Does a Hart nomination in '84 change that much in the long run?

I know that this site can often get annoyed at questions about convergent history, but I'll ask this anyway. If Gary Hart edges out Mondale for the Democratic nomination and likely goes on to still lose to Reagan by a decent margin, does the Democratic Leadership Council still come into play to try to get more moderates nominated? Does Dukakis still emerge as the nominee in '88 and Clinton in '92, just as in OTL? Or does the Democratic Party try to steer back in the direction of New Deal leftism?
 
Dukakis was liberal and the Democrats had a 40-year majority in the House by the time their run ended. The Senate flipped back to the Democrats in 1986 in OTL. So they were mainly worried about winning the Presidency.

A different sacrificial lamb in 1984 is unlikely to change the GOP nomination, or the general election result, in 1988. So you still have HW at 91% approval in early 1991 and the most prominent Democrats keep their powder dry for 1996. Clinton emerges from the Feeble Five and benefits from the recession and Perot.

The butterflies in this case are minimal.
 
Last edited:
Top