For St. George! For St. Louis!

I've been wanting to start a second time line for awhile now, but wasn't too sure on the subject. After doing a little kicking around this morning, I finally decided on the classic Keep the Stuarts on the English throne, with a tiny POD of Charles II marrying Anne d'Orleans in 1647. In hopes to give him a brood of legitimate children. There's still the issue of his bride's Catholic religion, and her French nationality, which should cause some interesting knock-off effects during the period of Cromwell's Commonwealth. No worries, I still intend for Charles II to be a notorious philanderer! :D I'm hoping this TL will be a little less intense than my other one. I can't promise frequent updates, but I'll probably keep them a bit shorter and probably more focused on Western Europe more than anything. Now, without further adieu...

For St. George! For St. Louis!

“She is a kind and witty princess, which is what I would most like in a wife.
It matters not if she isn’t very pretty—that is what mistresses are for!”

Charles, the Prince of Wales on Anne d’Orléans


Despite wishes to stay on in England alongside his father, the continued military defeats of the royalist party in the ongoing civil war in England convinced the Prince of Wales, Charles, to leave England for his own safety and to evade capture. Traveling many miles across hostile territory held by the Parliamentarians, Charles first reached the Isle of Scilly, allowing him to escape to Jersey, and thence to France. Landing in Normandy, Charles hastened to Paris to join his mother, Henrietta Maria, who had escaped from the country in 1644. Supported by the French crown, Henrietta had settled in Paris and hosted a court-in-exile at St. Germain, appointing Kenelm Digby, an eccentric Catholic as her chancellor. Arriving at St. Germain in the spring of 1646, Charles enjoyed a tearful reunion with his mother; with the Dukes of York and Gloucester, as well as the Princess Elizabeth still in England, Charles was the only other child of the Queen of England to be at her side (although the infant Princess Henrietta would be ferried out of England and reunited with her mother in June).

The daughter of Henri IV and Marie de Médicis, and thus a French princess by birth, Henrietta Maria was able to rely upon the French government to support her lavish court at St. Germain, as well as providing lodgings in Paris. Despite having certain legitimacy by being the wife of the King of England, a great number of exiles chose to flee to Holland, rather than join Henrietta’s court, finding her French connection repugnant. A variety of Frenchmen attached themselves to the Queen’s household, and her open adherence to Catholicism caused great derision from those Englishmen still attached to the cause of their king, yet attached even more to their Protestant Religion. Despite being only newly arrived from England, rumors flew amongst exiled communities that Henrietta was well on her way to corrupting the Prince of Wales, inducing him to accept the Papist faith, and preaching to him that Absolutism was the only proper government he should follow.

They were partially correct. While Henrietta was not ‘corrupting’ the Prince of Wales in the traditional sense, she was certainly pushing him towards a certain princess that she wanted him to marry—Anne d’Orléans, Le Grand Mademoisellelle. The eldest daughter of the Duke of Orléans, Anne had inherited a massive fortune from her mother only five days after her birth: aside from including a massive sum of money, it included five duchies, the Dauphinate of Auvergne, and the sovereign principality of Joinville. Anne was greatly interested in the Prince of Wales, and Henrietta was eager to encourage the match—not only was Anne her niece, but she hoped her revenues might not only be used to support herself and Charles, but also to aid the royalist caise. Although rumors of the Empress Maria becoming ill caused Anne to become interested in the possibility of marriage to the Emperor Ferdinand, the Empresses’ recovery[1] caused Anne to resume her visits to St. Germain.

It was not until the end of 1647 that the Prince of Wales openly declared his interest in marrying Le Grand Mademoiselle to her father the Duke of Orléans and Anne of Austria. Cardinal Mazarin, chief minister of the French Regent was opposed to the marriage on account of the vast fortune and extensive properties possessed by Anne d’Orléans, which would only be augmented upon the death of her father. Mazarin was not keen on seeing Anne’s properties pass into the hands of the Prince of Wales. Although Charles I was still struggling with the Parliamentarians, the possibility of Anne’s wealth ultimately ending up in the hands of the English crown proved deeply unpopular. The marriage treaty was finally agreed upon in early 1648; Anne and Charles would be allowed to marry. In return Anne would sell her properties at Saint-Fargeau and Châtellerault, and with the agreement that her remaining lands would remain the personal property of herself and her heirs. Although reluctant to part with her the lands specified, she ultimately signed the marriage treaty as it allowed her to maintain two of her most profitable estates—the Principality of Dombes and the County of Eu.

