Give Peace Another Chance: The Presidency of Eugene McCarthy

Chapter Two - Waist Deep in the Big Muddy
Chapter Two - Waist Deep in the Big Muddy

While Eugene McCarthy was making off-the-record declarations to the press that he was willing to run against the President, another man was trying to find someone to do just that.

Allard Lowenstein was a political and civil rights activist who had been involved in various liberal causes since the late 1940s. His biggest political accomplishments to date had been investigating abuses against the black population of South Africa by its apartheid government, and taking part in the Freedom Summer to register black people eligible to vote in the South. He also had the credentials of having previously worked as a staff member on Hubert Humphrey's foreign policy team, and as a speech writer for Bobby Kennedy. Lowenstein was a strong opponent of the Vietnam War, and, by 1966, had decided that Lyndon Johnson needed to be challenged for the Democratic nomination. Lowenstein was joined by Curtis Gans, a voting statistics analyst, and together they started what would come to be called the Dump Johnson Movement. Throughout 1966 and most of 1967, Lowenstein laid the groundwork for the as-of-yet-unchosen opponent to Johnson. Attending the 1966 annual convention of the National Students Association (NSA), Lowenstein had to contend with radicals in the organization who felt it was futile to operate within the political system as it existed, and felt that civil disobedience was the only way to challenge Johnson and the Vietnam War. Lowenstein's more moderate position won the internal NSA vote; a letter of protest was sent to the President, and a meeting was arranged between the hawkish Secretary of State Dean Rusk and the various student body presidents of the NSA. Unfortunately for Lowenstein, Rusk's dismissive attitude disillusioned many within the NSA to jump ship to the radical New Left Students for a Democratic Society (SDS). Next, Lowenstein approached Americans for Democratic Action (ADA), of which Lowenstein was the youngest board member. However, even the anti-war members of ADA questioned the feasibility, or even the rationality, of dumping Johnson, who, they said, had accomplished more for economic justice and civil rights than any president since Franklin Roosevelt.

With the NSA divided and the ADA unwilling to help, Lowenstein was forced to create his own political organization to act as the grassroots foundation of the Dump Johnson Movement. That organization would become the Conference for Concerned Democrats (CCD), officially formed in August of 1967. Throughout the summer, Lowenstein and Gans had criss-crossed the country on a shoe-string budget, setting up local chapters of the CCD on college campuses, and asking for support and donations from political reform clubs and anti-war organizations. While many saw their work as a fool's errand, Gans' voter analysis indicated that Johnson had an incredibly fragile voting base for an incumbent president. As Lowenstein continued on, he began to get in touch with various other state-based groups opposed to Johnson: in New Hampshire, a minor local politician named Eugene Daniell was attempting to organize a Draft Robert Kennedy movement; in Wisconsin, there was an attempt to whip up support for a write-in of “No” on the ballot to signify a rejection of Johnson; and in California, a group of anti-war activists were putting together their own slate of delegates to challenge the pro-Johnson delegate slate in the primary. Despite their sympathies for the CCD, all of these groups had the obvious flaw of lacking a willing candidate, but Lowenstein knew just the man to ask...

Bobby Kennedy.

Johnson's paranoia of Kennedy had continued even after he had secured the nomination 1964. Kennedy left his position as attorney general to become the senator for New York, which Johnson believed was so he would be better positioned to challenge him in 1968. And indeed, Kennedy did plan on running for president, with it being a question of when, not if. During his time in the Senate, he became a champion of civil rights causes and progressive reform, and while privately opposed to the Vietnam War, he vacillated in public for fear that any criticism would be interpreted by the press as a challenge to the President. Before he had even been approached by Lowenstein, Kennedy's cadre of advisors were arguing over whether he should run in 1968, or wait until 1972. The '68 faction consisted of his younger staffers, his wife Ethel, and his widowed sister-in-law Jackie. Those of the '72 faction consisted of his brother Ted, as well as the old guard Jack Kennedy advisors such as Ted Sorenson and Arthur Schlesinger Jr. The former argued that 1968 was the best chance to challenge the Vietnam War and heal the growing divisions in American society. The latter argued that challenging Johnson would be political suicide, especially with the powerful party bosses, like Mayor Richard Daley of Chicago, showing no interest in a challenge against the President. Kennedy was still undecided when he was first approached by his old speech writer in August of 1967, the same month the CCD was founded. Lowenstein laid out the plan that the basis of any challenge against Johnson would have to rely on building momentum in the early primary states where the President would not be directly competing. If Johnson was sufficiently weakened in the primaries, then the party bosses could be convinced that Kennedy would be the safer bet in the general against the Republican challenger. By the time of their second meeting in late September, Kennedy was still undecided. In a private gathering with Kennedy and some of his advisors, Lowenstein made an impassioned plea for the Dump Johnson Movement. Schlesinger proposed a compromise where Kennedy would not run for president, but would promote a peace plank at that Democratic convention. Kennedy rejected the plank idea as uninspiring, but also came to the decision that he would wait until 1972. As Lowenstein walked out the door, he derisively declared, “We're going to do it without you, and that's too bad. Because you could have become President of the United States.”

With Kennedy refusing to run, Lowenstein had lost the potential candidate with the highest name recognition and popularity of anyone opposed to the Vietnam War. With no clear second choice, Lowenstein went about asking different candidates. Kennedy himself had recommended Senator George McGovern of South Dakota, but McGovern declined, believing Johnson's nomination to be an inevitability, and fearing for his re-election chances in the Senate once he failed to beat the President. McGovern instead recommended, off the top of his head, Eugene McCarthy [1]. Lowenstein had only briefly met McCarthy once before, in the spring of 1967, when Kennedy was still the main choice of Dump Johnson and the CCD. Back then, McCarthy had agreed that Kennedy was the best candidate. However, with no other options left, Lowenstein got McCarthy to agree to a meeting in October. Giving his usual pitch on the feasibility and moral necessity of challenging Johnson, McCarthy, unexpectedly, agreed to run.

Lowenstein had finally found his candidate.

Allard Lowenstein 1969.jpg

Allard Lowenstein: The liberal activist and Dump Johnson leader who was instrumental in laying the groundwork for McCarthy's presidential campaign.

Word quickly spread through the grapevine of liberal senators that Gene McCarthy of all people was going to challenge the President. The idea was not warmly received by his colleagues: sympathetic anti-war senators did not want to risk backing a guaranteed loser when their own re-election chances were on the line, and most of them saw McCarthy as snide and unreliable. Even one of McCarthy's best friends in the Senate, Philip Hart of Michigan, thought he was a political incompetent without any sense of commitment. Kennedy thought that he was only doing it to boost his book sales, and one Johnson loyalist thought he was doing it out of boredom, exclaiming, “It's not in his nature to be President. He doesn't even want to be Senator [2]!” To his credit, McCarthy was open about the fact that he was losing interest in politics, and intended to retire and return to academia. He figured he had nothing to lose in challenging Johnson over what he saw as a critical moral issue. However, as he did a pre-announcement tour of the country to various college campuses – mostly in New England and California – McCarthy tried to convince Kennedy to run, despite their mutual antipathy. They met only once during this time. In a meeting organized by journalist and mutual friend Mary McGrory, the two were supposed to have a one hour discussion about the logistics of McCarthy running in the early primary states. Instead, McCarthy arrived late, barely said anything for seven minutes, then left. McCarthy later sent a message to Kennedy telling him not to “throw stones on the track while I'm running out there [3]."

While he was doing all this, McCarthy had yet to confirm that he was running for president, merely saying that he was considering the option. Lowenstein was becoming increasingly concerned that McCarthy would try to back out, with weeks having passed since their meeting. However, McCarthy gained more behind-the-scenes support that seemed to convince him to enter the race. His daughter, Mary, had been a leading anti-war activist at her college, and constantly pressured him to challenge Johnson, while some in the ADA had changed their mind; John Kenneth Galbraith and Joseph Rauh Jr., both founders of the ADA and both members of its executive committee, had had a change of heart about challenging Johnson, after witnessing the growing strength of the Dump Johnson Movement. The duo approached McCarthy to encourage him to run, and promised they would work to convince the rest of the ADA to hold a vote to endorse him if he did. Finally, McCarthy acquiesced [4].

On November 30th of 1967, McCarthy held a press conference in the Senate Caucus Room. Reading off a prepared statement in a monotone, McCarthy announced that he would be “entering” the primaries in Wisconsin, Nebraska, Oregon, and California, and would decide later if he was going to enter in Massachusetts and New Hampshire. Not once in his speech did he say he was running for president. In the question period that followed the address, he admitted that would rather have Kennedy run instead, “so that I wouldn’t have to do anything.”

Three days later, McCarthy flew to Chicago to give the keynote address at the CCD national convention in the Chicago Hilton ballroom, where Lowenstein hoped that he would start his campaign in earnest.

It did not go as planned.

McCarthy was still writing out his speech in his hotel room at the time the event was supposed to start. There was a record turnout of six thousand people, with the ballroom only being able to hold four thousand, with the rest waiting outside. Seeing their growing impatience, Lowenstein went on stage to get the audience warmed up. With the attention of the audience, Lowenstein gave the best, most passionate speech of his career, riling the audience up into a hysteria, booing Johnson, and cheering the anti-war movement. McCarthy watched in shock from the closed-circuit TV in his room, and sprinted down to stop Lowenstein. To McCarthy, the whole campaign was supposed to be about the issues, and a peaceful, orderly demonstration against the war. Instead, Lowenstein was firing off at Johnson personally in a demagogic monologue, and if there was one thing McCarthy absolutely hated, it was demagoguery. Even once McCarthy arrived, Lowenstein insisted on finishing his own speech, in perhaps the most spectacular example of stealing someone’s thunder in American political history. Regardless, by the time McCarthy took to the stage, the audience was screaming in adulation.

He began with a discussion of the degradation of Roman morality following the Punic Wars, before giving an extended anecdote about the Dreyfus Affair, and only then firmly settling on the topic of Vietnam. McCarthy dutifully listed the reasons why the war was unconstitutional or immoral in the style of a cerebral academic lecture, rather than a pumped up campaign rally. By the time he finished, the excitement in the room had completely deflated. McCarthy decided not to go outside to speak to the two thousand attendees who had not been able to hear the speech, and declined to meet with any of the CCD state caucuses. McCarthy never forgave Lowenstein for co-opting his night, and refused to ever take a stage after him again. They rarely met after that, with Gans becoming the chief representative of the CCD for the campaign. McCarthy was panned in the media. The weak showing hurt his support in the ADA, with many in the anti-war faction thinking that he was such an anemic candidate that he was making Johnson look good by comparison. The McCarthy campaign had stalled before it was even out of the gate [5].

Curtis Gans at the mic 1968.jpg

Curtis Gans at the mic: Following Lowenstein's estrangement from the campaign, Gans was the main link between Dump Johnson, the CCD, and McCarthy, and served in senior roles for the rest of his campaign. His voting pattern analysis was the first proof that Johnson would be vulnerable in 1968. A hastily put up McCarthy poster is peeling off the wall in the background.
After its rough start, McCarthy’s campaign struggled to coalesce. The entire campaign staff was made up of volunteers, with no official appointments having been made. Many politicians and lobbyists who had promised to support McCarthy if he ran suddenly went quiet, instilling a distrust of ‘professionals’ for the rest of the campaign. Gans continued to act as a liaison, but was often blocked by Jerry Eller, McCarthy’s personal aide, who was incredibly territorial about the Senator’s schedule. The various anti-Johnson electoral efforts were confederated into McCarthy’s campaign, but there was barely any communication between the regional offices (which McCarthy scarcely visited) and the central office (which McCarthy never visited). While money had indeed poured in from Adlai Stevenson’s old supporters on Wall Street, it was largely unaccounted for; the finances of the campaign had not been prepared, and donations were spread out over different banks and different accounts, without a way to quickly withdraw it for campaign needs. McCarthy’s brother-in-law Stephen Quigley, a surgeon by trade who had previously served as Minnesota’s comptroller, was put in charge of the budget. Seeing that the position was still vacant, Blair Clark, a sympathetic journalist and business executive, offered to act as the campaign manager until a professional could be found for the job. McCarthy never looked for a replacement, and Clark – who had never run a political campaign in his life – almost accidentally took on the position permanently [6].

Clark knew that challenging an incumbent president would be an uphill battle without any other factors, but the press had already begun to write off McCarthy’s campaign as amateurish, and losing press interest was something that the campaign could not afford. While all but the most optimistic volunteers expected to lose, they needed a strong enough showing to push Johnson into adopting a peace plank at the Democratic Convention in Chicago. Clark also knew that with the campaign so far behind, they needed to do something flashy to get things re-energized. To that end, Clark tried to convince McCarthy to enter into the New Hampshire primary.

Blair Clark.jpg

An undated photo of Blair Clark. A journalist and businessman, Clark served as McCarthy's campaign manager despite having no prior political experience.
Even before McCarthy had entered the race, New Hampshire had been one of the states with an active Dump Johnson Movement. Eugene Daniell, a state politician and former mayor, had been working on a Draft Robert Kennedy effort. Daniell was calling on voters to write in Kennedy’s name on their ballot, in an attempt to emulate the success of Henry Cabot Lodge Jr. in 1964 [7]. In the Republican primaries of that year, a draft effort for Lodge had seen him win the primary, despite not being an active candidate and not once setting foot in the state.

