Eagles and Hawks

I'm not sure you are describing the situation that will be in your TL, OTL, or both. I know that there were degrees of less passivity. For instance, significant preaching against Christians adopting the ways of Arabs (Mozarabation) by around the turn of the century (800) and Hakam I deposing or killing a number of his Christian officials let alone the later Martyrs of Córdoba.

Well, i said "passivity" but not "coma". Of course there will be still some religious troubles, but even OTL it was limited actions due to the reject of arabisation of Christians, i would say even "epidermic reactions". The high clergy rejected it, as the christian states and all that ended soon.
Even Ibn Hafsun actions were importants, but didn't meet a great echo, critically after his conversion.

ITTL, the Hispano-Roman population would be less passive, but in comparaison of the dynamism of the smaller Arabs or Berber population, the local population looks passive. The Gotandolos will form a more reactive population, but even as part of the Hispano-Roman population and distinct from the rest of mawali, they'll tend to have a separate action.
You'll have gontandolos hajib, but not "not-gontandolos" hispano-roman.

EDIT : And this is the 100th post of EaH! Yohooo!
 
[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]752 – 756[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif] Opportunities[/FONT]

[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]While Pepin's reign was consecrated by the Frankish church, the Pope became isolated in Rome, after that the Basileus Constantine V continued his iconoclast policy and the Lombard's king, Aistulf conquered Ravenna, putting an end to the Byzantine occupation of central Italy.[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif] [/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]Once Zachariah dead, his successor Peter refused to become just one more Lombard bishop and seek for help against Aistulf that was close to take the remnants of the Exarchate, including the Ducatus Romanus with the city of Rome and all the Latium.[/FONT]

[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]But with the disintegration of the Visigothic kingdom, letting only two little precarious states at the periphery of Al-Andalus and the internal religious and social troubles in the Roman Empire, only the Frankish kingdom united beyond a sacred and strong family could be the ally that the Papacy needed.[/FONT]

[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]Pepin III, still after more legitimacy and opportunities to increase his power benefited furthermore of a relative calm in Al-Andalus, where al-Sumail and

Yusuf al-Fihri managed to according themselves against the tentative of independence of both the walis of the province and the other leaders of Kaysits and Kalbits.
[/FONT]

[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]In 753, al-Sumail led an expedition to the Ebra basin, both to make the Goths remember that these lands weren't their anymore and to defeat the wali of Sharkusta who gave many worrying sings of independence. [/FONT]

[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]The military option wasn't the only that the governor and al-Sumail used. The Maslamids returned in this coalition after an expedition in western Betica in middle 753, more a safety to their own power in Lusitania than a tentative to growing it at the peninsular scale.[/FONT]

[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]In these conditions, the pope had no choice but cross the Alps and join Pepin. Reaching the Valais, he obtained to talk with the king, urging him to save Rome and the Papacy from Aistulf's grasp.[/FONT]

[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]Petre having a passionate nature but his gesture towards Pepin, to genuflecting as before a byzantine emperor marked the Frankish and devotes' spirits.[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif] By acknowledging Pepin as no less than the western equivalent of the Basileus, the traditional protector of Rome, the Church and the dogma, critically when the emperor was discredited for his intolerant and brutal religious policy, the Papacy couldn't have more pushed the Franks to feel themselves as a new “chosen people” and destined to restore the Christianity in all his glory in Italy as Pepin and Carolman did by their religious reforms.[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]Henri Tumez, “Histoire de Francie – Tome II : Les Francs[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]Pepin decided then to help the Pope against the Lombards, swearing to save the “Republic of the Romans” and to give to “Saint Peter” his “patrimony” : all the fallen Exarchate of Ravenna, instead of giving it back to the Byzantines.[/FONT]

[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]In recognition of the new role owned by the Frank, Peter sacred anew Pepin, using again a davidic inspiration but also the religious rite of confirmation by the highest moral authority of the Western world.[/FONT]

[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif] Furthermore, not only the king but his heirs, sons and eventual descendents. His whole family was considered as the temporal leaders and protectors of Christianity under the spiritual governance of the Pope they had to protect, as the title now owned by Pepin, “Patrice of the Romans”, commanded it by merging the Papacy and Rome.[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]
And now, obeying to Pepin wasn't anymore a duty created by the vassalic ties, but also a religious commandment, issued from the will of God.
[/FONT]

[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]Being rebellious against the Frankish king, anointed by the Pope and then chosen by the Divine Providence, became a crime against the Church.[/FONT]

[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]It's a position to qualify still. If the reformations of the Church in his own domains have led to a more obedient clergy, both to the king and to the pope, the most important nobles still independent de facto from Pepin's rule managed to keep their own clientele in their local monasteries and keep the control of their own bishops. [/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]
The consecration of the Pepinids was critically intended for the Frankish nobility still loyal to the Merovingians, the heir always being imprisoned in a convent, or by interest or by conviction.
[/FONT]

[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]The ardour of Peter and the consecration of the Pepinids, inspiring the nobles, managed to form an army quite soon and in the middle of 753, Pepin was in position to force Aistulf to stop his progression.[/FONT]

[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]As Pepin began to advance, the Lombard send an message to him, saying that he had decided to withdraw from the Latium. Even if the Lombards keep Ravenna and 2/3 of the Exarchate, he considered then his mission towards the Church as ended, and began anew to dress plans against his supposedly vassals in Bavaria and Aquitània, more rebels than ever.[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]
These rebellions was indeed a threat, not because of their potentially nuisance, but critically because it allowed many nobles of secondary importance and some great lords, more or less linked to the rebel dukes by blood or common interests, to refuse to acknowledge all the power claimed by Pepin.
[/FONT]