The ratification of the marriage treaty was the ultimate success of Henrietta Maria, and the Prince of Wales was married to Anne d’Orléans in the spring of 1648 at Notre Dame. A lavish affair, it was nevertheless considered an affair of the French nobility; although those English exiles situated around St.Germain attended, many Protestants denounced the marriage, decrying the brides’ Catholic faith as well as her French connections and seemingly ambitious nature. Many Protestants equated her to a modern day Agrippina who would certainly corrupt the Prince of Wales as Henrietta had corrupted her own husband. The marriage provided for Henrietta and her son financially, but certainly harmed their credibility amongst the English royalists. Even Charles I had reservations of his son marriage, remarking that, “My queen has done more harm to our cause than she will ever know. What use is Mademoiselles ècus if no one will fight for us?”

Not long after their marriage, the Prince of Princess of Wales traveled south to Clermont where they established themselves away from the overbearing presence of Henrietta Maria. It was here that Anne would remark later in life were both she and Charles were the happiest. They lived frugally and despite stormy arguments, the couple seemed to genuinely care for each other. Yet the Prince of Wales longed to return to his England. His father had been captured in 1647, yet had managed to escape from Parliamentarian clutches, negotiating a secret treaty with the Scots, with the promise of church reform. Under this secret treaty, the Scots agreed to invade England and restore the king to his throne. In return, he would establish Presbyterianism in England for three years.

By the summer of 1648, a series of uprisings had broken out in England and the Scottish army had invaded from the north. At the time, Anne was pregnant with the couple’s first child and Charles made the decision to head to The Hague to seek support from the Prince of Orange and his sister, the Princess Mary. Despite a comfortable exile in Clermont, the Prince of Wales was disappointed by the lack of support from his French relatives for his father’s cause. Although the Regent had promised some monetary support[2], Charles decided to try his luck his luck in the Netherlands. With the pregnant Princess of Wales in tow, Charles arrived at The Hague in July of 1648, receiving a cool reception…

[1]In OTL, the death of the Empress Maria in May of 1646 caused Anne to abandon her infatuations with the Prince of Wales, seeking to marry the widowed Ferdinand. In ATL, the Empress survives and Anne maintains her interest in Charles.

[2]With his marriage to Anne d’Orléans, the French promise some support during the Second Civil War (1648), but nothing substancial. As in OTL, Charles decides to head to the Netherlands.
 
Last edited:
Oh cool, good TL so now a legimate English king will be on the throne but..... Wait if parliment fails England remains an absoulute monarchy, just a sordid advice.... Good tl but be wary of the butterflies good sir, Britain may look completly different by ww1
 
Thanks for the comment. :) Butterflies will start flapping their wings slowly, but unfortunately the Prince of Wales marriage isn't enough to really prop up the Royalist cause against the Parliamentarians. So we'll still see Cromwell's Commonwealth and the execution of Charles I. The real changes will begin with Charles II's restoration.
 
Thanks for the comment. :) Butterflies will start flapping their wings slowly, but unfortunately the Prince of Wales marriage isn't enough to really prop up the Royalist cause against the Parliamentarians. So we'll still see Cromwell's Commonwealth and the execution of Charles I. The real changes will begin with Charles II's restoration.


Oh bloody he'll you mean.... No William and Mary...... Um Victoria would be butterflied away and.... Huge butterflies, and they're will be no English parliment !!!!!! Blasphemy you dirty wanker :c
 
Oh bloody he'll you mean.... No William and Mary...... Um Victoria would be butterflied away and.... Huge butterflies, and they're will be no English parliment !!!!!! Blasphemy you dirty wanker :c

Haha, well there will still be Parliament, but certainly no Glorious Revolution so the balance of power between the Parliament and Crown will be different. But certainly no Hannoverians, and probably a more pro-French England overall.
 
If by his marriage he gets vast estates and a fortune, why does he live frugally? It wouldn't seem to fit his nature :)

Also, I would imagiine having that amount of personal wealth would mean that he could mount campaigns and expeditions of his own, unless his wife is strong-willed enough to hold onto the purse strings?

Also, why is he going to the Netherlands when his wife has five duchies in France?

Just what occurs to the top of my head...

I like the general idea :)

Best Regards
Grey Wolf
 
It's better you don't forget "Prince of Peace" because of this new TL!:mad::D

I really liked your ideas, and I'll be following this one as well.

