Down the Parallel Road: An Afsharid Persia Timeline

The invasion if India must have been a shock to the Hindu, I think that they'll try to play catch up.
India has already been impacted by the innovations brought over by the Europeans, and for enterprising powers such as the Marathas, a combination of both the Persian and European systems may be desirable. The Mughal Empire has been mortally stricken, but the question remains of who inherits India when she finally expires. Both native Indian powers and European powers are likely to make a move if the circumstances appear fortuitous.
Just noticed this its great.:p
Thanks! Hopefully it will continue to be so as we start looking beyond Iran into the rest of the world.
What are his policies towards the Zoroastrians?
Zoroastrians were persecuted quite heavily under the Safavids if I remember rightly. Under the Afghans, the Zoroastrians were fairly low down the pecking order of the social groups in Persia, but were still higher than Jews and Persians interestingly enough. Historically, not much is written of Nader's conduct toward the Zoroastrians, though as they were not a challenger to his power, it is likely that he was easier on them than the Safavids have been. A surviving Afsharid Persia is therefore likely to be something og a breather for the Zoroastrian community in Iran.
Love this TL!
You are a wonderful writer Nas, that you are indeed!
Thanks for the compliment! Let's just hope I can keep this up.
Waiting for more, of course...
More is on the way of course.
 
The Shock of the Ottoman Defeat
sultan-mahmud-i-turkey-1696-1754.jpg


Gerhard Schneider; Osman's Children - A History of the Ottoman Empire

Nader’s invasion of the Ottoman Empire was one of the worst disasters the Ottomans had ever seen. For the first time in centuries, a foreign power had been at the gates of Constantinople, and huge areas of the Empire had been lost on the east. To make matters worse, Sultan Mahmud I’s treaty with the Persians was unpopular with almost every level of Ottoman society. Local notables feared that the central state would be unable to protect them from foreign powers, and that they would lose their power as a result. The Ulema greatly resented the recognition of the Jafari’ Madhab, which they viewed as an insidious innovation and it’s recognition as an acceptance of heresy. Although the amount of manpower that had been lost on the conflict was not catastrophic, the financial demands made on the Ottoman State certainly were, and it was these as much as anything that had broken down the previous system of accommodation based around tax farming between the Sublime Porte in Constantinople and the regional notables.


With their ties to Constantinople weakened, in the years following Nader’s invasion, Ottoman governors began amassing more local power to themselves, with many choosing to enact policies quite different from those seen in Istanbul. Although this trend of decentralisation was already present in the Ottoman Empire, the process now accelerated as local notables seized the reigns of the state in all but name. The Karaosmanoğlu family in Anatolia were an example of these “over mighty notables”, though the most pressing challenges would be in North Africa. Algeria had ceased to be a part of the Ottoman Empire for all intents and purposes in the late 17th century, and this trend was now spreading to Tunisia and Tripoli, with the hereditary Beys removing all but the most tenuous of ties to Constantinople. The most troubling change was seen in Egypt, where the ruling Mamluk Othman Bey now had designs on making his own Vilayet as independent as the other North African regions. The Egyptian Beys had always had to play a delicate balancing act between their own Mamluk soldiery and the Sultan in Constantinople, and the weakening of the latter was seen by Othman as an exceptional opportunity to shore up his own position.


Othman Bey attempted to win the approval of the Mamluks by promising a reduction of taxes, though at this point in time this open rebellion may have been premature. The Ottoman Army was still intact following the deal with Nader Shah, and was sent south to Egypt to crush Othman’s insurrection. Most of the Mamluks abandoned him in order to keep their own positions rather than sacrificing them for an apparently hopeless cause, and to some extent, notables who had ideas of attempting to forge a fully independent path elsewhere in the Empire were dissuaded by the example of Egypt. Nevertheless, the Ottoman Empire had crossed a point, and from now on it would be increasingly difficult for the Sultans to keep a lid on the ambitions of their governors. While there was an increasing desire at the centre for administrative reforms similar to those seen in Persia, the weakness of the central government meant that the Ottoman Empire struggled to put in place the kind of reforms and taxes that were necessary for a modernization of the army and state.


