If they have Quebec then they'd best be nicer to Catholics. Not sure what the Italians did in the US, I was thinking whatever role they filled in South Africa or the Carribbean.But how many, do you think? Due to the fact that a British North America may be more hostile to Catholicism, do you think they could fill much the same role as Italian immigrants?
If they have Quebec then they'd best be nicer to Catholics. Not sure what the Italians did in the US, I was thinking whatever role they filled in South Africa or the Carribbean.
Hmm... given the Court of St. James wasn't all that enthusiastic about British America in general, it's doubtful they would have bothered to acquire the lands we bought via the Louisana Purchase.
All land in British America belonged to the Crown, with parts held under feoff and sections chartered for cities, so there was no big reason to push west.
I'd guess the ethnic mix would be pretty much the same, but the political boundaries would be much different.
Honestly, if the British allow free emigration, you'll see the same mix I think, in many ways. Lots of Brits at first, followed by Germans and such later. Italians, Poles, even Irish are later and will be heavily butterflied.
Will the 'USA' have slavery? Or what is the deal with the South?
I don't see why Britain wouldn't still ban slavery. This will probably cause some kind of rebellion/attempted seccession in the South, which will require a good number of British troops to deal with.
Do you think there would be a sort of Liberia-colony set up from British territory in Africa?
If they have Quebec then they'd best be nicer to Catholics. Not sure what the Italians did in the US, I was thinking whatever role they filled in South Africa or the Carribbean.
Given that there was in OTL, yes.
Wait, you gave us that? Did you sell it? I always thought it was just some crappy coast no one else wanted (it being pre-scramble and all) where we tried (and failed) to send all of our blacks.