9/11 = Emergency Services Recognition Day
Good idea!
I wonder what day 7/11 would celebrate
9/11 = Emergency Services Recognition Day
Oh that's always been Free Slurpee DayGood idea!
I wonder what day 7/11 would celebrate?
John Kerry? I jestI wonder what running mate Edwards gets.
Max Baucus?John Kerry? I jest
Probably an older senator from the west or Northeast.
Could be. If Wellstone weren’t dead I’d say him.Max Baucus?
Though I am a bit disappointed that Al Gore didn't win the Democratic primaries, I do wonder what a Bush vs Edwards race will look like. This was a pretty interesting update.Part XXXIV Bullets & Ballots, Part 2
March 2nd would be the largest primary day of the calendar, 10 states would be holding their primaries and caucuses, and in one night over a quarter of the available delegates would be decided and divvied out between the two remaining serious candidates, Former Vice President Al Gore and Senator John Edwards, if either candidate came out significantly ahead of the other it would more than likely signal the end of the contest and decide the winner of the Democratic nomination.
There were many big prizes to be won on the night, including California and New York the two most populous states in the union, the whole country was represented with the new England region well-represented including Massachusetts, Vermont, and Rhode Island in the mix. The mid-west was also there with Ohio and Minnesota and the South would not be left out with Georgia, and the mix of D.C. white suburbanites and Baltimore African Americans that made up Maryland. The contest guaranteed to give the nation the chance to decide their preference.
There was no clear front-runner in the race, and polls teetered one way or the other in terms of the Democratic party's intentions. It was certain that both candidates were battling for every last vote, none comforted by their leads in each respective state. Looking at the map, Gore had an advantage in California and New York the ‘big enchiladas’ as the pundits put it, where the electorate and trends leaned in his favour. But Edwards's momentum was clearly felt as many Democrats stayed out of the endorsement game, clearly hedging their bets, but Gore still scored major endorsements from California Senator Dianne Feinstein and the Senatorial Spouse of his former boss Hilary Clinton, putting aside apparent animosity between the two, calling him “The greatest advisor, friend and indeed President you could ask for”. But Edwards continued to stun with the surprise endorsement of the editorial board of the nation's largest newspaper the New York Times, describing him as having “enormous discipline [making] a direct and genuinely emotional connection with people of all backgrounds. … who is easy to envision in the White House” The paper did praise Gore for his ability to communicate and that he was clearly very knowledgeable, suggesting he would make a perfect addition to any cabinet, but conceded that he was lacking in style and was hampered by the past and worries that a rematch between Gore and Bush would distract the country from today's issues, or to put a less kind columnists words to paper “Oh, boo hoo. This isn't about Al Gore's redemption. And it isn't a grudge match. The last thing we need now is a wallow in the past -- which a Gore nomination is almost certain to entail”.
In California with its mammoth 370 delegates, Gore had a lead where his newer liberal views found a more receptive audience. It was the first time that Californians would get a chance to have an important role in the nomination process since 1972. But both candidates campaigned in the state, and Edwards had built up a well-organized campaign, and pundits noted that despite California's leanings the state still had millions of moderate democrats and independents. “Even if Gore wins it, Edwards can't afford to give in, there are still many undecided,” said a Golden State pundit, California had recently become the centre of pollical controversy when San Francisco mayor Gavin Newsom had begun signing marriage licenses for same-sex couples, effectively legalizing same-sex marriage, and the stunt had even sparked the idea of the state legalizing the practice which according to polls a majority of Californians and Americans opposed.
Outside of the big prizes, Edwards held a stronger hand, in the mid-west area of Ohio and Minnesota, his message of economic populism, and reexamining trade deals played very well and he polled above Gore in both states. Ohio was a critical state and both candidates campaigned in the state but campaigning across the nation stretched Edward's campaign fairly thin.
The true toss-ups were Georgia, Maryland and the New England states. Gore had initially polled well with African American voters giving him a wide lead in the south, but Edwards's surge had made significant inroads with black voters and he remained attractive to southern more moderate white Democrats, despite Gore's background. Both candidates played to their southern roots ''I share the values that rural Southerners share; faith, family, and integrity. Those are the things I've believed in all my life” Said Edwards, while Gore took to the stages with as much energy he could muster and indulged a strong southern accent, outside of his usual statesman-like demeanour and talked about the importance of his faith while criticizing the Presidents ‘right-wing’ religion "If you elect me President, the voices of all faith-based organizations will be integral to the policies set forth in my administration.''. In New England, endorsements played a powerful role, Gore received the support of the popular former Vermont governor Howard Dean, while in Massachusetts Senator Ted Kennedy had endorsed John Edwards, boosting each in those respective states, but both candidates still stacked the airwaves with advertising to capture as many votes as possible Gores former running mate Connecticut Senator Joe Lieberman endorsed him, and despite Rhode Islands, usual low profile, both the candidate's spouses Tipper Gore and Elizabeth Edwards came to rally in the small state.
Democrats across the country were making their final decisions. “Everyones evaluating who can beat Bush?" Said one pundit, and with so many battleground states, the candidates were stretched thin across the country, the candidates were becoming clearly exhausted; months before the actual campaign had actually begun and both men raced against the clock to pull off, late in the game polling bounces. At the same time, it also became clear that President Bush was also ramping up his re-election campaign, as he began delivering his first campaign speeches and the first political adverts were hauled out touting the Presidents achievements, including his support for the energy industry information countering attacks fom Democrats on his climate policy (and Enron). But another elephant wandered into the room in the shape of Ralph Nader the green party candidate of 4 years prior, many Democrats still blamed him for siphoning off crucial Gore-leaning voters in Florida, and Nader declared that “the two-party duoplacy needs to be opposed” and called Washington D.C ‘corporate occupied territory in his announcement he was running.