Mahmud I, overwhelmed by the challenges that now faced the Ottoman Empire, died a year before his rival Nader. He left the throne to his brother Osman, a man ill-suited for the enormous challenges that now faced the Empire. He was more known for his aversion to music and his fear of women than for any administrative ability. His five year reign was marked by a continuation of the weakening of the Ottoman government. Regional notables managed to amass more power, unchecked by the central government, and it was only growing tensions in Europe that saved the weakened Ottoman State from the predatory Austrian and Russian Empires. While Osman retreated further into solitude due to his increasingly common episodes of mental instability, his brother Mustafa began to articulate a clearer vision of how he thought the Empire should be governed. As well as writing his ideas in private, he also began to build a cadre of educated men with which he planned to set the Empire on the path to recovery.


This did not go unnoticed amongst the people in the Empire who were opposed to reform, such as the regional notables and a substation portion of the Janissary corps, who now began to plot against Mustafa’s life. Aware of his growing unpopularity among the ruling class, Mustafa in turn attempted to build as much of a coalition of reformers as he could. Most importantly, he secured the allegiance of the Grand Vizier, Koca Ragıp Pasha, who was a fellow believer in the need for a meaningful reform in the Ottoman Empire. Following an assassination attempt which had left him wounded, Mustafa now decided that he would strike against his brother, and managed to unseat Osman and his supporters in a relatively bloodless coup. A few Janissaries had been killed, though many had surrendered in the vain hope that serious reform could be headed off under the new sultan. This was greatly mistaken however, and underestimated the transformation that the Ottoman Empire would begin to undergo in the reign of Mustafa.

******

640px-Kandahar_City_in_December_1841.jpg


Kandahar

“You needs to relax a bit more. The clothes would actually suit you if you into the right state of mind…”


The message the words conveyed seemed to be lost as soon as Hassan heard them. He fidgeted with his robe, not quite achieving the look he was aiming for. He slumped rather awkwardly back onto the couch.


“You should not be nervous if you are thinking about making the right impression on Anisah. She’s a very easy girl to please you know”


Hassan shot Yasser a mortified look.


“No my boy, nothing like that! I’m merely saying that you have the kind of personality that will appeal to her. Trust me, I’ve known her since she was born. And at any rate, her father has probably been filling her ears with your noble deeds”


Hassan’s expression had scarcely changed. He looked rather despondent.


“That’s my worry Yasser. She may have this image of a latter day Rostam in her head, a giant with a sword in one hand and an enemy’s head in the other”


“She isn’t prone to flights of fantasy”


“But she may be disappointed nonetheless”


“Women learn not to have high expectations. She’s an Afghan, she hasn’t exactly met a whole lot of men. You know, we are not like you Persians, where your women have met half the men in the world by the time they’re married”


Hassan shot an annoyed look toward Yasser. But the two men started laughing, and whatever tension was in Hassan’s body melted away.


“Any daughter of Omar’s is likely to be as agreeable as he is. I should stop worrying”


Yasser took a step back and examined Hassan, looking from head to toe.


“You’re not quite Rostam, but I think you’re a bit more dashing than you take yourself credit for. You would pass for a lancer I would think”


“Yes, but in order to do that I’d have to want to emulate you wimps in the first place”


Yasser smirked. “You’re good. But I think it is almost time. Ready to become a married man?”


Hassan nodded his head, and with that, the two men left the chamber.


It was a short walk to Omar’s house, one of the more opulent buildings in the rebuilt Kandahar. Like most Afghan houses, it was austere on the outside, though the courtyard on the inside was clearly well looked after, with flowers growing around a central fountain.


Omar came out of the entrance to the main part of his house to meet Hassan and Yasser. “Salam Aleikum, so glad to see you both”


He turned to Hassan. “Second Khastegāri, don’t worry about it. The first one is the harder one, and you could be meeting far scarier parents than me. Ha! Please, come this way”


In the main sitting room of Omar’s house, the formalities were discussed. Living arrangements, religious considerations and all the other nuts and bolts of married life. After some time had passed, the important part of the ceremony had arrived, as Omar offered tea to his guests. The tea was served by Anisah herself. Hassan’s nervousness returned, and he shifted about in his couch and constantly fidgeted, as if he was unsure of what to do with his hands.


The girl walked into the room, carrying a tray with small cups of chai tea arranged in a circle on it. One by one, she offered the guests a cup, coming face to face with Hassan last. He had avoided her gaze beforehand, and now found that he had to look at her.


