Here's a timeline idea I've been kicking around for a while: Abraham Lincoln goes into the military, becomes a career officer, and ends up as the top Union commander in an alternate Civil War.
There are a few aspects to this potential timeline:
1. What sort of general could Lincoln have been? I think that, given his handling of the war and his ability to grasp military matters, he would at least have been competent. His age would also suggest that he would be fairly senior by the start of the Civil War, (he was 52 when he took office) so I don't think its implausible that he ends up commanding the alternate Army of the Potomac. What remains to be seen is what kind of general he would have been. My first thought is that he would have tended to boldness, and he had a good grasp of modern technology. There's also the question of how his career would have shaped him - he would undoubtedly have served in the Mexican-American War, for example.
2. Without Lincoln, what does the prewar political situation look like? Who would the Republicans have nominated in 1860, and does the Civil War still start "on time"? I'm rather intrigued by the idea of a less effective Union president.
3. Assuming Lincoln is successful as a general, and doesn't die in action, he probably gets the credit for winning the war. Winning the White House in 1868 (or maybe even 1864) would be almost assured. So instead of Lincoln being the Civil War president, we get Lincoln the Reconstruction president. How might he handle things differently than Grant or Johnson?
There are a few aspects to this potential timeline:
1. What sort of general could Lincoln have been? I think that, given his handling of the war and his ability to grasp military matters, he would at least have been competent. His age would also suggest that he would be fairly senior by the start of the Civil War, (he was 52 when he took office) so I don't think its implausible that he ends up commanding the alternate Army of the Potomac. What remains to be seen is what kind of general he would have been. My first thought is that he would have tended to boldness, and he had a good grasp of modern technology. There's also the question of how his career would have shaped him - he would undoubtedly have served in the Mexican-American War, for example.
2. Without Lincoln, what does the prewar political situation look like? Who would the Republicans have nominated in 1860, and does the Civil War still start "on time"? I'm rather intrigued by the idea of a less effective Union president.
3. Assuming Lincoln is successful as a general, and doesn't die in action, he probably gets the credit for winning the war. Winning the White House in 1868 (or maybe even 1864) would be almost assured. So instead of Lincoln being the Civil War president, we get Lincoln the Reconstruction president. How might he handle things differently than Grant or Johnson?