Dominion of Southern America - Updated July 1, 2018

Glen

Moderator
Edited, 1843 meeting for Southern Federation.

Smaller picture of meeting place.

000_0034.gif
 
I always thought it would be a cool idea for Lafayette to settle in Quebec and become President. He was a citizen of the US when it was founded and meets the requirements.
 

Glen

Moderator
The Pre-Dominion Timeline in Timelines and Scenarios has now been updated to encompass all the information posted here thus far (thanks, Tom Veil, the list of post numbers really helped!). While there are likely to still be a few posts to flesh out the pre-Dominion era, we will be moving into the Dominion Era (slowly, slowly, but surely).
 

Glen

Moderator
I always thought it would be a cool idea for Lafayette to settle in Quebec and become President. He was a citizen of the US when it was founded and meets the requirements.

No, instead he became a leader of a Liberal Kingdom of France....but yeah, that would have been cool.
 

Glen

Moderator
As a matter of fact, IMO the political difficulties about merging the mainland DSA and the Caribbean islands seem merely temporary, lingering bad blood from the Slaver Rebellion that is bound to fade with time. The merger is in the best interest of Britain and the Dominions, and it would make the DSA better balanced against the USA and Mexico.

I tend to agree.

Yeah but whilst there isn't much reason for them to not merge, there is little reason for them to do so - the islands will still have to be secured by the Royal Navy and they'll thus want an independent voice in Westminister, and the Mainland BSA is going to want its military expediture to be small and focused towards the North and Mexico.

Yes and no. The benefits of liaisoning more closely between mainland and islands will occur to both sides, and the Brits in Parliament would prefer to deal with just a few voices rather than a cacophany of them. The Royal Navy will indeed be the law on the seas, but we'll see how they view their land neighbors over time.

Thus whilst it will almost certainly happen by the end of the 19th, it won't do so till BSA develops the industrial and commerical interests to make its independent hold over the Caribbean viable and Britain feels it has too much to do elsewhere and gives up some of the responsibility.

A British controlled canal across the isthmus will slow this process due to the increased naval and commerical reliance of the whole Empire.

Interesting thoughts...we will see how things develop.
 
Glad to hear my native Richmond gets to be a thriving border town!

If the DSA does include the Carribean, what are the odds that the people will end up looking like Brazilians by the 21st century? Odds are there will be at least some racial mixing.

Also, will the DSA's boder with Mexico change at all? Certain parts certainly could use minor adjustment.
 

Eurofed

Banned
If the DSA does include the Carribean, what are the odds that the people will end up looking like Brazilians by the 21st century? Odds are there will be at least some racial mixing.

Well, now that racial segregation has been forcefully ended, we can certainly see some racial mixing (or we might not: to my knowledge, even in modern USA, there has been relatively little spontaneous racial mixing) a la Brazil. It also depends on how much European immigration the DSA shall tend to attract after the creation of the Dominion. If the immigrants largely keep going to the USA, the DSA could evolve into a Brazilian direction. If they get some serious number of European immigrants, it would shore up the "whiteness" of the DSA (like it happened IOTL to Cuba and the Dominican Republic in comparison to Haiti and Jamaica). For that matter, the DSA could easily get a sizable number of Mexican immigrants in the future.

Also, will the DSA's boder with Mexico change at all? Certain parts certainly could use minor adjustment.

I definitely and strongly agree. Mexico is getting getting it far too good so far with not just one, but two great powers in the making on its borders. ;)

Besides the creation of the Dominion, territorial acquisition from Mexico would be another relatively easy way for Britain to cement the loyalty of DSA.
 

Glen

Moderator
Glad to hear my native Richmond gets to be a thriving border town!

Well, a thriving city in a border state...

If the DSA does include the Carribean, what are the odds that the people will end up looking like Brazilians by the 21st century? Odds are there will be at least some racial mixing.

High of some more mixing compared to OTL. Of course, there always was. Just in this case, there will be more acknowledged racial mixing. However, don't expect the south to be a homogenous moca color by the 21st century.

Also, will the DSA's boder with Mexico change at all? Certain parts certainly could use minor adjustment.

What were you thinking needed adjustment?
 
Well, a thriving city in a border state...



High of some more mixing compared to OTL. Of course, there always was. Just in this case, there will be more acknowledged racial mixing. However, don't expect the south to be a homogenous moca color by the 21st century.



What were you thinking needed adjustment?

As far as the border, nothing too serious. That straight line near the Arizone-New Mexico border and the Rio Grand River delta near Texas.
 