She was certainly a great beauty, and bore little resemblance to her father. The most noticeable feature were her large brown eyes, which had a rather unusual effect on those who looked into them. Her thin lips may have been considered unattractive by other men, but Hassan didn’t notice. Hassan was smitten, in love even. He had made the right choice indeed…
 
Well...
I only hope this won't butterfly away the USA.
For I cannot see how the matters in the Middle East could trouble America.
 
Well...
I only hope this won't butterfly away the USA.
For I cannot see how the matters in the Middle East could trouble America.

It doesn't have to, but... There's a good chance that it butterflies the early death of Frederick Louis, Prince of Wales (father of George III (who died in 1751, age 44). His father George II lived to be 77; George III to be 82. If Frederick lives to be 70, that would be 1777. Frederick was a very different personality from George.

The PoD is in 1735, so George III himself (born 1738) might be butterflied. (The odds against any given person being conceived and born is millions to one before it happens. Any disturbance, however trivial, almost certainly results in a different sperm and egg combination, and a child that is the sibling of the OTL person.)
 
Well...
I only hope this won't butterfly away the USA.
For I cannot see how the matters in the Middle East could trouble America.
There's already around a million settlers on the Eastern Seaboard when the POD takes place, so I don't think that an Anglophone state on the Eastern Seaboard of North America can be butterflied at this point. What might be butterflied is what kind of a form this state takes. A lot hinges on how the alt-Seven Years War goes down. The whole dynamic of international politics will be rather different indeed by TTL's 2016 (if we ever get there!).
Good update.

Waiting for more (in due time, of course)...
This next update has been a lot of time in the coming unfortunately.
It doesn't have to, but... There's a good chance that it butterflies the early death of Frederick Louis, Prince of Wales (father of George III (who died in 1751, age 44). His father George II lived to be 77; George III to be 82. If Frederick lives to be 70, that would be 1777. Frederick was a very different personality from George.

The PoD is in 1735, so George III himself (born 1738) might be butterflied. (The odds against any given person being conceived and born is millions to one before it happens. Any disturbance, however trivial, almost certainly results in a different sperm and egg combination, and a child that is the sibling of the OTL person.)
While George III's personality was important in determining the way that America broke away in OTL, I think that ultimately it will be nigh-impossible for the UK to keep America under wraps, especially going into the 19th century.

Alternate people is quite an interesting area indeed. To some extent, personalities are shaped by the parents we have, so I don't like making people too different at least for the first two decades following the POD, but eventually all those little butterflies result in totally different people.
 
The Persian Hegemony in India
640px-7_Muhammad_Shah_and_Nadir_Shah._1740,_Musee_Guimet,_Paris.jpg


Mark Huntington; Studies in Indian History - An Anthology

The Effect of Karnal on India

The Mughal Empire had been in decline for some time before the Battle of Karnal. The reign of Aurangzeb had been a glorious one marked by conquest and unprecedented wealth and prosperity, but less than fifty years after his death, the Mughal Empire would be moribund. Growing prosperity in India had led not to the spread of the Persian-speaking court culture of the Mughal Emperors, but a growing strength of different regional identities. This trend had been exacerbated by warfare toward the end of the 17th century, which had often encouraged the growth of local identities that were innately opposed to the Mughal “other”. While the Empire appeared to be strong, regional rebellions could be crushed and the general order of things in the Empire would remain as they were.


However, this was a delicate equilibrium, and the Battle of Karnal shook it to the very core. The wealth that was handed to the Persians represented many years of government income, and the impact of that paled in comparison to the effects on Mughal prestige. The Peacock throne, the symbol of Mughal Power, was carried off to Mashhad. As if the humiliation from that was not enough, the Mughal Emperor had to swear fealty to the Shah of Persia, promising to send an annual tribute in exchange for protection. Muhammad Shah had kept his throne, but it was a throne which was much diminished in the eyes of its subjects. Now, those who had been hostile to the Mughals for a long time, such as the Marathas saw their opportunity to carve out their own Empires.


The Marathas had already struck as far as Delhi in previous offensives, and now seemed to consume the Mughal Empire piece by piece. The Marathas had been buoyed by a stronger sense of social cohesion than the Mughals, as well as the increasing commercialisation of their cotton production, which ensured that the Marathas had sufficient resources with which to challenge the Mughals with. In Aurangzeb’s time, he was able to dismiss the Maratha ruler as a “mountain rat”. Muhammad Shah and his successors could ill afford to do the same, as the Marathas were now levying tribute from regional rulers who were supposed to be subjects of the Mughal ruler. The increasingly prosperous and energised Maratha state was now a looming existential threat on the horizon for the Mughal Empire, and it seemed that energetic policies of reform would be needed to stop the Marathas from eventually unseating the Mughal Emperor.