Democrats across the country cast their ballots, as the candidates wrapped up their tours of the nation. With Gore in Atlanta and Edwards in New York each candidate framed themselves as the best way to beat George Bush, and rejuvenate the American economy with the options being ‘common sense experience’ or ‘fresh-faced energy’
View attachment 780697The polls mostly bore out, despite the results being close, in terms of delegates, states and popular vote, Senator John Edwards had come out ahead of former Vice President Al Gore. His insurgent campaign pulled off a number of close victories once seen as an impossibility, in states across the country Massachusetts, Ohio, Georgia, and the greatest of the night California! where Gore had enjoyed a polling lead. An exultant Edwards stepped out “This was a dog fight, but we bite harder than their bark” The visibly tired senator’s voice began to grow hoarse toward the end of his speech "The truth is I may be losing my voice, but you haven't lost yours, thank you".
Super Tuesday Results
View attachment 780696
State results following Super Tuesday
But Gore wasn’t out yet, he still held the delegate lead thanks to Superdelegates, and at his own rally he celebrated “Thank you for your votes to empower Americans healthcare, for building and training green collar jobs, and against tax cuts for the wealthy and votes for reclaiming American leadership, so it was and so it shall be again.” The final showdown between the candidates would begin in a number of southern states.
But despite Gore’s optimistic outlook the polls began to truly turn against him, Edwards awash in the warm glow of his victories gained a substantial polling bounce. His support inside the Democratic party widened expanding his winning coalition. Additional surveys came in the days after Super Tuesday that confirmed public perceptions of the two candidates, Edwards was seen as the more favourable candidate and for the first time, several polls showed him beating Bush in the general election by several points. Edward's victory in Georgia was also a key indicator of his growing support from black voters, combined with his support from moderate voters.
View attachment 780695
(Left) celebratory rally for John Edwards and (right) Al Gore on Super Tuesday
The next round of states were all southern ones, where both Edwards and Gore tried to claim the home advantage. The North Carolinian and the Tennesean both attempted to woo the electorates, especially in the wide plains of texas Texas where Gore saw his best chance to prove the pollsters wrong and win back the momentum of the race At a rally in San Antonio, Mr. Gore went after the President seeking to counter claims that he was too liberal and planning to raise taxes “These are scare tactics, and I think it a shame that the president has already departed from the truth”. All candidates were also making eager efforts to expand their share of the growing Hispanic voting base, with the President meeting with the Mexican president Vicente Fox, while John Edwards made his pitch by highlighting his family values and support for growing the American Dream to immigrants, while Gore flexed his bilingual prowess ''I say to you tonight, 'Todavia no han visto nada,' '' Mr Gore said. ''You ain't seen nothing yet.'' And focused on his values of education and healthcare, Gore’s struggle to appeal to Hispanic voters compared to President Clinton had been a significant factor in his loss in 2000 loss (And losing California).
On what was dubbed 'Southern Tuesday' the democratic party voted again, what originally looked like a close night for the candidates turned into a southern sweep for Edwards who cleaned up, winning every state competition, only losing American Samoa which offered only 3 total delegates, in the big ticket items of Texas and Florida Edwards had trounced Gore by wide margins. It was an unforgettable moment for the Edwards campaign signifying that he had won his greatest victory “If I am smiling, its because this campaign has only just begun” With his wife and children by his side he thanked the glowing crowd and exited the stage the clear frontrunner for the Democratic nomination
There was now no room for error in the Gore campaign if he were to somehow turn back the tide but the evidence was pouring in that Democrats had made up their minds on who they thought could best beat Bush. A further round of polling doubled down on Edward's advantages, his favourably and his electability inflated while Gore’s numbers sagged. Gore’s campaigners began to irk about a lack of discipline, and a general lack of morale as Democratic insiders, one by one refused to give their support to the candidate and after a few more contests in March, Gore’s chances were becoming increasingly impossible to overcome, and his favours continued to drop following two painful losses in Kansas then the delegate-rich Illinois (a major Gore must win) only 3 days later.
The headlines were becoming harsher and harsher, each pronouncing Gore’s second run for the presidency dead in the water “Al Gore is as good as dead … there is no good news on the horizon as Democrats seem to have increasingly made up their mind on their preferred choice for the nominee and the democratic leadership is anxious to consolidate in preparation for a long and expensive campaign against the sitting President Bush” - Slate.com: The Gore Finale? The delegate math technically panned out, if Gore could pull off a series of crushing victories pending a swift implosion of the Edwards campaign, the candidate had encouraging words for his supporters “We are fighting for a sane government that can make smart decisions and right now that is what this campaign continues to be about” but more and more the wind was blowing the other direction.
It looked as if Democrats had settled on the candidate of choice. Gore still fought on, winning victories in smaller states, and territories, including Alaska and the Democrats abroad, but following several superdelegate shifts and another Edwards victory in Wyoming, It was clear that the writing was on the wall. Following a few days of political pondering, Gore officially withdrew from the Democratic race for President, and urged his supporters to back his former rival John Edwards in the November election “This is a bitter day, some have accused this campaign of being about the past, but we know that this was always about the future … I want to thank you as Democrats for the honor of being your nominee for president four years ago and I want to thank everyone for joining me again today and I want all of you to help John Edwards be the next president of the United States.”
Following Gore’s endorsement, Senator John Edwards gave a speech for the first time as the presumptive Democratic nominee “I want to thank Al Gore for his decades of service both for the Democratic party and our country, for many he represents the distinguished soul of the party and has inspired thousands to enter public service” But he also opened his first blistering attacks on the White House previewing the general election to come “We can't kid ourselves, with the Republican attack machine and their bag of dirty tricks we don’t know what they are willing to do, but I can promise you that together I have no doubt that we will defeat them, that with your help were on a one way ticket to the White House!”
