Dixieland: The Country of Tomorrow, Everyday (yet another Confederate TL)

Chapter 0 - The Trauma of Imagined Communities
  • The Trauma of Imagined Communities
    (Undergraduate Thesis, Longstreet University)

    As a thought experiment, imagine a community filled with green-eyed individuals. Presume that they aim to start their own empire, founded on the purity of those with green eyes. Presume they succeed, but at the cost of half of their lives. Now presume that collectively, they eventually later realize that caring about eye color is absolutely moronic. Would they still hang on together?

    History tells us that the answer is clearly yes. Take the Southroners, for example. The historical record is quite clear as to why those in charge of its political institutions, those who made the actual decision, chose to secede from the United States of America. The answer was clearly to preserve their institution of slavery.

    However, why did a nation, clearly founded on slavery, outlive slavery? To the average Bostonian, such a question seems bizarre. After all, America was founded on liberty and espouses that as its organizing principle in all of its excesses to this day. But Dixieland can unite on something else, something else that America doesn't have. That is, trauma.

    Over 400,000 Southroners, the vast majority with little stake in slavery, died in defense of what they thought was their homes, even if it was in reality for slavery. Yet, what matters today is not why they died - but that they died. Regardless of the politics of why, a young Southroner growing up in 1868 would see that the number one government expenditure in his state government was prosthetics for wounded veterans and that closely following was payments to aged widows. If he looked North, he would see those responsible, and he would see their relative wealth and comfort, regardless of what motivated them. The same story would repeat for his children and grandchildren

    For all that divides them, one thing unites the disparate peoples of Dixieland: trauma.
     
    Chapter 0.5 - The Disappearance of Stonewall Jackson
  • The Disappearance of Stonewall Jackson
    Historians still quibble today on how history might have changed if not for the events in the aftermath of the Battle of Chancellorsville. The chaos that engulfed the Army of Northern Virginia after the death of General Robert E. Lee (from friendly fire no less) may have been accidentally instrumental to the Confederate escape from Vicksburg, which was then clearly instrumental to Braxton Bragg's destruction of the Union's Army of the Cumberland at the battles of Chickamauga and Chattanooga. Bragg was never really able to replicate another victory on the scale of Chickamauga-Chattanooga, but he was certainly able to parlay his fame from those battles into a presidential term. The other great hero of the Confederacy, Stonewall Jackson, never fully recovered from less-fatal friendly fire wound, and although he was instrumental in slowing down the union advance through Virginia, surprised the rest of the Confederacy by simply totally disappearing from established Confederate society. After a brief tour of the North where he met various Union veterans and several prominent Northern writers and speakers, Jackson had barely returned to the Confederate States when he simply packed up, left his estate, to a destination clearly unknown by the general public. The "Disappearance of Stonewall Jackson" would for many years, be one of the strangest unanswered mysteries of the post-war Confederate States of America, largely because so few anticipated the actual answer.
     
    Chapter 1 - Treaty of Paris (1867)
  • 320px-Flag_of_the_Confederate_States_of_America_%281861%E2%80%931863%29.svg.png

    (Flag of the Confederate States of America, 1867) [1]

    Chapter 0 Here

    ~~~

    Chapter 1 Below:

    "Treaty of Paris (1867)"

    ...Confederate negotiators largely failed to accomplish most of their goals. American negotiators refused to budge on any major territorial concessions, including Confederate claims on Arizona, Kentucky, Missouri, Maryland, and even the new American state of West Virginia. The only Confederate negotiating victory came on accident - American negotiators agreed to "popular sovereignty" in the Indian territories, having not been informed of several now-infamously brutal massacres of Native Americans that pushed even many previously pro-Union tribes towards opting for the Confederacy. The parties agreed to respect these borders in perpetuity, a pledge that has been kept so far despite universal skepticism at the time.