Muhammad Shah’s response to the growing weakness of the Empire was not to embark on a serious policy of reform, but to sink ever deeper into a concentration on his patronage of the arts. This availed the Mughal Empire little as its revenues sank into Maratha hands, as well as the hands of regional governors. The only saving grace for the Mughals was that the Marathas, rather than forging a centralized Empire along a Persian model in her new conquests, chose instead to demand tribute from existing rulers. As with the Mughals, tribute rather than tax made up a large portion of government income, and this inefficiency prevented the Mughals from being able to smash the Mughals immediately. Although one after one, the regional rulers who had once sworn allegiance to the Mughals now paid tribute to the Marathas, for the immediate period after Karnal, the Marathas did not threaten the heart of the Mughal Empire.


As well as the growing threat of the Marathas, the Mughals had to contend with threats from other regional powers, as well as the ominously growing European powers. British attempts at seizing a foothold in the Gangetic Plain were foiled at the Battle of Rajshahi, but this was due to the assistance of the Persians more than that of the Mughal Emperor (or the French allies of the Nawab of Bengal). Nevertheless, in the Seven Years War the British managed to consolidate their hold on the Carnatic, and seemed willing and able to move into the vacuum caused by the retreat of teneous Mughal Power in the South of India. In the Punjab, the Sikh Jats grew increasingly resentful of Mughal persecutions and began to take local power into their own hands. Even with the assistance of the Persians, the Mughal Empire was seemingly unravelling.


It was the ambitious Maratha Peshwa, Balaji Baji Rao who wanted to formally unseat the Mughals. Rumours had abounded that the Persian ruler Reza Shah had withdrawn his support for the Mughal Emperor, who was according to intelligence unsupported by any other power. The Mughals now appeared isolated and ripe for their final downfall. However, they had been fed false information by some of their supposed allies, such as the Nizam of Hyderabad. The reasons for this are still unclear, but it is likely that the thesis famously argued by Saju Chandratreya that they saw Persian dominance over India as preferable to that of a power based in India. The thesis argues that the Nizam of Hyderabad as well as other local rulers feared a truly dominant Maratha Confederacy, and fed false information that Reza Shah had pulled back his armies to Persia itself. In actual fact, Reza had kept a 50,000 strong “Observation Force” at the border town of Mardan, ready to intervene in India once again.


The Maratha army marched north toward Delhi, intent on forcing the Mughal Emperor Ahmad Shah Bahadur off his throne. Reportedly they rode at the head of a mighty army of 70,000 men, mostly cavalry. The Mughal Emperor attempted to combat this force on his own, but was decisively defeated at Bhopal. After the defeat, he had around 40,000 loyal soldiers left, and looked certain to be defeated if he stood alone. He called upon his nominal overlord, Reza Shah for assistance. This was a humiliating move, though the sting was taken out when Reza Shah obliged, and once again sent his army into India to assist a Muslim ruler against non-Muslim assailants.


By a stroke of good luck, the army happened to arrive as the Marathas were besieging Delhi. The Mughals sallied out of the city in support of the Persians, and the great armies clashed at the Battle of Delhi. It was a hard fought effort, but the veteran Persian forces proved their superiority once again, and by the afternoon much of the Maratha force was in disarray. The Maratha Pindari had fled as early as noon, which left the core of professional Maratha soldiery to deal with the onslaught of Reza Shah’s disciplined force. The downfall of the Maratha army came when the cavalry on their right was annihilated by Afghan lancers commanded by the famous Ahmad Durrani. The Persian infantry proved quite capable of holding off attacks from the Maratha cavalry, which began a re-examining of conventional military wisdom in India.


Although it was the Persians and the Mughal Emperor who had overcome the Marathas at the battle of Delhi, it was in fact the regional rulers, like the Nawab of Bengal and the Nizam of Hyderabad who profited most from the battle. What little prestige the Mughal rulers had was now gone, and the Persians were distant masters at best, soon to be distracted by troubles elsewhere on their borders. Following the Battle of Delhi, one by one local Indian rulers broke all but the most tenuous of ties to the Mughal Emperor, leaving India to be a subcontinent dominated once again by rulers with a regional rather than subcontinental focus. By 1760, one could have been forgiven for believing the map of India to have reverted to its state before the Mughal invasion.

