For the Want of a King TL: Prussia loses the War of Austrian Succession

And a new update:

Part 7: The Great European War 1795-1806 Section 1: Rebellion in Spain and War in France:
The rebellions in the Spanish Americas would bring great pain to Spain and Europe as a whole. The constant fighting had caused taxes to rise dramatically the prices of goods rose as well. By 1795 the poorest were dying in the streets, hungry and penniless. This was the spark that lit the bomb. The people of Spain had long been angry with their king, would many viewed as little better than a French puppet, the loss of half their American empire, despite all that they had suffered to keep it, was the last straw for the Spanish populace and in March 1795, inspired the Mexican rebels, the Spanish Revolution began. In France, also, things were not well. The nobles were becoming increasingly angry with the King and many of the more radical members of the populace were stirring things up, in the hope of emulating the Louisianans.

The first uprising took place in Zaragoza. Crowds gathered in the Plaza de la Seo, day after day, and protested against the high bread prices and the high taxes they had to pay. When King Ferdinand VII heard about this he reacted angrily, sending a small force of soldiers to “remove [him] of these troublesome people.” The commanding officer that was assigned to this force, Colonel Jorge Íñigo Moreno, was a violent and ill-tempered man and a thoroughly unsuitable choice for this command. So, unsurprisingly, once the soldiers arrived in the town things took a turn for the worst. As the crowd continued to protest outside the Catedral Del Salvador, the soldiers grew agitated and jumpy. At this point one protester threw a rock at the soldiers, who promptly open fired on the protestors. The protestors broke ranks, some daringly attacked the soldiers, and others fled the plaza. By the end of the day 51 protestors were dead, 78 injured whilst 3 soldiers were dead and 101 injured in some way. The people of Aragon were furious, they banded together and handed out any weapons they had and on the 24th May attacked the Palacio de la Aljafería (Aljafería Palace) where the King’s soldiers were staying. They were poorly armed but they had the superiority of numbers and after several hours of fighting the crowd had stormed the palace and killed all the soldiers it contained. They armed themselves with the dead soldiers’ guns and swords and then locked the city’s gates, prepared to hold back the King’s forces when they came. But the King’s men didn’t come, the French came instead. Ferdinand VII had realised that he could not hope to defeat a rebellion in the Spanish homeland without help and so, once he heard of the Zaragoza Uprising, sent for help from his French allies.

The sight of French forces marching through the Spanish countryside dramatically worsened the situation in eastern. A second uprising broke out in Barcelona, a third in in Valencia and even in the capital of Madrid protests began against the King and the French. Chants of “El Rey es un títere francés” (The King is a French puppet) were heard across the land as the people of Spain turned on their king. At Zaragoza the French laid siege to the city. However, things took a turn in September 1790 when a massive army of rebels, numbering some 100,000 peasants and army deserters from across eastern Spain, armed with guns captured or taken from army defectors marched to lift the siege of Zaragoza. The French, who were in the middle of attacking the city, had no defence at their rear and the rebels charged, torching the French tents and huts, and smashed into the rear of the French force. The French scattered in terror of the fire-lit and vicious rebels, a French veteran later described them as “fiery devils who fought with such anger you could not help but flee.” The rebels inside the city burst out of the city’s gates and joined in the slaughter of the French.

At this point Joseph II saw his opportunity to further cement Austria’s position in Europe, even elevate it and called together representatives of Grand Alliance states to discuss war with France. After 26 years of peace Austria and her allies were more than ready to fight the French once more for supremacy in Europe and the rebellion in Spain presented a suitable opportunity. Joseph II called upon the Grand Alliance, all nations of the Holy Roman Empire and the Italian states, whilst France called its allies, Sardinia, Wittelsbach Belgium, Sicily and Saxony. These last two were new recruitments to the French sphere, Saxony seeking support to expand within the Holy Roman Empire, which Austria wouldn’t allow, and Sicily wooing Sardinia’s supporters in the hope of enforcing a partition of Italy between the two.