Just some doubts:
How the marriage to Charles will change Anne Marie's role in the Fronde?

You said that Empress Maria Anna won't die at the time she did IOTL. Does it mean that she has a normal pregnancy (her last daughter was born by cesarean)? And will she have more children?

I wonder also who you will choose to be the husband of Catherine of Braganza ITTL. I would have some suggestion myself, but I'd rather wait to see how butterflies change the conflict between France and Spain.
 
In your op did you mean to refer to Agrippa or Agrippina? The latter would make more sense

Agrippina. I knew I got my Romans mixed up. :eek: The latter would definitely apply more than a Roman general!

If by his marriage he gets vast estates and a fortune, why does he live frugally? It wouldn't seem to fit his nature :)

Also, I would imagiine having that amount of personal wealth would mean that he could mount campaigns and expeditions of his own, unless his wife is strong-willed enough to hold onto the purse strings?

Also, why is he going to the Netherlands when his wife has five duchies in France?

Just what occurs to the top of my head...

I like the general idea :)

Best Regards
Grey Wolf

That's true, given his extravagant nature originally, but he's still young and I think he might be convinced from blowing his wife's money when there are more important things to worry about: you are definitely right with the sort of wealth at his disposal he will certainly be able to outfit his own expeditions and that is touched upon in the next chapter. Anne does hold the purse strings, but not too tightly. She's quite ambitious and willing to aid her English husband in this conflict.

Although his wife has lands in France, I don't think the marriage would be enough to convince the Regency of Anne of Austria to fully fund any efforts against the Parliamentarians; the Thirty Years War has just ended and the Fronde will soon be brewing; unlike in OTL, they do provide some monetary support, but otherwise Charles decides to head to the Netherlands. His sister is married to the Stadholder and is much more willing to help against the Parliamentarians: a small fleet of ships also defected IOTL to the Royalists, and set sail to the Netherlands, this is the big reason Charles headed there, to take personal command of the fleet. Charles and his wife are warmly welcomed by the Prince and Princess of Orange, but have a hostile reception from the country, given Anne's Catholic religion.

It's better you don't forget "Prince of Peace" because of this new TL!:mad::D

I really liked your ideas, and I'll be following this one as well.

Just some doubts:
How the marriage to Charles will change Anne Marie's role in the Fronde?

You said that Empress Maria Anna won't die at the time she did IOTL. Does it mean that she has a normal pregnancy (her last daughter was born by cesarean)? And will she have more children?

I wonder also who you will choose to be the husband of Catherine of Braganza ITTL. I would have some suggestion myself, but I'd rather wait to see how butterflies change the conflict between France and Spain.

No worries, I still intend to update the Prince of Peace! This is merely a side project. :D

Anne Marie will probably give birth to their first child in the Netherlands, while Charles is commanding the small fleet that defected from England. Assuming he decided to mount an actual campaign (probably with extra funding from his wife), Anne will probably retire to St. Germain if Charles lands in England directly (iirc, he spent 1650-51 in Scotland and England) and especially if her reception in the Netherlands turns hostile: she's already dealing with a rowdy populace and the Regents of Amsterdam aren't comfortable having her around, so she will definitely return to France in 1649, 1650 and would probably take part in the Fronde in some capacity. It will only cement her reputation as an intriguer amongst the English exiles, of course, which is exactly what we want. She certainly is no Catherine of Braganza and probably won't be too popular. ;)

Yes, the Empress of Maria had a normal pregnancy, so no cesarean or blood poisoning to kill her at Linz. A minor POD, but her death caused Anne to focus her ambitions are marrying the widowed Emperor and she lost all interest in the Prince of Wales.

I have a certain udea for Catherine of Braganza, but I haven't totally made up my mind yet, so I'd love to hear your ideas. Especially any butterflies that could alter the war between Portugal and Spain. Either way, this 17th century will be quite different...
 
I have a certain udea for Catherine of Braganza, but I haven't totally made up my mind yet, so I'd love to hear your ideas. Especially any butterflies that could alter the war between Portugal and Spain. Either way, this 17th century will be quite different...

I'll send you my ideas about Catherine's possible marriages by PM.

About the war itself, I don't really think there would be much differences during the 1650's, unless you have other ideas in mind.
 
