Hey
@Iwanh, got a minor and perhaps a very nitpicky suggestion.
Is it alright if 9/4 can also be known as
The City Day Attacks?
I'm from Australia and this isn't meant to be a dig or anything but I think Americans (and Canadians) sometimes forget that they're the only country that uses the month-day-year format when writing dates. I also noticed that naming events after an all-numeric date tends to be an American thing.
I just don't think it's plausible for Australians to call a Russian historical event by its American date notation. In my opinion, there's nothing really significant or noteworthy about the dates 9/4 or 4/9 compared to 9/11 (the US emergency services number). Off the top of my head, I can't think of many famous events named after the D/M format other than the 2005 London attacks (7/7, doesn't matter if the date is in the D/M or M/D format). 9/4 will probably be the common name in the US, Canada, China, Japan and some Asian countries.
I think people in the UK, Australia, New Zealand and other English speaking countries are more likely to refer to 9/4 as the
2004 Moscow City Day Attacks, or the
2004 City Day Attacks, or simply
The City Day Attacks. In Europe, Latin America and Russia itself, they'll probably refer to it as the
4th of September Attacks in their own languages rather than simply 4/9.
City Days after all are something exclusive to the former Soviet Union so it's unlikely someone saying
The City Day Attacks will get confused with some other date, event, holiday or celebration from other parts of the world.