Typo
Banned
Fascism is just a catchall phrase for any authoritarian regime because of its emotional weight and ill definition in the first place. In reality fascism was something unique to the mid 20th century as a reactionary force against perceived loss in WWI, Marxism and Anglo-American Capitalism which basically makes no sense at all to any of the countries today.Didn't someone or other once say of the KMT that it was "Fascist in all respects save efficiency", or something along those lines? I think you could make an argument now that the modern PRC is closer to fascism than anything else. It is certainly promoting a governmental model based on authoritarian capitalism, with close ties between big business and government, and a very strong measure of restoring "lost national glory"...
If the Chinese economy continues to grow quickly, you may see the authoritarian-capitalist "Chinese model" spread beyond Burma and parts of Africa. It won't be popular anywhere where democracy is already entrenched, but I could see it popular in many poor countries that are already authoritarian and anti-Western.
Anyway, in regards to the OP's question, I could see fascism being popular as a Third World ideology for countries that are already deeply anti-Western and want to upset the global status quo. Places like a nationalist-run China, along with parts of the Middle East and South America, seem like workable candidates.