New Hampshire politics were in a state of flux at the time. The state was considered conservative and hawkish, with it having been a one-party state for the Republicans up until recently. Due to a centre-right ideological consensus, politics were mainly based off of personality, ethnicity, and the preferences of the local media rather than policy. It was for these exact reasons that McCarthy was hesitant to enter the New Hampshire primary. However, there was a small but active anti-war scene as well. In a preliminary scouting tour, Gans had recruited a local professor with experience in politics and who was opposed to the war: David Hoeh. Hoeh was receptive to the idea of running a campaign in the state for an anti-war candidate, but only if it was an active candidate, rather than a draft movement. After his October meeting with McCarthy, Lowenstein himself went to New Hampshire to meet with Hoeh and his compatriots to let them know they had a candidate, and that it was time to beginning laying the groundwork. Much like Blair, Hoeh was chosen as the temporary chairman of the New Hampshire McCarthy for President Steering Committee, but without anyone under consideration to take the job as permanent chairman after him. Hoeh was also joined by Gerry Studds, a former legislative assistant in the State Department during the Kennedy Administration, and the de facto co-leader of the New Hampshire operation. Both were working for the campaign on a part-time basis.

Hoeh had seen McCarthy campaign for Jack Kennedy in the state in 1960. Rather than being discouraged, he was convinced that McCarthy’s slow and steady style would be uniquely appealing in the state. Hoeh and Studds had thorough analysed the layout of the state, and had created a long list of reasons for McCarthy to run. They essentially boiled down to the facts that the state was cheap and easy to campaign in, had a disproportionately powerful impact on news coverage, and that even a meagre showing in the hawkish state would garner legitimacy. However, according to New Hampshire law, in order to officially file as a campaign organization they needed to be backing a declared candidate, and could not get started until McCarthy officially declared he was running in the state. Informed by Clark that McCarthy did not like heavy canvassing or front work, Hoeh and Studds offered to cut down on the campaign schedule.

When McCarthy met with the New Hampshire team in mid-December, he told them he was still undecided, but likely to enter. By late December, he was telling the press that he would be skipping the New Hampshire primary. This was a disappointment for Hoeh and Studds, especially since they had not been told about the decision directly, and instead had found out by reading a copy of the Boston Globe. The cautious McCarthy had apparently been convinced that the possibility of a catastrophic, embarrassing defeat in New Hampshire was not worth the risk of perhaps doing modestly well. He would instead focus his energies on the second primary in Wisconsin.

But, McCarthy changed his mind again. On January 2nd of 1968, he sent Clark on a secret mission to Hoeh’s house to tell him that he would be running in New Hampshire. A little while after Clark had arrived to deliver the news, McCarthy phoned Hoeh and did it himself. Clark was confused why he would be sent in person when McCarthy intended to call the entire time [8].

Regardless, with McCarthy as a declared candidate, the New Hampshire team was finally able kick into action.


McCarthy in New Hampshire, 1968.jpg

A handshake in the Granite State: Before officially announcing that he would be participating in the New Hampshire primary, McCarthy briefly visited the state at least twice.
Ever since his non-announcement that he was running for president, McCarthy had been an object of mockery and suspicion in the White House. The capture of the American spy ship USS Pueblo off the coast of North Korea had prompted a hawkish mood in the country, and Johnson was polling in landslide numbers in the early primary states. McCarthy’s former friend (and still the Secretary of Agriculture) Orville Freeman wrote him off as “a footnote in history,” while Humphrey was hurt that his old friend would betray him in an act of vindictive political suicide. Johnson dismissed him completely in public, but he was privately worried that McCarthy was working as a stalking horse for Kennedy, who he believed would be the real threat to his renomination. To the extent that he was worried of McCarthy, it was from the possibility if he gained the support of black leaders like Martin Luther King Jr. that it would irreparably split the party by the time of the general election [9]. For the primaries, Johnson decided to adopt a Rose Garden strategy. In New Hampshire, he sent Bernard Boutin as his agent in the state. Boutin had previously been a candidate for governor in New Hampshire, narrowly losing in 1959. Following that, he had occupied various middle management positions in the Kennedy and Johnson administrations. Chosen as the Johnson loyalist who knew New Hampshire best, Boutin was responsible for orchestrating a landslide victory for the President in the state's primary, with the implied reward of a cabinet position in his future. Joining Boutin's efforts were Governor John King, a hawkish moderate-conservative, and Senator Thomas McIntyre, a more liberal supporter of Johnson [10].

The challenge facing the Johnson team was that the President was not officially running, and therefore his name would not appear on the ballot. Their job was to whip up a suitably impressive number of write-in votes for Johnson as a show of support from the state, with Boutin confidently announcing to the press that the President would win as high as ninety percent of the vote against the upstart Senator. In order to achieve this, Boutin, King, and McIntyre had had the New Hampshire Democratic Party committee endorse Johnson, effectively merging the re-election campaign and the state party in a legally questionable move. The Johnson team also sent pledge cards to every Democrat in the state, which one could sign and mail to the White House in a promise that they would write in Lyndon Johnson on election day.

Both of these initiatives backfired spectacularly.

Many New Hampshire Democrats complained that they did not necessarily want their membership dues to go towards Johnson's re-election fund, and the Johnson team was dogged by demands to show proof that the finances of the state party and the re-election campaign were being kept separate. They were also met by accusations that they were violating the party's policy of official neutrality in the primaries by siding with Johnson. Likewise, Hoeh and the McCarthy campaign attacked the pledge cards as an example of the overbearing Johnson trying to browbeat voters into submission, and began to cast the election as Washington authoritarianism against New Hampshire free-thinking. Refusing to acknowledge the McCarthy campaign for fear that it would legitimize it, the Johnson team never came up with a convincing rebuttal, and the pledge cards remained a viciously effective talking point of the McCarthy campaign long after they had been discontinued. Further problems emerged for the Johnson team through Daniell's frequent legal challenges against the state party in his continued effort to draft Bobby Kennedy. Daniell had begun assembling Kennedy supporters to run in the state's forty-eight delegate slate. However, he had been blocked by the state's attorney general, who had interpreted the New Hampshire law that prevented a draft movement from having an official campaign as also preventing the allowance of delegates specifically supporting a draft candidate. Daniell claimed that the attorney general had only done so on Governor King's orders, and challenged it in the local press, threatening to pursue it into the courts. The problem became moot, however, when Kennedy sent a letter asking Daniell to discontinue the write-in campaign, and followed it up by sending Ted Sorenson to encourage Kennedy supporters to vote for an active candidate, reaffirming Kennedy’s statement that “I will not be a candidate against President Johnson this year under any foreseeable circumstances.” The Draft Kennedy effort folded shortly after, and released a statement endorsing Eugene McCarthy, thereby uniting New Hampshire’s doves without any acrimony [11].

Meanwhile, the Johnson team were having their own troubles with their delegate slate. Each candidate was supposed to run forty-eight delegates (twenty-four active delegates and another twenty-four as an alternate slate). Not expecting a primary challenge when the slate candidates had first been assembled, the top-heavy Johnson team had not strictly reviewed the delegate process, and they had nearly double the number of delegate candidates than their were positions. On the other hand, Hoeh and Studds had tightly organized the McCarthy slate so that they had exactly forty-eight candidates.

Meet the Press 1964.jpg
Meet the Press 1968.jpg

Four years later: McCarthy on Meet the Press in 1964, when he was under consideration for the vice presidency, and in 1968, when he was under consideration for the presidency.
After a fundraising tour in Boston, McCarthy arrived for his first day of New Hampshire campaigning in late January. McCarthy opened the campaign in the town of Nashua, in front of a memorial statue to Jack Kennedy. McCarthy elucidated the various reasons he was running, describing in his usual, calm, deliberate way why he believed the Vietnam War was immoral, ineffective, and unconstitutional. The national press was nonplussed however; when McCarthy was asked how he thought his campaign was doing, he replied “all right,” and when he was asked why he did not use a more forceful campaigning style, he retorted that “I don't intend to shout at people around the country.” When asked, McCarthy said that he thought he would be an “adequate” president [12]. With that, he began his canvassing of downtown Nashua, with the press following behind. McCarthy moved at a brisk pace through the area, shaking hands and making conversation, but refused to enter or spend much time in several of the stops Hoeh and Studds had planned. McCarthy breezed through a busy restaurant, believing that people would not want to talk long while they were eating, and refused to enter a salon, claiming that women would not want to be seen by the national press without being made up first [13]. Running well ahead of schedule, McCarthy began to overtake his advance men, and arrived at a factory so that he could meet the workers as they left their shift. Unfortunately, the advance man had been wrong about the time the workers let out, and McCarthy and the press had arrived five minutes after everyone had already left. The situation got worse when the advance man arrived after McCarthy, and started complaining that he was canvassing a non-unionized factory. Following the mid-day disaster, McCarthy held a rally in the evening at a high school gymnasium in Manchester which was well received by the audience. However, McCarthy's national headquarters had not printed off copies of the speech for the national press, leading them to focus more on the factory fiasco in their coverage, and writing off McCarthy's campaign as an amateurish disaster, with many leaving the state to focus on other stories. Despite this, McCarthy was nearly unanimously well-received by New Hampshirites, and left the state eager to return for more campaigning. McCarthy’s family also became involved; Abigail began organized a massive mailing campaign by Women for McCarthy almost singlehandedly, but was considered incredibly touchy and overprotective of ‘her Gene’ by the staff [14]. The McCarthy children, Ellen, Mary, Michael, and Margaret, helped as volunteers, with Mary in particular being praised as an effective youth coordinator and liaison to her father.

Meanwhile, unbeknownst to the Western world, North Vietnam had witnessed a brief power struggle in the upper echelons of its leadership. The President of North Vietnam (and also the Chairman of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of Vietnam), Hồ Chi Minh, had been marginalized from power along with General Võ Nguyên Giáp. Lê Duẩn, the General Secretary of the Communist Party of Vietnam, had taken control of the North Vietnamese Politburo with his hawk faction. Hồ and Võ had both preferred a strategy of guerrilla warfare and negotiations with South Vietnam and the United States. Lê Duẩn preferred a more militaristic approach, believing that a series of large-scale assaults in support of the South's communist guerrillas (the National Liberation Front, also known as the NLF, or Viet Cong) would eventually overrun the South and inspire its people to revolt. This culminated in the Tet Offensive: a simultaneous assault on nearly every major city in South Vietnam. Americans watched on the evening news as the fighting raged stronger than ever, and the NLF nearly took control of the American embassy in the South Vietnamese capital of Saigon. While the Tet Offensive was a tactical defeat for the North, as it failed to inspire a revolution or conquer the South outright, it was a strategic and political catastrophe for Lyndon Johnson. His assurances that victory was in sight were proven to be false, and his support plummeted overnight, empowering McCarthy's campaign.

The New Hampshire campaign became energized by a fresh flow of volunteers and donations at the same time that Hoeh and Studds whipped up a more organized quality to the campaign [15]. Emulating the state-based confederated campaign structure of the national McCarthy organization, Hoeh and Studds created a largely autonomous McCarthy committee in nearly every town in the state. However, unlike the national campaign, the headquarters office in Concord had clearly defined organizational structure, and a filing system that was able to accommodate a large number of volunteers. Most notably, students came on weekends and breaks, with many of them cutting their hair and dressing formally so as to not scare off the average conservative suburban New Hampshirite. Operating under the slogan “Get Neat and Clean for Gene,” often condensed into “Get Clean for Gene,” Hoeh was nearly obsessed with preventing a media disaster that played into the public's fears of the youth. However, no such disaster emerged, and the number of student volunteers seemed to vindicate McCarthy's objective to bring young people's faith into the nation's institutions and political process, while at the same time closing the generational gap through canvassing. McCarthy's relatively quick and infrequent visits made it so he took on an almost mythic quality to the young volunteers of his own campaign, who had a greater appreciation for his professorial nature than the national press. There was an uncomfortable, silent understanding between McCarthy and his student volunteers that the only reason they were working together was to end the Vietnam War. Nevertheless, they grew on each other, and McCarthy, initially put off by their youthful exuberance, began to call them ‘his kids.’ Additionally, the arrival of Richard Goodwin, a Kennedy loyalist and speechwriter, implied at least implicit support from Bobby Kennedy [16]. As the New Hampshire campaign went on, the national press also slowly caught on that something might actually be happening. McCarthy's young volunteers grabbed particular interest, as did the string of celebrities who swung through the state to campaign, canvass, and record ads for McCarthy, most notably Paul Newman. Since the start, offers of support had poured into the national office. After a few months, they finally got someone to start replying to mail.

With the March 12 voting day closing in, both the McCarthy and Johnson teams began to alter their campaigns. Hoeh and Studds draped the anti-war position in the language of conservatism, haranguing Johnson for raising taxes and causing rapid inflation to cover the costs of the war, and blaming the disproportionate conscription numbers of the black community for causing the race riots and lawlessness plaguing the nation. Having yet to be provided with any official campaign material or photographs by the national headquarters despite asking several times, Hoeh and Studds began making their own campaign material and distributing it around the state. They also hoped to gain an edge in cross-over voting. Republican anti-war moderate George Romney had dropped out of the presidential race following a gaffe where he had told the press that he had been “brainwashed” into supporting the Vietnam War; something that came off as tone-deaf considering the revelations two years earlier of the torture of American prisoners in North Vietnam. Hoping that McCarthy would make a sympathetic statement in order to gain Romney supporters, he instead stayed true to his caustic nature: when asked about Romney's brainwashing comment, McCarthy replied, for him, “a light rinse would've sufficed [17]." On the Johnson side, the early campaign plan of ignoring McCarthy and promoting a rally-around-the-flag mentality fell apart with the Tet Offensive. Boutin and King resorted to red-baiting, accusing McCarthy of being a communist sympathizer and of weakening America's negotiating position with the North Vietnamese. McIntyre, with his base in the state being more liberal urban Democrats, was reluctant to participate in throwing around accusations of communist sympathies, but was eventually forced to present a united front. The Johnson team's tactics backfired yet again, with Hoeh accusing them of engaging in (Joseph) McCarthyism out of desperation to try and trick the voters into not seriously considering the candidates [18].