Any dissection of the 2004 Democratic nomination, usually centres on the failure of the Gore campaign, Gore widely tipped for the nomination following his 2000 narrow defeat had seemingly snatched defeat from the jaws of victory and sent Democrats into the arms of the upstart Edwards. His campaign suffered from a severe lack of enthusiasm from Democratic insiders and though he maintained a strong following among the party's more ideological activists, his major selling point, his experience had become a turnoff for many voters. He was polarizing to many and had a high unfavourability rating, and attracted strong media scrutiny. and perhaps the biggest blow was the stain of already losing a presidential election. Many Americans were prepared to move on from the election of 2000 and many Americans desperately hoped to avoid a rematch. This was compared to Edward's campaign, a longshot, grassroots campaign that focused on attracting the centre of the Democratic party into its ranks, once he emerged as the best non-Gore candidate, the party was quick to attach itself to his candidacy.[1]
View attachment 780693
2004 Democratic Party Presidential Primaries final results
View attachment 780701
(Left) 2000 Democratic Nominee former Vice President Al Gore
(Right) 2004 Democratic Nominee Senator John Edwards
New York arrests, 'foil cyanide plot'Associated PressTue 18 Mar 2004 11.16 BSTThe mayor of New York, Mark Green, today said that a potential terrorist attack on the New York City subway station had been averted, with the arrest of 6 men and the seizure of several chemicals that when combined form the deadly hydrogen cyanide gas.The suspects, who allegedly were linked with radical Islamic terror groups including Al-Qaeda, the Afghanistan-based terror organisation responsible for the bombing of an American military base last year and several attempted plane hijackings 2 years ago, had planned to build devices capable of spreading the gas across the New York City subway system, Mr Green said."We have prevented a serious attack on the level of the World Trade Center bombing” police Commissioner Raymond Kelly said, referring to the 1993 truck bomb at the base of the north tower, in which 6 people died and 1000 were injured saying that such an attack could result in serious illness and even death.[2]Police claim they disrupted the plot when neighbours of one of the arrested an American José Padilla, they reported strange activity including strong chemical odours, loud phone conversations and once a fire. Padilla according to reports had travelled from the U.S. to the Afghanistan region multiple times where he is suspected of establishing contact with several terrorist organisations including undergoing training in building chemical and explosive weaponry.Other members of the plot included three British-born men of Pakistani descent, and two other Americans from New York State with Yemeni backgrounds all accused of holding connections to several Islamic terror groups including the east Asian group Jemaah Islamiyah, and the prominent so-called ‘freelance terrorist’ Khalid Shaikh Mohammed accused of plotting numerous attacks against the U.S. who is believed to be residing in Taliban controlled AfghanistanThe head of the CIA who aided New York police in the investigation, George Tenet, said that the suspects had trained with numerous terrorist groups and that. "Most of them know how to prepare improvised explosive devices," he told reporters.The suspects were arrested in a series of raids in the city of New York. The suspects had been under surveillance for weeks, Tenet said. They were being held on multiple attempted murder and conspiracy charges.Mr Green said that the evidence against the four detainees was "strong and airtight", adding that follow-up operations were underway. "Let no one underestimate our determination to keep New York and New Yorkers safe," he said.Chemical weaponry has occasionally been used by terror groups before, most notoriously there was an attack on Japan's Tokyo subway system by a religious cult using the nerve agent sarin killing 12 people and injuring hundreds. Inside the United States only months ago a plot by white supremacists to attack government buildings in Texas included a home-built cyanide gas bomb, but the plot was disrupted by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms[3]The arrests have brought some criticism from civil rights groups who claim that some of the tactics used by police, including heavy surveillance, represented a possible abuse of authority …
(Left) Arrested 'cyanide plot' suspect José Padilla [4] (Right) the devices created to distribute the chemicals
[1] Gore didn't run in 2000 because he thought George Bush was too popular at the time. Sadly for Gore I agree with his OTL decision political comebacks in US politics are rare and I generally refer to Patton's quote "Americans love a winner and will not tolerate a loser". Perhaps Gore is special because he could legitimately claim he had actually won the 2000 election but my mind immediately goes to imagining if Hillary Clinton had tried to run in 2020 or Humphrey's run in 72
[2] There is little hard evidence for this plot and has only been referenced in several memoirs claiming that the plot was cancelled by Al-Qaeda leadership for several reasons. I have serious doubts as to the actual potential success of such a plot (chemical weapons are harder to construct and are less deadly than conventional explosives) but TTLs leader of AL Qaida was more focused on chemical and biological weaponry so they attempt to carry out the plot only for it to be dismantled in its preparatory stage
[3] A real plot that was overshadowed by the war on terror and the name was changed to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives after 9/11
[4] Jose Padilla is the 'terrorist' who famously attempted to build a nuclear bomb by following a parody guide that included "putting uranium in buckets and spinning them clockwise over your head" ITTL his plan is less audacious but just as unsuccessful
Sad that Gore didn't get the nomination. I don't really have much of an opinion on Edwards though I am interested in who his running mate will be and how he will do against George Bush in the election. Great writing.Part XXXIV Bullets & Ballots, Part 2
March 2nd would be the largest primary day of the calendar, 10 states would be holding their primaries and caucuses, and in one night over a quarter of the available delegates would be decided and divvied out between the two remaining serious candidates, Former Vice President Al Gore and Senator John Edwards, if either candidate came out significantly ahead of the other it would more than likely signal the end of the contest and decide the winner of the Democratic nomination.
There were many big prizes to be won on the night, including California and New York the two most populous states in the union, the whole country was represented with the new England region well-represented including Massachusetts, Vermont, and Rhode Island in the mix. The mid-west was also there with Ohio and Minnesota and the South would not be left out with Georgia, and the mix of D.C. white suburbanites and Baltimore African Americans that made up Maryland. The contest guaranteed to give the nation the chance to decide their preference.
There was no clear front-runner in the race, and polls teetered one way or the other in terms of the Democratic party's intentions. It was certain that both candidates were battling for every last vote, none comforted by their leads in each respective state. Looking at the map, Gore had an advantage in California and New York the ‘big enchiladas’ as the pundits put it, where the electorate and trends leaned in his favour. But Edwards's momentum was clearly felt as many Democrats stayed out of the endorsement game, clearly hedging their bets, but Gore still scored major endorsements from California Senator Dianne Feinstein and the Senatorial Spouse of his former boss Hilary Clinton, putting aside apparent animosity between the two, calling him “The greatest advisor, friend and indeed President you could ask for”. But Edwards continued to stun with the surprise endorsement of the editorial board of the nation's largest newspaper the New York Times, describing him as having “enormous discipline [making] a direct and genuinely emotional connection with people of all backgrounds. … who is easy to envision in the White House” The paper did praise Gore for his ability to communicate and that he was clearly very knowledgeable, suggesting he would make a perfect addition to any cabinet, but conceded that he was lacking in style and was hampered by the past and worries that a rematch between Gore and Bush would distract the country from today's issues, or to put a less kind columnists words to paper “Oh, boo hoo. This isn't about Al Gore's redemption. And it isn't a grudge match. The last thing we need now is a wallow in the past -- which a Gore nomination is almost certain to entail”.