[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]But, the next year, he had to advance again against Aistulf. One of the chronicler of the late Carolingians, the Anonymous of St-Gall, explained it then: “The remorse of having gave his mission in exchange of empty promises, and penitent to the admonishments of the Pope, Pepin decided to unite the Franks again and to battle the king of the Lombards”.[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]
It's nevertheless more probable that Aistulf didn't leave the Latium and continued to attack the Duchy of Roma when the spring came.
[/FONT]

[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]Managing to form an army against the will of many of his vassals, more willing to make a demonstration of force as in 753 more than making a real expedition, Pepin attacked the Kingdom of the Lombards in June of 754.[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif] [/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif] Meanwhile, Chrodegang the bishop of Metz was invested by Petrus to continue the reformation of Austrasian Church, building here, and in Germany, a church devoted to the interest of Christianity, confounded with the ones of the Frankish Kingdom.[/FONT]

[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]In reality, as the prestigious bishopric seat implied (Metz was the birthplace of Pepinid dynasty) Chrodegang was in charge of this mission for the Frankish king, mission not also supported by recuperated (probably for his own benefit) by the Papacy.[/FONT]

[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]The Frankish heavy cavalry gave many victories to Pepin on his road to Pavia and Rome. Beaten at Lodi by a Franko-Bavarian army as Pepin have convinced his nephew Tassilon or more likely his sister, in charge of the Dukedom, to join this holy expedition,[/FONT]

[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif](Note there that the Aquitània lost another ally during this war, the Bavaria always being the traditional friend and co-belligerent against the Franks during the revolts against Charles and Pepin)[/FONT]

[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]the Lombards were also defeated in the Pentapole, near Rimini. Aistulf had no choice but leave the Latium (with Orvieto and Viterbe), the Sabine and the Pentapole (formed by the five bishoprics of Rimini, Pesaro, Fano, Senigallia and Ancona), and leaving Ravenna to the Byzantines, represented by Sergius of Bologna.[/FONT]

[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]The fact is the Exarchate was since the VII quite independent from Constantinople. Pepin wanted most probably to give the region to a local noble, still theoretically dependent from the Basileus, but in reality reliving from the Pope. It was a way to conciliate both Papal interests and Byzantine claims.[/FONT]

[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]By giving to Saint-Peter the keys of the cities abandoned by the Lombards, the Ducatus Romanus, a temporal institution inherited from the conquest of Justinianus, became the “Patrimony of Saint-Peter”, a temporal but also spiritual possession of the Church, administered only by the Pope without any other relevance than God itself.[/FONT]

[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]At least, it was the theoretical foundations of this state. In reality, the Frankish Kingdom have an heavy influence on it, only balanced by the remnants of Byzantine one. In these conditions, maybe the Pope enjoyed the distance created by the Kingdom of the Lombards that allowed to limit Pepin's interventions.[/FONT]

[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]In Al-Andalus, the situation continued in a singular regularity. In summer the wali and al-Sumail organized an expedition against troublesome governor or Muslim leader, or as in 755, against the Christians.[/FONT]

[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]But, at the contrary of the previous ones, Yusuf al-Fihri wasn't really victorious from this one. If he managed to ravage a part of the Asturias, he didn't succeed to subjugate them under the Muslim rule. Even if Alfonso I have build a far more powerful state that his father have ruled, his kingdom wasn't that powerful to indefinitely resist to the Muslims, but he nevertheless hold in check the plans of the wali.[/FONT]

[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]To the defense of Yusuf al-Fihri, al-Sumail was worried about a too prestigious wali and didn't give him enough men to lead a undoubted victorious campaign, using the pretext of a campaign of his own in Betica, where a local noble “deserved a punishment for his attitude”. [/FONT]

[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]Even by using his usual ways, judged brutal even by his supporters, the campaign against rebellious Christian, viewed as little more than a quite disorganized band of highlanders, suffered from the reality.[/FONT]

[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]After his campaign in Asturias, al-Fihri decided to “help” al-Sumail in the south, demonstrating a “savage and brutal force against Muslims that refused to acknowledge his mandate.[/FONT]

[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]Indeed the rebellion against the Ummayads and their eventual fall and slaughter have finished to destroy the alliegances towards Dimashq that the locals nobles, that they were wali or generals or only leaders among their peoples. The Andalusian chroniclers will please themselves into describing the “disorder that reigned on the land” (al-Mour), “each clan being opposed to others”(ibn Khaldun), “nobody respected the emir, because he wasn't at all respectable”(Malik ibn Aziz). Of course, an important part of this considerations were influenced by the need that the Ummayads felt to do up their role in the stabilization of the peninsula.[/FONT]

[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]But Hispania was indeed in a tumultuous situation, and the Gothic Chronicles (the version of St-Guilhèm) mention that “when the king wanted to took back the lands his father gave him, the Saracens were in a great trouble and fought themselves, and they were too busy to rise against each other that the Goths could took the lands until the Ebra”. Even if this text too suffers from a certain exaggeration, before the arrival of the lasts of the Umayyads, Al-Andalus was in turmoil.[/FONT]

[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]In the other side of the Mediterranean, having escaped the doom of their family and the assassins of the Abassids, Abd al-Rahman and his brother Yahyia have eventually reached the West after having known some perilous adventures that the later scholars and poets have romanticized up to a high point.[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif] [/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif] Arriving in Ifriqyia in 755, the province being governed by Abd al-Rahman ibn Habib al-Fihri, they searched to use the dissensions between the Abassids and the wali, who searched to keep the province for himself and his family who threatened to rule all the Western Muslim world. But the prestige of the two brothers was too great, and the risks of his desmise were too important for ibn Habib. He chased, then hunt them. Abd al-Rahman and Yahyia only save themselves by keeping a low profile among the Berbers.[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif] [/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif] The Berbers managed to keep themselves independents from Kairouan, and the dismiss of the Ummayads increased their freedom. But Abd al Rahman was Berber by his mother, and knowing their uses, he tried to settle down there.[/FONT]

