"For I Am One Favored By the Gods": The Rise And Fall of the Mauritian Dynasty

Space Oddity

Good update. Shows the flexible alliances and sudden flux of power at the time.

I would have assumed how much of the army was lost with Gordian's defeat is important. After all presumably the bulk of the army is with the emperor rather than his subordinate? However it does sound like it's not only a defeat but also a fairly heavy one and coupled with Ardashir's betrayal their supply line is exposed, forcing a withdrawal.

After this however the question is who will betray their 'ally' 1st, Ardashir or Artabanus;).

One quibble however. Did Babylon still exist as a settlement at the time? I though Selicius moved much of the population out to his capital at Seleucia, when he founded that?

Steve
 

Zioneer

Banned
An excellent update, Space Oddity.

I especially like the Empire's love for Macrinus (minus Rome), he seems to be one of the greatest Emperors of all time. He'll probably be deified by the pagans, and considered a "virtuous pagan" by the Christians.

I feel a little bit sorry for Gordian the Younger though. Eager, intelligent, loyal, and charming leaders are hard to find, and he nearly died with the overambitious attack.

Good to know that Rome will be much more powerful and interested in the East; In my Khazar timeline the Byzantines will do much the same (without the West of course), simply a few centuries later.

I like the schemes and betrayals among the Persians and Parthians a lot as well; but there seems to be nothing to stop the mighty Macrinus.
 
Space Oddity

Good update. Shows the flexible alliances and sudden flux of power at the time.

Thank you. :D

I would have assumed how much of the army was lost with Gordian's defeat is important. After all presumably the bulk of the army is with the emperor rather than his subordinate? However it does sound like it's not only a defeat but also a fairly heavy one and coupled with Ardashir's betrayal their supply line is exposed, forcing a withdrawal.

As you stated, most of the troops were with Macrinus--with a heavy reserve in Mesopotamia--focused in Hatra--and a garrison back in Babylon, whose fate shall be revealed. That stated, it wasn't an insignificant loss, and as you noted, the big deal is that with Ardashir no longer their "buddy" they can't be sure of their supplies. So--back to Roman territory.


After this however the question is who will betray their 'ally' 1st, Ardashir or Artabanus;).

Oh, yeah. It's really hard to base a lasting alliance begun with mutual betrayal, and--well, as Macrinus will detail, there are deep-rooted personality conflicts between the pair.

One quibble however. Did Babylon still exist as a settlement at the time? I though Selicius moved much of the population out to his capital at Seleucia, when he founded that?

Steve

Ha! Not only did it still exist at this time--but Seleucia didn't--the Romans burned it down in 165. IOTL Ardashir had to rebuild it.

An excellent update, Space Oddity.

Again, thank you.

I especially like the Empire's love for Macrinus (minus Rome), he seems to be one of the greatest Emperors of all time. He'll probably be deified by the pagans, and considered a "virtuous pagan" by the Christians.

Oh, yeah. He's definitely growing on people largely due to the simple fact that nothing succeeds like success. Rome has been suffering with a growing sense of decline and now--they're winning again. Sure, he's got a questionable start and he's not a classical Roman, but--you could say the exact same thing about Severus. Hell, you could say the exact same thing about the entire foundation of the empire.

And as I indicated way back in the beginning--ITTL, Macrinus casts a long shadow. After him--it's not the same Rome.

And there will be people less than thrilled with that.

I feel a little bit sorry for Gordian the Younger though. Eager, intelligent, loyal, and charming leaders are hard to find, and he nearly died with the overambitious attack.

To be fair it wasn't even that overambitious--had the Persians not gone for the backstab, it probably would have gone just fine. As for Gordian--he's kicking himself for this one. And before you get too worried, Macrinus doesn't believe in throwing subordinates away too hastily. Though he's not getting off scot-free either.

Good to know that Rome will be much more powerful and interested in the East; In my Khazar timeline the Byzantines will do much the same (without the West of course), simply a few centuries later.

Heh. Truth be told, the whole of the Eastern campaigns grew as I checked into the surrounding history and saw that this was one of the BEST chances Rome ever had to stabilize their Mesopotamian holdings--and Rome was headed by two of the top contenders for Worst Roman Emperor Ever, AND the Mediocrity that Walked Like a Man, Alexander Severus, during most of the affair. Macrinus was going to need to win the troops over somehow, and the changed dynamics of Artabanus' defeat turned the whole civil war into a free-for-all.

I like the schemes and betrayals among the Persians and Parthians a lot as well; but there seems to be nothing to stop the mighty Macrinus.

Well, reading Persian/Parthian history is like watching a nearly endless succession of Thirty Xanatos Pileups... "My brother has regained the throne! Impossible! I killed him in secret!"

