Well the Ottomans were leaning that way anyway. Though maybe without them getting a free BC and SC they would be more hesitant. Maybe this gives the British more opportunity to lessen tensions with the Turks, maybe even getting them to not join the war. And if the Ottomans dont join the war when they do, even if they join later on, then possibly the Greeks dont get involved. Or get involved later on.What if the RN successfully blocks Goeben and Breslau and they are forced to take refuge in a AH port and never end up in turkey
How will it affect the Turkish decision to join ww1?
Italy has 2-3 in 1914. It built a total of 6 vs 4 for the Austrians in the period, Dante Alighieri, the trio of Cesare's (1914-1915 iirc) and the pair of Duilio's (1915-1916).How will this impact the AH v Italy naval balance ?
AH has only 3 dreadnoughts in 1914 and Italy I think has 7 ?
MUI is that the Ottoman leadership had already decided to join the Germans, they were just negotiating on what price. Apparently, British Intelligence knew or suspected it. All the British seizure of the 2 dreadnoughts building in Britain was to make it easier to sell the decision to the general public.
The Russians perhaps launch Bosporus amphibious campaign simultaneous with the western Gallipolli campaign?With the Goeben not in the Black Sea the balance of power is certainly in Russia's favour with their Pre Dreads such as the Evstafi - and therefore a Russian Lake
OTL Yavuz Sultan Selim obliged the Russian Black Sea Fleet to remain concentrated reducing its options and forcing them to not use their older DDs and all of their Crusiers which were older models
ITTL all their ships would remain useful with no Modern BC and CL in the Turkish fleet
How this impacts the Ottoman empires subsequent decision making or wider events......I don't know but it certainly allows the Russians to dominate the Sea and therefore coast line.
Apparently, the Russians were supposed to do exactly that, but could never quite co-ordinate the troops and the shipping.Assuming this is true:
And this is also true:
The Russians perhaps launch Bosporus amphibious campaign simultaneous with the western Gallipolli campaign?
Was their fleet strong enough to transfer a force across the Black Sea and support it by shore bombardment?Apparently, the Russians were supposed to do exactly that, but could never quite co-ordinate the troops and the shipping.
Without Goeben and Breslau the next best thing the Ottomans can throw at the Russians is a pair of outdated protected cruisers a quartet of modernish destroyers and a barely floating pre-dreadnought. Protecting the convoys at sea shouldn't be a huge problem, though keeping BB's on station is likely harder.Was their fleet strong enough to transfer a force across the Black Sea and support it by shore bombardment?
I believe that was part of their problem.Was their fleet strong enough to transfer a force across the Black Sea and support it by shore bombardment?
Yes in terms of fighting power the Black Sea Fleet was both powerful and well led. Even before it commissioned the Imperatritsa Maria class Dreadnoughts it's predreadnoughts of the Ievstafi class had made Goeben run on at least one occasion through the use of surprisingly long ranged and accurate gunfire. Its older predreadnoughts such as Rostislav had been engaged in coastal bombardment of ports and coal mines and its cruisers had been interdicting coastal traffic betwwen trabzon and Constantinople.Was their fleet strong enough to transfer a force across the Black Sea and support it by shore bombardment?
Could she become a prize for the Royal Yugoslav Navy to come and in turn will end up being sunk the the Germans during the invasion of Yugoslavia.Without Goben being retained by Turkey post-war, what becomes of her? Is she claimed by Italy or France? Or is she allocated to the UK?
If Italy or France, is she incorporated into their fleets for a time or scrapped?
Regards,