[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]But then, “he feel that his destiny needed more than a chiefdom in the Maghreb, and aspired to an higher position […]. On the other side of the sea, there was a rich and great country, where his [great-uncle knew fame and wealth]” (Malik ibn Aziz)[/FONT]

[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]It's more likely even if his feelings towards his own fate and the probabilities of his survival in a dangerous region have certainly played a role, that the Kaysits (both Maslamids and from the junds) have learned about the two Ummayads presence, and saw an occasion to lower Yusuf's power.[/FONT]

[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]Whatever, Abd al-Rahman send his brother, with one of his muladies, among his parents, the Maslamids. There, the Kaysits tried to convince Yahyia that his brother and himself should come and stay in Al-Andalus, that promised much to them and where they could find a good and honorable position.[/FONT]

[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]The Syrians send a message to al-Sumail to make him knew their position on his operation and to seek his approval. The great leaders, as Obeid Allah ibn Uthman, Hassan ibn Abd al-Rahman ibn Maslamah or Yusuf ibn Khalid proposed to al-Sumayl to use the prestige of Abd al-Rahman to chase Yusuf al-Fihri and to give the wali seat to him, with the Ummayad at his sides to support his rule.[/FONT]

[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]But al-Sumayl refused it, fearing to loose his power and ordered them to send back Yahyia, or better, to send it to the Abassids.[/FONT]

[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]The Kaysits were almost ready to tell Yahyia and Badr to go back on Maghreb, but the Umayyad “keep up his cause and his brother's one with a moving talk, remembering them that they were the clients of the Umayyads that ever treated them well, that sending him and his brother to the Persians would be not aslo their certain death, but the death of all the one who supported the cause of the Arabs.” (ibn Khaldun).[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif] [/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif] Furthermore, the Maslamids and many Syrians were more ready to use Abd al-Rahman youth to increase their own power that would be impossible with al-Sumayl, and even more with the Abassids, even if this option was quite improbale due to the independence of all Maghreb and Ifryqyia.[/FONT]

[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]Eventually, an alliance was formed among many Kaysits and the Umayyad who send Badr advert his brother that he would find a support in Al-Andalus.[/FONT]

[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]Al-Sumayl seems first accept the established fact, and doesn't act openly against the Umayyad.[/FONT]

[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]Probably busy with another troubles in the northern part of Al-Andalus, subsequent to Yusuf's campaign, he misjudged the prestige of the fallen dynasty among the Kaysits, that could explain his passivity.[/FONT]

[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]But as soon he estimated the situation too perilous to his power, he left his campaign and searched support among the Syrians. But he knew that many among them were unreliable, with too many ties with the pro-Umayyads, and his Syrian clientele alone couldn't match an entire campaign. He decided then to call the Kalbits to help him, at their greater surprise.[/FONT]

[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]Indeed, it was the most opposite faction to al-Sumayl's power, the less susceptible to help him. Nevertheless he managed to convince Yusuf al-Fihri that Abd al-Rahman would crush him as well, and the governor see here a way to took back he power that al-Sumayl had usurped.[/FONT]

[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]Using all their clienteles, the two leaders managed to convince the Kalbits nobles that Abd al-Rahman was here to impose the rule of the Kaysits, and maybe even the Abassids (al-Fihri and al Sumayl weren't been but for one contradiction).[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif] [/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif] The leaders of the Kaysits managed to form an army, made of quite reluctant troops. Even then, the anti-Umayyad coalition was openly fragile and promised to broke itself at the end of the campaign at best, whatever it's result.[/FONT]

[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]Abd al-Rahman arrived at Kadis, but before that he had to pay a ransom to the Berbers that hosted him, as they see a possible hostage get out their lands without any compensation for them. [/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif] The Syrians payed the price, but make sure all along that Abd al-Rahman wouldn't forget that.[/FONT]

[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]At last in Al-Andalus, the Umayyad could see himself the prestige that his name and rank had among the nobles, the Arabs and even among the population. In October of 755, he began to form an army of his own and, thanks to the help of Kaysits (passivity before his arrival for the most part), he managed to take control of the region.[/FONT]

[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif] When the winter came, Abd al-Rahman and his brother ruled on a coastal zone between Algrave and Malaga, allowing the few of Ummayad clients still in Ifryqia to came, at the great dismiss of ibn Habib.[/FONT]

[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]The inevitable battle was waited to took place in the beginning of the spring, but one of the “allies” of al-Sumayl decided that it was most preferable to let them take charge of their issues and to let him rule the lower valley of Ebra.[/FONT]

[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]Then again, the small but symbolic conquests of Bera could have led to a more local feeling among the northern nobles, less preoccupied with the southern issues than the border's ones.[/FONT]

[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]As al-Sumayl stood in Tulaytula in case of attack, Yusuf al-Fihri crushed the rebellion in a bloody war, and took at the cost of many lives in the two sides the cities of Sharkusta, Dertusa, and the region between them.[/FONT]

[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]Even if the situation needed a unity, even imposed by force, on the anti-Umayyad side; the actions of the wali schoked his allies, fragilizing their even weak allegiance.[/FONT]

[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]The contrast with the advance of Abd al-Rahman taking without violence Ishbyia and Kurtuba was impressive and certainly led to a morale crush among Yusuf's troops.[/FONT]

[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]Joining al-Sumayl, Yusuf al-Fihri decided to let Abd al-Rahman advance up to Marida, the “capital” of the province.[/FONT]

[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]The Ummayad and their Kaysits supporters continued their advance towards North, ready to engage the fight, at the side of Albarregas river, near Almendralejo, then a little outpost on the road to Ishybia.[/FONT]

[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]Each side had approximately the same number of men, around 8,000. The main difference was in the cohesion of Umayyad side in comparison of the hotch-potch of Yusuf and al-Sumayl.[/FONT]

[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]The legend says that Abd al-Rahman, seeing that al-Sumayl had his banner and himself haven't, decided to took the blue capot of his brother and to put it on a spear, to let no advantage to his foe. It would be the origin of the blue, the capot and the spear as the symbol of the Andalusian Umayyads.[/FONT]

[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]On the other side, the Kalbits leaders began to renegotiate their allegiance towards al-Fihri by claiming more and more rewards for fighting his enemy.