And that said--Macrinus has the advantage of being a fairly competent general--now at least--with the best army in the field. And for those who think I'm exaggerating Rome's potency--IOTL, the afore-mentioned mediocrity, Alexander Severus, was able to fight Ardashir--by that point at the height of his power--to a standstill. With troops that were surly, rebellious, and badly trained. It fell to his son to regain Mesopotamia--and that was during the height of the Crisis.
 
And now, those extracts from Macrinus' Letter to his son I promised. Enjoy.

----

“…I entrust you, my son, to treat your elders with dignity and respect, to listen to the counsels of the wise and forswear the flattery of the foolish, and above all, to hold the gods in reverence, by whose munificent favor we have gained the rule of the greatest nation upon the earth. And I also hope that you will be kind to those beneath you in station, moderate in your habits, and careful in your thoughts, lest you prove unworthy of the heights to which we have climbed… For I grow more and more convinced that the gods hate an unjust, unworthy ruler, and love one that is good, and manages their realm according to the precepts of virtue.

“…And I say all of this, Diadumenian, for when I quit this life, it shall be you ruling in my place. I would consider all the praise I have received, and all the deeds I have accomplished as worthless if you should prove a tyrant or a fool. Cyrus of Persia was a magnificent King--Marcus Aurelius was a magnificent Emperor--and on a lesser order, Vespasian and my own dear lord Septimus were both worthy of the purple they wore. And yet what happened to all these great lords upon their deaths? Cambyses brought shame to the memory of Cyrus--Commodus brought shame to the memory of Marcus Aurelius--both Titus and Domitian brought shame to the memory of Vespasian, the first through frivolity, the second through evil. As for Septimus--need I detail the manifest unworthiness of his son, whom destroyed all the good favor his father had obtained with both men and the gods in a handful of years with wickedness and folly? I say this not because I think you are like these men--for I know you to be a good boy--but to bid you steel yourself that you may never be like them, remaining always a lover of virtue.…

“May good fortune, happiness, and the love of the Gods follow you, my son, for all the days of your life. Ulpian tells me you are reading Epictetus, which is excellent. I recommend to you Xenophon’s Education of Cyrus, for it is a most virtuous book, and one that a future ruler should study carefully…”
 
How exactly does Rome sustain itself without the grain imports?

And how long has it been since Macrinus has decided to "wait out" Rome rather than impose his authority in the City?

I would imagine that once his position is solidified, he's got to stop tolerating rivals, no matter how harmless (like the "False Nero"), they might be.

However, I like this TL and I will be keeping an eye on it.
 
How exactly does Rome sustain itself without the grain imports?

And how long has it been since Macrinus has decided to "wait out" Rome rather than impose his authority in the City?

I would imagine that once his position is solidified, he's got to stop tolerating rivals, no matter how harmless (like the "False Nero"), they might be.

However, I like this TL and I will be keeping an eye on it.

To answer your questions--

A) Not very well. (Though there's a steady trickle of smugglers and every now and then the Imperial Senate send a relief ship with a message that runs 'NOW are you willing to be sensible'?)

B) Longer than he expected. To be honest, without the whole Eastern affair occupying his attention, he'd have said 'screw it' by now and marched on the city. (Actually, I don't think it's too much of a spoiler to reveal that while the legions having been taking care of the East, the Imperial Senate has been tackling the whole 'Rome' issue. It's just taking them a while, because--well, the situation is a nasty little knot, and the Senate has tendency to debate things. Then debate things some more. Then reach an agreement to have further debate at the next meeting.) And yes--the pretenders are all living on borrowed time.

But trust me, his plan is going to have unexpected consequences.

Entreat? filler filler filler

No, 'entrust' as in to 'charge or trust with'. Less a request, more an order.

Ummm--sorry if that sounds snobbish. I tend towards the Grammar Nazi persuasion, even if I'm not above error.
 
Last edited:
PART 10: “…ONE WHO WILL TURN DEFEAT INTO TRIUMPH…”

“It didn’t take long for Macrinus and his retreating legions to find themselves in battle. A Persian scouting expedition, following the fleeing Gordian, set upon them, hoping to take advantage of what it assumed would be a disorganized, demoralized force. It was swiftly defeated, raising the spirits of the Romans, reminding them, Marius Maximus wrote ‘that they were still the greatest army in the field, and had only been defeated once, and that time by treachery.’ Heading westward, Macrinus had the good fortune to encounter Phraates, the self-proclaimed King of Elymais. [1] One of many local chieftains, Phraates hoped to reestablish the dismantled kingdom of his people, and had thrown his support to whoever might want it. He’d served Artabanus, Vologases and Ardishir each in their turns, and been disappointed by all. It now occurred to him that the great Emperor of Rome might prove a better long run investment. Macrinus agreed to support Phraates in his ambitions in the future, in return for his present aid. Phraates knew this was a gamble--but he took it, declaring to Macrinus ‘I hold your word as high as gold, for you have shown yourself to be a man of honor, and one who accomplishes his ends.’ Resupplying the legions, he escorted them to the Tigris, and ferried them across. The Roman army was now in Characene…