In California with its mammoth 370 delegates, Gore had a lead where his newer liberal views found a more receptive audience. It was the first time that Californians would get a chance to have an important role in the nomination process since 1972. But both candidates campaigned in the state, and Edwards had built up a well-organized campaign, and pundits noted that despite California's leanings the state still had millions of moderate democrats and independents. “Even if Gore wins it, Edwards can't afford to give in, there are still many undecided,” said a Golden State pundit, California had recently become the centre of pollical controversy when San Francisco mayor Gavin Newsom had begun signing marriage licenses for same-sex couples, effectively legalizing same-sex marriage, and the stunt had even sparked the idea of the state legalizing the practice which according to polls a majority of Californians and Americans opposed.
Outside of the big prizes, Edwards held a stronger hand, in the mid-west area of Ohio and Minnesota, his message of economic populism, and reexamining trade deals played very well and he polled above Gore in both states. Ohio was a critical state and both candidates campaigned in the state but campaigning across the nation stretched Edward's campaign fairly thin.
The true toss-ups were Georgia, Maryland and the New England states. Gore had initially polled well with African American voters giving him a wide lead in the south, but Edwards's surge had made significant inroads with black voters and he remained attractive to southern more moderate white Democrats, despite Gore's background. Both candidates played to their southern roots ''I share the values that rural Southerners share; faith, family, and integrity. Those are the things I've believed in all my life” Said Edwards, while Gore took to the stages with as much energy he could muster and indulged a strong southern accent, outside of his usual statesman-like demeanour and talked about the importance of his faith while criticizing the Presidents ‘right-wing’ religion "If you elect me President, the voices of all faith-based organizations will be integral to the policies set forth in my administration.''. In New England, endorsements played a powerful role, Gore received the support of the popular former Vermont governor Howard Dean, while in Massachusetts Senator Ted Kennedy had endorsed John Edwards, boosting each in those respective states, but both candidates still stacked the airwaves with advertising to capture as many votes as possible Gores former running mate Connecticut Senator Joe Lieberman endorsed him, and despite Rhode Islands, usual low profile, both the candidate's spouses Tipper Gore and Elizabeth Edwards came to rally in the small state.
Democrats across the country were making their final decisions. “Everyones evaluating who can beat Bush?" Said one pundit, and with so many battleground states, the candidates were stretched thin across the country, the candidates were becoming clearly exhausted; months before the actual campaign had actually begun and both men raced against the clock to pull off, late in the game polling bounces. At the same time, it also became clear that President Bush was also ramping up his re-election campaign, as he began delivering his first campaign speeches and the first political adverts were hauled out touting the Presidents achievements, including his support for the energy industry information countering attacks fom Democrats on his climate policy (and Enron). But another elephant wandered into the room in the shape of Ralph Nader the green party candidate of 4 years prior, many Democrats still blamed him for siphoning off crucial Gore-leaning voters in Florida, and Nader declared that “the two-party duoplacy needs to be opposed” and called Washington D.C ‘corporate occupied territory in his announcement he was running.
Democrats across the country cast their ballots, as the candidates wrapped up their tours of the nation. With Gore in Atlanta and Edwards in New York each candidate framed themselves as the best way to beat George Bush, and rejuvenate the American economy with the options being ‘common sense experience’ or ‘fresh-faced energy’
View attachment 780697The polls mostly bore out, despite the results being close, in terms of delegates, states and popular vote, Senator John Edwards had come out ahead of former Vice President Al Gore. His insurgent campaign pulled off a number of close victories once seen as an impossibility, in states across the country Massachusetts, Ohio, Georgia, and the greatest of the night California! where Gore had enjoyed a polling lead. An exultant Edwards stepped out “This was a dog fight, but we bite harder than their bark” The visibly tired senator’s voice began to grow hoarse toward the end of his speech "The truth is I may be losing my voice, but you haven't lost yours, thank you".
Super Tuesday Results
View attachment 780696
State results following Super Tuesday
But Gore wasn’t out yet, he still held the delegate lead thanks to Superdelegates, and at his own rally he celebrated “Thank you for your votes to empower Americans healthcare, for building and training green collar jobs, and against tax cuts for the wealthy and votes for reclaiming American leadership, so it was and so it shall be again.” The final showdown between the candidates would begin in a number of southern states.
But despite Gore’s optimistic outlook the polls began to truly turn against him, Edwards awash in the warm glow of his victories gained a substantial polling bounce. His support inside the Democratic party widened expanding his winning coalition. Additional surveys came in the days after Super Tuesday that confirmed public perceptions of the two candidates, Edwards was seen as the more favourable candidate and for the first time, several polls showed him beating Bush in the general election by several points. Edward's victory in Georgia was also a key indicator of his growing support from black voters, combined with his support from moderate voters.
View attachment 780695
(Left) celebratory rally for John Edwards and (right) Al Gore on Super Tuesday
The next round of states were all southern ones, where both Edwards and Gore tried to claim the home advantage. The North Carolinian and the Tennesean both attempted to woo the electorates, especially in the wide plains of texas Texas where Gore saw his best chance to prove the pollsters wrong and win back the momentum of the race At a rally in San Antonio, Mr. Gore went after the President seeking to counter claims that he was too liberal and planning to raise taxes “These are scare tactics, and I think it a shame that the president has already departed from the truth”. All candidates were also making eager efforts to expand their share of the growing Hispanic voting base, with the President meeting with the Mexican president Vicente Fox, while John Edwards made his pitch by highlighting his family values and support for growing the American Dream to immigrants, while Gore flexed his bilingual prowess ''I say to you tonight, 'Todavia no han visto nada,' '' Mr Gore said. ''You ain't seen nothing yet.'' And focused on his values of education and healthcare, Gore’s struggle to appeal to Hispanic voters compared to President Clinton had been a significant factor in his loss in 2000 loss (And losing California).