Then, al-Sumayl would be entered in a great rage, cursing them and calling them of “cowards, traitors and sons of nobody”. Yusuf quickly swear to reward his allies, that threatened to left the battlefield right now. Even with that, insulted many Kalbits leaders openly advert the wali that these insults wouldn't be forgotten, critically from “a bloody man and from a man without roof”.
[/FONT]

[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]Abd al-Rahman decided to advance his troops against al-Fihri and the Kalbits, and al-Sumayl move his cavalry against the flank, led by Yahyia.[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif] [/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif] If the Umayyad managed to push back the Kalbits, the Syrian cavalry of al-Sumayl harassed the right side of Yahyia and threatened to push the army the back to the river.[/FONT]

[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]But at this moment, the Kalbits, or “seeing the battle and believing that al-Sumayl was killed when he was strike by a cavalryman” (al-Mour), or “letting the battlefield as they threatened to did so, unwilling to fight for a lost cause”(ibn Aziz) decided to give up, forcing Yusuf al-Fihri to flee with them to Tulaytula.[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif] [/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif] Abd al-Rahman, letting the wali flee, turned back his own cavalry and attacked the back of al-Sumayl.[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif] The Syrian army was soon surrounded and his chief killed.[/FONT]

[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]As the battle ended, Abd al-Rahman have conquered Marida.[/FONT]

[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]Decided to attack quickly Yusuf al-Fihri, he planned to advance to Tulaytula and claim the title of emir of Al-Andalus.[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]But his supporters, fearing that he could reach too much power, too much against their own interests tried to convince him to make a truce.[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif] The Maslamids remembered that he had a dept towards them, and that for the peace of the province he had to settle the dispute with Yusuf, by the diplomatic way.[/FONT]

[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]The wali didn't expected so much, and offered his own daughter to Abd al-Rahman, ready to give him the place that al-Sumayl had and swearing to not longer trying to attack him, his family or his lieges; and to stay on the city of Tulaytula where he could organize raids against the Asturias.[/FONT]

[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]If Yusuf al-Fihri stood the wali of Al-Andalus, the Umayyad after having fled his country, the murderers of his family, after having crossed the whole Muslim world, had finally managed to have a domain at his measure for him and his brother. [/FONT]​
 
So, as the Lombardic expeditions of Peppin were quite similar to OTL, with some important differences, critically the dates and some consequances, i didn't detailed it too much.

For the history of Abd al Rahman, and in depsite of MNPundit advice, i stood with the Sumayl-Fihri-Kalbit alliance against the Ummayad. I hope i did it right...or at least not too wrong.

And, finally, a map. Okay, it's not really a good one, but it's to give a view of the western Europe at this time.

And only one update before the end of Part I...My, my...Time runs out, isn't?

So, don't miss the next update : "The lasts of their kinds"

ff.png
 
Enjoyed the update!

And the map is very useful to highlight differences wrt OTL notably the exclusion of Aquitaine and Gothia from the "Frankish Empire" :cool:.
I assume that Bertanny is a typo of Brittany/Bretonia?
 
Enjoyed the update!

And the map is very useful to highlight differences wrt OTL notably the exclusion of Aquitaine and Gothia from the "Frankish Empire" :cool:.
I assume that Bertanny is a typo of Brittany/Bretonia?

Well, technically Aquitaine is still relevant from Francia, since Odon reconginzed the Frankish suzerainty over his dukedom. But the Odonids have a heavy tendance to "forget" this...
The problem is that Pepin don't.

And Bretanny isn't a typo, as the western french dialect have more influence in the consitution of the french (and with a interesting development of neustrian), and the local use of BERtanny is used by the whole language.
Interestingly, its avoid the confusion between "Bretagne"(Britanny) and "Bretagne"(Britain) in ATL French.
 
Well, technically Aquitaine is still relevant from Francia, since Odon reconginzed the Frankish suzerainty over his dukedom. But the Odonids have a heavy tendance to "forget" this...
The problem is that Pepin don't.

And Bretanny isn't a typo, as the western french dialect have more influence in the consitution of the french (and with a interesting development of neustrian), and the local use of BERtanny is used by the whole language.
Interestingly, its avoid the confusion between "Bretagne"(Britanny) and "Bretagne"(Britain) in ATL French.

Ah, so it is called Bertanny in the Administrative French Dialect(s) (and likely Breith Breiz etc by the locals). I'm guessing the Anglo-Saxons will still call it Britonia ;)
 
Ah, so it is called Bertanny in the Administrative French Dialect(s) (and likely Breith Breiz etc by the locals). I'm guessing the Anglo-Saxons will still call it Britonia ;)
Well, in ATL French, it's "Bertagne"...But for the Anglo-Saxons, let's say that at the point reached by the notes (around 950), it's going to be a little more complicated.
As shown on other maps, Wales is named "Cambria", Essex is called "Wales", Tarraconesa/Southern Catalunya will be "Castelha", Septimania "Catalunha"...
Maybe it's going to be a little confusing?
 
756 - 762
The lasts of their kinds

In 756, the situation in Western Europe seemed stabilized. The alliance between the Pope and the Franks managed to keep the Lombards in northern Italy and to increase the power of the pepinids.
In Hispania, Abd al Rahman and Yahyia, seconded by their Kaysits allies, put an end to the conflict between the Muslims of Al-Andalus, and the christian kings of Asturias and Gothia have took enough territories south to create a march, in order to protect their core territories.