As McCarthy swept the state on the eve of voting day, his campaign had turned around to become a media darling. The staying power of effort to Dump Johnson had eventually convinced the press of its seriousness, and Boutin and the Johnson team had been forced to constantly move the goalposts of victory. Because they initially set a Johnson win at ninety percent, the press decided that anything higher than twenty percent would be significant for McCarthy, and emblematic of a rejection of the President. As the campaign went on, the Johnson team eventually dropped their win condition to being in the high sixties, and by election day, sixty percent.

But they had not even made it to that.

On the snowy night of March 12, President Lyndon Johnson came in at a little under fifty percent of the vote, while Senator Eugene McCarthy had gotten forty-two percent. Including Republican write-ins, McCarthy came within three hundred votes of beating the President. But, what was more, McCarthy completely obliterated Johnson in the delegate count: the bloated number of Johnson delegates had cut into each others votes, leaving McCarthy with over eighty percent of the delegates, despite having lost the popular vote.

Even while technically losing, it was one of the greatest upsets in American political history [19].

Four days later, Bobby Kennedy finally announced that he would be running for president. While Kennedy had decided he would enter regardless of the results of the New Hampshire primary, his timing was denounced by McCarthy's supporters, who accused him of being a gutless opportunist. Kennedy was tarred and feathered in liberal editorials, while McCarthy's youth organizer, Sam Brown, recalled, “We woke up after the New Hampshire primary like it was Christmas Day. When we went down to the tree, Bobby Kennedy had stolen our Christmas presents.” McCarthy, elated by his pseudo-victory in New Hampshire, refused to drop out, his past pronouncements about Kennedy now forgotten, and his position against Johnson stronger than ever.

Regardless of who would win the nomination, they would be in for a fight.


[1] Before asking McCarthy in the fall of 1967, Lowenstein and Gans went through a myriad of different candidates, including Senator J. William Fulbright of Arkansas from the Foreign Relations Committee, Senator Frank Church of Idaho, Senator Gaylord Nelson of Wisconsin, Senator Wayne Morse of Oregon, Senator Vance Hartke of Indiana, former General James Gavin, and Representative Don Edwards of California, all of whom declined. McGovern also recommended Senator Lee Metcalf of Montana, a friend of McCarthy's, who declined as well. John Kenneth Galbraith, a member of ADA, ambassador, and famous economist was willing to run, but he was disqualified because he was not an American citizen by birth.

[2] While McCarthy might have deserved his reputation as a lazy senator, many of his colleagues were selling his competence short. The lowest percentage of the vote McCarthy had ever gotten was thirty-seven percent, which he won in the four-way 1948 Democratic primary for the Fourth Congressional District, his first ever election. After that, McCarthy won a landslide victory in every election he ever ran in, with his lowest margin of victory after that being fifty-nine percent. While he may not have been a very proactive senator – something that was not helped by the fact that he intentionally cultivated a reputation for aloofness – he had the uncanny ability to whip up huge margins from a Republican-leaning district in what was then considered a swing state.

[3] The Kennedy-McCarthy relationship was especially complicated at this point. McCarthy clearly disliked Kennedy, but also acknowledged that he would be a much better candidate to challenge Johnson. Yet, when McCarthy was trying to convince him to jump in, he kept being rude and dismissive toward him. Some thought that McCarthy was trying to intentionally aggravate Kennedy into running, so that he would not have to do it himself.

[4] Why did McCarthy wait so long to run for President after his meeting with Lowenstein? The most obvious answer would be that he was still waiting on Kennedy to enter the race, but it has been suggested that McCarthy did not take Lowenstein and Gans seriously, and that being approached by senior, well-known liberal lobbyists like Galbraith and Rauh convinced him of the feasibility.

[5] In the aftermath of the CCD conference, the highest ranking politicians willing to be publicly associated with McCarthy was Sandra Hoeh, the Chair of the 2nd Congressional District of New Hampshire for the State Democratic Committee, and Bronson La Follette, the Attorney General of Wisconsin.

[6] The position of campaign coordinator was also left unfilled by McCarthy. It would remain vacant for over a month before Gans was appointed to it in January of 1968. McCarthy also did not clearly appoint a Chief of Staff. His Senate aide, Jerry Eller, took on the position informally.

[7] When told about Daniell’s draft effort in New Hampshire, Kennedy replied, “Robert Kennedy spelled R-O-B-E-R-T-K-E-N-N-E-D-Y is not a write-in candidate.”

[8] What caused McCarthy to change his mind? Blair Clark, as it turns out. Clark was pushing for McCarthy to enter the New Hampshire primary harder than anyone. In late December, the two of them were going to take a plane on a quick trip to New York from Washington, but inclement weather caused the flight to be cancelled. Taking a train instead, Clark was able to lay out over several hours why entering New Hampshire was a good idea. Without that train ride, McCarthy would not have gone in on New Hampshire.

[9] Martin Luther King Jr. did indeed go on to support McCarthy, making a statement for him that was used in radio campaign ads in New Hampshire. However, King also told McCarthy that his political support would have to be kept quiet for the most part since he was still pressuring Johnson on various policy actions. King's political involvement in 1968 was cut short by his assassination, and it is unclear if he would have ultimately preferred McCarthy or Kennedy. However, his widow, Coretta Scott King, was personal friends with Abigail McCarthy, and may have privately preferred McCarthy over Bobby Kennedy, though this is unclear.

[10] In Johnson’s New Hampshire chain of command, King and McIntyre were officially co-chairs of his re-election campaign. However, Boutin was the de facto leader, and controlled most of the campaign's decisions.

[11] Kennedy did not go so far as endorsing McCarthy, saying that he did not think that it would “further the cause of peace.” The more likely reasons were that he was still deciding on whether he would enter or not himself, and he still very much disliked McCarthy.

[12] The national press frequently and negatively compared Gene McCarthy to George Romney, the moderate Republican Governor of Michigan who was also running for president. Romney was much more of a politician's politician, and while popular nationwide, came off as a tourist who did not really understand the Granite State and its people to New Hampshirites.

[13] Politically aware or lazy campaigner? McCarthy hated the politicking part of politics, and loathed the demagoguery of selling himself as a candidate. Sometimes this may have helped him, and other times it probably hurt him. For example, McCarthy typically refused to do any campaigning in the morning, frequently skipping opportunities to meet night shift workers as they left their jobs, since he thought they would not want to talk to anyone. Also, he liked taking his time to start the day in the morning and did not want to be disturbed.

[14] One ugly episode involving Abigail McCarthy recalled by McCarthy’s then-press secretary Seymour Hersh is that she complained there were too many “Hebrews” on the staff.

[15] Hoeh and Studds were initially promised a million dollars from the national campaign headquarters. Ultimately, they did not directly receive any money from the national headquarters, with Blair Clark and financier Howard Stein paying for many of the initial expenses. McCarthy's New Hampshire campaign floated almost entirely on donations and volunteer work, with final expenses coming up to around five hundred thousand dollars.

[16] Richard Goodwin's exact role in the McCarthy campaign remains something of a mystery. Some think that he came to New Hampshire to work for McCarthy because Kennedy refused to run, while McCarthy himself seemed to believe that Goodwin was a spy sent by Kennedy to keep tabs on him. Goodwin would later abandon McCarthy when Kennedy announced, but would return to work for McCarthy following Kennedy's assassination.

[17] Romney was also mocked by the colourful Governor of Ohio, Jim Rhodes, who commented, “watching George Romney run for the presidency was like watching a duck try to make love to a football.”

[18] The two McCarthys of American politics had a strange relationship. In the 1950s, Gene agreed to debate Joe in what the media taglined as McCarthy vs. McCarthy, with Gene arguing that communists should not be barred from any occupation except for those that would be handling top secret government files. However, Gene was in favour of banning the Communist Party of the United States of America in his early career, and went along with most anti-communist measures. Gene would be confused with Joe even past death, with the 2008 Democratic National Convention memorializing him as Joseph McCarthy. It did not help that his full name was Eugene Joseph McCarthy.

[19] So why is it that McCarthy nearly won in conservative, hawkish New Hampshire? Well, as it turns out, because most of McCarthy's voters were not actually voting for him, but were rather voting against Johnson. Exit polling in New Hampshire showed that the majority of voters actually wanted someone more hawkish on Vietnam, and most of those who voted for McCarthy said they did not know what his position on the war was. In fact, eighteen percent of all of McCarthy's voters in the primaries would go on to support the third party bid of archsegregationist Southern Democrat George Wallace in the general election. While Johnson was able to hold on to the 'default support' of more voters, Hoeh and Studd's decision to phrase things around fiscal conservatism and emphasizing leadership qualities rather than war policies paid dividends on election night. IOTL, both Hoeh and Studds would later run for Congress. Hoeh unsuccessfully in 1968, and Studds successfully in 1972.
 
Last edited:
great update find it funny the people voted for him just to screw lydnon johnson also I wonder how many got confusd between the 2(mcarthys)
 
Last edited:
great update find it funny the people voted for him just to screw lydnon johnson also I wonder how many got confusd between the 2(mcarthys)
There's no exact numbers but it must have been a reasonably solid chunk of his vote, considering he benefited from McCarthy mix-ups as late as 1992, in his last zany presidential run. In a lot of the most northern, rural, conservative parishes in Louisiana, McCarthy placed second behind Bill Clinton, which has been credited to people thinking he was Joseph McCarthy.
 
McCarthy Speaks: Announcement of Candidacy and Conference of Concerned Democrats Keynote Speech
McCarthy Speaks: Announcement of Candidacy and Conference of Concerned Democrats Keynote Speech

By 1967, Eugene McCarthy was one of the most experienced politicians in the Senate, if not in years, then in the breadth of his knowledge. He had served on nearly every major committee in that illustrious body, and several of the minor ones too.

He was also bored.

Having been exiled from President Johnson's inner circle after withdrawing his candidacy for the vice presidential nomination in 1964, McCarthy had become increasingly dissatisfied with politics, and Johnson's attempted solutions to the problems facing the nation. The notable of these dissatisfying issues was the Vietnam War. By 1966, McCarthy felt the extent that the United States would have to go to win the war outright would be worse than the likely communist victory that would come with a negotiated withdrawal. Approached by Allard Lowenstein of the Dump Johnson Movement and the Conference of Concerned Democrats (CCD) in October, McCarthy began seriously considering a presidential run. McCarthy delayed his decision, but was eventually convinced by his own internal determination, as well as additional encouragement from his daughter, Mary, and senior members of Americans for Democratic Action (ADA), such as Joseph Rauh Jr. and John Kenneth Galbraith. His initial plan was to perform well enough to scare Johnson into supporting a peace plank at the upcoming Democratic National Convention, then fade into obscurity.

McCarthy's announcement speech was given on November 30, 1967. It was considered vague and confusing by the reporters who had assembled to hear it. McCarthy did not outright declare that he was running for president, merely stating that he would be entering into certain primaries. People were uncertain if he was really challenging Johnson for the presidency, or if he was acting as some sort of regional favourite son for the Midwest and West. Many considered him a stalking horse for Kennedy. Some even thought he was secretly working for Johnson as a sort of controlled opposition within the Democratic Party.

While his announcement speech did a good job of elucidating his concerns with the state of the union, it was considered one of his most forgettable speeches.

McCarthy 1967 with Fair Campaign Practices Committee w Felix M Putterman and Samuel J Archibald.jpg

McCarthy with Felix M. Putterman and Samuel J. Archibald of the Fair Campaign Practices Committee (FCPC), shortly before announcing his entry into several of the 1968 Democratic primaries. Small reform groups like the FCPC were some of the most receptive to aiding Dump Johnson organizations like the CCD.

"I intend to enter the Democratic primaries in Wisconsin, Oregon, California, and Nebraska. The decision with reference to Massachusetts and New Hampshire will be made within two weeks. In so far as Massachusetts is concerned, it will depend principally upon the outcome of the meeting of the Democratic State Committee this weekend.

Since I first said that I thought the issue of Vietnam and other related issues should be raised in the primaries, I have talked to Democratic party leaders in twenty-six states, to candidates – especially Senate candidates – who will be up for re-election next year, and to many other persons.

My decision to challenge the President’s position has been strengthened by recent announcements from the Administration of plans for continued escalation and intensification of the war in Vietnam and, on the other hand, by the absence of any positive indications or suggestions for a compromise or negotiated political settlement. I am concerned that the Administration seems to 5 have set no limits on the price that it will pay for military victory.