On what was dubbed 'Southern Tuesday' the democratic party voted again, what originally looked like a close night for the candidates turned into a southern sweep for Edwards who cleaned up, winning every state competition, only losing American Samoa which offered only 3 total delegates, in the big ticket items of Texas and Florida Edwards had trounced Gore by wide margins. It was an unforgettable moment for the Edwards campaign signifying that he had won his greatest victory “If I am smiling, its because this campaign has only just begun” With his wife and children by his side he thanked the glowing crowd and exited the stage the clear frontrunner for the Democratic nomination
There was now no room for error in the Gore campaign if he were to somehow turn back the tide but the evidence was pouring in that Democrats had made up their minds on who they thought could best beat Bush. A further round of polling doubled down on Edward's advantages, his favourably and his electability inflated while Gore’s numbers sagged. Gore’s campaigners began to irk about a lack of discipline, and a general lack of morale as Democratic insiders, one by one refused to give their support to the candidate and after a few more contests in March, Gore’s chances were becoming increasingly impossible to overcome, and his favours continued to drop following two painful losses in Kansas then the delegate-rich Illinois (a major Gore must win) only 3 days later.
The headlines were becoming harsher and harsher, each pronouncing Gore’s second run for the presidency dead in the water “Al Gore is as good as dead … there is no good news on the horizon as Democrats seem to have increasingly made up their mind on their preferred choice for the nominee and the democratic leadership is anxious to consolidate in preparation for a long and expensive campaign against the sitting President Bush” - Slate.com: The Gore Finale? The delegate math technically panned out, if Gore could pull off a series of crushing victories pending a swift implosion of the Edwards campaign, the candidate had encouraging words for his supporters “We are fighting for a sane government that can make smart decisions and right now that is what this campaign continues to be about” but more and more the wind was blowing the other direction.
It looked as if Democrats had settled on the candidate of choice. Gore still fought on, winning victories in smaller states, and territories, including Alaska and the Democrats abroad, but following several superdelegate shifts and another Edwards victory in Wyoming, It was clear that the writing was on the wall. Following a few days of political pondering, Gore officially withdrew from the Democratic race for President, and urged his supporters to back his former rival John Edwards in the November election “This is a bitter day, some have accused this campaign of being about the past, but we know that this was always about the future … I want to thank you as Democrats for the honor of being your nominee for president four years ago and I want to thank everyone for joining me again today and I want all of you to help John Edwards be the next president of the United States.”
Following Gore’s endorsement, Senator John Edwards gave a speech for the first time as the presumptive Democratic nominee “I want to thank Al Gore for his decades of service both for the Democratic party and our country, for many he represents the distinguished soul of the party and has inspired thousands to enter public service” But he also opened his first blistering attacks on the White House previewing the general election to come “We can't kid ourselves, with the Republican attack machine and their bag of dirty tricks we don’t know what they are willing to do, but I can promise you that together I have no doubt that we will defeat them, that with your help were on a one way ticket to the White House!”
Any dissection of the 2004 Democratic nomination, usually centres on the failure of the Gore campaign, Gore widely tipped for the nomination following his 2000 narrow defeat had seemingly snatched defeat from the jaws of victory and sent Democrats into the arms of the upstart Edwards. His campaign suffered from a severe lack of enthusiasm from Democratic insiders and though he maintained a strong following among the party's more ideological activists, his major selling point, his experience had become a turnoff for many voters. He was polarizing to many and had a high unfavourability rating, and attracted strong media scrutiny. and perhaps the biggest blow was the stain of already losing a presidential election. Many Americans were prepared to move on from the election of 2000 and many Americans desperately hoped to avoid a rematch. This was compared to Edward's campaign, a longshot, grassroots campaign that focused on attracting the centre of the Democratic party into its ranks, once he emerged as the best non-Gore candidate, the party was quick to attach itself to his candidacy.[1]
View attachment 780693
2004 Democratic Party Presidential Primaries final results
View attachment 780701
(Left) 2000 Democratic Nominee former Vice President Al Gore
(Right) 2004 Democratic Nominee Senator John Edwards
New York arrests, 'foil cyanide plot'Associated PressTue 18 Mar 2004 11.16 BSTThe mayor of New York, Mark Green, today said that a potential terrorist attack on the New York City subway station had been averted, with the arrest of 6 men and the seizure of several chemicals that when combined form the deadly hydrogen cyanide gas.The suspects, who allegedly were linked with radical Islamic terror groups including Al-Qaeda, the Afghanistan-based terror organisation responsible for the bombing of an American military base last year and several attempted plane hijackings 2 years ago, had planned to build devices capable of spreading the gas across the New York City subway system, Mr Green said."We have prevented a serious attack on the level of the World Trade Center bombing” police Commissioner Raymond Kelly said, referring to the 1993 truck bomb at the base of the north tower, in which 6 people died and 1000 were injured saying that such an attack could result in serious illness and even death.[2]Police claim they disrupted the plot when neighbours of one of the arrested an American José Padilla, they reported strange activity including strong chemical odours, loud phone conversations and once a fire. Padilla according to reports had travelled from the U.S. to the Afghanistan region multiple times where he is suspected of establishing contact with several terrorist organisations including undergoing training in building chemical and explosive weaponry.Other members of the plot included three British-born men of Pakistani descent, and two other Americans from New York State with Yemeni backgrounds all accused of holding connections to several Islamic terror groups including the east Asian group Jemaah Islamiyah, and the prominent so-called ‘freelance terrorist’ Khalid Shaikh Mohammed accused of plotting numerous attacks against the U.S. who is believed to be residing in Taliban controlled AfghanistanThe head of the CIA who aided New York police in the investigation, George Tenet, said that the suspects had trained with numerous terrorist groups and that. "Most of them know how to prepare improvised explosive devices," he told reporters.The suspects were arrested in a series of raids in the city of New York. The suspects had been under surveillance for weeks, Tenet said. They were being held on multiple attempted murder and conspiracy charges.Mr Green said that the evidence against the four detainees was "strong and airtight", adding that follow-up operations were underway. "Let no one underestimate our determination to keep New York and New Yorkers safe," he said.Chemical weaponry has occasionally been used by terror groups before, most notoriously there was an attack on Japan's Tokyo subway system by a religious cult using the nerve agent sarin killing 12 people and injuring hundreds. Inside the United States only months ago a plot by white supremacists to attack government buildings in Texas included a home-built cyanide gas bomb, but the plot was disrupted by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms[3]The arrests have brought some criticism from civil rights groups who claim that some of the tactics used by police, including heavy surveillance, represented a possible abuse of authority …
