Tom Skylark
Banned
http://www.raptureforums.com/forum/...ian-chronology-exodus-rehoboams-5th-year.html Some 521 years of Egyptian history matching the 521 year chronology of Ancient Israel.
Archaeologist found Amenhotep III scarabs at Jericho in the graves where people were buried after Jericho's destruction. Amenhotep III was the last king to have trade with Jericho because there were no scarabs found of Akenaton. In the Tel-Amarna letters the city of Jericho is not mentioned because Jericho has already been destroyed. Joshua 6:26 Joshua placed a curse on Jericho and no Egyptian king after Amenhotep III had trade with Jericho for it was not rebuilt until 600 years later in Israel king Ahab's reign. (1 Kings 16:30-34) Check out the archaeological facts about Amenhotep III scarabs and Jericho not being in the Tel-Amarna letters.
Why condemn the research without reviewing the ancient history? It can make sense if you review the 521 year brief simple history. Why target a website if we are actually searching to find historical imformation on a subject which is highly debated? Whose wrong whose right should be a topic for discussion.
Archaeologist found Amenhotep III scarabs at Jericho in the graves where people were buried after Jericho's destruction. Amenhotep III was the last king to have trade with Jericho because there were no scarabs found of Akenaton. In the Tel-Amarna letters the city of Jericho is not mentioned because Jericho has already been destroyed. Joshua 6:26 Joshua placed a curse on Jericho and no Egyptian king after Amenhotep III had trade with Jericho for it was not rebuilt until 600 years later in Israel king Ahab's reign. (1 Kings 16:30-34) Check out the archaeological facts about Amenhotep III scarabs and Jericho not being in the Tel-Amarna letters.
Why condemn the research without reviewing the ancient history? It can make sense if you review the 521 year brief simple history. Why target a website if we are actually searching to find historical imformation on a subject which is highly debated? Whose wrong whose right should be a topic for discussion.
Hmmm...http://www.raptureforums.com/forum/...ian-chronology-exodus-rehoboams-5th-year.html Some 521 years of Egyptian history matching the 521 year chronology of Ancient Israel.
The issue I take is that you are working from the conclusion that biblical history is correct and working backwards from there to fit the data into that conclusion. It is rife throughout what you wrote and it serves to taint practically everything you say in it. Your conclusions are pretty much all rely on the first assumption that biblical history is correct, and then fitting the relevant biblical details into the historical data that we do have. In my opinion that is bunk historical methodology and it taints the entire thing.
Why wasn't this thread closed/moved?