“Characene was a semi-independent buffer state that leaned towards the Parthians.[2] Its present ruler, Abinergaos III, was a man of little ability, less courage, and a rather desperate desire to make himself useful to whichever faction came out on top. [3] While he received the Roman emissaries kindly, as opposed to Phraates he saw little to be gained in supporting their cause. After sending them back to Macrinus with empty promises, he mustered a small army, and sent it against them, thinking to curry favor with whatever side won the ongoing war. Unfortunately for the king, Macrinus was expecting his ham-fisted attempt at treachery, and easily repulsed the Characene army. The legions then continued on their way north, seizing supplies as they went…

“As they passed through Babylonia, they were joined by Cassius Dio and the small Roman garrison Macrinus had left behind in Babylon. Following Ardashir’s treachery, a cabal of nobles in communication with the Persians had arisen and seized control of the city. They had been about to put the Romans to death when the populace had revolted, gathering in the streets to shout ‘Let the Romans free!’ Macrinus’ good treatment of the inhabitants and improvements to the city had earned his men much love, and the cabal, realizing that they might lose the city if they killed the garrison, had released them. Once again, this reunion was followed by a skirmish, this time when Roman scouts lead by the tribune of soldiers Lucius Valerius Claudius Acilius Priscillianus Maximus [4] discovered a small Babylonian force sent to kill the garrison in secret, which they quickly defeated. Hearing of this, many among the Romans, including Valerian, Tacitus, and Gordian the Younger, wanted to assault Babylon immediately, but Macrinus bid them wait. His emissaries had revealed that Hatra remained firmly wedded to the Roman cause, and he wished to regroup and rest before committing his forces to a major campaign. ‘Babylon will pay for her betrayal,’ he declared. ‘But only when the time is right.’

“Macrinus’ surprising optimism and good spirits were a great encouragement to his legions. When Marius Maximus asked him how he could keep in such a good mood, Macrinus replied ‘When all was easy I worried about the troubles that were to come--but now they are here, and they are not so great. I still command the greatest army in the world, and as for Ardashir and Artabanus--their friendship will not last. They are both too prideful--Ardashir because he is a great man, Artabanus because he is not, and wishes he was. Artabanus will hate and resent Ardashir, for he hates being the lesser man, and so he will be in any alliance--Ardashir will despise Artabanus, and feel associating with him diminishes his glory. As their alliance is doomed to fail, why then should I fear it?’

“The legions were harassed by irregular Babylonian forces for much of the way back north--these failed to do much damage to them. Further, the Romans met as many friends as enemies at this stage. However, soon Macrinus discovered that Characene and the Babylon cabal were pooling their forces for a final assault on the fleeing Romans, hoping to avenge their earlier defeats and wipe out the Roman threat at a time of perceived weakness. Realizing that there would be no avoiding battle, Macrinus had much of his cavalry hurry towards Hatra in hopes of bringing reinforcements as swiftly as possible, then had his men reinforce their present position. The cavalry were still gone when the Characene and Babylonian army arrived, with Abinergaos, eager for what he imagined would be easily-won glory, at its head. Macrinus had been in a similar position in Nisibis--but he had thought often of that battle, and his skills as a commander were greatly improved.

“On the first day, the Characenes and Babylonians charged the Romans five times--each time, they were repulsed with heavy losses for themselves, and mild losses for the Romans. Desperate, on the second day, Abinergaos had his troops--mostly cavalry--attempt a flanking, resulting in Macrinus’ famous order to his men--‘give them no flanks’. Before Abinergaos’ amazed eyes, the legions spread themselves out into a shallow, wide formation that his troops could not flank. [5] Ultimately the Characenes and Babylonians were forced to abandon the attempt. By now, Abinergaos and his allies were terrified--and this terror only worsened when the reinforcements from Hatra arrived. A plea for peace was sent to Macrinus, who noted bluntly that he would ’have no peace based on honor known to be false'. Surrounded, the now greatly-reduced army was soon crushed by the Romans and their Hatran allies, with Abinergaos being captured by Pupienus Pulcher.[6]