(Left) Arrested 'cyanide plot' suspect José Padilla [4] (Right) the devices created to distribute the chemicals
[1] Gore didn't run in 2000 because he thought George Bush was too popular at the time. Sadly for Gore I agree with his OTL decision political comebacks in US politics are rare and I generally refer to Patton's quote "Americans love a winner and will not tolerate a loser". Perhaps Gore is special because he could legitimately claim he had actually won the 2000 election but my mind immediately goes to imagining if Hillary Clinton had tried to run in 2016 or Humprhey's run in 72
[2] There is little hard evidence for this plot and has only been referenced in several memoirs claiming that the plot was cancelled by Al-Qaeda leadership for several reasons. I have serious doubts as to the actual potential success of such a plot (chemical weapons are harder to construct and are less deadly than conventional explosives) but TTLs leader of AL Qaida was more focused on chemical and biological weaponry so they attempt to carry out the plot only for it to be dismantled in its preparatory stage
[3] A real plot that was overshadowed by the war on terror and the name was changed to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives after 9/11
[4] Jose Padilla is the 'terrorist' who famously attempted to build a nuclear bomb by following a parody guide that included "putting uranium in buckets and spinning them clockwise over your head" ITTL his plan is less audacious but just as unsuccessful
Though I am a bit disappointed that Al Gore didn't win the Democratic primaries, I do wonder what a Bush vs Edwards race will look like. This was a pretty interesting update.
Either way, your timeline's version of JibJab's This Land will look different with John Edwards as the Democratic nominee instead of John Kerry and without the War on Terror (assuming it still gets made). I do wonder who Edwards will choose as his running mate.
18 years ago and the 2000s in general seem like ancient history with how everything is nowadays. God how I miss the old days.God, I'm old I remember watching that when it was new. I loved the update I really like this world I'm curious how it's going to end up thanks for the awesome work.
Uh, John Edwards got the Democratic nomination in this timeline and was the running mate for John Kerry in the OTL 2004 US presidential election.John Edwards as running mate. Thought it would be Bob Graham
A Gore comeback bid in 2004 or 2008 probably would fare about what the same in the primaries as in your timeline.Part XXXIV Bullets & Ballots, Part 2
March 2nd would be the largest primary day of the calendar, 10 states would be holding their primaries and caucuses, and in one night over a quarter of the available delegates would be decided and divvied out between the two remaining serious candidates, Former Vice President Al Gore and Senator John Edwards, if either candidate came out significantly ahead of the other it would more than likely signal the end of the contest and decide the winner of the Democratic nomination.
There were many big prizes to be won on the night, including California and New York the two most populous states in the union, the whole country was represented with the new England region well-represented including Massachusetts, Vermont, and Rhode Island in the mix. The mid-west was also there with Ohio and Minnesota and the South would not be left out with Georgia, and the mix of D.C. white suburbanites and Baltimore African Americans that made up Maryland. The contest guaranteed to give the nation the chance to decide their preference.
There was no clear front-runner in the race, and polls teetered one way or the other in terms of the Democratic party's intentions. It was certain that both candidates were battling for every last vote, none comforted by their leads in each respective state. Looking at the map, Gore had an advantage in California and New York the ‘big enchiladas’ as the pundits put it, where the electorate and trends leaned in his favour. But Edwards's momentum was clearly felt as many Democrats stayed out of the endorsement game, clearly hedging their bets, but Gore still scored major endorsements from California Senator Dianne Feinstein and the Senatorial Spouse of his former boss Hilary Clinton, putting aside apparent animosity between the two, calling him “The greatest advisor, friend and indeed President you could ask for”. But Edwards continued to stun with the surprise endorsement of the editorial board of the nation's largest newspaper the New York Times, describing him as having “enormous discipline [making] a direct and genuinely emotional connection with people of all backgrounds. … who is easy to envision in the White House” The paper did praise Gore for his ability to communicate and that he was clearly very knowledgeable, suggesting he would make a perfect addition to any cabinet, but conceded that he was lacking in style and was hampered by the past and worries that a rematch between Gore and Bush would distract the country from today's issues, or to put a less kind columnists words to paper “Oh, boo hoo. This isn't about Al Gore's redemption. And it isn't a grudge match. The last thing we need now is a wallow in the past -- which a Gore nomination is almost certain to entail”.
In California with its mammoth 370 delegates, Gore had a lead where his newer liberal views found a more receptive audience. It was the first time that Californians would get a chance to have an important role in the nomination process since 1972. But both candidates campaigned in the state, and Edwards had built up a well-organized campaign, and pundits noted that despite California's leanings the state still had millions of moderate democrats and independents. “Even if Gore wins it, Edwards can't afford to give in, there are still many undecided,” said a Golden State pundit, California had recently become the centre of pollical controversy when San Francisco mayor Gavin Newsom had begun signing marriage licenses for same-sex couples, effectively legalizing same-sex marriage, and the stunt had even sparked the idea of the state legalizing the practice which according to polls a majority of Californians and Americans opposed.
Outside of the big prizes, Edwards held a stronger hand, in the mid-west area of Ohio and Minnesota, his message of economic populism, and reexamining trade deals played very well and he polled above Gore in both states. Ohio was a critical state and both candidates campaigned in the state but campaigning across the nation stretched Edward's campaign fairly thin.
