Doesn't seem to be a huge disparity in strength between the British home fleet and the combined European Axis navies, provided there was some way for the Italians to break out of the Mediterranean, if the Axis prioritized it.
Doesn't seem to be a huge disparity in strength between the British home fleet and the combined European Axis navies, provided there was some way for the Italians to break out of the Mediterranean, if the Axis prioritized it.
Those numbers are for May '41... Seelowe is realistically August-October '40. It also counts Vichy French ships as definitively Axis rather than dubiously neutral pro-Axis, and pre-Dread rust buckets as effective capital ships, both of which inflates Axis numbers considerably.Doesn't seem to be a huge disparity in strength between the British home fleet and the combined European Axis navies, provided there was some way for the Italians to break out of the Mediterranean, if the Axis prioritized it.
Japanese Hawaii depends on the POD. You can't do it with one in WWII, but if the USA had not annexed Hawaii, it probably would have become part of either the British Empire or the Japanese one. If it didn't get annexed by either of those, it would probably be Imperial Germany.What would be examples of other "Sealions"? (Highly speculated but doomed to fail enterprises)?
Successful Barbarossa? Invasion of Alaska after conquering the USSR? Japanese Hawaii?
Operation Sealion: Implausible given a POD sometime during WWII, but I'd argue is plausible given a POD sometime in the Interwar Period. It would require a different idea of German expansionism, but I'd say that with a POD in the interwar you could have a WWII that is identifiably similar to OTL's WWII that has a successful German invasion of the British Home Islands.
Operation Barbarossa: Plausible given a POD sometime during WWII. Not particularly likely but it's not direly impossible.
Operation Sealion: Implausible given a POD sometime during WWII, but I'd argue is plausible given a POD sometime in the Interwar Period. It would require a different idea of German expansionism, but I'd say that with a POD in the interwar you could have a WWII that is identifiably similar to OTL's WWII that has a successful German invasion of the British Home Islands.
Japanese invasion of America: Implausible with any kind of POD that has a WWII that is similar to OTL's. Maybe you can have a War Plan Red-Orange vs. a hyperisolationist USA that leads to the creation of Hong Kong like treaty ports across the country if you can have the US military disarm and disengage as much as it did, say before WWI or the Spanish-American War.
Though honestly, I think that in general we lost the plot a bit as per sealion. The reason why Sealion threads are so maligned is because 1.) back in the Ye Olden Days, they took up so much fucking space and 2.) instead of being anything interesting, a German administration of Britain either ends up being gratuitous tortureporn or a neonazi fantasy. Ultimately, it doesn't matter if something is plausible as long as it is interesting. I would much rather have an interesting look at the British Home Islands under the jackboot than yet another "basically Kaiserreich but with a few minor changes," even if the latter is much more "plausible." Be bold in your timeline crafting, but be unique.
The best I could see would be that OKW actually do its job of strategic planning. And in the same way that the US has its Orange, Red and other War Plans has a contingency plan for how it could organise an invasion of the UK were France to be occupied and the UK fight on. But as in 1933 to 1938 that would have seemed a very remote contingency, perhaps they can be excused for not considering the problem.
That is serious contingency planning. With adequate air and sea power I could see them liberating the Faroes and maybe the Shetland islands. Getting further would have been...The Americans had one in case the UK fell to counter-invade via the north circle route using Iceland as a stepping stone to Scotland and northern Ireland. It was frankly unworkable.
Would Ireland have been a potential stepping stone or did the US have to assume it would also be German controlled?
The issue of earlier PODs has been dealt with over and over. The Nazis start making a bigger navy and the Brits and the French do the same. To keep up, Hitler will have to put more resources into the Navy and less into tanks and planes. If the Nazis start building much more advanced aircraft, the reaction is that the Brits and French do too with the same result. And maybe it influences the Russians. Maybe the British make the alliance with Russia that Churchill urged after Hitler came to power and began grabbing territory. And there will also be blowback on U.S. military development and production, with the U.S. developing prototypes on which the Brits and French can purchase patent rights, or order the first assembly line batch. Maybe this will include tanks as good as those of Hitler, with the Russians also stealing or purchasing the designs. Soon Hitler will be priced out of the market both directly and metaphorically. His suicidally narcissistic launching of a huge war results in no conquest of France and a much earlier defeat of Hitler.I'm sure we can all come up with things to make a Nazi German invasion of Britain in 1940 seem plausible with a pre-1940 POD .