“Macrinus and his legions returned to Hatra as ‘the wonders of the world’. [7] Roman discipline and skill had turned what seemed like certain destruction into triumph... While the Emperor was concerned about the shifting situation in Rome, the Imperial Senate’s troops appeared to have things in order, leaving him a free hand to finish affairs in the East--for the moment. [8] At the celebration of their return and victories, the pathetic Abinergaos ceded his claim to Characene to ‘the all-conquering Emperor of Rome’ following which he was imprisoned. [9] And more good news was to come. Ardashir and Artabanus had joined forces to assault Vologases at Ecbatana. While they’d eventually succeeded in seizing the city--at great loss--the wily Arsacid had already fled back to Arsacia. [10] Artabanus had then conspired to seize control of the city, forcing Ardashir to retire back to Ctesiphon with very little to show for all his efforts. Clearly, the pair were already well on their way to fulfilling Macrinus’ prophecy. As for Vologases, through an emissary sent to his Armenian cousin, he notified Macrinus that he considered his previous offer of alliance as still on the table…” [11]

-----------------------------------
[1] Elymais was a Parthian subject kingdom created out of the old territory of the Elamites. (Old Elam had Susa as its capital--Elymais doesn't seem to have ranked so high.) It doesn't seem to have been a very prestigious kingdom, and its coinage has the interesting trait of having meaningless lines on the back--suggesting that it was created by someone who couldn't read Greek, and thus merely imitated what appeared to him as meaningless scribbles. Phraates is, I'm afraid to say, my own creation--we have very little idea who the various kings of Elymais were at this period. It appears that the Arsacids had deposed the local nobles a century back, and then had begun to gradually phase the kingdom out--something the Persians finished up for them. That stated, while Phraates may not have really existed, someone like him probably did, striving to take advantage of the eastern Empire's collapse, and being bitterly, bitterly disappointed. Consider Phraates my salute to all the minor kings in history that we don't know about, who strove to do their best for their people, and were rewarded not only with defeat, but virtual annhilation.

[2] Characene, also known as Mesene, lay on Persian Gulf, and provided a port to Susa and much of the Tigris-Euphrates area. It was a wealthy, somewhat important nation with a fairly prosperous capital, which IOTL, was conquered and absorbed by the Sassanids early on. Like many Eastern "nations" it was heavily dependent on the status quo of the Arsacids' loose-knit government to survive--once that ended, it was essentially doomed.

[3] Abinergaos III is the last-known King of Characene. Like all Kings of Characene, we mostly know about him from his coins. Thus I may be doing him a tremendous wrong, but hey--at least ITTL, he gets a sort of historical immortality. Not the best sort, but still--a sort.

[4] Lucius Valerius Claudius Acilius Priscillianus Maximus was the son of Lucius Valerius Messalla Apollinaris, who served as consul in 214, and who will be playing a significant role ITTL shortly. As for Lucius Valerius Claudius Acilius Priscillianus Maximus, IOTL, he was Consul twice, and urban prefect once. That and having such a wonderfully long name ensured that I would use him.

[5] IOTL, Macrinus had his army do something similar at Nibisis on the third day. It worked there too, supposedly.

[6] Tiberius Clodius Pupienus Pulcher Maximus, son of Marcus Clodius Pupienus Maximus, the IOTL emperor whose wound up playing such a significant role in all this.

[7] If it isn't exactly clear, accounts of Macrinus' Eastern campaigns ITTL come to us through a heavy mist of nostalgia and propaganda.

[8] And what exactly is happening? Well, that will revealed in a future post. But rest assured--it's not good.

[9] As noted earlier, IOTL Characene didn't survive the end of the old Arsacid kingdom. And yes, Rome now has a claim--a paper claim, so to speak, but still a claim--to the Mesopotamia all the way to the Persian Gulf. It's been a profitable little war--if they can make it all stick.

[10] Better known to us as the city of Rey--or Rhagae--in Iran.

[11] The Kings of Armenia were an Arsacid Dynasty, albeit one that leaned heavily towards Rome in an effort to maintain their autonomy.
 
Last edited:

Philip

Donor
Roman claims reaching to the Persian Gulf? Looks like the East will not be settling down anytime soon. Now something is brewing back in Rome? I can't wait for next Monday.
 
Roman claims reaching to the Persian Gulf? Looks like the East will not be settling down anytime soon. Now something is brewing back in Rome? I can't wait for next Monday.

Well, thanks. And actually, the present war in the East will wrap up in the next post. Remember, they were fighting for years before Macrinus even got involved, and his doing so has just accelerated things. There's a genuine sense of exhaustion among all sides at the moment.

Which doesn't mean that the East will be settling down to peace, harmony and love.

As for affairs in Rome.... Bwa-ha-ha-ha!
 

Zioneer

Banned
Well, thanks. And actually, the present war in the East will wrap up in the next post. Remember, they were fighting for years before Macrinus even got involved, and his doing so has just accelerated things. There's a genuine sense of exhaustion among all sides at the moment.

Which doesn't mean that the East will be settling down to peace, harmony and love.