Austria and her allies began the fighting of the Great European War with the launch of a major offensive to invade Belgium and eastern France in January. The Grand Alliance-HRE army, commanded by Archduke Charles Leopold of Austria (OOC: post-POD son of Joseph II), marched on Belgium, defeating a Belgian and French army at Luxembourg, before splitting in two, one half marching on into Belgium, the other marching south to Lorraine. The Belgium Army, under Archduke Charles Leopold, liberated Liege that had been occupied by French and Belgian forces, before marching into the western half of Belgium. At this point an envoy was sent to the Dutch and Prussians to entreat them to come to the aid of the Anti-French Coalition, the Dutch and the Prussians agreed and so a Dutch army marched into Belgium to meet the Grand Alliance-HRE army. The two armies met near Brussels where they fought a Belgian-French army, led by General Adrien de Moncey, outside the city. The Battle of Brussels was bloody and vicious and fought over a day and a half. Archduke Charles Leopold ordered his cavalry to charge the, less well trained, Belgian forces on the left wing of the Belgian-French army. The Belgians fought gallantly against the thunderous cavalry charge but their ranks were shattered and their battle lines brutalised. After a long and vicious fight they broke and fled the field. In the meantime the French forces had charged the Grand Alliance army and the battle had descended into ruthless hand-to-hand combat. This continued for many hours, even into the night. By morning most had taken refuge in either Brussels or surrounding farm yards and even nearby Waterloo. At noon that day the Dutch army arrived at the field and, seeing this, the Grand Alliance-HRE remnants came out of their ‘lodgings’ and flocked to the Dutch banner. The French and Belgians, who were largely holed up in Brussels by now, seeing the ever swelling numbers of the Dutch army, fled the town and scattered across the countryside. By 3 o’clock that day Archduke Charles Leopold and the Dutch Lieutenant-General Willem Frederik van Bylandt that ridden victorious into Brussels, but in reality the Battle of Brussels was a Pyrrhic victory for the Grand Coalition, so great were their loses.

Dellevoet.jpg

Dutch cavalry at the Battle of Brussels

Meanwhile the Army of Lorraine was faring better, they reached Nancy by February and besieged the city. The Siege of Nancy lasted until September 1796, when the city was stormed by the besieging army. This was as far as the army of Lorraine got. Having captured Nancy set a garrison in the town they marched towards Châlons-sur-Marne, but here they met a significant French Alliance force. The French army stood they ground and repulsed several Grand Coalition attacks, before charging the weakened right wing of the Grand Coalition army. The right wing broke and the main body of the Grand Coalition army retreated back to Nancy. This was the end of the war in France, for now…
 
Last edited:
Austria and her allies began the fighting of the Great European War with the launch of a major offensive to invade Belgium and eastern France in January.

Could you just detail the casus belli here?
I have the feeling that the Austrian attack lack an explanation. (I understand that they attack France while a part of its army is in Spain, but I didn't read about a declaration of war...)
When did the declaration was sent and what is the official reason? I might have missed it, but I have not seen any.
 
Could you just detail the casus belli here?
I have the feeling that the Austrian attack lack an explanation. (I understand that they attack France while a part of its army is in Spain, but I didn't read about a declaration of war...)
When did the declaration was sent and what is the official reason? I might have missed it, but I have not seen any.
Damn it! :mad: I took out that part by accident, I'll put it back in shortly.

EDIT: And done.
 
Damn it! :mad: I took out that part by accident, I'll put it back in shortly.

I understand why it felt a little short on explanation here.
Great update, things are going to take a bad very soon I think.
Austria has just turned Europe into a huge battlefield, and it seems likely that there will be a lot more uprisings. It's revolution time :cool:
 
I understand why it felt a little short on explanation here.
Great update, things are going to take a bad very soon I think.
Austria has just turned Europe into a huge battlefield, and it seems likely that there will be a lot more uprisings. It's revolution time :cool:
Exactly, but there's 5 years of bloodshed first.
 
This sort of opportunism would alarm people on the fence (cough Britain) who would see it especially as the threat of Austrian hegemony on the continent. Others may take advantage of it.
 
Looks like Joseph aims to put a Habsburg on the throne of Spain hurrah :D
Waiting for Britain to side with France though because of the threat of Austrian hegemony.
 
This sort of opportunism would alarm people on the fence (cough Britain) who would see it especially as the threat of Austrian hegemony on the continent. Others may take advantage of it.
Britain is Austria's ally, so will be OK with it, for now...
Looks like Joseph aims to put a Habsburg on the throne of Spain hurrah :D
Waiting for Britain to side with France though because of the threat of Austrian hegemony.
Indeed.
For now, Britain will remain a Austrian ally. That may change after the Great European War ends.
 