Well, now that racial segregation has been forcefully ended, we can certainly see some racial mixing (or we might not: to my knowledge, even in modern USA, there has been relatively little spontaneous racial mixing) a la Brazil. It also depends on how much European immigration the DSA shall tend to attract after the creation of the Dominion. If the immigrants largely keep going to the USA, the DSA could evolve into a Brazilian direction. If they get some serious number of European immigrants, it would shore up the "whiteness" of the DSA (like it happened IOTL to Cuba and the Dominican Republic in comparison to Haiti and Jamaica). For that matter, the DSA could easily get a sizable number of Mexican immigrants in the future.

What are you talking about Eurofed?
a) Brazil recieved lots and lots of white europeans relative to its population.
b) At no point was the African:European in Brazil as skewed in the African direction as it was in the American south - Blacks make up less than 8% of modern Brazil!
c) The Brazilian culture of mixing was established right from start, when the portuguese colonists couldn't get enough european women to emmigrate.

Brazil is not a model you can apply to the DSA, especially if your also positing little immigration.

On the immigration front, the DSA has already recieved a big bunch according to the TL (that which went to Canada), and is likely to recive more thanks to the British funded travel (since in TL they are unlikely to leave the British territories for warmer climes, and there is easy famrland available out west).

Regarding taking land from Mexico, there is no need for such expansion as the next tier of mexican states is a) empty of known resources and b) full of mexicans. Plus without the slave plantation economy there is much less drive for rabid expansion. The British aren't going to sign off on a war of conquest with an important trade partner like mexico, particularly if there is a plan for a canal - its so much cheaper to get the white dominion on board in other ways. If people clamour for land London will just tell them to piss off to Australia or California and not make trouble with an important market - its not like the US, where Mexico was the only possible expansion vector.

IMO there will be strict seperation in the northern provinces (which will have a black belt and a white belt), whilst the urbanising gulf coast will see a much more mixed culture.

@thekingsguard: the OTL US border is not some holy artifact handed down from on high, a slightly divergent line works just as well.
 
britishsouthamericatl18.png


Still waiting on Glen for city names, red lines are waterways (finished much earlier with a larger and richer South). You can see a railroad route (of the OTL southern pacific), heading further north is pretty much impossible due to the mountains. I'd think the Houston-Mobile gulf coast will become the workbench and import-export economic heart of the nation, and you'll see Caribbean blacks moving there whilst the upper farmlands stay white.
 

Glen

Moderator
No comments on the Founding Fathers of Federation Post? I am truly saddened. This sucker has involved weeks of research to come up with a quasi-plausible list.

The final Conference on Southern Federation occured in 1844. There was renewed interest in the federation after Texas came out in favor of the plan, and the only major colony in North America and the Caribbean to opt out was Hispaniola.

It was agreed to petition the Crown for the formation of a federation. Almost as hotly discussed as the points of federation was the proposed name for the federation. At first, many favored refering to the federation as a new Kingdom of Southern America under the British Crown, but it was quickly realized that this might antagonize the United States to their north as well as the British Parliament. Several descendants of United Empire Loyalists whose families originally hailed from Virginia (among them Generals Grymes and Randolph) countered with 'Dominion', calling the new federation the truly faithful 'Old Dominion' of America. And so the Dominion of Southern America was decided upon as the name for the federation.

The previous points of agreement from the 1843 conference were reiterated, and a few other points were added. The final document produced is considered by historians to be the true beginning of a Southern Constitution. The points included:

  • Restoration of civil rights for rebels who swore allegiance to the crown.
  • Representatives from all provinces to the federal legislature would be elected.
  • The rights of Aboriginal Americans to vote in Indiana would be preserved, but whites in the province would also be enfranchised.
  • No landowner or renter would be denied the right to vote.
  • Catholics would be enfranchised and allowed to hold public office in provinces where they were a majority such as Louisiana, Cuba, and Richport.
  • The Territories of New Mexico and California would remain under the jurisdiction of Texas until such time as they were populous enough to become full provinces.
  • The Minor Antilles would be under Dominion jurisdiction.
  • The British Government to commit to a trans-continental railroad to connect the Pacific Coast of California with the Dominion.

The final report was sent to the Crown and Parliament, and on June 20th, 1845, the Dominion of Southern America Act was passed and a new jewel was added to the British Crown.