As for affairs in Rome.... Bwa-ha-ha-ha!

Excellent. I do enjoy the rampant plots and schemes in the East, especially with the "too dumb to live" minor kings who really think they can outfight Roman arms and training.

It's a shame though, the Elamites seem to be a cool little nation. Perhaps a neo-Elamite state could pop up during the continued chaos?

Also, Hatra will be the common dividing line between Roman interests/influence, and more Eastern powers, right? They seem to be a loyal little city.
 
Excellent. I do enjoy the rampant plots and schemes in the East, especially with the "too dumb to live" minor kings who really think they can outfight Roman arms and training.

It's a shame though, the Elamites seem to be a cool little nation. Perhaps a neo-Elamite state could pop up during the continued chaos?

Also, Hatra will be the common dividing line between Roman interests/influence, and more Eastern powers, right? They seem to be a loyal little city.

To be fair to Abinergaos, the Romans really looked down for a moment, and he really doesn't get that for Macrinus this is more 'increase Rome's power in the region in a way that can last' than the 'let's play Alexander the Great!' that's pretty much been Rome's stock-in-trade in the East up until now. So, to his mind, he gets friendly with these people--while they're losing--when they pull out like they've done every other time, he really hasn't done much to help himself has he? And once, he's attacked them--well, if he doesn't finish the job, he's pretty much screwed isn't he? And--anyway--they're retreating. And it's been awhile. And he's got more men now. And allies.

Admittedly not too smart, but understandable.

As for Phraates and the Elamites--wait and see.;)
 
PART ELEVEN: “…ON THIS FIELD ONE SHALL FALL--EITHER HE OR I…”

“…Having regrouped and reinforced at Hatra, the Roman army marched east again, now with allied forces from the kingdom of Armenia, where they hoped to link up with Vologases‘ army and attack Ctesiphon. Another, smaller force under the leadership of legate Cassius Dio headed south hoping to reconquer Babylon and subjugate newly-won Characene. Dio’s task was simplified when the tottering pro-Persian cabal, still weakened by the losses near Hatra, was overthrown in a popular revolt. The new Babylonian regime opened the gates once again to the Romans, and Cassius Dio returned to the city to the grateful cheers of the populace. Those members of the cabal still alive were crucified, and their possessions seized… Going on to Charax Spasinu[1], Dio faced sporadic, but weak resistance, most of which ended when he produced Abinergaos, who tearfully told his subject nobles that he had given his realm to the Romans. Having done this, the former monarch killed himself shortly afterwards, declaring that as he would have to live with the shame of his utter defeat for the rest of his days, he did not want those days to be many…[2]

“Macrinus’ force had begun the march to Ctesiphon when it was discovered that Ardashir’s army was on the move as well. The Persian King of Kings’ prestige had suffered greatly thanks to the Emperor’s triumphant retreat to Hatra, and he’d been alarmed at the news of Vologases’ rapprochement with Macrinus. It was clear that if he did not defeat the Romans now, then he would have no hopes of unseating the Arsacids. But by this time, his soldiers were terrified of Macrinus, viewed as the greatest general in the war. The only way they would face him was under Ardashir’s direct leadership--for like Macrinus, Ardashir could boast that he’d never been defeated on the field in this conflict. As he lead his forces for one last battle against the Roman Emperor, Ardashir knew that his future would be decided in the upcoming fight…

“The two armies met near the Tigris. Macrinus had reinforced his position and had forced the Persians to cross the river to get to him, exhausting them--Ardashir would have refused battle, except that this would likely mean that his entire army would dissolve away. He thus forded the river as far as he reasonably could from the Roman forces, hoping to minimize harassment and lessen his chances of an ambush… The battle began poorly for the Persians, whose bravest troops insisted on performing a charge to commence the battle. By now the Roman legions could handle such tactics with dismissive ease, and repulsed the charge with the loss of only a single soldier. Having allowed his troops to burn off their zeal, Ardashir then began his battle in earnest. While a far wilier tactician and abler general than the hapless Abinergaos, the Persian king was facing the Roman army at its full strength, with a complete arrangement of cavalry. Macrinus allowed the Persians to dissipate their forces in futile attacks, while heading off efforts by cataphracts to flank his troops with his light Numidian cavalry, then wiping out the weakened units with his Parthian auxiliary. So desperate became Ardashir’s plight that he actually sent a division of horse archers out unsupported in hopes that their greater speed would allow them to avoid the fate of their fellows[3]--they did, in a manner of speaking, being killed by Macrinus’ cataphracts outright…

