Distance. Supporting an ad across three thousand miles of open ocean is an utter nightmare, right up to modern (World War era) times.
It is a fun timeline and a good update. Some justifications are lacking in some ways however.
How could Louisiana really fend-off France? They are what, a hundred thousand, maybe two at most? Against a country who can field as many people...
What timeline are you guys speaking of.
Distance. Supporting an ad across three thousand miles of open ocean is an utter nightmare, right up to modern (World War era) times.
Disaster at Leuthen it's about the same premise with Austria winning the war against Prussia and goes from there
According to what i have found out the population of Louisiana in OTL is roughly 500,000.
Is there a link for the timeline.
French sources says that it was closer to 50,000, and an english one gave me 60,000 in 1803...
source: https://books.google.ca/books?id=PH...age&q=Population of Louisiana in 1803&f=false
The Louisiana Empire is made of:
The French parts of Canada: 300,000 people.
The French parts of the USA: 76,000 people.
Some immigration to then French Louisiana: 50,000.
Texas which is also part of the empire: 10 to 20,000.
Yeah, but at first, and for more than a year, Louisiana was just Louisiana, and the French could field more men than the actual population of that place. The fact that they didn't is still not explained. The French sent close to ten thousand soldiers for the ARW. Why wouldn't they send as many to keep their hold one the continent? Such a force is 3 times the population of New Orleans at the time!
It is a fun timeline and a good update. Some justifications are lacking in some ways however.
How could Louisiana really fend-off France? They are what, a hundred thousand, maybe two at most? Against a country who can field as many people...
So you need to detail why France gave up the fight. For example a distraction such as a war, a lack of will but a negotiation on the use of New Orleans, a great power as an ally, etc...
It is quite fun to read the victory of Dumas. Wouldn't he be called "généralissime", "grand maréchal" (great marshall), or "Protector"/"Dictator" though? And I'm not sure about the term "Empire of Louisiana". It seems a bit odd for them to get that name.
Distance. Supporting an ad across three thousand miles of open ocean is an utter nightmare, right up to modern (World War era) times.
CRCV you make a good point, but there have been good reasons for why such a thing would happen. My view is this:Disaster at Leuthen it's about the same premise with Austria winning the war against Prussia and goes from there.
Basically this such a campaign after this latest war would be hugely unpopular
My view is this:
1. Louisiana is unpopular with the French government, what with it being a melting pot of anti-government sentiment,
2. They don't see it as worth saving, given the above, and the incredible distance required to actually get their.
3. The French in the north have been defeated by the Canadians and the south is controlled by rebels. Thus they have no obvious way of regaining a foothold on the American continent. The URA don't like them. The URCN, as it was then, are helping the rebels in the north and the Spanish don't want to get involved.
4. Things aren't great for the French at home right now either, waging a war over a colossal distance would be very unpopular.
This can be made to sound better and put into the last update if people wish. Should I do that?
I'll do that then.IMHO you should put those 4 points in the previous update. For me, it is a needed explanation. I thank you for those precisions, which help to understand this update and Louisiana's achievements.
I guess the French situation at home will be detailed in next updates.
Exactly!¡ Viva la Revolución !
By the way, did Louisiana gain anything, or they just wanted to screw New Spain? California is their ally?
Exactly!
California is their ally yes. Did I not put that in?![]()
OK, cool. I'll get that in now then.I understood that they fought side by side, but that doesn't mean that the alliance would last after the war (it could have been as in the ACW with a French intervention, but no true alliance after that).
But it is true that you have yet to explain the post-war situation, so I might have went a little to fast here.
Firstly, I make no claim to be an expert on Indian history. Secondly. I would like to point out that the War of Sardinian Succession is after the POD, thus allowing butterflies to change the situation in India. Finally, I have very little knowledge of Indian provinces, cities, etc. and merely used the rivers as a guide, therefore it is unsurprising if there is something wrong with that section. If you are able to, I would be grateful if you posted a map showing a more plausible Hyderbadi gain.I want to suggest a correction of sorts in the treaty of the Sardinian war of Succession about the Indian part. You have mentioned that Marathas were forced to cede territories in southern India to the Hyderabadis or the Nizam more specifically, and in your map showing all the world has the Nizam occupying all of Maharashtra which I think is absolutely ASB because even if the Hyderabadis were able to defeat the Marathas they would at best be granted the territories of the Marathas in Karnataka or if you want to stretch it some parts of Southern Maharashtra not the whole of Maharashtra with the Capital of the Peshwas (Pune) in it. And first of all the Marathas wouldn't ally themselves with the British because there was widespread distrust about them in the populace and most importantly the ruling class of the Marathas which makes an alliance with them out of the question. The Marathas would rather ally with the French against the British not the opposite as you mentioned in your update. The period in question is the period of ascendancy for the Marathas which makes it unlikely for the Hyderabadis to even pull off a fluke victory on the Marathas just the way they never pulled off over the entire period of existence of the Maratha empire.
Sorry if I offended you.
Nope. There has been some rebellion in South America but it was brutally crushed, as per the last update.Did the Tupac Amaru rebellion still happen in this TL? Because otherwise I would think this would have been the perfect time to launch the rebellion.