But this stability was only superficial : in all this region, the power was disputed by the nobles and many among them didn't see the rise of their lieges as a good thing.

Gaifièr, the duke of Aquitània, in despite of his isolation, remained one of the most importants and the most independent lord of the kingdom, except Pépin himself. And his ally Tassilon of Bavaria, was an additional obstacle to the king of the Franks. Even his younger brother Griffon, marquess of Bertanny, remained defiant against Pépin's authority.

In Al-Andalus, if the Umayyads took the reality of the power, the wali still have a nominal authority and was determined to use it. The arabs nobles, even among the allies of Abd al-Rahman, refused to gave up their power to him and the province was close to become a patchwork of semi-independent principalities as it was during the rule of the Visigoths.

And in the small, weaks in comparaison, christian states of the peninsula, the kings owned their prestige more to have battled the Muslims in the south than having really crushed the power of the nobles. In Septimania (called Catalonia since the IX), in Galicia, in Cantabrias, the royal authority was far less respected.

Paradoxally, it was the actions of Abd al-Rahman that manages to actually unifiy the christians of Hispania. In order to make the troops of the province more linked to him, rather to the provincial institution, he launched many raids in the North, letting his brother in Ishybia.

Even if the main goal was to unite the army of Al-Andalus around him, the gain of plunder and the possibility to regain some of the lost territories were probablt other objectives that Abd al-Rahman fixed to himself.

In 757, he raided first the Asturian borders, taking Tuy (where he let a garrison) and most of the southern Region beyond the Cantabrian Mountains. However, even after having sucessfully plundered the asturian cities, except some strongholds as Amaia, he didn't let any garrison within. Indeed, he knew that he couldn't spare his forces now to protect the territory against Asturian counter-raids and without attacking the core of the christians territory, he couldn't justify to organize and form an army for a long time to his allies.

He turned back to Ishybia, with the loot made during the campaign, where his brother managed to make the supporters of Umayyads, both in Al-Andalus and in Syria came and claim posts in the Abd al-Rahman and Yahyia administrations.

It displeased much to the andalusians, especially the Kalbits, but the Umayyads have little trust in the local nobles, allies or not.

In 761, Abd al-Rahman would led another raid, in Gothia this time, again without any great conquest, but having clearly shown to the Goths and to the locals Muslims or Gotondolos nobles that he could move his troops anywhere in the peninsula.

In Frankish Gaul, the swords were drawn too, but for more bloodier actions.
The situation was yet more promising than in Al-Andalus : in the middle of 757, Bera have pledged his alliegeance to the Frankish King at the occasion of a little rebellion in Provence. Pépin have indeed transformed this secondary operation to a real show of force for the Gothic and Aquitanian nobles.

By nominally recognizing the Frankish suzerainty, Bera hoped that Pépin would help him against his parent and to make him recover some territories given to Gaifièr as the Conflans, and maybe even conquering lands on him.

Such an alliance could have as objectives or the Muslims, or the Aquitains, and Gaifièr knew that. But instead of or make amendment to Pépin, he continued to reject his demands : giving to frankish monasteries the lands and the wealth that the king promised them.

But before that the Franks could attack the Aquitània, their attention was driven back to italy, were the nobles have killed Aistulf in October of 757 and crowned his brother Rachis. Even when his crownation upset the Pope, who would have preferred a nobles as Desiderius, who was murdered shortly after Aistulf, the nobles had no choice but to recognize Rachis.

Even if Rachis didn't make any move against the Papacy or against the Franks, neither Peter or Pépin could allow the Lombards to eventually threatenn Rome anew.
Pépin, apparently accompagned by a cousin of Bera, Ambert of Lodeva, cross anew the Alps, forcing the Lombards' nobles to abandon Rachis to the Pope. Pépin hismelf choose the new king, Archeis of Benevent.

Archeis was a supporter of Aistulf, and even if it ruled on the furthest point of the kingdom, Pépin tought that it would make him an ally and, furthermore, the occasion to enlarge his influence in the southern part of italy, beyond the Papal States.

In 758, Pépin turned back in Gaul, after having organised the sucession of Aistulf, preparing anew the unification of the country. First, he demanded to his liege to did their alliegence anew. Tassilon and Griffon, reluctantly made it at the contrary of Gaifièr, giving a prextext to the Frankish king.

But the second part gave more difficulties to Pépin. Indeed, he asked to the nobles to rise their armies with him, but in 759 as he wanted to began his campaign, Griffon and Tassilon refused, weakening his position. On the other hand, the Goths weren't involved, probably because the Count of Tolosa, Marcion, was percieved by both Pépin and Bera as a potential ally.

As Gaifièr refused to acknowledge Pépin as suzerain and to agree to his demands, the Franks attacked the Aquitaine in the North and in the East. Soon, all the northern part was ravaged by their army, deafeting Berthelan bishop of Bourges, Hunibert of Bourges and Bladin of Auvernha.
Having no choice but surrender, Gaifièr stubbornly refused it and attacked in 760, using the winter's departure of the Frankish amry to ravage and plunder the region between Loire and Jura.

Surprised, Pépin reformed his army, attacking anew Gaifièr in the northern part of his domain, hoping that his army would turn back. It was a correct calculation, and the Aquitain offensive, if it gave hopes to the nobles, didn't gave great advantages to Gaifièr.

The northern Aquitaine was plundered and "every town was took as Jericho (destroyed)". Even if the Frédégaire exaggerate the facts of this campaign, the Aquitaine was indeed ravaged by this new war. But the Aquitains continued to resist.

In 762, Pépin decided to make a final and decisive move against the still-rebellious Aquitània. Promising to Bera new territories, he managed to organise a powerful offensive in the eastern Aquitaine.
Pépin defeated anew Bladin and advanced quickly, when Bera didn't manage to did the same thing in Tolsan where Mancion stopped his attack.