“It is a testament to Ardashir’s skill as a general that he managed to stay on the offensive for three days in these circumstances. But eventually, the inevitable happened. Ardashir’s attacks grew fewer and fewer, while Macrinus’ own cavalry counter-charges kept getting closer and closer to the Persian line. The last one was followed by a general charge of the Roman army that routed the Persians, and sent them into a desperate retreat. Ardashir barely escaped back to Ctesiphon, defeated and humbled. The full extent of the defeat only became obvious when Ardashir discovered that his beloved wife Myrōd, and favorite son Shapur had among those captured by the Romans… [4] Even worse, Artabanus had taken advantage of his “ally’s” misfortune by marching on Susa. When Macrinus offered to come to terms, Ardashir had no choice but to agree to a meeting…

“Ardashir and Macrinus met at the gates of Ctesiphon, where the Emperor, in a notably magnanimous act, restored the Persian monarch’s family to him. The two monarchs were swiftly joined by a third--Vologases arrived having, as Marius Maximus notes, rather conspicuously missed the battle--Marius suggests that the Arsacid prince had intentionally hung back, hoping to reach an arrangement with whomever won--or possibly wiping out both if they were weakened enough. [5] Still, regardless of these theories, Vologases proved receptive to Macrinus’ suggestions for a peace settlement… In truth, by this time both Vologases and Ardashir were exhausted by their years of warfare. Vologases, having seen his cause rise and fall more times than he could count, was willing to take what he could get, while Ardashir had sadly accepted that his dream of supplanting the Arsacids and restoring the glory of the Achaemenids had slipped beyond his grasp. Being the acknowledged master of the south of Iran was, to his mind, something of a consolation… Henceforth, there would be not one King of Kings in the east but two, a Parthian and a Persian… [6]

“Both Eastern monarchs were perfectly willing to accept Macrinus’ claims to Babylonia and Charcene, the first by acclaim, the second by conquest, as both realized neither had the ability to contest them at this time. His demands for the recognition of an independent kingdom of Elymais met with some resistance from Ardashir, but ultimately the Persian knew he especially was in no position to argue. Their treaty signed, they set off for Susa, joined by the newly-crowned King Phraates. By the time the armies reached the field, Artabanus and most of his army had fled back to Ecbatana--the allies contented themselves with wiping out stragglers and looting his supply train. That finished, Ardashir settled once again in Susa, while Vologases and Macrinus returned to Ctesiphon to wait for the new campaign season… In camp, the emperor dispensed honors to his legates, tribunes and centurions for the year’s campaigning. Gordian the Younger received honors for various acts of valor, and then had them stripped for his endangering of the entire army by his rash actions. Kneeling before Macrinus, the young tribune of soldiers declared that he not only deserved this rebuke, but worse ‘and I swear that the whole of my life shall be spent paying your gracious mercy…’

“Artabanus spent the winter in a mounting panic. Having betrayed both his brother and Ardashir, he was without allies. His efforts at bringing in his cousins from Iberia, Albania, and Chorasmia met with little success. [7] The Caucasian Arsacid monarchs had no stomach to march for Artabanus, with Vache, King of Iberia declaring, ‘I will not fight for you, kinsman, because that would mean to defend you and to fight Macrinus, and he is one the gods love, and you are one the gods hate’. Chorasmia appeared more willing--but demanded funds--allegedly for bribing Vologases’ officers in the area--and promises of territorial concessions before they’d even consider sending forces. Ultimately, they sent nothing, as Vologases kept a close watch of the negotiations, and outbid his brother at every turn. Worse, the Eastern provinces, the source of his strength, who had stayed loyal to him even in his earlier defeats, were now deserting Artabanus for for his brother, partially due to his failures on the field, and partially due to his increasingly tarnished reputation. Only Asaak stayed faithful… Time was finally running out for the Parthian king…

“The next year, the armies of the allies descended on Ecbatana. While the allies each overpowered their enemy by this point, all had other concerns that kept their troops busy[8]--and indeed, the simple problem of logistics meant that they could not field too huge an army there. As Artabanus still possessed a formidable army himself, increased with his troops from Esfahan, he decided to meet them in battle. Whatever doubts he may have felt internally, the Parthian king remained outwardly convinced that ‘I am the son of heaven, and heaven shall deliver me’ as he put it. Indeed, going into the battle, his spirits were good. Asaak was sending reinforcements, and he felt very certain that the allies would split shortly. His troops did not share his optimism--and their spirits sank further when Artabanus fell from his horse while reviewing his forces, shattering his ankle.[9] His doctor suggested he quit the field, but Artabanus would not hear of it, declaring as it was bound that he could ride, even if he could not walk, and that would be all he needed to do this day. Historians debate to this day the effect of that shattered ankle. While Artabanus was almost certain to lose, he might have been able to make a more respectable showing if he had not been constantly distracted by pain--and he might have chosen to retreat back into the safety of Ecbatana at the end, instead of the dramatic course of action he chose…