Let me summarize the cost of the war up to this point:
- the physical destruction of much of a small, weak nation by the military operations of the most powerful nation on this earth;
- 100,000 to 150,000 civilian casualties in South Vietnam alone, according to the estimates of the Senate subcommittee on refugees;
- the uprooting and fracturing of the social structure of South Vietnam, where one-fourth to one-third of the population are now refugees;
- for the United States, 15,058 combat dead and 94,469 wounded through November 25, 1967;
- a monthly expenditure by the United States of between $2 and $3 billion on the war;

I am also concerned over the bearing of the war on other areas of United States responsibility:
- the failure to appropriate adequate funds for the poverty program, for housing, for education and other national needs, and the prospect of additional cuts as a condition for congressional approval of a tax bill;
- the drastic reduction of our foreign aid program in other parts of the world;
- the dangerous rise of inflation and, as an indirect but serious consequence, the devaluation of the British pound which is more important east of the Suez than is the British navy.

There is growing evidence of a deepening moral crisis in America: discontent, frustration, and a disposition to extralegal – if not illegal – manifestations of protest.

I am hopeful that a challenge may alleviate the sense of political helplessness and restore to many people a belief in the processes of American politics and of American government. On college campuses especially, but also among other thoughtful adult Americans, it may counter the growing sense of alienation from politics which is currently reflected in a tendency to withdraw in either frustration or cynicism, to talk of nonparticipation and to make threats of support for a third party or fourth party or other irregular political movements.

I do not see in my move any great threat to the unity and the strength of the Democratic party.

The issue of the war in Vietnam is not a separate issue but is one which must be dealt with in the configuration of problems in which it occurs. It is within this context that I intend to take the case to the people of the United States.

I am not for peace at any price but for an honorable, rational, and political solution to this war; a solution which I believe will enhance our world position, encourage the respect of our allies and potential adversaries, which will permit us to give the necessary attention to our other commitments abroad – both military and nonmilitary – and leave us with both resources and moral energy to deal effectively with the pressing domestic problems of the United States itself. In this total effort, I believe we can restore to this nation a clearer sense of purpose and of dedication to the achievement of that purpose."

McCarthy Business Executives Move for Vietnam Peace.jpg

McCarthy gives a speech to the Business Executives Move for Vietnam Peace. Johnson's refusal to either raise taxes or cut spending to pay for the Vietnam War began to wreak economic havoc in 1966, mostly in the form of runaway inflation. A surprisingly large number of Wall Street and big business executives financed McCarthy's campaign, if only to remove Johnson.
After McCarthy's underwhelming announcement speech, Allard Lowenstein was looking to make a splash. Lowenstein had delayed the annual CCD convention, which had been scheduled for the summer of 1967, in the hopes that he would have a Dump Johnson presidential candidate by the end of the fall who could be the keynote speaker for the event. His hopes had paid off when McCarthy agreed to run, and the two headed to Chicago for the CCD convention, now planned for December 2nd, at the Conrad Hilton Hotel. McCarthy had not finished preparing his statement by the time he had arrived in Chicago, and was still writing it when he was supposed to be on stage. Looking to keep the crowd occupied, Lowenstein gave his own speech, which was considered the best of his career by his followers, but demagogic populist drivel to McCarthy. After being practically dragged off stage, Lowenstein left the podium to McCarthy, whose cerebral, academic-moralistic look analysis of Vietnam severely underwhelmed the excited crowd.

McCarthy's CCD address is generally considered the worst of his career, completely failing to read the room or work off of Lowenstein's. However, McCarthy was perhaps alone in thinking it was the best speech of his career. Despite the polarizing opinions, it was reflective of the style and sensibility that McCarthy wanted to bring to the campaign, and his unbending belief in his own political abilities and style.

McCarthy at the Conrad Hilton Chicago 1968.jpg

McCarthy greets an applauding crowd at the Conrad Hilton Hotel in Chicago. The Conrad Hilton would serve as both the convention hall for the CCD's annual meeting in 1967, and as McCarthy's headquarters for the 1968 Democratic National Convention.

"In 1952, in this city of Chicago, the Democratic party nominated as its candidate for the presidency Adlai Stevenson.

His promise to his party and to the people of the country then was that he would talk sense to them. And he did in the clearest tones. He did not speak above the people, as his enemies charged, but he raised the hard and difficult questions and proposed the difficult answers. His voice became the voice of America. He lifted the spirit of this land. The country, in his language, was purified and given direction.

Before most other men, he recognized the problem of our cities and called for action.

Before other men, he measured the threat of nuclear war and called for a test ban treaty.

Before other men, he anticipated the problem of conscience which he saw must come with maintaining a peacetime army and a limited draft, and urged the political leaders of this country to put their wisdom to task.

In all of these things he was heard by many but not followed, until under the presidency of John F. Kennedy his ideas were revived in new language and in a new spirit. To the clear sound of the horn was added the beat of a steady and certain drum.

John Kennedy set free the spirit of America. The honest optimism was released. Quiet courage and civility became the mark of American government, and new programs of promise and of dedication were presented: the Peace Corps, the Alliance for Progress, the promise of equal rights for all American and not just the promise, but the beginning of the achievement of that promise.

All the world looked to the United States with new hope, for here was youth and confidence and an openness to the future. Here was a country not being held by the dead hand of the past, not frightened by the violent hand of the future which was grasping at the world.

This was the spirit of 1963.

What is the spirit of 1967? What is the mood of America and of the world toward America today?

It is a joyless spirit – a mood of frustration, of anxiety, of uncertainty.

In place of the enthusiasm of the PEace Corps among the young people of America, we have protests and demonstrations.

In place of the enthusiasm of the Alliance for Progress, we have distrust and disappointment.

Instead of the language of promise and of hope, we have in politics today a new vocabulary in which the critical word is war: war on poverty, war on ignorance, war on crime, war on pollution. None of these problems can be solved by war but only be persistent, dedicated, and thoughtful attention.

But we do have one war which is properly called a war – the war in Vietnam, which is central to all of the problems of America.

A war of questionable legality and questionable constitutionality .

A war which is diplomatically indefensible; the first war in this century in which the United States, which at its founding made an appeal to the decent opinion of mankind in the Declaration of Independence, finds itself without the support of the decent opinion of mankind.

A war which cannot be defended in the context of the judgment of history. It is being presented in the context of an historical judgment of an era which is past. Munich appears to be the starting point of history for the Secretary of State and for those who attempt to support his policies. What is necessary is a realization that the United States is a part of the movement of history itself; that it cannot stand apart, attempting to control the world by imposing covenants and treaties and by violent military intervention; that our role is not to police the planet but to use military strength with restraint and within limits, while at the same time we make available to the world the great power of our economy, of our knowledge, and of our good will.

A war which is not defensible even in military terms; which runs contrary to the advice of our greatest generals – Eisenhower, Ridgway, Bradley, and MacArthur – all of whom admonished us against becoming involved in a land war in Asia. Events have proved them right, as estimate after estimate as to the tie of success and the military commitment necessary to success has had to be revised – always upward: more troops, more extensive bombing, a widening and intensification of the war. Extension and intensification have been the rule, and projection after projection of success have been proved wrong.

With the escalation of our military commitment has come a parallel of overleaping of objectives from protecting South Vietnam, to nation building in South Vietnam, to protecting all of Southeast Asia, and ultimately to suggesting that the safety and security of the United States itself is at staje.

Finnally, it is a war which is morally wrong. The most recent statement of objectives cannot be accepted as an honest judgment as to why we are in Vietnam. It has become increasingly difficult to justify the methods we are using and the instruments of war which we are using as we have moved from limited targets and somewhat restricted weapons to greater variety and more destructive instruments of war, and also have extended the area of operations almost to the heart of North Vietnam.

Even assuming that both objectives and methods can be defended, the war cannot stand the test of proportion and of prudent judgment. It is no longer possible to prove that the good that may come with what is called victory, or projected as victory, is proportionate to the loss of life and property and to other disorders that follow from this war.

Let me summarize the cost of the war up to this point:
- the physical destruction of much of a small, weak nation by the military operations of the most powerful nation on earth;
- 100,000 to 150,000 civilian casualties in South Vietnam alone, according to the estimates of the Senate subcommittee on refugees;
- the uprooting and fracturing of the social structure of South Vietnam, where one-fourth to one-third of the population are now refugees;
- for the United States, 15,058 combat dead and 94,469 wounded through November 25, 1967;
- a monthly expenditure by the United States of between $2 and $3 billion on the war.

Beyond all of these considerations, two further judgments must be passed: a judgment of individual conscience, and another in the broader context of the movement of history itself.

The problem of individual conscience is, I think, set most clearly before us in the words of Charles Péguy in writing about the Dreyfus case:

'...a single injustice, a single crime, a single illegality, if it is officially recorded, confirmed, a single wrong to humanity, a single wrong to justice and to right, particularly if it is universally, legally, nationally, commodiously accepted... a single crime shatters and is sufficient to shatter the whole social contract... a single legal crime, a single dishonorable act will bring about the loos of one's honor, the dishonor of a whole people.'

And the broader historical judgment as suggested by Arnold Toynbee in his comments on Rome's war with Carthage:

'Nemesis is a potent goddess... War posthumously avenges the dead on the survivors, and the vanquished on the victors. The nemesis of war is intrinsic. It did not need the invention of the atomic weapon to make this apparent. It was illustrated more than two thousand years before our time, by Hannibal's legacy to Rome.'

Hannibal gained a 'posthumous victory over Rome. Although he failed to defeat the great nation militarily because of the magnitude of her military manpower and solidity of the structure of the Roman Commonwealth, he did succeed in inflicting grievous wounds on the Commonwealth's body social and economic. They were so grievous that they festered into the revolution that was precipitated by Tiberius Gracchus and hat did not cease till it was arrested by Augustus a hundred years later... This revolution,' Toynbee said, 'was the nemesis of Rome's superficially triumphant career of military conquest,' and ended, of course, the Republic and substituted for it the spirit of the dictators and of the Caesars.

Those of us who are gathered here tonight are not advocating peace at any price. We are willing to pay a high price for peace – for an honorable, rational, and political solution to this war; a solution which will enhance our world position, which will permit us to give the necessary attention to our other commitments abroad, both military and non-military, and leave us with both human and phyical resources and with moral energy to deal effectively with the pressing domestic problems of the United States itself.

I see little evidence that the Administration has set any limits on the price which it will pay for a military victory which becomes less and less sure and more hollow and empty in promise.

The scriptural promise of the good life is one in which the old men see visions and the young men dream dreams. In the context of this war and all of its implications, the young men of America do not dream dreams, but many live in the nightmare of moral anxiety, of concern and great apprehension, and the old men, instead of visions which they can offer to the young, are projecting, in the language of the Secretary of State, a specter of one billion Chinese threatening the peace and safety of the world – a frightening and intimidating future.

The message from the Administration today is a message of apprehension, a message of fear, yes – even a message of fear of fear.

This is not the real spirit of America. I do not believe that it is. This is a time to test the mood and spirit:
To offer in place of doubt – trust.
In place of expediency – right judgment.
In place of ghettos, let us have neighborhoods and communities.
In place of incredibility – integrity.
In place of murmuring, let us have clear speech; let us again hear America singing.
In place of disunity, let us have dedication of purpose.
In place of near despair, let us have hope.

This is the promise of greatness that was started for us by Adlai Stevenson and which was brought to form and positive action in the words and actions of John Kennedy.

Let us pick up again those lost strands and weave them again into the fabric of America.

Let us sort out the music from the sounds and again respond to the trumpet and the steady drum."
 
Last edited:
Not bad. If there's audio of the OTL version, I'd have to listen to it to compare.
It took some editing, but I was able to find the audio, spruce it up a bit, and convert it to mp4 to add a nice picture... and the file was too big. So enjoy the downloaded raw audio instead... which was also too big. Here's a link to it online instead: https://umedia.lib.umn.edu/item/p16022coll407:0?q=conference+of+concerned+democrats

The actual speech starts around the 7:00 mark of the recording. Some observations I've made of the recording is that McCarthy makes some pretty extensive deviations from the official transcript that he himself published, and either the microphone is right beside a really small but enthusiastic part of the crowd, or the media and most other accounts significantly overstated how poorly the speech was received by the audience.
 
Last edited:
Chapter Three - Sympathy For The Devil
Chapter Three - Sympathy For The Devil

With the entry of Bobby Kennedy into the Democratic primaries, the anti-war vote was split between two camps. Kennedy faced a harsh initial backlash, resurrecting accusations of political ruthlessness that had haunted him since the 1950s. However, his decision to finally enter the race prompted many of the few professional political operators that McCarthy had to defect, leaving his already disorganized campaign in even further disarray. Most notably, Allard Lowenstein, the driving force behind the Dump Johnson Movement, drifted into Kennedy's orbit as a political advisor, despite officially still supporting McCarthy. On top of that, McCarthy dropped like a stone in the polls, as Kennedy began absorbing his default support with anti-war voters. But, while Kennedy had the reputation of being Johnson's nemesis, McCarthy was the one who was better positioned to challenge him in the primaries; due to Kennedy's late entry and Johnson's Rose Garden strategy, McCarthy would be the only candidate to appear on the ballot in the Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and Massachusetts primaries. For the first time in his campaign, McCarthy explicitly stated that he was running to be the Democratic nominee, to unseat Johnson at the National Democratic Convention in Chicago, and become President of the United States.