In the 12 April, near Agen, Pépin and his army encountered the one of Gaifièr. Here's the frankish cavalry make again the proof of his strenght, and Gaifièr's ranks, after having resisted to two attacks, fail to did it a third time. As the duke retreated, he fell, killed by a Aquitain noble on the Frankish side, Varatton.
The Aquitain army fleeing the battlefield, the Franks could seize Gaifièr's body, taking his bracelets that symbolized his power.

The Aquitània was pacified, and Péppin organized the country. Continuing the traditional Frankish policy, he respected the local laws and choose Varatton as the duke of Aquitaine (approximativly the part between Garona and Loire, except Bordèù), kept Mancion as Count of Tolosa (probably to block the Gothic pretentions, who only recieved the Conflans) and let the Gascons choose their own duke so long as he pledged his alliegance.

As a certain Hunald, most probably a parent of Gaifièr was elected, the Gascony was just a part of the previous domain. Critically, Pépin hoped that, surrounded in the north by the Frankish presence, Hunalt would likely turn his attention on the other side of the Pyrenees.

At this moment, the situation in Al-Andalus radically change anew, making all hopes possibles among both the Arabs and the Christians.

Streghtening his rule, Abd al-Rahman succeded more and more to became the reality of the provincial power. But the opposition of the nobles became an important issue, and the tensions between Kaysits and Kalbits, Kaysits and Umayyads and even between the two brothers were growing.

And Yusuf al-Fihri see here an occasion to claim the power of his title. He managed to contact the Abassid caliphe, Al-Mansur to propose him an alliance.

"Al-Andalus was led astray by an adventurer, and the emirs saw now all the madness of his pretentions. As you saved the Islam from the Umayyads, please save us from him."

As Al-Mansur positivly answered to the wali, promising him to keep him at this post, Yusuf wanted to prepare the arrival of the army. As Abd al-Rahman was in Ishybia to confront his brother about the independence of his actions against him, Yusuf ordered their assassinations.

But, as they were attacked, the two Umayyads defended themselves. Yahyia nevertheless died at the ends of the murderers, and Abd al-Rahman, because of his culpability towards his brother and led by revange make the enuchs tortured, and not only learned about Yusuf's responsability but aslo his alliance with the Abassids.

Entering in a great rage, and in a great fear for his life, he call his allies to learn them what the Fihrid did and wanted to do "against him and the Muslims". United by a common hatred for Abassids, a coalition between the Syrians and the Umayyad formed itself again.

Yusuf, learning about the survival of Abd al-Rahman, quicky organised his own forces, covering a territory between Tulaytula and Ballansyia.
The Abassids arrived in this last town, led not by a Fihrid of Ifryqia, but by al-Ala the new wali. Understanding that the Abassid never intended to keep him as wali of Al-Andalus, Yusuf al-Fihri welcomed al-Ala, but instead of joining their forces, turned back in his city, willing to make a principality of his own when the Umayyad would be defeated.

As the Abassid threat was far more important, Abd al-Rahman decided to let Yusuf in his city, and to attack al-Ala, with 6 000 men. In numerical inferiority and in hostile land, the inhabitants having welcomed the Abassid leader, Abd al-Rahman used the hesitations of al-Ala, due to the defection of Yusuf to advance against him.

Unfortunatly, al-Ala was well aware of his moves and thanks to local supporters, used their terrain's knowledge, defeating Abd-al-Rahman near the town.

The Ummayad had no choice but protecting his remaining forces at Bab-al-Jabal (modern Balaguos*), waiting for reinforcments of the west.
Al-Ala besieged him soon, and tried to attack the Ummayad multiples times, wanting to force him making a sally, which would be devastating.
But as Abd-al-Rahman began to desesperate and thinking about a final move, preferring "dying than starving", the [FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]Hassan ibn Abd al-Rahman's forces pointed to the land. Al-Ala decided then to spare his forces to keep Abd-al-Rahman in the place, and attacked the Maslamids with 5 000 men.

As the battle was engaged, Abd al-Rahman could see that the Abassid was winning, thanks to the quality of his troops and to the exhaustion of Maslamids forces that came here at forced march.

He decided to make a sally, as it was the only possibility to win the battle. As the gate opened, the andalusians attacked the unexpecting Abassid army, that didn't tought that the Umayyad would make such a sucidial attack. Soon, the besieging army was fleeing, and al-Ala could see his doom on the form of a raging charge made by Abd al-Rahman.

The 7 March of 763, at the Battle of Bel-al-Jabal, Abd al-Rahman took revenge of the Abassids. The nobles were executed and their heads sent to Al-Mansur, then at the Mecca.

Soon, the 10 April of 763, Yusuf was defeated near Tulaytula and executed as a renegade and an apostate.

"God be praised for placing a sea between me and this devil" would have say the Caliphe al-Mansur, at the news of Abd al-Rahman's victories
[/FONT]

At the price of his brother, Abd al-Rahman became the Emir of Ishybia, opening a new era for the peninsula.

This years saw the end of prestigious dynasties. The Odonids were crushed as the Fihrids, but even the victories of the Peppinids and of the Syrian Ummayads would eventually led to their mutation and to the rise of Carolingians and Andalusian Ummayads.

*OTL Cullera
 
And it was the end of Eagles and Hawks Part I - The Conquests.

I hope you enjoyed it, and i will try to make a short text about demographic, economic, institutions, etc.

See ya for Part II : 764-810 - The Empires, with (no contractual previews) Gothic Tolsan, Bigger Carolingian Empire, Byzantino-Caroligian war and alliances, a paranoïd (even more) Abd al-Rahman, and the premises of Fatimid-Ummayad wars.
 
Awesome update! I love middle ages timelines, and this one is a great example of why I do. I will be interested to see the ramifications of the butterflies become larger and larger, and I am especially looking forward to a different breakup of the Carolingian empire.

