FALN kill Carter, Mondale, and George H. W. Bush in 1980

In March 15, 1980, Armed members of FALN raided the campaign headquarters of Carter-Mondale in Chicago and the campaign headquarters of George H. W. Bush in New York City. Let say Carter, Mondale, and George H. W. Bush was they, and the FALN kill them.

(This might be ASB, but this could have happen)
 
Reagan has a different running mate. I am thinking Laxalt. Kennedy wins the Democratic nomination. The time frame does not give President O Neil snout time to organize a campaign.
 
ONeil would have to quit his Congress Seat to become President,right?
Who would replace him as Speaker and would that person have a less Toxic relationship with Reagan if hes elected?Maybe EWK gets elected out of sympathy and a rally around the flag effect.
 
ONeil would have to quit his Congress Seat to become President,right?
Who would replace him as Speaker and would that person have a less Toxic relationship with Reagan if hes elected?Maybe EWK gets elected out of sympathy and a rally around the flag effect.

Doubtful, Edward Kennedy was strongly disliked outside the East Coast and had no real connection with Carter except for being in the same party.
 

Driftless

Donor
I think it would become a dystopian fantasy.

Remember, at the same time that the Iranians are still holding the 80 American Embassy folks as hostage. The US was also in what was termed a "National Malaise". With FALN violently attacking both major parties during an election, the combination would have been viewed as war against the US; regardless of lack of connection between events. The cynic in me would see great internal pressure to crack down on any Hispanic or Middle Easterner within the US as a result. ( OTL, loyal Iranian Americans suffered increased discrimination and abuse during the hostage crisis.). While FALN was specifically Puerto Rican in focus, you could imagine conspiracy theory would pull in the Cubans, any other other "Red" connection, Columbian drug cartels, and anyone looking Hispanic.

There would be a great deal of pent up, near impotent fury, while investigators sorted out the details. Somebody is going to get pounded.... hard... i.e. "Remember the Alamo", "Remember the Maine", "9/11..." As an outlet valve, I could also imagine that the Iranian hostage crisis heat up real quick - Bring them home today, by whatever means necessary ....

I don't see this playing out well at all.
 

CalBear

Moderator
Donor
Monthly Donor
Lets not forget that, had the POTUS or candidates been present the offices would have been robustly protected by Secret Service and swarms of local law enforcement.

In all the odds are beyond astronomical.
 
Even if the FALN succeeds in some fashion, the members will likely be killed/captured.

And I highly doubt, as a result, that any president will grant clemency to FALN members, especially if they killed either of the three targets mentioned. (If you think Clinton (1) got heat IOTL for clemency for FALN members, if he tries anything like this ITTL, he'd be slammed. Hard.)

(1) That's even assuming Clinton becomes president ITTL.
 

Realpolitik

Banned
Reagan wins big time, with carte blanche to go after a much more muscular foreign policy. If this is possible.
 
Who would replace him as Speaker and would that person have a less Toxic relationship with Reagan if hes elected?Maybe EWK gets elected out of sympathy and a rally around the flag effect.[/QUOTE]

Was Jim Wright majority leader? He dealt with Reagan as Speaker 1987 - 1989.
 
Top