The true toss-ups were Georgia, Maryland and the New England states. Gore had initially polled well with African American voters giving him a wide lead in the south, but Edwards's surge had made significant inroads with black voters and he remained attractive to southern more moderate white Democrats, despite Gore's background. Both candidates played to their southern roots ''I share the values that rural Southerners share; faith, family, and integrity. Those are the things I've believed in all my life” Said Edwards, while Gore took to the stages with as much energy he could muster and indulged a strong southern accent, outside of his usual statesman-like demeanour and talked about the importance of his faith while criticizing the Presidents ‘right-wing’ religion "If you elect me President, the voices of all faith-based organizations will be integral to the policies set forth in my administration.''. In New England, endorsements played a powerful role, Gore received the support of the popular former Vermont governor Howard Dean, while in Massachusetts Senator Ted Kennedy had endorsed John Edwards, boosting each in those respective states, but both candidates still stacked the airwaves with advertising to capture as many votes as possible Gores former running mate Connecticut Senator Joe Lieberman endorsed him, and despite Rhode Islands, usual low profile, both the candidate's spouses Tipper Gore and Elizabeth Edwards came to rally in the small state.
Democrats across the country were making their final decisions. “Everyones evaluating who can beat Bush?" Said one pundit, and with so many battleground states, the candidates were stretched thin across the country, the candidates were becoming clearly exhausted; months before the actual campaign had actually begun and both men raced against the clock to pull off, late in the game polling bounces. At the same time, it also became clear that President Bush was also ramping up his re-election campaign, as he began delivering his first campaign speeches and the first political adverts were hauled out touting the Presidents achievements, including his support for the energy industry information countering attacks fom Democrats on his climate policy (and Enron). But another elephant wandered into the room in the shape of Ralph Nader the green party candidate of 4 years prior, many Democrats still blamed him for siphoning off crucial Gore-leaning voters in Florida, and Nader declared that “the two-party duoplacy needs to be opposed” and called Washington D.C ‘corporate occupied territory in his announcement he was running.
Democrats across the country cast their ballots, as the candidates wrapped up their tours of the nation. With Gore in Atlanta and Edwards in New York each candidate framed themselves as the best way to beat George Bush, and rejuvenate the American economy with the options being ‘common sense experience’ or ‘fresh-faced energy’
View attachment 780697The polls mostly bore out, despite the results being close, in terms of delegates, states and popular vote, Senator John Edwards had come out ahead of former Vice President Al Gore. His insurgent campaign pulled off a number of close victories once seen as an impossibility, in states across the country Massachusetts, Ohio, Georgia, and the greatest of the night California! where Gore had enjoyed a polling lead. An exultant Edwards stepped out “This was a dog fight, but we bite harder than their bark” The visibly tired senator’s voice began to grow hoarse toward the end of his speech "The truth is I may be losing my voice, but you haven't lost yours, thank you".
Super Tuesday Results
View attachment 780696
State results following Super Tuesday
But Gore wasn’t out yet, he still held the delegate lead thanks to Superdelegates, and at his own rally he celebrated “Thank you for your votes to empower Americans healthcare, for building and training green collar jobs, and against tax cuts for the wealthy and votes for reclaiming American leadership, so it was and so it shall be again.” The final showdown between the candidates would begin in a number of southern states.
But despite Gore’s optimistic outlook the polls began to truly turn against him, Edwards awash in the warm glow of his victories gained a substantial polling bounce. His support inside the Democratic party widened expanding his winning coalition. Additional surveys came in the days after Super Tuesday that confirmed public perceptions of the two candidates, Edwards was seen as the more favourable candidate and for the first time, several polls showed him beating Bush in the general election by several points. Edward's victory in Georgia was also a key indicator of his growing support from black voters, combined with his support from moderate voters.
View attachment 780695
(Left) celebratory rally for John Edwards and (right) Al Gore on Super Tuesday
The next round of states were all southern ones, where both Edwards and Gore tried to claim the home advantage. The North Carolinian and the Tennesean both attempted to woo the electorates, especially in the wide plains of texas Texas where Gore saw his best chance to prove the pollsters wrong and win back the momentum of the race At a rally in San Antonio, Mr. Gore went after the President seeking to counter claims that he was too liberal and planning to raise taxes “These are scare tactics, and I think it a shame that the president has already departed from the truth”. All candidates were also making eager efforts to expand their share of the growing Hispanic voting base, with the President meeting with the Mexican president Vicente Fox, while John Edwards made his pitch by highlighting his family values and support for growing the American Dream to immigrants, while Gore flexed his bilingual prowess ''I say to you tonight, 'Todavia no han visto nada,' '' Mr Gore said. ''You ain't seen nothing yet.'' And focused on his values of education and healthcare, Gore’s struggle to appeal to Hispanic voters compared to President Clinton had been a significant factor in his loss in 2000 loss (And losing California).
On what was dubbed 'Southern Tuesday' the democratic party voted again, what originally looked like a close night for the candidates turned into a southern sweep for Edwards who cleaned up, winning every state competition, only losing American Samoa which offered only 3 total delegates, in the big ticket items of Texas and Florida Edwards had trounced Gore by wide margins. It was an unforgettable moment for the Edwards campaign signifying that he had won his greatest victory “If I am smiling, its because this campaign has only just begun” With his wife and children by his side he thanked the glowing crowd and exited the stage the clear frontrunner for the Democratic nomination
There was now no room for error in the Gore campaign if he were to somehow turn back the tide but the evidence was pouring in that Democrats had made up their minds on who they thought could best beat Bush. A further round of polling doubled down on Edward's advantages, his favourably and his electability inflated while Gore’s numbers sagged. Gore’s campaigners began to irk about a lack of discipline, and a general lack of morale as Democratic insiders, one by one refused to give their support to the candidate and after a few more contests in March, Gore’s chances were becoming increasingly impossible to overcome, and his favours continued to drop following two painful losses in Kansas then the delegate-rich Illinois (a major Gore must win) only 3 days later.
The headlines were becoming harsher and harsher, each pronouncing Gore’s second run for the presidency dead in the water “Al Gore is as good as dead … there is no good news on the horizon as Democrats seem to have increasingly made up their mind on their preferred choice for the nominee and the democratic leadership is anxious to consolidate in preparation for a long and expensive campaign against the sitting President Bush” - Slate.com: The Gore Finale? The delegate math technically panned out, if Gore could pull off a series of crushing victories pending a swift implosion of the Edwards campaign, the candidate had encouraging words for his supporters “We are fighting for a sane government that can make smart decisions and right now that is what this campaign continues to be about” but more and more the wind was blowing the other direction.