Sensing the danger of two anti-war candidates running against each other, Richard Goodwin and Blair Clark tried to unify the two camps. Kennedy’s entry had been a double-edged sword in that it had split the base, but that it brought significantly more people over to an anti-war position by virtue of the Kennedy mystique alone. A plan was drawn up where the two anti-war candidates would run in half of the primaries each, with the other’s support. They would then hold a winner-take-all competition in the California primary, where the loser would drop out and endorse the winner. There was also talk of sweetening the pot for McCarthy by promising him the position of Secretary of State if Kennedy were to win. Ted Kennedy was recruited by the collaborators to rendezvous in Wisconsin with McCarthy at the Green Bay, Wisconsin hotel in which he was staying. Those in McCarthy’s closest circle – his family and Senate aide Jerry Eller – were outraged that Goodwin and Clark (as well as other collaborators, such as campaign coordinator Curtis Gans, assistant campaign manager Jessica Tuchman, and youth coordinator Sam Brown) would be working with the Kennedys on anything, and initially blocked them from meeting with McCarthy, despite him having previously agreed to it. Losing his patience with Abigail, Clark barged past her into the hotel. McCarthy’s daughter Mary stopped him, while also convincing her father to go through with the meeting with Ted. After some chilly small talk, Ted began to push forward, but before he could even open the suitcase with the details of the plan, McCarthy waved him off. Instead, he suggested that Bobby go into the primaries he had not yet entered in Florida, West Virginia, and Louisiana [1], and that after he had successfully toppled Johnson and was elected president, Bobby could run in 1972. “I only want one term. Then Bobby can take over.” Otherwise, “we need no help.” As the disappointed Ted Kennedy left to be harassed by the press outside, McCarthy bitterly remarked, despite refusing to listen to the plan, “That’s the way they are. When it comes down to it they never offer anything real. [2]”

Meanwhile, various factions of the New Left were making their own plans for the Democratic Convention. Broader plans to hold protests in Chicago were frustrated by more moderate anti-war activists, were concerned that a protest would hurt the political chances of McCarthy and Kennedy at the convention. This left only the more radical groups willing to organize a protest in Chicago. Meeting over the weekend of March 23-24 in Lake Villa, Illinois, the revolutionary Students for a Democratic Society (SDS), the absurdist Youth International Party (the Yippies), revolutionary pacifist activists from the National Mobilization Committee to End the War in Vietnam (the Mobe), and various Black Power and smaller New Left groups came together, with the meeting presided over by Tom Hayden, Rennie Davis, and Dave Dellinger, the former two of SDS, and the latter of the Mobe. Hayden and Davis were cagey on whether they were calling for violent protest or not, and while officially denouncing political violence, they described the protests in Chicago as being a, “massive confrontation with our government” and an “attack on the Democratic convention” signalling “the final days of militancy.” The convention voted in favour of a motion to express their opposition to both McCarthy and Kennedy as being part of the bourgeois liberal establishment, before deliberating on their course of action for Chicago [3], with the convention ultimately voting to organize local political action rather than a march on the Windy City. Refusing to accept the results, Hayden waited for those in disagreement to leave, before putting it to a vote again and having the motion rescinded. Those remaining at the convention dispersed without making a plan for Chicago; the Black Power groups decided that protesting in Chicago would not be in their interest, while the Yippies decided they would organize their own protest in Chicago titled the Festival of Life. The Yippies' leaders, Abbie Hoffman and Jerry Rubin, declared that their main program in Chicago would be a protest to eliminate pay toilets.

McCarthy and Ted Kennedy full.jpg

Of all the Kennedys, McCarthy got along best with Ted, which was not saying much. The most notable confrontations between the two were over McCarthy's conduct during the vote on the Kennedy Amendment of the Voting Rights Act, and their brief, failed meeting to discuss a possible coalition between McCarthy and Bobby Kennedy during the 1968 Democratic primaries.

Having moved on to Wisconsin, McCarthy began the next step in his campaign.

Always more opposed to the Vietnam War than New Hampshire and neighbouring his home state of Minnesota, Wisconsin had clear advantages in McCarthy's favour. Midge Miller, the third highest ranking member of the CCD after Lowenstein and Gans, had been serving as the state campaign manager for McCarthy, and had prepared everything for his arrival. Goodwin and new recruit Jeremy Larner devised a speechwriting system where they would write a Kennedy-style speech describing a problem followed by three solutions before sending it off to McCarthy, who would then cut it down to a skeletal version and incorporate it into his usual, dry lecture-speeches which would then be mimeographed and sent off to Wisconsin's newspapers [4]. Thirteen thousand canvassers had been assembled – most of whom were students – each with their own regional captain who had broken down the state into canvassing districts. Due to Republicans being over to cross over in the Wisconsin primary, every residence in the state would be able to be canvassed. McCarthy’s efforts were also bolstered by the supporter of Midwest women’s and Catholic groups who he had grown familiar with, frequently through Abigail [5].
Running nearly the same campaign as he had in New Hampshire, McCarthy began to canvass the state with a growing entourage of academics, pundits, journalists, and hangers-on. The most notable of these was the famous poet Robert Lowell, who became his closest confidante on the campaign trail. Appealing to rural farmers, college students, liberal intellectuals, suburban moderates, and business executives concerned with the morality and cost of the war, McCarthy had assembled an unbeatable coalition (at least for Wisconsin); not only was he polling at over sixty percent over Johnson, but pro-McCarthy, anti-war candidates were practically guaranteed to win a spot on the delegation slate with an outright majority of the popular vote, unlike in New Hampshire, where the McCarthy slate only won because of poor planning on the part of the Johnson team.

However, a schism emerged in the McCarthy staff over an incredibly sensitive issue: McCarthy had been intentionally avoiding the ghettos. Despite his staunch support for desegregation and the implementation of the findings of the Kerner Commission to improve the well-being of the black community, McCarthy’s liberalism was steeped in a tradition of individualism that made him reluctant to address racial politics directly. McCarthy considered it demagogic, distasteful, and overly-generalizing to address an entire racial or ethnic group as one voting bloc, and mocked Kennedy’s efforts to appeal to, as McCarthy put it, “twenty-six separate communities to deal with twenty-six varieties of Americans – like twenty-six types of ice cream.” Instead, McCarthy said, he would “address all Americans as individuals.” In practice, this meant that McCarthy frequented black political groups, but avoided black ghettos, in part because of his beliefs, but also for more cynical reasons: McCarthy felt that publicly identifying himself with black voters would hurt him with his white middle class base, and wrote off all black voters as unwinnable due to their loyalty to the Kennedys that he felt was beyond any reason. This resulted in an ultimatum from a faction of his staff with his press secretary, Seymour Hersh, as their spokesman. They demanded that McCarthy canvass the Milwaukee ghetto, or they would leave the campaign. McCarthy refused, and Hersh, along with assistant press secretary, Mary Lou Oates, resigned, along with around two dozens members of his staff. As a tardy reaction, McCarthy made a speech firmly in favour of civil rights shortly after, and went on a walking tour of the Milwaukee ghetto, but only on a winter day when nobody was outside and at a pace that left the press winded.

But, for all that, the Wisconsin primary would be an anti-climax. On March 31, two days before voting day, President Johnson made a public address announcing a bombing halt, imploring North Vietnam to negotiate a peace, and, most importantly of all, that he would not be running for re-election in 1968.
To Johnson’s dismay, the news was received with widespread celebration.

In the aftermath, Wisconsin’s turnout was depressed with many not feeling a need to come out to vote against Johnson after he had already left the race. McCarthy would still win fifty-six percent of the vote, against thirty-five percent for Johnson, and six percent in Kennedy write-ins. Leaving the national press waiting, McCarthy instead did a meandering, long-form interview with a local news channel, limiting his personal coverage, but delighting the Badger State, with a boost in Midwestern polls carrying him to the next primary in Indiana.

However, the primaries were interrupted when the country was rocked by the assassination of Martin Luther King Jr., sparking a wave of race riots across the country. A rare exception had been in Indianapolis, where Kennedy’s calls for peace while on the campaign trail in the city had soothed tensions that would have turned violent without him. McCarthy had been an acquaintance of King’s, and their wives had been friends, but McCarthy was reluctant to go to King’s funeral. He felt that it would be a political theatre where he would be forced to compete with Kennedy, and he had to be convinced that to not attend would be political suicide. In the end, McCarthy went, but left early, while Kennedy stayed for a march after the funeral to extemporize on stage about King’s legacy. Not wishing to politicize their friendship, Abigail declined offers by Coretta Scott King to be on the airport tarmac as they brought down Dr. King’s body, and further declined to go to the funeral home with her. Instead, she went to the King residence to help prepare dinner for the hundreds of visitors passing through. Among those in the packed house were two Kennedy staffers who did not recognize Abigail, discussing how to best destroy her husband’s campaign.

The relationship between the Kings and the McCarthys was never revealed to the public.

McCarthy MLK Funeral.jpg

McCarthy at the funeral of Martin Luther King Jr. McCarthy believed it was morally reprehensible to take advantage of King's death for political gain; he never discussed the close relationship between their wives, never publicized the fact that King had supported him in the New Hampshire primary, and had to be convinced to attend King's public funeral.

The rest of April represented a transitional phase in the election. Running unopposed, McCarthy won the April 23 primary in Pennsylvania, but the delegate slate remained under the control of the pro-Johnson Pennsylvania Democratic Party leadership. Four days later, Vice President Hubert Humphrey announced his candidacy for president. Having entered too late to submit his name into the primaries, Humphrey would instead be forced to rely on the majority of the states that had delegate slates controlled by the party bosses, rather than appointed through a primary election or a caucus. Running as a ‘safe’ candidate who would continue President Johnson’s policies, Humphrey remained vocally supportive of the Vietnam War, despite his private reservations. Considering Kennedy the greater threat, Humphrey began to surreptitiously fund the McCarthy campaign, and kept a low profile as the primaries continued [7]. This left McCarthy and Kennedy as the two clear challengers for the Democratic nomination, but, with Johnson not running, a bombing halt implemented, and negotiations in progress, the fight between them would become a contest of personalities. With it all said and done, Goodwin finally made his long-expected return to the Kennedy campaign, but tore himself away telling McCarthy that he was the frontrunner; Goodwin was mesmerized by the possibilities of McCarthy as a candidate, and feared that Kennedy’s intensity would scare off voters compared to his coolness, in an election year where the public was demanding stability.

Meanwhile, Richard Nixon continued to sweep the Republican primaries, virtually unchallenged, and virtually unnoticed.

Kennedy and McCarthy were to have their first head-to-head contest in Indiana. Going into the state, things seemed to be in McCarthy’s favour. Kennedy was considered too liberal, too young, and too close to black people, while McCarthy’s non-existent reputation allowed people to project on to him, and he had months more ground game. Likewise, Eugene Pulliam, the owner of several major newspapers in the state, had a personal vendetta against Kennedy, and vilified him in the press. On top of all that, Indiana’s governor, Roger Branigin, was running as a favourite son and stand-in for Humphrey, and the tightly controlled state party was firmly behind him. Changing tactics, Kennedy became running a law and order campaign in the state, emphasizing his past as the country’s chief law enforcement officer, and dressing, speaking, and generally behaving in a more conservative style. While he kept the same policy positions, his presentation and the policies he spoke most about became dramatically different. For Indiana, Bobby turned himself into Robert.

As for McCarthy, he was failing to adapt to a campaign where he was not the only candidate on the ballot; a new press secretary, Philip Murphy, had been chosen, by the press team was in disarray after Hersh and Oates’ departure; the Indiana campaign manager, Jim Bogle, felt marginalized by Gans, who was trying to wrest total control of the state operation away from the locals and into the national headquarters; no one could agree on whether to use McCarthy’s old Minnesota ad firm or the campaign firm from New York, and tapes were frequently lost in the shuffle, leaving dead air in time slots the campaign had bought; the encounter in Green Bay had created a rivalry in the national headquarters between those willing and unwilling to work with the Kennedys, and, despite the pleas of his advisors and staff, it was nearly impossible to get McCarthy to sit down for a meeting and approve of a campaign strategy. Because of the national headquarters rivalry, Eller became increasingly protective of McCarthy’s schedule, leaving campaign stops dysfunctional and poorly attended, with McCarthy once giving a full stump speech to three Hoosiers in a shed – the same stump speech he had been using since before New Hampshire. Failing to tailor his presentation to a crowd that was more hawkish and conservative than even New Hampshire, McCarthy continued to target the Vietnam War despite Johnson no longer being in the race, called for the firing of the popular Director of the FBI J. Edgar Hoover without explaining why, and raised eyebrows by saying he would pay the ransom of the USS Pueblo without a fuss. McCarthy’s voting record came back to haunt him, with Kennedy sending out attack ads criticizing his vote against the poll tax amendment of the Civil Rights Act and presenting other positions of his mean to shake his young liberal core supporters. McCarthy’s volunteers, the majority of whom remained college students, became convinced that any and all attacks against their man were smears, once McCarthy revealed the context of his vote against the poll tax amendment, but the ad stayed in circulation. By the time of the primary on May 14, Kennedy had pulled from behind to win the primary with forty-two percent of the vote, as well as winning nearly all of Indiana's delegates . Branigan had placed second with a little under thirty-one percent, while McCarthy placed third with twenty-seven percent. While McCarthy had won the suburbs and college towns, Kennedy won every major city with the help of a crushing eighty-five percent of the black vote [8]. The same night, Kennedy won in the Washington D.C. primary, which McCarthy had not entered. In Ohio, favourite son Stephen Young, an anti-war moderate who was nonetheless supporting Humphrey, won unopposed. When McCarthy declared in a televised speech that winning was not everything. Kennedy, watching from his hotel room, scoffed at the sentiment: “that’s not what they taught me growing up.”