Also, very interesting notes on the linguistics. I love alt-linguistics, seeing new languages form is just so cool! What exactly do you mean b "western french dialect"? Do you mean the west frankish germanic dialect, or the gallo-roman dialect that predated and evolved into French as we know it today. Really, I'd be interested to hear (well, read) anything you have to say about alt-linguistics, especially in French/Frankish.

Also, might I ask how you accounted for these changes? My own timeline (stil in the planning stage, I plan to post the actually thread and first few updates very soon) will feature a different evolution (a lot more germanic influence later on) of french in the late middle ages and modern world, and I am trying to plan out the changes that will come about.
Thanks, great work, and I look forward with great anticipation to Part II,
Scipio
 
[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]"God be praised for placing a sea between me and this devil" would have say the Caliphe al-Mansur, at the news of Abd al-Rahman's victories[/FONT]
In all timelines where Abd ar-Rahman arrives in Al-Andalus, Al Mansur is just screwed. :p

In reality, this is quite well done and I am sorry I did not respond to your last PM in time, but I see you have done an excellent job without me. Something I did not doubt. Also these events should see Abd ar-Rahman becoming even more paranoid than in OTL. As for family members, who from the Umayyads is there? I know you killed the named brother, but what about his sister(s)?

I also would be interested in examining the structures (such as survive) of the Christian kingdoms of Iberia at this time.
 
Also, very interesting notes on the linguistics. I love alt-linguistics, seeing new languages form is just so cool! What exactly do you mean b "western french dialect"?
Approximativly the OTL Gallo, except that, from some reasons not yet unveiled, it extand from Nantes to Cherbourg.

Also, might I ask how you accounted for these changes? My own timeline (stil in the planning stage, I plan to post the actually thread and first few updates very soon) will feature a different evolution (a lot more germanic influence later on) of french in the late middle ages and modern world, and I am trying to plan out the changes that will come about.
Well, at this moment, nothing change really for linguistics. We have most probably a larger survival of the visightohic alphabet but it's very next from the merovingian one. It would probably merge in a caroline alphabet at the end. The changes that would alterate the anguages would happen in Part III.



In all timelines where Abd ar-Rahman arrives in Al-Andalus, Al Mansur is just screwed. :p
It's quite understable.


I also would be interested in examining the structures (such as survive) of the Christian kingdoms of Iberia at this time.
In 750, the christians kingdoms have different structures. The Asturians have more a merging between visigothic monarchy (aka elective) and the local power of the Pedro-Alfonsines that was quite well established, critically with the union of cantabrian and most of asturian clienteles. It have the more potential to became an earlier hereditary monarchy.
But Alfonso I is not an absolut monarch, in Galicia, in southern Asturias (with the refugees coming with their own leaders), in Vasconia; his power is disputed, especially since Abd al Rahman managed to raid the kingdom virtually encountering any resistance.

The kingdom of Gothia is far more influenced by the old kingdom of Toletum, keeping quasi-intact these institutions. It could have became an issue, since the kingdom needed another cadres to be better administred, and it's indeed a problem when the king have to go south, making the northern nobles less encline to obey him. But thanks to a Franko-Aquitan influence (don't forget that Bera is an Odonid by his mother), and both the utilisation by Franks of visigothic uses and the prestige of Pépin, the court became little by little more gaulish than hispanic, making Bera use a majordomo (with far les power)
 
A few more questions: Does Asturias use the vicarii (well whatever the vicarii were called in the west, I forgot the exact word), are there counts?
Is partible inheritance still the only inheritance practice in Asturias/Gothia?
What is the status of Visigothic script?
 
A few more questions: Does Asturias use the vicarii (well whatever the vicarii were called in the west, I forgot the exact word), are there counts?
Is partible inheritance still the only inheritance practice in Asturias/Gothia?
What is the status of Visigothic script?

The vicarias doesn't exist yet in Hispania, even if it begin to appear in Gaul. To resume, it's an official who have the power to judge for the Count the civil and criminal business. At this time, it's quite exceptionnal use, and limited to the pepinid clientele.
The Counts are far more present in Gothia than in Asturias. The Counts of Lodeva, Besièrs and critically the Counts of Magalona (sort of local archenemy of Berano-Guilhemids) have many power, renforced by the arrival of Hispanis and are not that quicks to obey to the Narbonese king.
However, in Tarraconesa, they're less present, even if they have quite well possessions (the Cassidians, by exemple) and Bera have a better grasp on the pyrenean nobles and to the coastal cities, thanks to the support of the bishops (critically the one of Barcelona that gain the title of metropolitan, lost by Tarragona, in 781).

In Asturias, there are less counts, as the pre-feudal hierarchy is more desorganized due to less tradition, more presence of local powers, to the presence of refugees with their own leaders, and to powerful dukes as the one of Galicia.

For the inheritance, it's quite different in Asturias and in Gothia.
In Asturias, the Rex Christianorum is considered more than a point of union between Asturias (at the more little sense) and Cantabria with the support of the two clienteles. With the submission of Galicia and the conquest of lands, Alfonso became a little more than that, without modifying this : the king is the lord of 1)his own lands, 2)the lands that his clientèle share with him 3)the lands he conquered.
So, not only the partibility is not outed, but it could even lead to the independence of lands from any heir.

For Gothia, the kingdom is considered as THE kingdom of the visigoths and use its traditions. If the partiable heritance existed among the goths, as oriental germans they were less encline to did it. Futhermore, the roman traditions, and the history of the kingdom show that it disapperead quickly.
Even if the sons of a king could be considered as co-king or sub-king, it was only their father that was the "real" one.
Beyond these considerations, it was more favoured by the Septimanian nobility. Indeed, a partage between the heirs would have led to a king more focused on his part of the kingdom, and less encline to let the nobles have a semi-autonomous rule.*

The visigothic script is still used and in development in 763. In Asturias it evolve independently, much like OTL, until the apperence of the caroline who will influence it more and more up to its disapperence in the XIII. In Gothia, the visigothic script would be more quickly influenced by the merovingian script, forming the littera narbonesa opposed to littera toletana and to littera asturiana. But it would finally vanish from chartes in the XI, and to religious text in XII.