“ ‘Bring me those traitors’ heads!’ Artabanus is said to have raved when he saw the standards of Iberia and Albania in the service of his brother. And so the battle began with the traditional Eastern charge between Parthian and Persian troops. With that out of the way, the Romans took the field, which they swiftly dominated. Macrinus, watching the battle from a nearby hill, gave what direction he could through the tribunes Valerian and Gordian the Younger, as his legates Lucius Alfenus Senecio, Tiberius Julius Pollienus Auspex, and Marius Maximus [10] handled the situation on the ground. Artabanus, meanwhile watched as his troops fell in droves, retreating ever further towards Ecbatana. It was then that his hoped for deliverers arrived--the reinforcements of Asaak appeared on the field. They quickly took their position--and charged Artabanus’ forces. Vologases’ agents had taken the ancient capital of Parthia. Despairing, Artabanus threw a hateful gaze towards the man he blamed for all of this, and gathered his bodyguard for one, last desperate assault. ‘The earth may open before me--the heavens send its thunders to slay me--the waters of the world come here to drown me--but I will slay that accursed Macrinus!’ he shouted, as he spurred his horse onto a gallop… [11]

“Artabanus’ bodyguards were cut down beside him as he rushed towards the Roman emperor--he continued heedless of the cost. Moving through the battlefield like a man possessed, Artabanus approached Macrinus, shouting for him to face the Parthian King of Kings and die. As his few remaining bodyguards scattered and distracted the Emperor’s, he fired several shots from his bow--the first (and possibly the second) missed utterly, while Gordian the Younger stepped between the monarchs, blocking two shots with his shield while being wounded in the face by the last. Macrinus began to head for his horse as Artabanus drew his sword, but seeing he had no time, the Roman emperor took up his spear. Artabanus charged forward, hoping to run Macrinus down, and Macrinus stabbed forward, taking the Parthian in the stomach. (Cassius Dio says Macrinus threw the spear, but he is the only source who says this, and was not an eye witness, so it is safe to say that he is confused.) Artabanus fell from his horse with a sickening crunch, wrenching his good leg and landing on his shattered ankle. Staring at his fatally wounded foe shrieking in agony, Macrinus drew his sword, and with one stroke, severed Artabanus’ head. [12] Macrinus saw that Gordian received proper treatment for his wound, and then sent the news to his allies--the great war of the East was finally over…

“Arriving in Ecbatana, the allies were startled to find, as they looted its palace, a small room that Artabanus had filled with images of Macrinus--statues smeared with blood and lying on their backs as if slain--pictures and coins placed in water and lye to disfigure and fade them. All were amazed at Macrinus’ lack of fear at such an ill sight, but he dismissed their wonder with a shrug. ‘Why should I fear? Like all wicked men, Artabanus believed he could command the gods. That I live and he is dead is proof that all his efforts were merely delusion and vanity.’

“…With Artabanus dead, the allied monarchs finalized their treaties, Ardashir returning swiftly to Susa, and then further on to Persepolis. With the situation in the East well under hand, Macrinus was free to leave the newly expanded Roman Mesopotamia in the hands of Cassius Dio, and head back to Europe, where the forces of the Barbarian Pretender Maximinus Thrax [13] were well on their way to collapse…”

------------------------
[1] Charax Spasinu was the capital of Characene. It was originally named 'Alexandria'--like a lot of other cities, but wound being known as Charax--which basically means 'fort' after some rebuilding--Hyspaosines after its first king, which semantic drift turned into Spasinu.

[2] A suspicious death, albeit one that really doesn't help the Romans much. Of their newly acquired territories, expect Characene to cause the most problems.

[3] The traditional use of eastern mounted archers in large battles involved them supporting--and being defended by--the cataphracts during their charges, mixed of course, with the infamous Parthian shot.

[4] Yes, this is that Shapur. And if you're wondering why he's even here--well, Persian kings used to take their wives and children with them on battles. This caused quite a few problems over the years--in fact IOTL, Shapur's son Narseh wound up having to make a rather humiliating peace with Galerius after the latter overran his camp and took his wives and children hostage.

[5] If it isn't abundantly clear by now, Vologases is kind of a coward. A smart coward, mind you--but still a coward.

[6] Further detail on this peace will come in a supplementary post. Suffice to say, neither Vologases or Ardashir finds it a perfect arrangement--but both of them are tired of fighting, and rather spooked.

[7] The Iberia and Albania mentioned here are Caucasian kingdoms allied with the Parthian kingdon, eached ruled by its own Arsacid dynasty. Chorasmia--or Khwarezm--was the latest of a series of states centered on the Amu Darya river delta.

[8] Obviously, everyone has areas of questionable loyalty to shore up, potential rebels to control, and Macrinus has whatever's happening in Rome to deal with...