The Founding Fathers of the Federation (sometimes irreverently refered to as the 'Daddies of Dominion') in alphabetical order by Province and Name:

Arkansas
Henry Johnson Conway
Thomas Rector Conway
Thomas Drew
John Hamilton Gray
Edward Palmer
Joseph Pope
Archibald Yell

Bahamas
Francis Bickerton
William Bucktrout
Mackenzie Hubard
Frank Jaram
Drake Watson

Bermuda
Toby Jaram
James Menzies
Edward Robinson
Michael Ross
Thomas Tarpley

Carleton
Neill Brown
James B. Campbell
Newton Cannon
Horatio Grymes
William Andrew Johnson
James Dean Jones
James Randolph
James Polk

Cuba
William Carter
Carlos Cepedes
Jose Heredia
Andrew Hill
Jonathan Jaram
John Thompson
Felix Varela

East Florida
James Anderson
Joseph Gray II
Thomas Heath Haviland Jr.
Donald Henley
George Mercer Johnson
Charles Maitland
James Middleton

Georgia
Edward Chandler
Howell Cobb Jr.
James Cockburn
George Rockingham Gilmer
Richard Gwatkin
John Hardcastle
George Wood

Indiana
David Evans
Greenwood Le Fleur
George Harkins
John McGillivray
William McIntosh III
John Ridge
John Ross
Buck Watie

Jamaica
J. W. Gordon
Ronald Hubard
Thomas S. Hunter
John Ritchie
Thomas Tilley
Joseph Williams

Louisiana
Paul Hebert
Andre Roman
Joseph Marshall Walker
Daniel McDougall
John Mowatt
Floyd Pitt
Samuel Levi Wells III

North Carolina
Edward Bishop Dudley
William Holden
John Howe Jr.
Reuben Settle Reid
Richard Dobbs Spaight, Jr.
George David Swain
Jonathan Worth
Robert Brank Vance

Richport
Primo Belvis
J. Philip Benjamin
Phineas Bland
James Carter
Juan P. Duarte

South Carolina
Seth Allan
Robert Brown
Alexander George Campbell
Benjamin Carey
Harold Corbin
Barnabas Drew Henegan
George McDuffie

Texas
Moses Austin Jr.
John Brown
Sam Carson
John Galt
Isaac Brock Hamilton
J. D. Henderson
Hugh Macdonald

West Florida
Benjamin Fitzpatrick
James Henderson
Joseph Hunter Johnson
Hugh Macdonald
Bruce Miller
George William Pitt
William Sharkey

A lengthy list of links to the wikipedia pages used for finding the OTL families of many of the founding fathers of federation for the Dominion of Southern America, not fully in order.

PS - The other names of founding fathers who aren't here without links came from a list of VA Loyalist families.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Howe John Howe Jr.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Lowry_Swain George David Swain
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_Bishop_Dudley Edward Bishop Dudley
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Dobbs_Spaight,_Jr. Richard Dobbs Spaight, Jr.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Woods_Holden William Holden
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Brank_Vance Robert Brank Vance
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Settle_Reid Reuben Settle Reid
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jonathan_Worth Jonathan Worth
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barnabas_Kelet_Henagan Barnabas Drew Henegan
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_McDuffie George McDuffie
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Brown_(Canadian_politician) Robert Brown
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_Campbell_(Canadian_politician) Alexander George Campbell
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_C._Jones James Dean Jones
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neill_S._Brown Neill Brown
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_B._Campbell James B. Campbell
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newton_Cannon Newton Cannon
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_K._Polk James Polk
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Johnson William Andrew Johnson
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Rockingham_Gilmer George Rockingham Gilmer
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Howell_Cobb_(disambiguation) Howell Cobb Jr.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Tyler_Wood George Wood
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_Barron_Chandler Edward Chandler
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Cockburn_(politician) James Cockburn
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Patton_Anderson James Anderson
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Hamilton_Gray_(New_Brunswick) Joseph Gray II
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Heath_Haviland Thomas Heath Haviland Jr.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Mercer_Johnson George Mercer Johnson
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isaac_Johnson Joseph Hunter Johnson
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benjamin_Fitzpatrick Benjamin Fitzpatrick
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_L._Sharkey William Sharkey
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Pinckney_Henderson James Henderson
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Archibald_Macdonald Hugh Macdonald
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Marshall_Walker Joseph Marshall Walker
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Octave_Hebert Paul Hebert
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Madison_Wells Samuel Levi Wells III
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andre_B._Roman Andre Roman
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_McDougall_(politician) Daniel McDougall
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oliver_Mowat John Mowatt
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Sevier_Conway Thomas Rector Conway
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archibald_Yell Archibald Yell
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Stevenson_Drew Thomas Drew
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Wharton_Conway Henry Johnson Conway
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_Palmer_(politician) Edward Palmer
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Pope_(politician) Joseph Pope
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Hamilton_Gray_(Prince_Edward_Island) John Hamilton Gray
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_William_Gordon J. W. Gordon
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_William_Ritchie John Ritchie
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samuel_Leonard_Tilley Thomas Tilley
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Juan_Pablo_Duarte, Juan P. Duarte
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judah_Benjamin J. Philip Benjamin
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Segundo_Ruiz_Belvis Primo Belvis
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/José_María_Heredia, Jose Heredia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Félix_Varela Felix Varela
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carlos_Manuel_de_Céspedes Carlos Cepedes
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frederick_Carter William Carter
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_W._Harkins George Harkins
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greenwood_Leflore Greenwood Le Fleur
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opothleyahola David Evans
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Ridge John Ridge
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Ross_(Cherokee_chief) John Ross
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elias_Boudinot_(Cherokee) Buck Watie
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_McGillivray John McGillivray
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_McIntosh William McIntosh III
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samuel_Price_Carson Sam Carson
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J._W._Henderson J. D. Henderson
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_J._Hamilton Isaac Brock Hamilton
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_Tilloch_Galt John Galt
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_A._Macdonald Hugh Macdonald
 