More about the institutions in Gothia
The gothic majordomo, named the Aulista have far less power than his frankish counterpart (before Pepin crownation). It didn't have much power when the king was in his town, and couldn't transmit his title to his heirs. When the king was elsewhere in the kingdom, the aulista have technically the charge to administrate the palace and the town on hiw behalf. Except that, because of his lack of power and authority, it doesn't work very well. The first aulista known is the bishop of Elna, Sigbert of Toleta.
Quickly, the gothic king would give this positions to members of their clientele or even their sons. But the danger of the diversion of the charge would permanantly restrein the aulistas to excerce a real authority, and at the beginning of XI, the charge would have nearly disappered, surviving to the modern times only as an intendence charge.
 
Last edited:
Institutions : Al-Andalus

The andalusians institutions remained very diverses during all the period. If the caliphal or ifryqian-appointed wali of Al-Andalus kept the subdivisions of the province in 5 wali, made by Abd al-Aziz ibn Musa; they were opposed to two other institutions.
First the gotondolos that keeped a certain control of their lands in northern Lusitania, in the Ebra's valley, in Murcia (for quoting only the biggest aeras). Even if the gotondolos remained quite neutral during the inner wars of arabo-berbers, their power stood important until around 745, were the biggest figures disappered and integrated themselves in the hisano-roman population. After that, the gotondolos formed no more a distinct group, but still were leaders of their people, obeying to the Muslims leaders without excluing Kalbits or Kaysits, or Ummayads. In 763, the counts in Al-Andalus formed more and more an administrative and legal power and less a political one.
When the political power of the gotondolos weakened, the Kalbits and Kaysits leaders formed many little "states in the state" or principalities. The main ones were the Maslamids, the Fihrids, the Banu Hasn. They knew their apogee after the Berber Revolt, making and changing the policy of the province following their interest, making Al-Andalus going deeply in political-military chaos.
Even after the victories of Abd al-Rahman, these Muslims factions remained powerful and formed an obstacle passive at best against his power.
Finally, the wali administration (particularly the one strenghtened by Abd al-Rahman since he bacame hajib of Yusuf) was composed by Ummayads and their clientele that they choosed among both their allies (or supposedly ones) and their former foes (particularly the Kalbits of south-east). It would led to a normalization of these factions at term, but in 763, it was considered as certain that the Muslims factions and families formed a power comparable to the one of the wali.

Armies


The visigothic armies were issued and raised by the local nobles, and even if a cavalry dominated their army, it was merging many different groups with different fighting traditions, led by their leader under the theorical command of the king (or want-to-be)
In fact, the visigothic lords, especially the semi-independent ones from the south have ever formed armies without the conscent or the control of Toletum.
After the conquest, the gotondolos will continue to have the power to rise their army, if the wali agreed (and in reality, ordered it), ending a process of formation of local armies under the command of a local noble.

The christian armies were composed of free men, that armed themselves to answer to the call of their suzerain. If the possibility of loot was always a good tool to form an army, it forced the leader to make relativly short campaigns, mostly summer ones. That could explain the passivity of the visigoths in winter, were the arabo-berber couldn't turn back in Ifryqia and then were focused on the campaign.

After the formation of the kingdom of Asturias, the Pedro-Alfonsines kings would use the traditional war-organisation of the region, that because of the mountainous terrain privilegied a strategy of guerilla by footmen lightly armed. This tactic, first imposed by circonstances and terrain, would be a strong point against the muslims expeditions, forming an efficient counter-raid organisation and, after the Great Berber Revolt, a decent raiding organisation.

In Gothia, more welthier thanks to his agricultural production, the cavalery remained an important basis for the army. Furthermore the aquitano-vascon influence, and the importance of their light cavalry forced the goths to develop their own.
Interestingly, the Frankish influence, important after the 740's, never really modified the gothic armies and the frankish model of heavy infantery (footmen or mounted) didn't recieved a great echo. It's true that the nobilty of Septimania gained more autonomy by using a cavalry composed of relativly richs nobles (more encline to have independent poses) than a bigger quantity of footmen, issued from freemen and little nobility that could have supported the royal authority in exchange of a lowering of the ducs and counts of northern Septimania.

The muslims armies were quite diverses. If the berber formed the main troops, both light infantry and cavalry, forcing the christians to develop their own in quantity (relativly to their possibilities), the arabs heavy infantry and cavalry made the differences in all the decisives battles between 710 and 763. But as the berbers were placed to the borders with the christians, when the arabs colonized the core of the country, the influence of berber armies on the christian ones were far more presents.
One of this influence major changes was the progressive adoption in Gothia of the round shield and a more widspread use of lances.
 
Might we eventually have a map posted noting the religious and ethnic demographics of Al-Andalus? :) It was a good update, though kinda hard to read at some parts.
 
Might we eventually have a map posted noting the religious and ethnic demographics of Al-Andalus? :) It was a good update, though kinda hard to read at some parts.

For the demographic, you should see the data i gave to MNP some updates before. A demographical map for 763 would be really difficult to do, considering the moving flux and the lack of stability in the settlement.
Approximativly, the Arabs settled the south, the part of Al-Andalus between Toleta and Olisba and the mediterranean coast. The berber have all the other lands, critically the northern ones (yes the ones periodically raided by christians)

Sorry for the language, i'm not really good in english and i understand that i'm difficult to be read. If someone wants to correct the updates, it's good, but i'm not sure that a benevolent guy would do it freely for all the TL.
 
Top