However, despite his clear victory, there was a feeling still nagging at Kennedy, that McCarthy’s volunteers were more informed, more politically active, and more dedicated than his volunteers. As he headed to the Indianapolis airport diner (the only restaurant open after 1:00AM), he bumped into two McCarthy student volunteers who had missed their flights, Pat Sylvester and Taylor Branch. Asking them to join him for a meal, Kennedy tried to understand why anyone would support a lazy, uninspiring, political dilettante like McCarthy who barely wanted to be president, with Sylvester shooting back against Kennedy’s spotty record on the Vietnam War and his belated entry into the race. The more he tried to convince them, the more they dug in. After talking for over an hour, the three parted ways on good terms, but his failure to convince them to abandon McCarthy was something Kennedy would keep in the back of his mind for the rest of his life.

McCarthy’s campaign was in equal disarray in the next primary in Nebraska. While the state’s demographics were even more in his favour, being more rural, less black, and closer to Minnesota, his amateur operation buckled under Kennedy’s well-organized efforts. The small but enthusiastic efforts of McCarthy’s Nebraska manager, Andrew Robinson, were hopelessly overwhelmed. Kennedy won an outright majority with close to fifty-two percent of the vote, next to thirty-one for McCarthy, with write-ins for Humphrey and Johnson making up the rest. On the same night, in West Virginia, no candidate had entered, and unpledged delegates won the entirety of the vote.

It was becoming more and more clear that McCarthy was not running out of an overwhelming desire to be president, or out of a passion for the issues. Rather, he felt that he had a solemn, moral duty to oppose the Vietnam War, and had been reluctantly pressganged into the leadership of the anti-war movement, rather than left to his hopeless one-man crusade against injustice. But, while McCarthy would rather lose and be right than win and be wrong, he would rather win and be wrong than lose to Bobby Kennedy.

McCarthy in Indiana.jpg

McCarthy campaigns in Indiana. While McCarthy drew large audiences in college towns, poor planning resulted in a hectic schedule and small crowds.

Heading for disaster on the West Coast in the Oregon and California primaries, a shake-up occurred in the McCarthy campaign to bring in some of the professionalism it had long lacked. A group of McCarthy’s long-time friends involved in liberal lobbying held an intervention to force him to define the roles and responsibilities in the campaign. The group consisted of Tom Finney, a member of Secretary of Defense Clark Clifford’s law firm and a former CIA agent, Maurice Rosenblatt, a lobbyist for the Committee for a More Effective Congress, Larry Merthan, another lobbyist, John Safer, a real estate executive and the campaign’s one-time finance chairman, and Thomas McCoy, another former CIA agent. Finney was chosen to replace Gans as the national coordinator, resulting in him quitting from the campaign in protest, only to return after being offered co-chairmanship of the California campaign along with its current chair, Gerry Hill. Despite being well-equipped to oversee the Oregon and California primaries, Finney’s appointment sparked a civil war in the national headquarters in Washington D.C., which McCarthy had still yet to set foot in. The title of Chief of Staff constantly alternated between Clark, Finney, and Eller, in office coup and counter-coup, with Clark remaking that the office had more leadership changes than South Vietnam. The majority of the finances from the Wall Street Stevensonians was still unaccounted for, and the entire nationwide effort remained carried on the momentum of enthusiasm, goodwill, and competent state and local organization.

Fortunately for McCarthy, Oregon was well organized.

One of the first states to have a solid McCarthy infrastructure, the Oregon operation was run by Howard Morgan, the former chairman of the Oregon Democratic Party state committee. Morgan was considered an excellent campaign manager who was frequently credited with breaking the Republicans’ one-party status in the state, and was an expert at smoothing over intraparty conflict. Working alongside Blain Whipple and Arthur Herzog, the other Oregon co-managers, Morgan was able to maximize McCarthy’s synergy with his key demographic: middle class, well-educated, suburban white voters. Sensing the danger of total defeat if he lost Oregon, McCarthy barnstormed the college towns and suburbs and redefined his campaign from the vague, moralistic, intellectual, anti-Vietnam position of the early primaries. “New Politics” became the new catchphrase, defined by a rejection of all Cold War foreign policy. He contented that Johnson was not the cause of the Vietnam War, but rather he had been adhering to an ideological orthodoxy stretching back to the Second World War that made it inevitable. McCarthy laid these problems at the feet of the Kennedys and their ‘counterinsurgency’ policy, that had been supported by both Jack and Bobby, where America, according to McCarthy, “still set for itself a moral mission in which we took upon ourselves the duty to judge the political systems of other nations and to alter them if we found them wanting.” Because both Democrats and Republicans had accepted this, it, “escaped any sustained and vigorous public judgement.” In Oregon, McCarthy asked the American people to, “pass harsh judgement on obsolete dogmas and irresponsible institutions” by electing him. Likewise, he linked systematic failure to urban poverty and segregation, and called for a policy of rapid desegregation through widespread affordable housing projects and expanding public transportation from the ghettos and inner cities out to the suburbs. Ironically, the candidate most philosophically committed to America’s institutions was calling for their complete overhaul. Further pressing the attack in his new populist style, McCarthy criticized Kennedy for his vacillation on his opposition to the war, his approval of FBI wiretapping of Martin Luther King Jr., and mocking him as childish by joking he promised “to hold his breath unless the people of Oregon voted for him.” Unlike in the early primaries where he tried to be as non-descript as possible, in a campaign stop in the Cow Palace in San Francisco, McCarthy smiled and waved as he marched down the centre aisle up to the podium. Once up there, McCarthy dressed down both Kennedy and Humphrey; he tied them together by pointing out that Kennedy had yet to distance himself from Secretary of State Dean Rusk and former Secretary of Defence Robert McNamara, both initially appointed to the cabinet by Jack Kennedy, and both instrumental in prosecuting the Vietnam War [9]. McCarthy also got additional support from the Teamsters, who had never forgiven Kennedy for going after their boss, Jimmy Hoffa, during his days as attorney general. Despite all this, McCarthy did not entirely abandon his old habits, and once left a reporter waiting on him for an interview while he wrote a poem about wolverines in the other room.

Meanwhile in the Kennedy camp, they were the ones crippled by internal conflict for once. Representative Edith Green had offered to serve as Kennedy’s campaign manager in the state, but she was combative against efforts by Kennedy’s national team to take control of her operation. McCarthy lampooned the power struggle in the press by comparing Kennedy’s senior advisors to the cigar smoking, backroom dealers that he said he was fighting. Campaigning through the state, Kennedy failed to gain traction, lamenting that, “This state is like one giant suburb. Let’s face it, I appeal best to people who have problems.” The death blow for Kennedy’s efforts in Oregon came when he happened to be on tour at a park near Portland when McCarthy coincidentally arrived at the same time with a bus full of press. Kennedy had been dodging any encounter with McCarthy, and refused to answer the calls for a debate. Looking to avoid a confrontation, Kennedy ran for his car while McCarthy’s speechwriter Jeremy Larner chased after him. The press arrived just in time to get pictures of Kennedy driving off with a cloud of dust behind him.

On May 28th, McCarthy won his first contested primary, and Bobby became the first Kennedy to lose an election, ever. Oregon delivered forty-four percent of the vote for the man from Minnesota, while Kennedy trailed at thirty-eight. A stunned Kennedy acknowledged his loss in a congratulatory telegram to McCarthy (a courtesy he had never received from the other candidate) and by saying publicly it was, “a serious blow… I’ve lost. I’m not one of those who think that coming in second or third is winning.” When asked what he meant for his campaign, Kennedy replied, “I would say it is not helpful.”

Few noticed that, on the same night, McCarthy lost in Florida to favourite son George Smathers.

McCarthy Canoeing in Oregon.jpg

Making waves: By winning the Oregon primary, McCarthy caused the first loss for a Kennedy in any election ever, destroying the legendary Kennedy invincibility.
Ironically, the primaries had come down to a final confrontation in California, though with the intense animosity that Goodwin and Clark had been looking to avoid. Looking to raise the stakes and trusting his political instincts, Kennedy declared that he would withdraw his candidacy if he lost the California primary, and that he would be participating in the long-avoided debate with McCarthy. Kennedy’s advisors were nervous. Even with the loss in Oregon, Kennedy was in the lead in California, and McCarthy had much more to gain in exposure than Kennedy if a debate were held. Not only that, but Bobby never came off as well on television as Jack; the energy he gave off was well-received by a crowd or in person, but he seemed fidgety and nervous on television. McCarthy seemed a composed, cool professional on television, making steady, frequent eye contact with the camera, and had grown comfortable with the medium after making more frequent use of it as the primaries went on. Before the deal could be finalized, Kennedy’s team stipulated specific conditions for Kennedy’s participation, including that there would be no live audience, and would instead take a more round-table discussion format moderated by a panel of reporters.

Adapting to McCarthy’s New Politics, Kennedy began to emphasize his own themes of restoration, moderation, and technocratic realism. He accepted America’s institutions as being sound as they were, and blamed Johnson and only Johnson for the nation’s problems. Rather than calling for a swift negotiation process followed by a prompt American withdrawal like McCarthy, Kennedy began talking of a more gradual withdrawal – but a withdrawal nonetheless – that would leave South Vietnam able to defend itself. Pointing to his work with the Bedford Stuyvesant Restoration Corporation, Kennedy believed the best way to go about racial integration would be through local community involvement and the investment of private capital into ghettos. Kennedy thought that once black Americans had greater economic power, integration would naturally follow, and he dismissed McCarthy’s proposed programs as being bloated, naïve, and overly reliant on the government. It was one of the paradoxes of 1968 that racial minorities and the lower class supported Kennedy’s program of gradual integration and private initiative, while the white middle class supported McCarthy’s program of rapid integration and broad government spending.

Instead of playing it safe like he had in Indiana, Nebraska, and Oregon, Bobby doubled down on his Bobby-ness: Campaign stops in Mexican American, black, and poor white communities were prioritized, while meetings with delegates, union bosses, and other power brokers were delayed or cancelled. Kennedy waved from the back of an open-topped convertible as it drove through city streets, seeming to tempt fate with memories of Dallas. Kennedy’s state team, led by Speaker of the California State Assembly Jesse Unruh, was put under the tight control of the national team; they did not want a repeat of Oregon, where internal disagreements had kneecapped their efficiency. The national team found the Unruh and his people had failed to mobilize or register to vote the black and Mexican American voters who could make all the difference in the election, and began a massive registration drive in the major cities, white working class neighbourhoods, and majority-Latino communities in the Central Valley region [10]. This strategy began to work almost too well, as Kennedy’s team started to worry that his association with racial minorities would start to put off white voters. Unruh reported that hawkish Democrats who would otherwise vote for Humphrey’s state surrogate, Attorney General of California Thomas Lynch, were drifting into the McCarthy camp in a white backlash against Kennedy’s minority supporters, nearly faster than the accelerating rate that McCarthy was losing his furthest left supporters to Kennedy.

While McCarthy’s college corps of volunteers had originally swamped California with their sheer numbers, the tide had begun to turn with the tidal wave arrival of Kennedy press releases, policy statements, and, most of all, money, into the state. While McCarthy had Paul Newman and Dustin Hoffman, as well as folksy performers like Simon and Garfunkel, Kennedy benefited from a star-studded cast of celebrity endorsements. Likewise, Kennedy took advantage of the internal divisions in the campaign and discontent with Gans’ replacement with Finney, who many within the McCarthy campaign was too much of a political insider and too chummy with members of the Johnson Administration. Andrew Robinson, McCarthy’s Nebraska manager, defected to Kennedy, as did the executive director of his national finance committee, and one of his top committee leaders in northern California. Hoping to stop Kennedy from preventing his ascension to the presidential nomination, Humphrey upped his surreptitious support for McCarthy by having surrogates pay donate more to his campaign and cover the costs for his advertisements. While the full details were not clear to the public, what was clear was that McCarthy and the Humphrey-Lynch forces were tacitly cooperating in an informal Stop Kennedy operation, in what Kennedy’s team described in the media as the collapse of, “The moral basis of McCarthy’s candidacy… by an increasingly open and cynical coalition of McCarthy and Humphrey forces… especially deplorable coming from a candidate whose public posture has been ‘holier than thou.’” Despite this, McCarthy was greeted like a messiah in every college town; the honoured prophet who would no longer be denied. His preference towards local radio and television interviews over canvassing and glad-handing gave him nearly equal air time to Kennedy in the huge state, despite putting in much fewer hours and much less work, and his support from middle class suburbanites, independents, and cross-over Republicans continued to trend upward. Overall, Kennedy was receiving more coverage, but McCarthy was receiving more positive coverage.

As Kennedy engaged in an eye-bulging, heart-pounding, furious mad dash to the finish line, McCarthy was moseying his way there, shrugging off mass defections by his middle management like they were nothing.

Mere days away until the primary, and polls were inconclusive.

Both candidates headed to San Francisco for the June 1st debate. Both candidates were staying at the Fairmont Hotel.

Bobby prepared with the team that had prepped Jack Kennedy for his famous 1960 debate against Nixon, but he seemed distracted, frequently taking long pauses to look out the window. Cutting things short, he skipped a meeting with the local heads of the United Auto Workers that had been put together at great expense, in order to go shake hands down at Fisherman’s Wharf. Once back, rather than going over his notes again before the debate, he decided to take a nap instead.