Glen

Moderator
What are you talking about Eurofed?
a) Brazil recieved lots and lots of white europeans relative to its population.
b) At no point was the African:European in Brazil as skewed in the African direction as it was in the American south - Blacks make up less than 8% of modern Brazil!
c) The Brazilian culture of mixing was established right from start, when the portuguese colonists couldn't get enough european women to emmigrate.

Brazil is not a model you can apply to the DSA, especially if your also positing little immigration.

Fair points, though I thought he was more referring to the amount of mixing rather than the reasons for mixing.

On the immigration front, the DSA has already recieved a big bunch according to the TL (that which went to Canada), and is likely to recive more thanks to the British funded travel (since in TL they are unlikely to leave the British territories for warmer climes, and there is easy famrland available out west).

More or less agree.

Regarding taking land from Mexico, there is no need for such expansion as the next tier of mexican states is a) empty of known resources and b) full of mexicans. Plus without the slave plantation economy there is much less drive for rabid expansion. The British aren't going to sign off on a war of conquest with an important trade partner like mexico, particularly if there is a plan for a canal - its so much cheaper to get the white dominion on board in other ways. If people clamour for land London will just tell them to piss off to Australia or California and not make trouble with an important market - its not like the US, where Mexico was the only possible expansion vector.

More or less agree here as well.

IMO there will be strict seperation in the northern provinces (which will have a black belt and a white belt), whilst the urbanising gulf coast will see a much more mixed culture.

Ah, but you are forgetting the X-factor here - the mediating effects of the Civilized Tribes, who mix with both whites and blacks...though as a general point about degree of mixing, you're not wrong I suspect.

@thekingsguard: the OTL US border is not some holy artifact handed down from on high, a slightly divergent line works just as well.

What Nugax said...
 

Glen

Moderator
britishsouthamericatl18.png


Still waiting on Glen for city names, red lines are waterways (finished much earlier with a larger and richer South). You can see a railroad route (of the OTL southern pacific), heading further north is pretty much impossible due to the mountains. I'd think the Houston-Mobile gulf coast will become the workbench and import-export economic heart of the nation, and you'll see Caribbean blacks moving there whilst the upper farmlands stay white.

Your map is a thing of beauty!

Which cities are you looking for?
 
Dunno whichever ones have become important over the timeline :).

IMO urban centres in the ATL that I need names would be:
-Houston
-Beumont
-Dallas/Arlington/Fort Worth
-Shreveport
-Little Rock
-A centre with no OTL analog near the top of the navigable Arkansas river
-Jackson
-Memphis
-A new city on the mississippi near the american border.
-Biloxi (would have the same root, but probably butchered from the original Bilocci in a different manner)
-Wherever the major Charleton Urban centre turns up
-Birmingham, Alabama
-Atlanta (on the border of Georgia and Indiana here)
-An analogless centre near the mouth of the Apalachicola-Chattahoochee system (since Tallahassee is butterflied away)
-Tampa
-Jacksonville
 
I din't mean to nitpick on the border, but like alot of AHer's I have an strange aversion to staight lines. As for Texas, I have always had the impression that the Rio Grande River made a good border. Thats just my opinion anyway.

And Glen, the list of the founders was VERY good. I certainly thought it was interesting to see the fates of several people in this TL... James K. Polk of Carleton still suprises me somewhat.
 
I din't mean to nitpick on the border, but like alot of AHer's I have an strange aversion to staight lines. As for Texas, I have always had the impression that the Rio Grande River made a good border. Thats just my opinion anyway.

And Glen, the list of the founders was VERY good. I certainly thought it was interesting to see the fates of several people in this TL... James K. Polk of Carleton still suprises me somewhat.

People who dislike lines of latitude borders in deserts are fools, are you a fool thekingsguard? ;)

The Rio Grande? Truely a formidable barrier! Its just a long line that works okay on a map, and its use as a border only dates back to Texan greed (it being a lince long line across the continent they could point at as a 'natural' border).
 
Top