And a new update for you all:
Part 7: The Great European War 1795-1806 Section 2: The Rebellion Intensifies and War in Germany and Italy:
After the Pyrrhic victory in east France and Belgium the Grand Coalition focussed their attentions elsewhere, on the French allies in Germany and Italy. However things were disrupted by the death of Emperor Joseph II of Austria in October 1796. This meant that the Grand Alliance commander-in-chief Archduke Charles Leopold was now Emperor. Charles Leopold ascended to the throne as Charles I of Austria and Charles VI of the Holy Roman Empire. This smooth succession decreased the impact of the monarch change and by November 1796 plans were underway. Their first target was Saxony, the wolf in the fold of the Holy Roman Empire. Saxony had long been sought after by the Prussians and, to a lesser extent the Austrians, but it had also always held great ambitions for expansion and decided that an alliance with France was the way to expand. This proved to be a mistake.

In November 1796 the full force of the Grand Coalition was against this, relatively, small German nation. The Austrians, now under General Franz von Weyrother, marched on Dresden from the south, the British invaded from Hanover to the west, the Poles attacked from the east and the Prussians attacked from the north. Unsurprisingly Saxony was put to the sword. Once they realised that they had no hope of defeating all the armies individually, for they would defeat one but leave three more still invading, they decided on an all-or-nothing last stand outside Dresden. The colossal army of the Grand Coalition numbering at 175,000 men (approx.) faced a French and Saxon army of 50,000 men (approx.). The result was a rout of the scale never seen before in Europe. The Saxons were butchered and their army shattered. Dresden fell that same day. In less than a month Saxony’s ambitions for an empire were dashed upon the rocks of time.

Meanwhile in Spain the rebellion was intensifying, the rebels had captured Barcelona, Valencia and Zaragoza a year ago, Huesca and Jaca six months ago. The rebel leader,Luis Fernández de Córdoba y Montcada, the Duke of Medinaceli, and his generals met on the 1st March 1797 in the Aljafería Palace, Zaragoza to plan the attack on the rest of Spain. They sent envoy to the Austrians asking for their, and the Grand Coalition’s, help against Charles IV. At this point Charles I of Austria realised that this was a potential opportunity for a Habsburg Restoration in Spain, this would be a major victory for the Habsburg family as it would out one over the Bourbons as well as securing a potential power in Europe for the Habsburg Dynasty. So, Charles I agreed to openly support the Zaragoza Confederation, as the rebels were known, if, and only if, they crowned a Habsburg as the King of Spain once they had deposed the King. Duke Luis Fernández of Medinaceli, having heard of the reforms made by the Habsburgs in Austria, was happy to accept. And so the Austrians and their allies were now, officially, supporting to Zaragozan Confederation against the Bourbon King. Having won the support of the Grand Coalition the rebels decided to prepare for a daring attack on Madrid itself.
The Portuguese were still unaligned in the Great European War, but in May 1797 the Portuguese King, John VI, received envoys from the Zaragoza Confederation and the Grand Coalition requesting Portuguese aid in the Great European War against the French and Spanish. The envoys promised that the Portuguese could take their pick of Spanish colonies at the end of the war. John VI also received envoys from France and Spain which promised the ceding of several Spanish African ports to Portugal in exchange for their support. John VI, perhaps unsurprisingly, decided to side with the Grand Coalition and invaded Galicia in June 1797.

Elsewhere the rest of the Grand Coalition was now focussed on the domination of the Italian peninsula and removing Sardinia and Sicily from the war. To that end the Grand Coalition launched an invasion of Sardinia from Venice in April 1798. The Grand Coalition army marched to attack Genoa first. As the main army marched on Genoa, a second, smaller, army went south to attack Lucca and the surrounding area that had been taken by the Sardinians after the last war. The Lucca Army marched on Massa on the Italian coast where they met a Sardinian-Sicilian Coalition army. The Battle of Massa was a short one, the Grand Coalition cavalry charged the Sicilian forces on the right wing, before wheeling round to fight the main body of Sardinians. Meanwhile the Grand Coalition’s centre had charged the Sardinian infantry, causing the battle to descend into hand-to-hand combat. The Grand Coalition forces won out and Massa was besieged. In the meantime the Genoa Army had arrived at Genoa, having already defeated the Sardinians at Parma and the Battle of the Bocchetta Pass. At Genoa, the Grand Coalition besieged the city. By December 1798 both Genoa and Massa had fallen.