Meanwhile, McCarthy was in his hotel room with Finney. He had barely looked at the booklet his speechwriters had put together on the likely lines of attack that Kennedy would use against him, and was instead waiting for his friend Robert Lowell so that they could do a poetry reading. Before Lowell could arrive, Finney convinced McCarthy to check out of the Fairmont, and instead they would move to the Hilton at Union Square, where he could focus.

Then, just as Tom Finney was about to step in the car with McCarthy, a synapse fired, a jolting thought occurred, a detail that could have been easily overlooked, was not overlooked: after the Fairmont, the Hilton was the second-most likely place to go. Some of the Fairmont staff – the concierge maybe – had probably heard them talking about it as they left the lobby. It would not take much snooping around for someone to figure out that McCarthy was at the Hilton.

Well, let them think he was at the Hilton. They would go to the Stanyan Park Hotel instead [11].

McCarthy and Kennedy Debate.jpg

McCarthy and Kennedy sit down for their first and only debate.

The debate was held at Station KGO-TV, on ABC News Issues and Answers, and moderated by Frank Reynolds, Robert Clark, and William H. Lawrence. McCarthy won the coin toss to determine who would go first. The first question was a simple one: “What would you do at this time that President Johnson is not doing to bring peace in Vietnam?” McCarthy responded with an allusion to the Gavin Plan that America should withdraw its troops to a position of strength, have South Vietnam form a new coalition government that would include the National Liberation Front, permanently halt bombing, and continue negotiations with the North. Leaning into his new populist messaging in his own academic way, he then digressed into French colonial history, before accusing Kennedy of, “playing a prominent role in formulating positions that resulted in disastrous adventures,” by, “taking up the cause of colonialism for the sake of political expediency [12].” Kennedy addressed the accusation, saying, “I was involved in many of the early decisions on Vietnam and I am willing to bear my share of the responsibility, but past error is no excuse for its own perpetuation.” Flipping the accusations back on McCarthy, he pointed out that he had not publicly come out against the war until 1966. He then said, unlike McCarthy, he would not force the South to accept communists into their government before the negotiations had even began, and instead proposed an anti-corruption and land reform push in the current government. He then went on to say that South Vietnamese troops should be stationed at the demilitarized zone instead of Americans, and that search and destroy missions should be ended. McCarthy shot back: “First of all, I did come out against the war in nineteen-hundred sixty-six, and voted to repeal the Tonkin Gulf Resolution – which gave the President the power to fight a war without congressional or constitutional approval – while you voted to allow him to continue to have that power in that same vote. Secondly, I didn’t say I was going to force a coalition government on South Vietnam. I said we should make it clear we are willing to accept that. Now, if the South Vietnamese want to continue to fight, and work out their negotiation that is well and good. But I don’t think there is much point in talking about reform in Saigon or land reform, because we have been asking for that for at least five years and it hasn’t happened [13].”

After that tense exchange, Kennedy was then asked the next question about Johnson’s statement that he would leave all options for bombing North Vietnam on the table. Kennedy cited that Robert McNamara had testified before Congress that the bombings were not dramatically effecting the North’s will to fight, and that the South would have to pick up the slack, but he seemed rattled by McCarthy’s strong start: “If they don’t have that will, no matter how many men we send over there, how many bombs we drop – we’re dropping more now than we dropped in the Second World War – no matter how much we do of that, if they don’t have the will, and the desires themselves, no matter what we do, we-uh, can’t instill that in them. And that’s why I want to m-make it clear if I was President of the United States – and why I was critical back in 1965 because I thought we were making it America’s war, we were militarizing the conflict – that we – that this is a South Vietnamese war, I am opposed to unilaterally with-withdrawing from there, but they have to carry the major burden of this conflict. It can’t be carried by American soldiers [14].” Moving back over to McCarthy, he more or less reiterated the ineffectiveness of the bombing in a much more cogent way, but called into question McNamara’s credibility, considering he had been instrumental in the persecution of the Vietnam War, and ventured that Kennedy’s continued close relationship with McNamara was emblematic of the fact that Kennedy had yet to reject the preconceptions that had led to the Vietnam War, unlike him; his long experience on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee had allowed him to see the faults in American policy firsthand, and how to address, making him the candidate best qualified to guarantee, “no more Vietnams.” Kennedy shot back at McCarthy’s increasingly close cooperation with Humphrey, but McCarthy deflected it by pointing he had been the only candidate to have the courage to run against Johnson when no one else would, and, as for Humphrey, “I do not desire to control the actions of other candidates, and I cannot control whether they choose to enter the primaries at an opportunistic moment for them or not [15].”

McCarthy then had to justify an attack ad in the papers released by his campaign, saying that Kennedy had to be held responsible in his role in the Vietnam War and the intervention into the Dominican Republic. McCarthy was caught off guard for the first time, with Kennedy accurately pointing out that he was not even part of the Johnson Administration when it invaded the Dominican Republic. Backpedaling, McCarthy weakly brushed it off by saying that Kennedy was responsible for the “process.” Both candidates then had to address the charge that running an anti-war campaign encouraged the North to delay negotiations in hopes of getting a better deal if either of them were elected. Both candidates answered adequately: McCarthy argued that dissent was essential in a democratic society, and Kennedy argued that the reforms he proposed were necessary for South Vietnam to win the war. Both candidates reaffirmed that they would maintain America’s responsibilities to its allies and elaborated on the point. In particular, Kennedy voiced his support for sending fifty jets in military aide to Israel following the Six Days War of the previous year.

With McCarthy having clearly come off as the better of the two on Vietnam, Kennedy was visibly relieved when the topic shifted to domestic affairs. On the matter of law and order, he started shakily, but seemed to regain confidence as he went through his point-by-point plan: he would increase funds for police departments to deal with riots, but emphasized his relationship with the black and Mexican American communities; he declared that the best way to deal with these problems would be to make in clear that riots and disorder were unacceptable, but that people without hope who rioted out of despair would be provided with jobs and economic opportunity, proposing the government become the employer of last resort. McCarthy seemed less comfortable in domestic policy, and stumbled to his point that the country needed a massive new housing initiative to build a million houses a year in high-employment, new suburban areas across the country, in order to clear out the ghettos, and provide adequate housing and work to all Americans. Kennedy chimed in by talking about the loss of hope in the black community, emphasizing the success of his Bedford Stuyvesant program, and chastised the Johnson Administration for not abiding by the suggestions of the Kerner Commission to address to the root problems of urban rioting. McCarthy agreed that Johnson was not doing enough, and posited that the war was using up all the budget money that could otherwise be used to implement his policies and the recommendations of the Kerner Commission.

After a back in worth where the two candidates largely agreed on the dangers of budget cuts to social programs, McCarthy singled out the slashing cuts to the housing budget that Johnson had enacted. Kennedy then interjected to voice his disagreement with McCarthy’s housing program; Kennedy reiterated his position that improving the conditions in the ghettos through private investment was a better solution than replacing them, with McCarthy countering, “I would say we’ve got to get into the suburbs with this kind of housing. Some of the jobs are in the city and some jobs are being built there, but most of the employment is in the – in the beltline outside of the cities, and I don’t think we ought to perpetuate the ghetto if we can help it, even by putting better houses there for them, or low-cost houses… otherwise we’re adopting a kind of apartheid in this country, a practical apartheid… and it means funding, I think, five or six billion dollars a year, eventually, in the same that we funded, roughly four to five billion dollars a year for the interstate highway program… clearly funded, so as to carry over a period of five to ten years until the housing needs of this country are, in fact, met [16].”

Kennedy was waiting for a comment like that and jumped in hard: “Can I make just a comment on that? I’m all in favor of moving people out of the ghettos, but we have fourteen million Negros who are in the ghettos at the present time, we have here in the state of California a million Mexican Americans whose poverty is even greater than many of the black people… the children who go to these schools, only three out of ten graduate from high school, and the ones who graduate from high school have the equivalent of an eight grade education. So to take them out, where forty percent of them don’t have any jobs at all… to take those people out, put them in the suburbs, where they can’t afford the housing, where the children can’t keep up with schools, and where they don’t have the skills for the jobs, it’s just going to be catastrophic [17].”

Kennedy had hit back, but McCarthy had been prepared for some sort of attack like that, and struck back just as fiercely: “There you go again. I did not say that we would move ten thousand Negros to Orange County. We need to instead allow the Negro community to have a sense of their own personal freedoms with their own opportunities in dignified communities, rather than leaving them an economic colony, dependent on the government. Many of the beltline jobs do not need specialized training, and what a housing program like what I’m calling for would address would be your very concerns of affordability. Gilding the ghettos cannot possibly provide for all the unemployed there. What you’re representing is part of the problem, Bobby [18].”

Briefly losing his patience, political pundits watching from across the country collectively cringed as Kennedy whined in his most nasally, New England twang, “I’m naaawt part of the problem!”

Attempting to quickly recomposing himself, Kennedy then had to answer to recent allegations that he had approved the wiretapping of Martin Luther King while he had been attorney general. Refusing to discuss it further, Kennedy stated that discussing individual cases would be illegal [19]. Kennedy then tried to avoid the topic of cabinet appointments. McCarthy went after Dean Rusk and Robert McNamara for their incompetent handling of the Bay of Pigs invasion and the Vietnam War. Trying to take the high ground, Kennedy remarked, “I think with all the problems that are affecting the United States, with the internal problems that we have and the problems around the rest of the world, to talk about it in terms of personality… I don’t want to be playing games with people’s reputations [20].” However, McCarthy retorted that one of the great problems of American politics had become the personalization of government positions, “up to and including the presidency,” and that, “cabinet members should not be immune to just criticism, nor left to turn our institutions meant to serve the people into their own fiefdoms.” Kennedy had unintentionally cornered himself into the position of defending the Johnson cabinet [21].

As the debate concluded, Kennedy landed with a thud; he had been unaware that they would have to make closing remarks, and quickly ad-libbed a closing statement discussing his political experience, while McCarthy repeated his prepared statement that his New Politics and its New Constituents were needed in order to revitalize America’s institutions and political process before discussing his own political career, which, while more distant from the flashpoints of world history, was nonetheless more extensive than Kennedy’s. McCarthy concluded, “And I think there’s something to be said for a president or a presidential candidate who can somehow anticipate what the country wants, especially when what they want is on the side of good and justice, and to provide not real leadership in the sense of ‘you’ve got to follow me,’ but who needs to be prepared to move out ahead somewhat, so that the people of the country can follow. And thirdly I think I sensed what the young people of this country needed – these young students were dropping out and saying ‘the Establishment is no good’ – we’ve had a genuine reconciliation of old and young in this country, and the significance of that is, I think, that through the whole country now there’s a new confidence in the future of America. It’s a projection of this country in trust, which has always been the character of this country, and it’s in that mood and that spirit that I would act as President of the United States [22].”

McCarthy and Joey BIshop.jpg

Talking Heads: The media generally agreed that McCarthy won the debate with Kennedy. McCarthy is seen here on the Joey Bishop Show.
In the aftermath of the debate, it was clear that McCarthy had won it. The title of the conservative Santa Monica Evening Outlook’s editorial was emblematic of the public perception: “McCarthy shines as Kennedy whines,” with ‘I’m naaawt part of the problem’ becoming the political joke of the week. McCarthy’s statement of ‘no new Vietnams’ became the simplest soundbite for the media to use in an otherwise policy-heavy and complex debate. In a San Francisco phone-in poll, voters gave the debate to McCarthy by a one and a half-to-one margin; in a statewide poll, fifty-five percent thought McCarthy had won the debate, while according to Kennedy’s internal polling numbers, McCarthy’s suburban base was swelling in size from Lynch-Humphrey voters who were switching over to the candidate more likely to beat him [23].

Fighting to make up lost ground, Kennedy intensified his already superhuman work hours, sending off his family on a trip to Disneyland without him as he barnstormed southern California, starting with Orange County and working his way up through the Central Valley. The day before the primary, he traveled twelve hundred miles, from Los Angeles to San Francisco, Long Beach, Watts, San Diego, then back again to Los Angeles, literally collapsing from exhaustion more than once. Meanwhile, McCarthy attended a writer’s forum with Robert Lowell and a few light radio interviews in commuter-heavy areas during rush hour. In reaction to McCarthy’s strong debate performance, Humphrey had Lynch take down as much as his advertising as possible, so as to not split the anti-Kennedy vote, with the exception of anti-Kennedy attack ads released so close to polling that it was illegal to do so.

Polls closed at 8:00PM. Results reported before the polls closed were inconclusive. As the first results came in from the cities, Kennedy took an early lead. The numbers were big enough that he could win. But, as results came in from the suburban counties, especially from the Central Valley, it was becoming more and more clear that despite gargantuan, record-breaking numbers in black and Latino areas, the feared white backlash was pushing McCarthy forward, with Lynch dramatically underperforming. There was a dead silence from the Kennedy headquarters, while, when asked by the press, McCarthy remarked that the results were looking “pretty good.”

