And let us say Haiti does to the CSA what Cuba did to Angola.![]()
True, and depending on how many French troops are sent, the US is going to take a real interest in the place all of a sudden...But big changes are gonna come very soon to North America.
You know, for someone who keeps saying that he doesn't want to give too much away, you've already come out and given an awful lot away. Just try and save a few surprises for us, okay?Well the US will effected heavily. The war in Haiti and the upcoming Russian revolutionary wars is going to bankrupt France. A second bloodier French Revolution is going to occur. Let us say when the revolutionaries take power they spread the spirit of the Revolution to Spain and Portugal by supporting revolutionaries in those countries.
So that will mean the House of Bourbon entire royalist court flees to Mexico and rules it. Let us say that the House of Bourbon will lead to the economical and military reforms Mexico needs.Cuba and Puerto Rico swears fealty to the Mexican empire. Central America is absorbed to the empire in a bloody proxy war between Gran colombia and the Mexican empire. A stronger,expansionist Mexico with reconquista in the brain. This will scare Haiti and Gran Colombia to be more militaristic. That means they defeat the Tejas revolt,defeat the US in war. Since they are monarchist they will be pro slavery and will ally with the Confederacy and Brazil. This will lead to a system of alliances in the America which will lead to a major conflagration. And let us say Haiti does to the CSA what Cuba did to Angola.![]()
Now this is a fun timeline.
I have to say, you've drastically changed a lot just by killing off Boyer alone. Much of the economic restrictions with landholding and trading came with him IIRC (including the inability for foreigners to own land on Haitian soil, prompting traders to marry into local commercial families) and also the policy of collecting most government revenues through customs duties rather than tax farming. In return, we get a brutal unification war against a foreign power that hammers siege mentality and military rule into the state.![]()
And also you've avoided much of the grievances in the East in one foul swoop through federalism and a reversal of those blatantly idiotic policies put in after 1822. Still one problem that's not been solved yet: The commercial Elite of El Cibao isn't going to be happy if they cannot trade, and the embargoes on Haiti from other nations were a severe issue that needs to be addressed somehow. Without the indemnity of France this should be lessened (and the unification of Gran Colombia kept, therefore creating a new market to sell to), but its still going to be a concern in the mid term.
All this said, I have concerns for the future wellbeing of the state. Mainly debt and decentralization. I have my doubts the Fermage is sustainable in the long run; that sort of forced labor is easily turned into peonage, which tends to decentralize the state as landlords have private armies. These decentralization trends are aided by the geography of the island and the lack of infrastructure. The latter of which is the real roadblock to development. As of this time it takes almost 2 months just to travel from Le Cap to Samana or from Port-Au-Prince to Santo Domingo just on a wagon. Marching soldiers? Even longer. And with the increasing militarization and arming of society, this makes the possibility of regional Caudillos rising a very real threat. Once you have those, bringing them to heel is a massive pain.
The second one is debt. As you said, keeping up a large army is expensive, which requires large amounts of money being made. Same thing with all the money needed to repair the damage from this war and improve infrastructure. Given the economy, this means extraction of commodities, mainly sugar and coffee, but also tobacco, logging and ranching in the east. All of these are subject to massive fluctuations in price over time, and thus aren't steady sources of income, which gives you boom and bust cycles (less so than in Central America due to the economic diversity). I fear the state might have to borrow in order to make up the deficit. Of course, this can be solved by simply just diversifying the economy into other sectors- manufacturing, new crops (if Hispaniola were to somehow get something like Nutmeg or any other east Indian spices that'd be a major source of income), etc.
Yeah I got carried away. Anyway there will be an update tonight.You know, for someone who keeps saying that he doesn't want to give too much away, you've already come out and given an awful lot away. Just try and save a few surprises for us, okay?
I have to say, you've drastically changed a lot just by killing off Boyer alone. Much of the economic restrictions with landholding and trading came with him IIRC (including the inability for foreigners to own land on Haitian soil, prompting traders to marry into local commercial families) and also the policy of collecting most government revenues through customs duties rather than tax farming.
These decentralization trends are aided by the geography of the island and the lack of infrastructure. The latter of which is the real roadblock to development. As of this time it takes almost 2 months just to travel from Le Cap to Samana or from Port-Au-Prince to Santo Domingo just on a wagon. Marching soldiers? Even longer.
On the trading part that is the reason why I made a unified Gran Colombia. This will create a massive market in which can trade and also other Latin American states like Argentina since an Imperial Mexican nation head by the Spanish royal family will make them fear reconquista. Maybe even trade with Great Britain since they wont be too thrilled with an expansionist Mexican Empire. So the elites in El Cibao will have their fears tempered.
I am trying to figure what could come after the fermage system or if he can create a new farming system after the war.
Yup Christophe and Toussaint did some trading with the UK with the agreement they wouldn't try to instigate a slave revolt in Jamaica. So with the major changes coming the UK may see Haiti as a trading partner as long they promise to not expand to Jamaica. I like your idea of indirect trade from Haiti to Gran Colombia to markets in Europe and North America by transferring goods in Colombian ships.Marcus Licinius Crassus has said that Haiti will be more nationalist after the war, and restrictions like that are often a by-product of nationalism so they may exist anyway. On the other hand, Haiti will need a lot of money, so there might be many exceptions, especially for Colombian trading houses.
OTOH, a lot of the postwar military construction will probably involve building roads.
There was a lot of under-the-table trade with Britain during the Christophe monarchy, so this should also be possible under Guerrier, especially if relations between the UK and post-1830 France are tense. Also, I'd expect a lot of indirect trade via Gran Colombia, with Haitian investors owning warehouses in Cartagena where goods can be transferred to Colombian ships and "laundered" with Colombian bills of lading for shipment to Europe and the United States.
If some kind of efficient marketing system for smallholders (e.g. provincial marketing boards) can be established, that would help. Maybe this could begin in the south where Pétion already created a large smallholder class which would resist having their land confiscated and being forced back onto plantations. A possible alternative would be to require them to devote a certain percentage of their land to cash crops and to market the crops through government boards, which would of course take a percentage of the earnings off the top.
Should be easy, find metal, melt it, presto, musket balls.How is the Haitians' ammunition situation by this time? I'd imagine that, without any reliable source of materiel, they'd start raiding French supply trains, which could tie up more troops behind the lines.
I've read once that the imdemnity Haiti was forced to paid after independence basically ruined the country for whole decades, so a "no payments to France" PoD can indeed allow a better reconstruction of the country.