Interesting. I'm curious about what you intend to do with Mademoiselle's territories - I'm always attracted to a tale of a Personal Union, especially slightly unusual British PU's, but obviously such a PU would be hard to hold together, so I'm curious: do you intend to try to make something of the PU (whether it be a successful union, or just a storyline about Charles trying to retain the land) or do you just plan on having the French re-appropriate the land not far down the line?
 
Interesting. I'm curious about what you intend to do with Mademoiselle's territories - I'm always attracted to a tale of a Personal Union, especially slightly unusual British PU's, but obviously such a PU would be hard to hold together, so I'm curious: do you intend to try to make something of the PU (whether it be a successful union, or just a storyline about Charles trying to retain the land) or do you just plan on having the French re-appropriate the land not far down the line?

I wouldn't really consider it a personal union: while Anne does hold a variety of lands and titles within France, I'd consider it much different than the middle ages, and much more akin to personal property. Anne had to part with several properties in order to marry Charles: if anything, these lands will simply be the personal property of the King of England. It isn't too farfetched as Englishmen certainly owned property in France (such as the Chateau of Aubigny) This is interesting because Charles II himself had a very hard time with money; upon his restoration he gave up the feudal dues revived by his father in exchange for money from Parliament raised from customs. He won't have as much of a money problem as he did OTL with his wife's French revenue (of course, as Grey Wolf pointed out, all this money may simply make him more extravagant) The only stickling point may be Joinville, which was a sovereign principality and theoretically independent.

Of course, the French properties may not be an issue: assuming the Bourbons and Stuarts continue to intermarry, you may see the Kings of England slowly alienate their French lands, parceling off pieces as a dowry for those English princesses who marry into France, sold to pay off debts, ect. Anne herself might choose to divide her properties amongst her children as well, rather than give it all to the eldest. If the King of England chose to travel to France, he would probably style himself as Duke of Montpensier or something of the sort: especially in the 18th century when it became in vogue for foreign royalty to travel in cognito with lesser titles, usually false.
 
I wouldn't really consider it a personal union: while Anne does hold a variety of lands and titles within France, I'd consider it much different than the middle ages, and much more akin to personal property. Anne had to part with several properties in order to marry Charles: if anything, these lands will simply be the personal property of the King of England. It isn't too farfetched as Englishmen certainly owned property in France (such as the Chateau of Aubigny) This is interesting because Charles II himself had a very hard time with money; upon his restoration he gave up the feudal dues revived by his father in exchange for money from Parliament raised from customs. He won't have as much of a money problem as he did OTL with his wife's French revenue (of course, as Grey Wolf pointed out, all this money may simply make him more extravagant) The only stickling point may be Joinville, which was a sovereign principality and theoretically independent.

Of course, the French properties may not be an issue: assuming the Bourbons and Stuarts continue to intermarry, you may see the Kings of England slowly alienate their French lands, parceling off pieces as a dowry for those English princesses who marry into France, sold to pay off debts, ect. Anne herself might choose to divide her properties amongst her children as well, rather than give it all to the eldest. If the King of England chose to travel to France, he would probably style himself as Duke of Montpensier or something of the sort: especially in the 18th century when it became in vogue for foreign royalty to travel in cognito with lesser titles, usually false.

True enough about the Personal Union thing - I just like Personal Unions. And for your info - Dombes is also a quasi-independent state, just like Joinville, so she owns two. I was thinking that you might have been planning on some manner of story where the Kings of England attempt to somehow split off their territories from France and keep them as foreign exclaves, but your reply showed me that you're doing the realistic thing and just having them slowly get alienated. As I say, I enjoy a good story about weird Personal Unions, and bizarre exclaves, but at the end of the day I really can't fault you as I felt that was by far the more probable alternative. Your comments about the land being split off to second sons or sold off etc is probably pretty much on the money.

I was rather wondering about the use of those territories as money-making exercises for Charles, also, though. I somewhat have the feeling that, while they wouldn't be able to do anything about the monetary savings Anne would carry with her (figuratively) and thus Charles could benefit from an immediate boost to his material wealth, I suspect that the French would take steps to prevent any money raised through tax or royal monopolies from going into the coffers of England. In fact one of the things I had in mind when asking my question was that the King of France would probably try to force Anne to alienate her French territories entirely and hand them over to the royal demesne - though of course they would have to really distort their words to find a way of doing anything with Dombes or Joinville, as the French monarchy had technically ceded control of those territories when they allowed them to become independent Principalities essentially for the glory of the French nobles who held the titles.
 
