Gender Gap

What if elections were even more divided by gender instead of by income status or race, leading to males of all income bracket/race voting extensive for one side while female voted the opposite of their male counterpart?
 

d32123

Banned
Are you asking what the effects of such a gap would be or how such a gap could be achieved?
 
Are you asking what the effects of such a gap would be or how such a gap could be achieved?

Making a gender gap extremely polarization that you'll reserve the divided racial voting lines and when election results come out showing the majority of African American males would vote Republican at the same rate as white males. We get to see white females going towards the Democratic party because of women right issues. The timeline I'm having in mind is where you'll see larger gender gap that is expanded to all walks of life among the genders. This would be cooler talk for political pundits now questioning if one party could narrow the margin the other party has on select gender voters.
 
There would be even more arguments between married couples. Perhaps the divorce rate would increase at election time, and especially every four years during presidential elections. This would lead to lawyers making even more money. More lawyers with more money means more candidates with more money, unless divorce attorneys are at a disadvantage over other lawyers in running for office, in which case we might actually see fewer lawyers running for office, as they're all divorce attorneys.
 
You'd have to greatly increase sexism while greatly decreasing racism. I'm not sure that it can be done, to be honest, as long as people have sex.
 
Bill Clinton impregnates Monica Lewinsky ala Monica's Baby. In 2000 the Republicans nominate Elizabeth Dole and she wins. The 2000s go a lot better, democrats nominate John Edwards in 2004, Eliot Spitzer in 2008, and Anthony Weiner in 2012.

That's a rather silly way to do it.
 

d32123

Banned
Bill Clinton impregnates Monica Lewinsky ala Monica's Baby. In 2000 the Republicans nominate Elizabeth Dole and she wins. The 2000s go a lot better, democrats nominate John Edwards in 2004, Eliot Spitzer in 2008, and Anthony Weiner in 2012.

That's a rather silly way to do it.

Don't really see how this would increase the gender gap.
 
Female republican president and a bunch of male democrats who can't keep it in their pants. Republicans got a slight female bump in 2000 because of Monicagate.
But a lot of men would also vote against the Democrats for their scandals, so the only gap would be the gigantic gap between the GOP and their opposition in the polls.
 
Top