801631.jpg

Sardinian soldiers at the Battle of the Bocchetta Pass

At the dawn of 1799 the Grand Coalition had the upper hand, at least territory wise, in the Great European War, having conquered Saxony and made significant headway into Belgium, Sardinia and even France. However a French counterattack in February 1799, recaptured Nancy and drove the Grand Coalition from France. Having done this the French, under the legendary “Iron Marshall” Louis-Nicolas Davout, invaded Rhineland. They marched through the area, largely un-opposed by the fleeing German forces, until they reached Wesseling, just south of Cologne, on the banks of the River Rhine. Here the French met a Grand Coalition army under the command of General Ludwig Alexius von Laudon (OOC: The OTL nephew of the famous Generalissimo von Laudon, but slightly changed). The resulting Battle of Wesseling was a brutal affair. The Grad Coalition was largely assembled from the shattered remnants of the Lorraine Army, soldiers from the surrounding German states and even several columns of peasant militia. The French the charged the Grand Coalition army, which fought bravely and even seem to be winning at one point, thanks to an inspired tactical manoeuvre by von Laudon, but the French were ultimately victorious. The Holy Roman Empire west of the Rhine was now under French control, with the exception of Grand Coalition occupied Belgium. (OOC: And the Netherlands of course, but they aren’t part of the HRE.) This astounding victory for the French, temporarily quelled the rebellious sentiment in France. A second French force, under Duke Emmanuel-Félicité de Durfort of Duras, marched into Grand Coalition occupied Belgium. The Grand Coalition’s forces, with the exception of the Dutch troops, were stranded from reinforcements and so many surrendered without a fight when they saw the French at their gates. Thus, by May 1799 all of Belgium, that wasn't occupied by the Dutch, was returned to Belgian control, at least in name, but in reality it was the control of the French army. At this point the French then invaded the Belgian lands occupied by the Dutch. The Dutch fought bravely but, with little help from their Grand Coalition allies, were driven back and in early July 1799 the Second Battle of Brussels was fought, also known as the Battle of Waterloo after the village outside Brussels where most of the fighting actually took place. The French far outnumbered the Dutch, who were also heavily demoralised by the string of defeats that they had suffered leading up to this battle, and so the fight was a short one and Brussels fell to the French.
 
Last edited:
Firstly, I make no claim to be an expert on Indian history. Secondly. I would like to point out that the War of Sardinian Succession is after the POD, thus allowing butterflies to change the situation in India. Finally, I have very little knowledge of Indian provinces, cities, etc. and merely used the rivers as a guide, therefore it is unsurprising if there is something wrong with that section. If you are able to, I would be grateful if you posted a map showing a more plausible Hyderbadi gain.

.

I would love to make one but sadly I am not in hold of a computer right now and secondly I do not know how to make maps. However if you want some help regarding Indian political scenario in the future I would be glad to help you out to the best of my abilities.
 
It may seem a bit off topic but I want to ask about the political status of Venice. Is it a Republic vassalized by Austria or out right annexed by them since I think Napoleon conquered Venice as a Republic and not as an Austrian territory, in 1797. I actually have less to negligible information about Late 18th and early 19th century Europe other than the Napoleonic wars, but I must say that you are doing a great job here and this time line's becoming better and better with each update.

Eagerly awaiting the next update.
 
Last edited:
Since you haven't mentioned a lot about India I think you could keep India from falling under any European power and staying united under a native power(cough cough Marathas) . I have some ideas which will result in some interesting stuff and potentially altering the balance of power in the world in the future.

I will have to clearly hammer them out first though.

If you are interested I will let you know.
 
It may seem a bit off topic but I want to ask about the political status of Venice. Is it a Republic vassalized by Austria or out right annexed by them since I think Napoleon conquered Venice as a Republic and not as an Austrian territory, in 1797. I actually have less to negligible information about Late 18th and early 19th century Europe other than the Napoleonic wars, but I must say that you are doing a great job here and this time line's becoming better and better with each update.