It looked as if Democrats had settled on the candidate of choice. Gore still fought on, winning victories in smaller states, and territories, including Alaska and the Democrats abroad, but following several superdelegate shifts and another Edwards victory in Wyoming, It was clear that the writing was on the wall. Following a few days of political pondering, Gore officially withdrew from the Democratic race for President, and urged his supporters to back his former rival John Edwards in the November election “This is a bitter day, some have accused this campaign of being about the past, but we know that this was always about the future … I want to thank you as Democrats for the honor of being your nominee for president four years ago and I want to thank everyone for joining me again today and I want all of you to help John Edwards be the next president of the United States.”
Following Gore’s endorsement, Senator John Edwards gave a speech for the first time as the presumptive Democratic nominee “I want to thank Al Gore for his decades of service both for the Democratic party and our country, for many he represents the distinguished soul of the party and has inspired thousands to enter public service” But he also opened his first blistering attacks on the White House previewing the general election to come “We can't kid ourselves, with the Republican attack machine and their bag of dirty tricks we don’t know what they are willing to do, but I can promise you that together I have no doubt that we will defeat them, that with your help were on a one way ticket to the White House!”
Any dissection of the 2004 Democratic nomination, usually centres on the failure of the Gore campaign, Gore widely tipped for the nomination following his 2000 narrow defeat had seemingly snatched defeat from the jaws of victory and sent Democrats into the arms of the upstart Edwards. His campaign suffered from a severe lack of enthusiasm from Democratic insiders and though he maintained a strong following among the party's more ideological activists, his major selling point, his experience had become a turnoff for many voters. He was polarizing to many and had a high unfavourability rating, and attracted strong media scrutiny. and perhaps the biggest blow was the stain of already losing a presidential election. Many Americans were prepared to move on from the election of 2000 and many Americans desperately hoped to avoid a rematch. This was compared to Edward's campaign, a longshot, grassroots campaign that focused on attracting the centre of the Democratic party into its ranks, once he emerged as the best non-Gore candidate, the party was quick to attach itself to his candidacy.[1]
View attachment 780693
2004 Democratic Party Presidential Primaries final results
View attachment 780701
(Left) 2000 Democratic Nominee former Vice President Al Gore
(Right) 2004 Democratic Nominee Senator John Edwards
New York arrests, 'foil cyanide plot'Associated PressTue 18 Mar 2004 11.16 BSTThe mayor of New York, Mark Green, today said that a potential terrorist attack on the New York City subway station had been averted, with the arrest of 6 men and the seizure of several chemicals that when combined form the deadly hydrogen cyanide gas.The suspects, who allegedly were linked with radical Islamic terror groups including Al-Qaeda, the Afghanistan-based terror organisation responsible for the bombing of an American military base last year and several attempted plane hijackings 2 years ago, had planned to build devices capable of spreading the gas across the New York City subway system, Mr Green said."We have prevented a serious attack on the level of the World Trade Center bombing” police Commissioner Raymond Kelly said, referring to the 1993 truck bomb at the base of the north tower, in which 6 people died and 1000 were injured saying that such an attack could result in serious illness and even death.[2]Police claim they disrupted the plot when neighbours of one of the arrested an American José Padilla, they reported strange activity including strong chemical odours, loud phone conversations and once a fire. Padilla according to reports had travelled from the U.S. to the Afghanistan region multiple times where he is suspected of establishing contact with several terrorist organisations including undergoing training in building chemical and explosive weaponry.Other members of the plot included three British-born men of Pakistani descent, and two other Americans from New York State with Yemeni backgrounds all accused of holding connections to several Islamic terror groups including the east Asian group Jemaah Islamiyah, and the prominent so-called ‘freelance terrorist’ Khalid Shaikh Mohammed accused of plotting numerous attacks against the U.S. who is believed to be residing in Taliban controlled AfghanistanThe head of the CIA who aided New York police in the investigation, George Tenet, said that the suspects had trained with numerous terrorist groups and that. "Most of them know how to prepare improvised explosive devices," he told reporters.The suspects were arrested in a series of raids in the city of New York. The suspects had been under surveillance for weeks, Tenet said. They were being held on multiple attempted murder and conspiracy charges.Mr Green said that the evidence against the four detainees was "strong and airtight", adding that follow-up operations were underway. "Let no one underestimate our determination to keep New York and New Yorkers safe," he said.Chemical weaponry has occasionally been used by terror groups before, most notoriously there was an attack on Japan's Tokyo subway system by a religious cult using the nerve agent sarin killing 12 people and injuring hundreds. Inside the United States only months ago a plot by white supremacists to attack government buildings in Texas included a home-built cyanide gas bomb, but the plot was disrupted by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms[3]The arrests have brought some criticism from civil rights groups who claim that some of the tactics used by police, including heavy surveillance, represented a possible abuse of authority …
(Left) Arrested 'cyanide plot' suspect José Padilla [4] (Right) the devices created to distribute the chemicals
[1] Gore didn't run in 2000 because he thought George Bush was too popular at the time. Sadly for Gore I agree with his OTL decision political comebacks in US politics are rare and I generally refer to Patton's quote "Americans love a winner and will not tolerate a loser". Perhaps Gore is special because he could legitimately claim he had actually won the 2000 election but my mind immediately goes to imagining if Hillary Clinton had tried to run in 2016 or Humprhey's run in 72
[2] There is little hard evidence for this plot and has only been referenced in several memoirs claiming that the plot was cancelled by Al-Qaeda leadership for several reasons. I have serious doubts as to the actual potential success of such a plot (chemical weapons are harder to construct and are less deadly than conventional explosives) but TTLs leader of AL Qaida was more focused on chemical and biological weaponry so they attempt to carry out the plot only for it to be dismantled in its preparatory stage
[3] A real plot that was overshadowed by the war on terror and the name was changed to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives after 9/11
[4] Jose Padilla is the 'terrorist' who famously attempted to build a nuclear bomb by following a parody guide that included "putting uranium in buckets and spinning them clockwise over your head" ITTL his plan is less audacious but just as unsuccessful