YJKW1eM.png

India Circa 1760​
 
So France is still very much the lesser of Britain wrt India - either that or your Victoria 2 basemap doesn't show what power they actually have. Either way, good work, keep it up.
 
Interesting timeline. Subbed because there isn't enough Nadir Shah TLS out there.
Just a few minor nitpicks,
1)Sikhs and jats are different groups ( I know because my community has a distinct dislike of both :) )
2) It should be Diwan not Nawab of Bengal. ( Nawab is a ducal title )
3) Strange that the Peshwa acted on the Nizam's Intel as Hyderabad and the Confederacy were arch-rivals.
But these are minor nitpicks. You have an interesting concept, will definitely follow.
 
There's already around a million settlers on the Eastern Seaboard when the POD takes place, so I don't think that an Anglophone state on the Eastern Seaboard of North America can be butterflied at this point. What might be butterflied is what kind of a form this state takes.
Exactly.
While George III's personality was important in determining the way that America broke away in OTL, I think that ultimately it will be nigh-impossible for the UK to keep America under wraps, especially going into the 19th century.

In the long term, yes. One can't say that Canada or Australia remain "under wraps", though they never rebelled.

Alternate people is quite an interesting area indeed. To some extent, personalities are shaped by the parents we have, so I don't like making people too different at least for the first two decades following the POD, but eventually all those little butterflies result in totally different people.

Anyone born later is different. Consider baseball players José and Ozzie Canseco. José you've heard of, probably - Rookie of the Year, MVP, 8-time All-Star, two World Series championships, 35th in career home runs (462). Ozzie is José's identical twin brother; he played in 24 games and had 13 hits in 65 at-bats.

What made this enormous difference? Nobody knows. (They both used steroids - and steroids can't make that much difference, anyway.)

For purposes of narrative, butterfly trapping is necessary, but we should acknowledge it's happening.
 
Last edited:
Great update, I'm sure the Marathas will be making a recovery, necessitating further Persian involvement in India.

With the collapse of Mughal authority and regional secessionists, I see Maratha authority solidifying over southern and central India into a proper Maratha Empire, while the rest of India becomes a patchwork of highly-militarized states, some Muslim (Bengal, Hyderabad, etc) that would owe at least nominal fealty to the Persians, and the others Hindu/Sikh (Rajputs, Dogras, Jats, etc) that are more independent of and hostile to the Persians.

What's happening in the Caucasus and Turkic Central Asia?

(Can we please shift the Western-centric focus of our questions to the author? Its a timeline about Nader Shah's Persia and so far there have been a whole bunch of questions and talk about - as always - America and the Western powers).
 
Great update, I'm sure the Marathas will be making a recovery, necessitating further Persian involvement in India.

With the collapse of Mughal authority and regional secessionists, I see Maratha authority solidifying over southern and central India into a proper Maratha Empire, while the rest of India becomes a patchwork of highly-militarized states, some Muslim (Bengal, Hyderabad, etc) that would owe at least nominal fealty to the Persians, and the others Hindu/Sikh (Rajputs, Dogras, Jats, etc) that are more independent of and hostile to the Persians.

What's happening in the Caucasus and Turkic Central Asia?

(Can we please shift the Western-centric focus of our questions to the author? Its a timeline about Nader Shah's Persia and so far there have been a whole bunch of questions and talk about - as always - America and the Western powers).

Because Western powers were flexing their muscles around this time, and it doesn't do to ignore the rising stars of the world post 1600's. Variables could lead to an European power seeking an alliance with Persia to counteract another power. What happens in the West affects the world, simple as that.
 
