Does the Chinese Communist Party liberalize if the Soviet Union survives?

I've read that the loss of control by the Communist Party of the Soviet Union was both a factor in causing the Tienanmen Square demonstrations, and was also a factor in making the Chinese Communist Party decide to crack down hard on the demonstration and its subsequent aversion to allowing greater political plurality since.

So if the Soviet Union continues, and the Soviet Party maintains its monopoly on power, does that mean there's a real chance that the Chinese Party allows other political voices? Say, allows independents to stand for elected offices. Or even allows other political parties to form (or more realistically, to split off of the Communist Party) and contest elections with the Communist Party?

fasquardon
 
Another thought: Would a political liberalization in China in the 1990s cause a collapse of the Chinese system?

fasquardon
 
How does the Soviet system survive? Andropov was apparently working on economic reforms to strengthen the Party's regime, without any political liberalization planned. Or does Gorbachev approach perestroika the way the KGB preferred? Or does perestroika proceed IOTL, which Gorbachev shrewd enough to crush Yeltsin's people and retain enough support to crush the nationalist movements? Or does the USSR limp on after the New Union Treaty is signed?

Deng had already implemented reforms throughout the 1980s, and had appointed many figures sympathetic to greater political freedom into the highest levels. After the Tiananmen Square protests, he purged the Party of liberals (most notably General Secretary Zhao Ziyang, who met the protesters). The turmoil in the Soviet Bloc seriously dampened appetite for further economic reform until 1992.
 
How does the Soviet system survive? Andropov was apparently working on economic reforms to strengthen the Party's regime, without any political liberalization planned. Or does Gorbachev approach perestroika the way the KGB preferred? Or does perestroika proceed IOTL, which Gorbachev shrewd enough to crush Yeltsin's people and retain enough support to crush the nationalist movements? Or does the USSR limp on after the New Union Treaty is signed?

Like I say, any way that leaves the Party in full control in the USSR. For the sake of argument, let's say Andropov lives longer and healthier, meaning he can finish his anti-corruption campaigns and institutes enough economic reforms that the Soviets can continue.

Deng had already implemented reforms throughout the 1980s, and had appointed many figures sympathetic to greater political freedom into the highest levels. After the Tiananmen Square protests, he purged the Party of liberals (most notably General Secretary Zhao Ziyang, who met the protesters). The turmoil in the Soviet Bloc seriously dampened appetite for further economic reform until 1992.

So if Tienanmen Square still has a demonstration that goes pear-shaped, but the Soviets are still in the game, is political reform discouraged as much as OTL? Would Deng's purge of the party be as thorough?

And what happens if the Soviets still continue AND there is no traumatic protest in Tienanmen square? How far would liberals like Zhao Ziyang really gone? And how far would the more conservative players let them go?

fasquardon
 
Top