I have thought about this idea for some time, namely trying to somewhat reconcile things that are discussed so often and from so many angles by military afficionados like the germans, japanese, soviets and even the chinese doing better militarily, while at the same time to at least try not to be a bloodthirsty maniac (as there are enough topics around here in which some are joyously and enthusiastically "killing" tens, even hundreds of millions of peoples more in a prolonged and or more savage WW2 or an atomic WW3).
So given that USSR, Germany, Japan and China suffered the vast majority of deaths and destruction in WW2, would be interesting to hear ideas of how they can on one side, all do better militarily against their respective foes (eg. Japan vs US/UK, USSR vs Germany, Germany vs. US/UK etc.) and at the same time suffering as fewer casualties especially civilian as reasonably possible, while WW2 ends more or less about same time, give or take a few months. This ATL contains of course contradictory requirements, but this is the "interesting" part. You can add other countries if you want, like Italy.
So given that USSR, Germany, Japan and China suffered the vast majority of deaths and destruction in WW2, would be interesting to hear ideas of how they can on one side, all do better militarily against their respective foes (eg. Japan vs US/UK, USSR vs Germany, Germany vs. US/UK etc.) and at the same time suffering as fewer casualties especially civilian as reasonably possible, while WW2 ends more or less about same time, give or take a few months. This ATL contains of course contradictory requirements, but this is the "interesting" part. You can add other countries if you want, like Italy.