What's that purple thing in India?
What remains of the Mughal Empire I believe.
Derek is right. To be honest, the map isn't one of my best, and the map of India will be re-done in the world map circa 1763 I'm working on at the moment.
So France is still very much the lesser of Britain wrt India - either that or your Victoria 2 basemap doesn't show what power they actually have. Either way, good work, keep it up.
France (or her allies) has triumphed in the North of India, though the Third Carnatic War in the South of India still goes England's way. The Seven Years War as a whole will end rather differently than OTL's affair did, and it will take up a few updates in the not too distant future. Hopefully it will make some fun reading for you all, though one of the big changes has been revealed already.
Interesting timeline. Subbed because there isn't enough Nadir Shah TLS out there.
Just a few minor nitpicks,
1)Sikhs and jats are different groups ( I know because my community has a distinct dislike of both :) )
2) It should be Diwan not Nawab of Bengal. ( Nawab is a ducal title )
3) Strange that the Peshwa acted on the Nizam's Intel as Hyderabad and the Confederacy were arch-rivals.
But these are minor nitpicks. You have an interesting concept, will definitely follow.
I do like nitpicks actually, aside from yet more reading it's the only way I'll learn.
1) I was under the impression that the Sikhs that went on to found the Sikh Confederacy were largely from Sikh Jats. My knowledge of Indian history is really lacking though, and my research was likely too shallow. (Also, what community are you from if you don't mind me asking?
3) The idea that I had was that it would be a Hyderabadi ploy to weaken Maratha influence in Central India. Again though, it's an area I know frightfully little about.
Exactly.

In the long term, yes. One can't say that Canada or Australia remain "under wraps", though they never rebelled.

Anyone born later is different. Consider baseball players José and Ozzie Canseco. José you've heard of, probably - Rookie of the Year, MVP, 8-time All-Star, two World Series championships, 35th in career home runs (462). Ozzie is José's identical twin brother; he played in 24 games and had 13 hits in 65 at-bats.

What made this enormous difference? Nobody knows. (They both used steroids - and steroids can't make that much difference, anyway.)

For purposes of narrative, butterfly trapping is necessary, but we should acknowledge it's happening.
One will certainly notice a difference as we get to the end of the 18th century. Certainly, significant figures such as Napoleon are avoided by quite some margin, though many of the Enlightenment Philosophers will still be kicking around, even if some of their ideas might be different. Certainly, by 1800 everyone in this world will be an ATL cousin or sibling of the people in OTL's 1800. It will certainly make the 19th century interesting as totally different people and a different international situation will encounter the technological, societal and other transformations of the 19th century. (Which I view as being pretty hard to butterfly from the mid 18th century.

As an interesting little aside, I actually have heard of José Canseco thanks to cultural osmosis (thanks Simpsons!).
Great update, I'm sure the Marathas will be making a recovery, necessitating further Persian involvement in India.

With the collapse of Mughal authority and regional secessionists, I see Maratha authority solidifying over southern and central India into a proper Maratha Empire, while the rest of India becomes a patchwork of highly-militarized states, some Muslim (Bengal, Hyderabad, etc) that would owe at least nominal fealty to the Persians, and the others Hindu/Sikh (Rajputs, Dogras, Jats, etc) that are more independent of and hostile to the Persians.

What's happening in the Caucasus and Turkic Central Asia?

(Can we please shift the Western-centric focus of our questions to the author? Its a timeline about Nader Shah's Persia and so far there have been a whole bunch of questions and talk about - as always - America and the Western powers).
The question is of course whether or not the Persians will be able to intervene in India. Ultimately, Persia has a number of powers assailing her on a number of fronts. Although relations with China and Russia are decent enough for the time being, this could change as powers expand and face challenges. In the long term I feel that the Persian presence in India may ultimately be a bridge too far, and that as Indian states become more able to resist Persian demands for tribute, Persia's influence will wane.

The Marathas could either go expansionist then bust (at the hands of another ambitious empire) as they did OTL, or they could centralise and become one of the dominant states of India. Bengal in particular has a relatively bright future, with a large population and a thriving cottage industry. Although it is likely to suffer in the 19th century at the hands of more competitive European exports, it may well do better than the total obliteration of its proto-industrial areas that it did in OTL.
Nice to see Ahmed Shah Durrani make an appearance as a feared Persian vassal lord!
At least according to his own histories, he was quite a loyal follower of Nader Shah and was recognised as a man of ability by him. His talents may well be better harnessed in a reformed Persian state then they were in the short-lived Durrani Empire, though the Afghans themselves might not do so well out of it.
Afghanistan.
It doesn't help that I took other Empires off that map. Persia's borders and China's aren't quite touching, but there are just a few mountain passes separating the two. In Central Asia, the two powers spheres of influence are definitely colliding, and this will be a sticking point for tensions in the future.
 
Top