Hafsa Ibn Salman; Last Gasp of the Ancients: The Rise and Fall of the Pontic Empire (Aden Publishing Corporation, 2541)
A Brief Moment of Peace
With peace in the West secured for the moment, Mithradates made his way back to Asia Minor, the core of his Empire. Although Greece and Western Asia Minor had been the site of a war, only Greece had been devastated. Pontus’ army had managed to be less disruptive than one would think. As a result, aside from the Asian Vespers, there had not been a lot of casualties among the civilian population. This, alongside his hard-fought war of liberation, served to endear the population of Asia Minor to Mithradates.
However, when peace with Rome was won, questions now turned to how Mithradates would govern his new Empire. In Pontus itself, power was very much in the hands of Mithradates personally, as well as to the Persian aristocracy. Cities such as Sinope and Trapzon had little in the way of self-government, though already some cities in Asia Minor and Greece had been granted some measure of self-government. It was in the years of 448 to 453 that the administration of the Pontic Empire began to move away from an ad-hoc arrangement into something resembling the administration of the Classical Pontic Empire. However, renewed war would ensure that Mithradates’ reforms would be limited, and the importance of these years in shaping the later Empire should not be overstated.
Greece presented the most pressing problem for Mithradates. In terms of population, around two hundred thousand Greeks had lost their lives in the war with Rome, but this still left a population of about three million, about a quarter of the whole population of the Empire. Although the Greeks of Greece itself were far from a majority in the Empire, they made up for this in terms of disruptiveness. Although many Greeks were happy that they had been liberated, they did not intend to trade the rule of Rome for that of Pontus. On the flip side, Mithradates had sacrificed great amounts of treasure and soldiers in the cause of Greek freedom, and would not have been pleased to have the Greeks say “Thank you, now please get out of here”.
Reportedly, it was one of Mithradates’ most trusted advisors; Metrodoros of Scepsis who thought suggested the solution. He advocated that in most of Greece (less urbanized areas such as Thessaly, Macedonia and Epiros aside), administrative responsibility should be given to the Polis, which would be tied to Pontus in a permanent alliance. In exchange for a high level of autonomy, a small amount of treasure would be sent to the Pontic king, who would also be allowed to control tariffs and trade in Greece. For Mithradates, this meant that Greece would be the loosest part of his Empire. However, high on victory and eager to see his good name carried forward, he granted Greece, and many Greek cities in the Empire (with the exception of those in Pontus proper) these concessions.
There was also the question of what to do with non-urban areas in the Empire. The Empire was by now too large to be directly administered by the Pontic King. While Pontus had been small, Mithradates had been able to keep a tight grip on things. Now controlling an Empire of twelve million people and approximately 932,000 km squared, he needed a way to delegate authority and administration in the Empire. Thankfully, a system had already been pioneered by his Achaemenid ancestors, that of Satrapies.
Mithradates did not use the Persian system exactly though. Satraps were in charge of the tax collection, law enforcement and maintained roads and other infrastructure, as their forbearers had. The Satraps were able to keep around 40% of the tax they collected in order to ensure that the roads and law were maintained in the lands they governed, though this did not leave them with a great amount of power. They were forbidden from maintaining more than five thousand men at arms, and would be inspected to ensure that this was true. They would receive no money from Polis within their Satrapies, with that money instead going to the Pontic King. Most of the fortresses in their land were held by commanders answerable to the king rather than the Satrap. In addition to this, a Satrap could serve for no more than ten years at a time.
It was with this system that Mithradates ensured that none of the Satraps could build up a powerful enough base to challenge the authority of the king. The first Satraps themselves tended to be a mixed group. Both Greeks and Persians were appointed as the first Satraps, which promoted Mithradates’ own credentials as a second Alexander, bringing together Greeks and Persians in a single Empire. In Greek eyes, he now looked like the most effective Diadochi king in centuries, though this was probably true because his other subjects saw him hailing from the legitimate line of kings that Alexander had overthrown.
Had Mithradates died at this point, he would have almost certainly found a prominent place in the history books. However, subsequent events would turn his legacy from that of the liberator king into simply, “The Great”. The East had been a quiet front for Mithradates for a long time. Even after the flow of subsidies from Parthia had stopped, the Pontic and Parthian kingdoms had been respectful neighbours, and had continued to co-operate in a number of areas. However, after the death of Mithradates II of Parthia, the situation had deteriorated.
There had been a number of civil wars in Parthia within the past decade, usually following the death or usurpation of a king. Sandarouk took the throne in 449, but the throne he inherited was a weakened one, and the Parthian king had now been reduced to the first among equals of the Parthian lords. This created an enormous power vacuum in areas adjacent to Parthia. Tigranes of Armenia, an erstwhile Parthian client took advantage of the situation to take part of Media. In 451, he provocatively conquered the remnants of the Seleucid Empire, though Sandarouk was too weak to stop this flagrant disregard of the balance of power.
Mithradates too was made nervous by Tigranes’ newfound power. A Tigranes who built up an Empire in the East could well make common cause with Rome to destroy the Empire Mithradates had built. It was with this in mind that Mithradates turned on his one-time allies, the pirates of Cilicia. The conquest was a hard one, owing to the excellent defences of the pirates, and took a whole year for the huge Pontic army to undertake. This also eliminated the last area that stood between Armenian and Pontic control. Mithradates’ embassy warned Tigranes that expansionist action would be met with likewise action from Pontus.
However, this warning did not appear to faze Tigranes. Sandarouk of Parthia was killed by a bodyguard during a hunt in the spring of 453. Who arranged this is unknown, though the effects were momentous. Parthia once again descended into squabbling, with each magnate trying to advance his candidate to the throne. It might have ended like the other Parthian Civil Wars, had it not been for the actions of Tigranes of Armenia. However, Tigranes decides to take the step that would lead to the “Parthian Wars”, and declared that he was the best candidate to rule Parthia.
This was astonishing news for Mithradates. He had expected something like a move into the Hasmonean kingdom, or the seizing of more territory in Media. Instead, Tigranes had more or less declared his intention rule an Empire as large as Mithradates’. This was something that could not be tolerated by Mithradates, who initially sent an envoy to ward Tigranes off from this course of action. However, Tigranes would not be dissuaded, and Mithradates went with the alternative plan. He would launch his own candidacy for the Parthian throne.