Better Intelligence ( both the military and usual senses of the word).
Longer range single engine fighter.
Use the Me-110 as an intruder and low level fighter bomber
Proper Amphibious warfare equipment.
A dedicated anti-shipping force within the LW
Most of all... a proper Operational Plan . One that set out the key objectives of the air Offensive and target priorities . Such as : radar stations, Fighter Command Sector control airfields,
The problems of such PODs are many. The obvious one is that anything additional to actual German military production means that something else has to be foregone. So what do you give up?
More fundamentally, what priority should Nazi Germany give to production of what's needed for the USM prior to 1938 or even 1939? Given that its primary targets are France, Poland and the USSR?
The best I could see would be that OKW actually do its job of strategic planning. And in the same way that the US has its Orange, Red and other War Plans has a contingency plan for how it could organise an invasion of the UK were France to be occupied and the UK fight on. But as in 1933 to 1938 that would have seemed a very remote contingency, perhaps they can be excused for not considering the problem.
Japanese Hawaii depends on the POD. You can't do it with one in WWII, but if the USA had not annexed Hawaii, it probably would have become part of either the British Empire or the Japanese one. If it didn't get annexed by either of those, it would probably be Imperial Germany.
There are a plethora of highly implausible things (up to and including ASB) related to the ACW.
Indeed. As far as I am aware with regards to the naval aspect of Sealion, the Kriegsmarine had been largely crushed in Operation Weserübung. This meant that Hitler would have needed to ensure that the Italian Regia Marina could operate in the Atlantic in order to draw the Royal Navy away from the channel for long enough in order for the Wehrmacht to begin the assault. In order to do this, they would have needed to occupy both Malta and Gibraltar. This would also have meant that Hitler would have needed to find some way to convince Franco to join the Axis in order to assault the Rock (the colloquial name for Gibraltar). This then frees up the Italian navy to operate in the Atlantic. This was not part of the planning however.Doesn't seem to be a huge disparity in strength between the British home fleet and the combined European Axis navies, provided there was some way for the Italians to break out of the Mediterranean, if the Axis prioritized it.
Some of this whackadoodle thinking persisted until deep into WWII. In addition to the racism, bigotry and just plain hatred of the "different and the other", it has been my sneaking suspicion, that the opportunity to steal and misappropriate the capital, property and fruits of the interned Japanese-Americans labor and ingenuity was at work.The US Army was scared stiff in the early 1900's of the Japanese invading Oahu with a large force and then rallying disaffected Japanese workers on the island to their cause. (There was something like 60,000+ Japanese farm workers on Oahu alone back then. The US Army force was small, and what little coastal artillery there was, was focused around Pearl. A whole flurry of tactical analyses debated the relative merits of coastal guns, fighting from prepared positions up in valley, fighting on the beaches, etc. Each one concluded with the US forces at hand, that the Japanese could easily overrun the island. In those first two decades of the 20th Century, some of the leaders of the Pacific branch considered Hawaii even less tenable than the Philippines! It wan't till later when more funding, additional forces, and more mobile resources were allotted that the panic subsided (too far by 1941)
Right from the earliest days, there was some level of concern to outright paranoia about the Issei and Nissei on the island. Internment, deportation, displacing the whole population outside the primary defense zone were all analyzed. Even the more rational officers estimated the local Japanese were either loyal Americans, or mostly inclined to get the hell out of the way of any battle, but there were likely some Japanese military agents mixed in. Deportation was ruled out, as there wasn't anywhere near sufficient number of ships to quickly transport ten's of thousands of people.
There were even a few top officers who thought the Japanese conquest of Oahu would be a precursor to an invasion of the US West Coast. Pre-WW1/Pre-Panama Canal, the bulk of the US Fleet and most of the heavies were in the Atlantic, so the fear was the Japanese could overtake key cities on the coast and functionally hold them for political/diplomatic ransom.