[9] Or spraining it. Or perhaps doing nothing of the kind. Accounts of this battle ITTL are highly prone to... embellishment.

[10] Lucius Alfenus Senecio was the last governor of Roman Britain before the province was divided under Caracalla. ITTL, he's very much Macrinus' man right now. Tiberius Julius Pollienus Auspex was a governor of Britannia Superior, and possibly before that of Numidia. Again, ITTL he's one of Macrinus' New Men.

[11] Or at least, that's what the people writing it afterwards figured he said. Eastern monarchs seem to have been somewhat prone to this sort of 'go out with a blaze of glory' thinking at times, especially when there was nothing left for them to lose.

[12] Or stabbed him through the throat. Or did nothing as he was already dead. As I've noted, ITTL, this battle has had a lot of writers at it, trying to make a good tale better. (IOTL, by the way, Artabanus was supposedly killed in hand to hand with Ardashir.)

[13] IOTL, Maximinus Thrax was the Roman Emperor from 235-238, who I will detail in length in the next post. ITTL--his career has taken a similar, yet different, turn a bit earlier. (And for those wondering why I've used Maximinus--well, I needed someone crazy, and in the end, he just fit the bill perfectly.)
 
Last edited:

Philip

Donor
Well done.

So, the Sassanids survive, but with greatly reduced territory and somewhat indebted to the Romans. Was Shapur released?
 
Well done.

So, the Sassanids survive, but with greatly reduced territory and somewhat indebted to the Romans. Was Shapur released?

Philip

More to the point the Parthians survive, at least for the moment.

Shapur and his mother were restored to their father/husband shortly after the defeat which led to their capture.

Steve
 
Space Oddity

Good update and a very good result for Rome. Persia is basically split into three, with Rome having the richest part, which also gives them sea links to the eastern markets. The rest, war torn and exhausted, are split between Parthian and Persian monarchs who are unlikely to be friendly to each other. [Unless the empire suffers serious problems or possibly an eastern army commander making a bid for the purple and leaving the provinces undefended. However this is unlikely to be a factor while Macrinus's dynasty is strong.

So Maximinus Thrax has tried a rebellion somewhere in Europe presumably? Which sounds like it has failed, presumably because of Macrinus's loyal subordinates? Although given Thrax's relatively lowly status possibly he tried winning over Rome and got an embarrassing rejection?

Steve
 

Philip

Donor
More to the point the Parthians survive, at least for the moment.
Indeed, but I had somewhat anticipated this. I was curious whether the Sassanids would be completely defeated or would be able to carve out their own kingdom. Now I wonder about the development of Zoroastrianism. Will there be the possibility of a religious divide between the Persians and Parthians? With a split Eran, could the Kushans survive?

Shapur and his mother were restored to their father/husband shortly after the defeat which led to their capture.

Thanks. I missed that the first time through. Oh, well. I was looking forward to him being raised in Macrinus's court.
 
Last edited:

Zioneer

Banned
I must say, for being a coward, Vologases is persistent. Probably the most intelligent of the Eastern monarchs, as well. Shapur will likely overshadow him, though, even with a diminished inheritance. I assume this is Shapur II, of the "crowned en utero" fame?

Also, yay Elamite survival! Awesome! I hope they prove to be a wildcard in the region, to Roman and Persian/Parthian interests alike.

Ardashir, I think, will go even further east, perhaps attempting to imitate Alexander the Great's conquests towards India.

Moving back to the Roman side of things, I think Gordian the Young has learned his lesson. He'll be a more cautious fellow, likely.

Maximinus Thrax... Oh geez, is that who I think it is? Hahaha, this'll be good. Do I smell a alt-"Year of Six Emperors" thing going on in Rome itself? :p
 
I must say, this is an interesting timeline. I must, however, take issue with your repeated insults against one of Rome's better late emperors. It is quite jaring to see an otherwise well-researched timeline fall victim to the revisionist histories put forth by an unloyal Senate. But not too jarring ;).
 
I must say, for being a coward, Vologases is persistent. Probably the most intelligent of the Eastern monarchs, as well. Shapur will likely overshadow him, though, even with a diminished inheritance. I assume this is Shapur II, of the "crowned en utero" fame?

Nope. Shapur I. Shapur II is his great-grandson.

I must say, this is an interesting timeline. I must, however, take issue with your repeated insults against one of Rome's better late emperors. It is quite jaring to see an otherwise well-researched timeline fall victim to the revisionist histories put forth by an unloyal Senate. But not too jarring ;).

I assume you mean Alexander Severus. To which I say, yes he was, but largely because he was facing such distinctly lackluster competition.

Unless you're suggesting Maximinus Thrax or Elgabalus. Or... Caracalla...
 
Last edited:
Top