True enough about the Personal Union thing - I just like Personal Unions. And for your info - Dombes is also a quasi-independent state, just like Joinville, so she owns two. I was thinking that you might have been planning on some manner of story where the Kings of England attempt to somehow split off their territories from France and keep them as foreign exclaves, but your reply showed me that you're doing the realistic thing and just having them slowly get alienated. As I say, I enjoy a good story about weird Personal Unions, and bizarre exclaves, but at the end of the day I really can't fault you as I felt that was by far the more probable alternative. Your comments about the land being split off to second sons or sold off etc is probably pretty much on the money.

I was rather wondering about the use of those territories as money-making exercises for Charles, also, though. I somewhat have the feeling that, while they wouldn't be able to do anything about the monetary savings Anne would carry with her (figuratively) and thus Charles could benefit from an immediate boost to his material wealth, I suspect that the French would take steps to prevent any money raised through tax or royal monopolies from going into the coffers of England. In fact one of the things I had in mind when asking my question was that the King of France would probably try to force Anne to alienate her French territories entirely and hand them over to the royal demesne - though of course they would have to really distort their words to find a way of doing anything with Dombes or Joinville, as the French monarchy had technically ceded control of those territories when they allowed them to become independent Principalities essentially for the glory of the French nobles who held the titles.

I agree, the question of money generated through taxes and monopolies might be opposed by the King, he might demand a part of the revenue rather than it all going to England. Of course, Charles II had fairly good relations with France, he was practically eating out of their hand in the 1670s since Louis XIV was paying him not to summon Parliament, so it might not be a large issue. Any money other money of course would be untouchable.

But yes, I imagine Anne's large holdings would be a nice prize for the French King, after all he pretty much pressed her to sell him several territories and at the end of the day she had to name the Duke of Orleans as her heir. The King might make out other deals over time to purchase the lands; especially once Charles is restored in England, the couple will be living in England and won't really be able to oversee these estates like they are able to in the 1650s. Charles II would certainly jump at any immediate purchase even if it means ceding potential revenue, but they are Anne's lands ultimately and she might be a bit more shrewd.

Dombes and Joinville are a little different, yes: but I think ultimately the French would be diplomatic (the French and English will be major allies in this time line) and push for them to be handed over as part of a dowry.
 
“A Princess of Orléans,
Means to do well,
But only time can tell
Until her Papist ambitions are quelled.”
A Dutch Rhyme lampooning the Princess of Wales, 1648

The Prince and Princess of Wales arrived in the Netherlands in the summer of 1648, with Prince Charles seeking support for the royalist cause after French support had proved disappointing. Although warmly welcomed his brother-in-law and sister, the William II and Mary, the mood of the country was openly hostile towards their English visitors. While Anne’s Catholic religion was a major sticking point, the Netherlands was also in the midst of a political crisis. The Stadholder sought to gain ascendancy over the Regents of Amsterdam, pursuing a hardline policy against Catholics in the Generality Lands (despite his own lax Calvinism) and opposing acceptance of the Treaty of Münster even though it formally recognized Dutch independence. William II’s policies proved hypocritical—he persecuted Catholics to gain the support of the lower classes while scrumptiously hosting the Catholic Princess of Wales without an issue.

Prince Charles was barely allowed to situate himself at The Hague before news of a naval mutiny arrived from England, the mutineers demanding the Earl of Warwick be re-appointed Lord Admiral. The mutiny had spread to nine ships from the North Sea squadron and rather than submit to Parliament, the small fleet defected and declared for the king, sailing for Helvoetsluys in the Netherlands, placing themselves at the disposal of the Prince of Wales. Charles hastened to take personal command of the fleet and left his wife (who was nearly six months pregnant) in the hands of his sister, Mary. Charles was joined at Helvoetsluys by his brother, the Duke of York (who had escaped from St. James palace only months earlier) as well as Prince Rupert of the Rhine and other senior royalists. Supplies were provided by the Prince of Orange, and others were purchased using revenue from Anne’s French estates.

