You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly. You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
alternatehistory.com
Hugh Gaitskell is sometimes called “the best Prime Minister Britain never had. Many considered that he had great capacity for the job. He died in a strange way: some kind of bacterial infection killed him. What if Gaitskell lived longer? Let’s say he dies in 1968 instead of 1963. I assume Labour still wins the 1964 general elections, probably with a larger margin then in OTL. Who will succeed Gaitskell as leader of the Labour Party after he dies? Harold Wilson? Gaitskell was an eurosceptic (he once regarded the EEC as "the end of a thousand years of history") so what effects will this have on Europe?