Eagerly awaiting the next update.

Venice is an undependent Republic in Austria sphere of influence. Think of it like how the US views Latin America or Russia views the Ukraine. Just because 5hey don't "control" them doesn't mean they are firmly aligned with Austrias interests.
 
I would love to make one but sadly I am not in hold of a computer right now and secondly I do not know how to make maps. However if you want some help regarding Indian political scenario in the future I would be glad to help you out to the best of my abilities.
Thanks , I'll PM you if I need any advice. :D

It may seem a bit off topic but I want to ask about the political status of Venice. Is it a Republic vassalized by Austria or out right annexed by them since I think Napoleon conquered Venice as a Republic and not as an Austrian territory, in 1797. I actually have less to negligible information about Late 18th and early 19th century Europe other than the Napoleonic wars, but I must say that you are doing a great job here and this time line's becoming better and better with each update.

Eagerly awaiting the next update.
It is exactly as the Undead Martyr says.

And thanks for your kind words. :D
Since you haven't mentioned a lot about India I think you could keep India from falling under any European power and staying united under a native power(cough cough Marathas) . I have some ideas which will result in some interesting stuff and potentially altering the balance of power in the world in the future.

I will have to clearly hammer them out first though.

If you are interested I will let you know.
I am very interested in this idea, PM me your thoughts please!
Venice is an undependent Republic in Austria sphere of influence. Think of it like how the US views Latin America or Russia views the Ukraine. Just because 5hey don't "control" them doesn't mean they are firmly aligned with Austrias interests.
That is exactly right.
 
Speaking of Austria, if andesired when we get another "Gratis Turkish War" Venice could easily play a part. Either eating some of Greece or reclaiming their overseas colonies eg Crete, Cyprus, Euboia.

Note that Britain without India (entirely possible, though I don't think you can keep the Europeans out entirely) changes things drasrically- tjey dontncare nearly so much about thr mediterranean for instance, so Egypt, Malta e5c dont become British. Lilewise they dont care about Russia erc carving up the Ottomans.

British hegemony was due largely to France and Spain, her traditional overseas rivals, being burned out by the Napoleonic Wars ans Portugal and the Dutch being too tiny and also war weary to make an issue of it. Austria isn't going to be a major sea power and Venice chance to do a dash across Egypt to the Indian Ocean (a favorite EUIV and alternate history indulgence of mine) is long past if it ever really existed. YOU need to either strengthen the native states and/or provide a peer competitor they can play against the Brits- either the French, the Spanish, or the Russians would be the only viable choices, though Japan doing an early Meiji might exert power in Southeast Asia.
 
Speaking of Austria, if andesired when we get another "Gratis Turkish War" Venice could easily play a part. Either eating some of Greece or reclaiming their overseas colonies eg Crete, Cyprus, Euboia.

Note that Britain without India (entirely possible, though I don't think you can keep the Europeans out entirely) changes things drasrically- tjey dontncare nearly so much about thr mediterranean for instance, so Egypt, Malta e5c dont become British. Lilewise they dont care about Russia erc carving up the Ottomans.

British hegemony was due largely to France and Spain, her traditional overseas rivals, being burned out by the Napoleonic Wars ans Portugal and the Dutch being too tiny and also war weary to make an issue of it. Austria isn't going to be a major sea power and Venice chance to do a dash across Egypt to the Indian Ocean (a favorite EUIV and alternate history indulgence of mine) is long past if it ever really existed. YOU need to either strengthen the native states and/or provide a peer competitor they can play against the Brits- either the French, the Spanish, or the Russians would be the only viable choices, though Japan doing an early Meiji might exert power in Southeast Asia.
My little rough plan for India (and other stuff mentioned in there as well).
India: A native state spends their time playing the British and French off each other and eventually becomes modernised enough and powerful enough to be truly independence, BUT won't rule all of India. (A bit of Balkanisation never did anyone any harm. :p)
Venice/Austria: Venice becomes the shipyards of Austria. Basically Venice's sole purpose of existence to provide the Austrians with a navy from colonisation.
Japan: Early Meji is possible, but they will mainly fight the Dutch and Prussians in the East Indies.
China: Whose up for some colonisation of China? :D
Egypt: Austrian colony! Why you ask? See my user title. :p
 
Top