As midnight approached, it became clear that McCarthy had the numbers in the north and Central Valley to make him the winner, possibly even with a majority of the vote. Kennedy’s only concession was that he was projected to win by a landslide in the South Dakota primary being held at the same time, with McCarthy in a dismal third behind the pro-Humphrey unpledged delegate slate. Kennedy, at his headquarters in the Ambassador Hotel in Los Angeles, abandoned a half-written congratulatory telegram to McCarthy, and instead went down to his waiting audience. Opening with some levity, he thanked his dog, Freckles, followed by his family and all his supporters, before announcing that he would be withdrawing his candidacy, as promised, but doing so in such a way as to imply that he would be available to be drafted at the convention. Kennedy then prepared for a second reception before going to a press conference, but plans were changed by his aide, Fred Dutton. Seeing that Kennedy was exhausted, and wanting to control the media narrative as much as possible, Dutton decided that they would go to the press conference first. The fastest way to get there would be back through how they entered; the back kitchen and pantry. Separated by his bodyguard in the crowd, Kennedy made his way through the kitchen, shaking hands, and led by maitre d’ Karl Uecker. Uecker, on edge from the emotional tension of Kennedy’s defeat, noticed a man charging up with a gun. Two shots were fired before Uecker, in a knee-jerk reaction, slapped the gun aside. Several more shots went wild before the shooter was restrained. Kennedy was obviously wounded, and barely retained consciousness until he was brought into an ambulance.

McCarthy was in his suite at the Beverly Hilton Hotel when he heard the news. He grew pale. He lashed out at his long-time rival, bitterly remarking, “He brought it on himself, demagoguing to the last.”

And then, Eugene McCarthy wept.

McCarthy Visiting RFK in Hospital.jpg

McCarthy on his way to visit Bobby Kennedy at the hospital.
Out of concern that the shooting might be part of a wider plot, McCarthy told his celebrating staff what had happened, and asked them to vacate their Los Angeles headquarters at the Westwood, an old Sears Roebuck building. While it was not yet known to the public, the shooter was Sirhan Sirhan, a young Palestinian who had gone after Kennedy for his pro-Israel policies, including his support of sending jet fighters to Israel as military aide.

Meanwhile, Kennedy was received at Central Receiving Hospital where he was stabilized. He had been shot three times: one bullet had passed through his torso, causing internal bleeding, the second had lodged in his spine, while a third had grazed his neck. A fourth bullet had passed through his coat without hitting him [24]. He was transferred, half-conscience and on painkillers, to the Hospital of the Good Samaritan, where a team of surgeons were preparing to operate. A priest was brought in, and last rites were administered. Before the procedure began, Kennedy spoke to his press secretary, Frank Mankiewicz, telling him that he wanted to endorse McCarthy. Mankiewicz was shocked; his distaste for McCarthy was equal to, if not greater, than Kennedy’s, but Bobby was firm. “It’s not about a man, it’s about the movement,” he mumbled [25].

By the time McCarthy arrived at the hospital, Mankiewicz had already informed the press that Kennedy was entering surgery with uncertain prospects, and that before being put on anesthesia that he had endorsed Gene McCarthy. Mankiewicz later wisecracked that, “It’s too bad Gene didn’t meet Bobby before they put him in surgery. He probably would’ve changed his mind.”

In the long shadow of California, McCarthy had become the sole peace candidate in more ways than one. He had gotten just under a majority of the vote at forty-nine percent, next to a little under forty-three percent for Kennedy, and a little under seven percent for Lynch. Not only that, but he came away from California with a sense of moral absolution after the bitter primary battles of the past, having received Kennedy’s endorsement. And, while the news had been lost in the shuffle, he had also won a solid victory in the New Jersey primary. As he headed for the Democratic convention, Eugene McCarthy was feeling good about his chances.

Every other politician in America prepared for the inevitable nomination of Hubert Humphrey.



[1] Unlike Florida and West Virginia, Louisiana did not have a presidential candidate preference primary. They did have a delegate slate primary, which is what McCarthy was referring to. The Louisiana delegate primary would ultimately be won by those loyal to Governor John McKeithen, a Johnson/Humphrey surrogate.

[2] This is slightly out of chronological order in relation to the end of chapter two: this episode in the Kennedy-McCarthy relationship happened after the New Hampshire primary, after Bobby Kennedy unofficially announced his intention to run, but before Kennedy officially announced he was running. Jerry Eller never forgave Clark for his part in the plan, and frequently blocked his access to McCarthy – even more so than he was already doing – for the rest of the primaries.

[3] Despite being the left-most figure in mainstream American politics at the time, the New Left, and particularly the SDS, had a special disdain for McCarthy. They considered his calls to bring people back into the political process to be anathema to their ideology of direct political action and revolutionary incitement. Ironically, the more centrist Kennedy had greater respect in New Left circles for being a more professional and realistic anti-war candidate. As recalled by former SDS President Carl Oglesby, “McCarthy wouldn't have had anything to do with real power. That was pure symbolism. It was empty. McCarthy was not going to be the president of this country. Period. No way. No how. But Bobby Kennedy? Ah, ha, a very real chance to be the president of the United States. Very real, very practical.” The opposite was true of the Yippies; they preferred McCarthy because they thought he was going to lose (Abbie Hoffman once said that rooting for McCarthy is like rooting for the New York Mets: you know they’re going to lose but you do it anyway), while they thought Kennedy would ruin their fun, since he was the only candidate who could match them in “theatre in the streets,” with what Hoffman described as his “participation mystique.”

[4] Following the McCarthy campaign IOTL, Larner would go on to write the script for the political satire The Candidate, starring Robert Redford. The Candidate was in large part inspired by the McCarthy campaign, along with the 1970 Senate campaign of John V. Tunney, which the director, Michael Ritchie, participated in.

[5] McCarthy’s campaign had more women in leadership positions on the state and local level than any other campaign of the year, or perhaps even ever up to that point in American politics. The disorganized, decentralized structure allowed political amateurs and hobbyists to attain important local roles with little to no prior political experience. This allowed many women who were generally kept out of the political process to get involved, while they were stonewalled in more ‘professional’ campaigns such as Kennedy’s.

[6] Why did Lyndon Johnson drop out? There are a few different interpretations, but the one most agreed on was that he was in poor health, and did not know if he could survive a second term. It is also believed that his close friend John Connally's decision to not run for another term as Governor of Texas influenced his decision. Of course, there is also the obvious take that McCarthy’s strong showing in New Hampshire scared him away, along with Kennedy's entry into the race. That was the general belief of the public at the time, except for the cynics who believed he was dropping out in order to bypass the primaries and organize a draft at the convention. More on that next chapter.

[7] While legal at the time, Humphrey’s funding of McCarthy’s campaign was incredibly sneaky and had horrible optics, so it was kept a secret from the public. The money was most likely delivered to McCarthy, alone and in person, by Miles Lord, a district judge from Minnesota and a known Humphrey supporter who was observed occasionally visiting McCarthy every few primary elections.

[8] The only person in McCarthy's entire campaign structure who seemed able to make any sort of connection with black voters was the actor Paul Newman. When Newman met with local black community leaders Charles Hendricks and Ben Bell, Hendricks commented, "I tell you what, you sell him better than he sells himself. You've done more for McCarthy in these few minutes than he did for himself [in the entire campaign up to that point]."

[9] McCarthy’s address at the Cow Palace was considered one of his best by his speechwriters, but he had to be convinced to criticize Humphrey in it. Indeed, McCarthy’s campaign nearly collapsed when he said that he would consider endorsing Humphrey if he changed his position on the war, and he had to quickly claim he was misquoted. McCarthy still had a latent fondness for Humphrey, and would later admit that if it came down to Humphrey or Kennedy at the convention that he would have backed Humphrey, despite him being publicly opposed to nearly all of his major policies in 1968. Bobby Kennedy had independently arrived at the same conclusion, and intended to support Humphrey over McCarthy if he could not be the nominee, such was their mutual loathing by the time of the Oregon primary.

[10] Indeed, Kennedy had such strong Latino support that César Chávez, the leader of the largely Latino United Farm Workers (UFW), temporarily suspended their strike so that they could focus their attention on campaigning for him. McCarthy supporters in the Latino community were ostracized. According to Chávez, when he saw twenty Latinos marching with McCarthy signs in East Los Angeles, “There must have been about a thousand people ready to skin them… you don’t do that in East L.A. or any place where there’s blacks and browns.”

[11] This is our Point of Divergence. Historically, Finney did not cover his tracks, and Lowell and a group of mutual friends found McCarthy at the Hilton, where he ended up doing barely any debate prep. Instead, he spent most of his day singing Irish folk songs. ITTL, McCarthy and Finney go through the entire debate prep undisturbed, while Lowell and company waited around Union Square looking for McCarthy.

[12] IOTL, McCarthy did not go on the attack in his opening statement. His accusation of Kennedy, “playing a prominent role in formulating positions that resulted in disastrous adventures” is from one of his speeches during the Oregon primary.

[13] Their respective voting records did not come up in the Vietnam section of the debate IOTL, but the rest of what McCarthy said, following “Secondly…” is verbatim.

[14] Verbatim.

[15] IOTL, McCarthy ended this back-and-forth with his criticism of McNamara, without tying it to Kennedy or his experience in the Senate.

[16] Verbatim.

[17] Verbatim.

[18] IOTL, McCarthy did not rebut Kennedy’s assertion that he was going to move ten thousand black people into Orange County, one of the most white and conservative counties in California. His reply here is based off of what McCarthy’s speechwriter, Jeremy Larner, had prepared for him as a reply to such an assertion by Kennedy in the debate prep that McCarthy did not do.

[19] Kennedy did indeed approve the wiretapping of Martin Luther King. In an attempt to hurt Kennedy in the California primary, J. Edgar Hoover leaked this information to the press shortly before the debate.

[20] Verbatim.

[21] IOTL, McCarthy was unable to come out with an adequate response to Kennedy’s response about playing with people’s reputations. Instead he came off as petulant when he started talking about how the Johnson Administration had been rude to the Foreign Relations Committee, and that he thought that Jack Kennedy had been “too kind to a number of people after the Bay of Pigs…”

[22] Verbatim.

[23] IOTL, the media believed the debate was a tie, the San Francisco phone-in poll gave it to Kennedy by two and a half-to one, and the statewide poll gave forty-five percent to Kennedy, while in the internal polling, white middle class suburban voters shifted dramatically from McCarthy to Kennedy.

[24] IOTL, the third bullet lodged in his brain, and was the one most responsible for killing Kennedy. ITTL, Uecker’s quick reaction had the shot go wild.

[25] Kennedy, in his right mind, never would have endorsed McCarthy. He would be more likely to do so while hopped up on painkillers and having a religious revelation at death’s door. If Kennedy had left the California primary defeated but unharmed, he would have, in all likelihood, tried to deadlock the convention to get himself chosen as a compromise candidate, and, failing that, throw it to Humphrey.
 
Last edited:
Presumably for Bobby Kennedy. His reaction ITTL is the same as IOTL. Later on IOTL, McCarthy alternated between accusing Kennedy of bringing his assassination on himself, and manic depressive episodes where he implied that he felt responsible for Kennedy's death because of how heated the primaries got.
Wow! Really shows how complex the man was.
 
One what if he'd run for reelection in 1970- a Humphrey - Mccarthy primary?
Two - what if he had been VP? Have had idea of VP openly challenging President but refusing to resign.
 
One what if he'd run for reelection in 1970- a Humphrey - Mccarthy primary?
McCarthy and Humphrey always had something of a love-hate relationship. I imagine that Humphrey would be hesitant to run against McCarthy in the Senate seat for personal reasons, and for fear that people would think he was doing it out of revenge. That being said, Humphrey doesn't really have anywhere else to go, politically speaking, except for the Senate or the governorship, and he never showed any interest in the governorship. Regardless, if it did come down to a primary in 1970, Humphrey would definitely beat McCarthy. Amongst Democratic voters, Humphrey was always more popular than McCarthy. As an example, in every poll held that was exclusive to Democrats in 1968, Humphrey outperformed McCarthy. Likewise, IOTL, the pro-McCarthy candidate in the 1970 primary, Earl D. Craig, got a mere twenty percent of the vote. While McCarthy would presumably have done better in a 1970 primary than Earl Craig, he almost definitely would have lost.

Two - what if he had been VP? Have had idea of VP openly challenging President but refusing to resign.
American politicians' stances on the Vietnam War were very much defined by their experience with protesters, government reports, and lobbyists. Dominic Sandbrook, McCarthy's biographer, argued that if he had been selected for the vice presidency in 1964, that he would have been just as hawkish as Humphrey was IOTL. He based this on the idea that McCarthy would be getting his news about Vietnam from the same flawed military reports that Johnson (and Humphrey) was receiving. That being said, I think that it would be likely for McCarthy to drift toward a dovish position even if he had been selected as vice president considering his moralistic and contrarian personality. It would have been entirely within his character to resign in protest (something even Humphrey considered doing IOTL in early August of 1968), though he may not have run for the presidency in this situation. I don't think he would have stayed in office while also running against Johnson.

As for Humphrey, he was basically excommunicated by Johnson for questioning the war policy in 1965, and had to brownose his way back into the President's good graces by backing the war completely for the next three years. Assuming Humphrey stayed in the Senate, he probably would have become a dove like McGovern, Kennedy, or Church, but was too much of a team player to run against Johnson in the primaries. IOTL, Bobby Kennedy ultimately decided that he would enter the Democratic primaries, no matter what, a few weeks before the New Hampshire primary. All other things being equal, the primaries would eventually come down to Johnson and Kennedy, and presuming Johnson still drops out, it would be down to a hawkish McCarthy and his surrogates against Kennedy, or Kennedy running unopposed, or Kennedy running against a dark horse like John Connally. Who knows, maybe I'll write a TLIAW about this someday. :p
 
Last edited:
Top