The royalist fleet set sail at the end of July and arrived at Yarmouth days later. The Prince of Wales was highly ambitious and hoped to provoke an insurrection in favor of his father’s in East Anglia but soon found the region firmly in Parliamentarian hands. With no hopes of a royalist rising, the fleet set for the Downs in Kent, where Prince Charles issued a proclamation calling for the rest of the navy to declare for the king. The royalist fleet then began to seize merchant shipping in the channel, which put pressure on Parliament by London’s commercial interests to meet an agreement with the king. Prince Charles was soon joined by the Vice-Admiral Batten who added to the royalist fleet a privateering ship he partially owned. The Earl of Lauderdale also joined the Prince and attempted to influence Charles towards an alliance with the Scots and setting sail for Scotland to take titular command of the Engager Army. Yet Charles was deeply suspicious of the Presbyterians[1], perhaps influenced by his wife regarding the ‘harsh’ treaty that Charles I agreed to in 1647.

Charles reluctance to set sail for Scotland as well as the opposition of senior royalists such as Prince Rupert to the idea soon caused the expedition to ground at a halt. Remaining at the Downs, word soon arrived of the defeat of the Engager Army at Preston and the surrender of royalist garrisons in both Deal and Colcester. With these defeats, Charles and his council decided to return to the Netherlands. The crews protested this, preferring to sail up the Thames to convince Warwick’s fleet to defect to the king or to defeat in battle. While Charles flagship set sail for the Netherlands, several ships of the royalist fleet defied the orders of the officers and sailed for the Thames. Charles had no choice but to follow, despite his council expressing reservations. The fleet sailed down the Thames, and for a night the two fleets anchored nearly a league apart. But bad weather and Warwick’s disinterest in engaging the royalists caused the fleet to once more set sail for the Netherlands.

At Helvoetslys the royalist commanders argued amongst themselves for the failure of the expedition; Charles chose to return to The Hague where the Princess of Wales was currently staying. Towards the end of September, the Earl of Warwick used his fleet to blockade the royalists in port. While the Dutch harbored the royalists, they had no desire for the two fleets to engage in neutral waters and stationed a large squadron at Helvoetslys to prevent hostilities from breaking out. The mood of the royalist fleet was mutinous and Warwick’s agents worked to persuade them to rejoin the Parliamentarians. In October of 1648 chose to name Prince Rupert as vice-admiral in place of the incompetent Lord Willoughby. This appointment was unpopular and many sailors chose to desert from the fleet despite Rupert’s attempts to establish order over the unruly fleet. His draconian policies caused two ships to defect to the Parliamentarians in November of 1648.

The collapse of the royalist fleet depressed Charles who had hoped to set sail again in the Spring. His wife lifted his spirits, with promises that there would be other chances to strike against the Parliamentarians. It was also November that the Princess of Wales formally went into labor, delivering a healthy baby boy who was christened Prince Charles of Wales. The occasion was widely celebrated amongst the English exiles, representing the hope of success against the Parliamentarians. Recognizing the important effect of the birth, Charles saw that his son was christened by an English priest. It was at this christening that Charles first met Mary Stanley. Just as the infant Prince was the first of his many legitimate children, Mary would become the first of Charles’ many mistresses.

[1]In OTL, the Earl of Lauderdale became a lasting influence over Charles II; Anne d’Orléans is quite political and pushes Charles to take a hard-line against the treaty his father signed with the Scots in 1647; Charles never grows close to the man and remains quite suspicious of him.
 
Good idea...... It might work but how is Charles going to cross the channel.. Is not the RN the strongest in the world and fierce water of the channel make it impossible to lead an army that's just ASB
 
Good idea...... It might work but how is Charles going to cross the channel.. Is not the RN the strongest in the world and fierce water of the channel make it impossible to lead an army that's just ASB

Don't confuse the British navy of the 19th century with that of the 17th century. Britain's fleet was still second-rate at this time period: they didn't even surpass the French navy until the 1690s and the League of Augsburg. It's not even ASB considering the mutiny and feats described (Charles raiding the channel, sailing down the Thames) all happened in OTL.
 
Don't confuse the British navy of the 19th century with that of the 17th century. Britain's fleet was still second-rate at this time period: they didn't even surpass the French navy until the 1690s and the League of Augsburg. It's not even ASB considering the mutiny and feats described (Charles raiding the channel, sailing down the Thames) all happened in OTL.


Oh... I see... Nvm then continue:)
 
Just as the infant Prince was the first of his many legitimate children, Mary would become the first of Charles’ many mistresses.

It probably is the beggining of marital hell for Charles... A daughter of Gaston of Orleans probably won't accept "too kindly" her husband taking mistresses.:p
 
A fantastic time period to set a story about alternate royalty in.

As usual, not that much to say but reading closely.
 
Top