What would Europe look like if the Nazi conquer all of Europe but implodes violently decades later? How long would it take for the continent to recover? How would countries like Switzerland, Spain, and the UK handle the inevitable refugee crisis?
It depends on how the collapse takes place. Are we talking Germany descending into syria or USA and UK going for an alpha strike?
That also depends on what went on in Germany whilst the NSDAP was running things there. How much of their Germania plans were implemented? Calbear's The Anglo/American - Nazi War goes into excellent detail on the Nazi's plans for their newly conquered territories. If left unmolested enough to have implemented them, then there'd not be many folk left in Germania to contest the collapse and that would drive how the implosion went along.
No it won't, the Nazis never planned on mass ethnic cleansing of western Europe outside of the JewsSyria is a very difficult situation due to the ethnic and religious diversity which would not be present in nazi Europe which would be mono ethnic and mono religious.
AFAIK they weren't planning on working everyone to death, they expected to keep 30 million alive as chattel slaves and kept alive to breed more. That feels gross even having to type that to describe Nazi plans.CalBear also stated that he can't a victorious Reich lasting longer than 1980. Once all the slave labor has been worked to death their economy will suffer greatly.
AFAIK they weren't planning on working everyone to death, they expected to keep 30 million alive as chattel slaves and kept alive to breed more. That feels gross even having to type that to describe Nazi plans.![]()
RousseauX,
I think you might want to recheck the details of Generalplan Ost. It included quite a bit more than just the Jews... And really, can you imagine the Nazis being sated with exterminating just the Jews and the untermenschen of the east?
The other part of it was Wehrbauer German colonists. Plus the Nazi birth policies were to build up the German populace to have a large domestic workforce and if their policy of recruiting foreign allied or conquered labor for Germany, that would probably continue too, much as Germany had to get migrant workers post-WW2 due to more jobs than workers. As it was they were using a lot of cheap Italian, Greek, Polish, etc. unskilled labor.Those chattel slaves would be on farms in the East though. I can't speak on the economic feasibility of their plantations but I highly doubt the entirety of Nazi Europe can stay afloat based solely off the efforts of illiterate serfs picking grain and vegetables in the Ukraine.
In the east yeah the plan was to kill 80% of everyone but the Nazis didn't really hate ethnic French or Spaniards that much and if you were Wallonian or somtething you were most of the way to being GermanRousseauX,
I think you might want to recheck the details of Generalplan Ost. It included quite a bit more than just the Jews... And really, can you imagine the Nazis being sated with exterminating just the Jews and the untermenschen of the east?
The Nazis were far more extreme than any of the Eastern Bloc countries, there are depths they would stoop to to enforce pronatalism that the Romanians and all others would not. Putting aside just how deeply ingrained in ideology and hence open to manipulation the generations born after 1933 would be, I could easily see the Nazis simply passing laws to enforced or at least made extremely expensive to avoid all families (other than the ruling class) to have X number of children. Perhaps restrictions of access to healthcare or education for any family that cannot come up with a reason for not having 5 or 6 children? They probably wouldn't jump into the deep end on these policies immediately, but the Nazi solution to failure would simply double down (or triple, or quadruple...) until they got results. Honestly, I could see enforced insemination for working class 'Aryans' (if not _Germans_). It's hard to top the Nazis.
Sure, I don't doubt that they'd do all kinds of terrible things. I just question whether these would actually work. Negative sanctions can produce a modest effect, as the example of Romania shows. If you're going to enact hugely negative ones, like denying families without a requisite and plausible number of children access to public services or imposing punitive taxation, then all you're going to do is limit general access to basic services and impoverish existing families. (Not that very large families will do better.)
Human nature might be flexible, but human demographics are not nearly so plastic. Fertility rates were falling in Germany for explicable reasons: an increasingly urban population, with access to modern education and aspirations towards higher standards of living in an uncertain economic contrast, was limiting its births. There may be things that Nazi Germany could do to reverse these trends, like seeing an economic boom post-war that will lead to a baby boom. Will Nazi Germany's leadership be able to do that? Separate question.
How will the Nazis fall apart? We need to know.
Human demographics become a lot more plastic when you put into place policies that amount to "do this, or die".
If Nazi Germany's government is going to be threatening to murder most of the German population unless these people do unrealistic things, then Germany is going to end up killing a good share of its population.