Good POD for a non-partitioned India?

Muslims wanting to seceded while Hindus want to remain ?
More like ATL near totality of Muslims and Hindus wanting to have one secular country and two very small minorities wanting secession. If those minorities become violent, then that could serve as an insurgency that is ups be dealt with and squashed.
 
There's alot of assuptions made that the parititon was unavoidable or so on. Would there be a way for the confluct to drag on between Congress and Muslim League to render them both unpopular in the idea of a divided India?
 

Srihari14

Banned
Perhaps general rules of Untied India -
  • No religious affiliated parties allowed
  • No person of the same religion can be Prime minister for More than 2 terms
  • Complete separation between laws and religion
  • President Also has Rotation between religions
 

Srihari14

Banned
The All-India Congress of the 1900's is more inclusive to Muslim leadership. Memorandums issued by the Congress can reflect this. Jinnah feels assured Muslims have a place in India, and India gains independence unpartitioned. No Partition, no Indian-Pakistani Wars, no fights over Kashmir, no military buildup, better cricket team, higher development. I see only good things from this. Plus the fact you created a country with the highest population and much bigger economy.

Edit: https://www.alternatehistory.com/forum/threads/“the-left-and-right-eyes-of-india”-tl.431860/
Shameless self-promotion of my own TL, one where previous Raj break ups also don't occur. So a united South Asia.
Btw, are you going to Update it???
 
Avoiding the 1905 partition of Bengal, while not the last possible PoD, is a useful one. Curzon specifically tried to divide the Bengali population along confessional lines.
 
Combine no partition of the Bengal, no Rowlatt Act (which also butterflies the Jallianwala Bagh massacre) with a more tangible move towards the promise of Homerule, and you might just succeed.
 
Is there a possibility that this scenario leads to a secession of the Pashto and Baluch territories? They wouldnt really fit in the framework of secular nationalism, and really bring a lot of issues to Pakistan.
 
Mountbatten finds about Churchill's backdoor plans early on and outs him publicly for it, destroying his career and any chance of a Pakistan in the first place. Jinnah as a result gets somewhat discredited and then you get a lot of overtures and gesturing between Muslims and Hindu's higher up to form political parties.
 
Top