    Unbeknownst to most observers at the time, more painful than any of the territorial concessions was the agreement of the Confederacy to assume its share of the pre-1861 national debts of the United States - as proportioned by population. American negotiators famously laughed in the face of Confederate negotiators who claimed it unfair when their American counterparts suggested counting slaves as "3/5ths" of a citizen for purposes of debt apportionment. Worst of all for the CSA was that the debt was denominated in US dollars, not the nearly useless Confederate dollar. Confederate inability to pay such debts, as small as they were by American standards (the 1867 debt of the USA was $4 billion, while the CSA share of 1861 debt came out to under $40 million), would eventually prove disastrous to its political class.

    One 20th century Marxist Southron politician joked about what he called the "dual ironies of 1867" - first, how the assassination of pro-war President McClellan by an abolitionist radical famously elevated a pro-peace politician in the White House.[2] Second, in their quest for power, Slave Power bankrupted the new nation and sent nearly 400,000 Southrons to their graves, ensuring American economic dominance of the nascent Confederacy.[3] He lamented that "if not for the First Revolution, we would have at least gotten to vote on the terms of our subordination."

    Modern historians largely have rehabilitated once-reviled Confederate diplomats, pointing to the weak bargaining position of the CSA. Although the Tennessee front went horribly for the Americans, Richmond and its ironworks were lost. Though CSA troops successfully escaped Vicksburg, the Mississippi was lost.[4] Confederate troops hadn't ventured onto American territory since the unsuccessful 1862 Maryland campaign (though historical documentation strongly suggests General Lee would have mounted a similar campaign in Pennsylvania if not for his death by friendly fire at Chancellorsville).[5] The economy was in shambles and much of Europe had easily adjusted to the loss of Dixie cotton. Ironically, the primary destination of cotton would soon be to textile mills...in America.

    Despite the lack of any better options, the Treaty of Paris triggered revulsion among the Confederate public elite. President Davis was famously unable to get the Confederate Senate to ratify the treaty and was forced to pass the terms as a bill in Congress (with simple majorities). With some angered at his autocratic violation of state rights throughout the war and others screeching at this "betrayal", the upcoming 1867 elections would prove to be an ordeal for the new nation.
    ---
    [1] The OTL CSA adopted the Battle Flag of the Army of Northern Virginia into its national flag because of the national prestige of R.E. Lee. But here, Lee is dead, and the ANV is not the most successful CSA army, so that doesn't happen.
    [2] McClellan was pro-war, but his VP, Pendleton, was not.
    [3] A longer war means higher casualties, on both sides. And IIRC, the OTL CSA was already scrapping the bottom of the barrel, so this hurts going forward.
    [4] No Vicksburg surrender means more CSA fighting power, which means the CSA can last longer in various meat grinders.
    [5] This butterflies out Gettysburg. Not blowing manpower in Gettysburg also delays the collapse of the Army of Northern Virginia.

    ---

    FOREWORD (probably tl;dr)

    Hi. I've lurked a lot and read lots of good TLs, so I decided to try my own hand at something! It's basically my first timeline, so uh, good luck me.

    Oh no, another cliche US Civil War timeline? Well, maybe? To make it worse, I really don't know much about military history of the US Civil War itself (or really any military history at all). My knowledge of the U.S. South largely starts in 1865 (and peaks with the Civil Rights Movement). What I have studied is developmental economics and to a lesser extent, African-American studies. On this subject, I'm a huge fan of C. Vann Woodward's books on Jim Crow, John W. Cell's The Highest Form of White Supremacy, a fantastic comparison/contrast of Jim Crow and South Africa, and obviously anything written by W.E.B. DuBois. I was also interested by the discussion of the US South in Why Nations Fail (as an example of an extractive oligarchy created by fundamentally broken political institutions).

    So the focus is far less on Civil War villainy/heroics, and more on the social and political development of the CSA in the context of a wider world. What I don't plan on is a CSAwank (I obviously have no sympathy towards the Dunning School/Lost Cause) nor a CSA dystopian hatesink (I remember someone making a good point about a sort of US narcissism where people with regional prejudices grind jump straight into polemics because they think their history created the most heroic/evil people ever). The CSA almost certainly ends up a significantly worse place than the OTL US South and probably OTL Mexico...but things get better...eventually. As the title strongly implies...the CSA...sort-of-muddles-through. So here we go with my first post.
     
    Last edited:
    Chapter 2 - Confederate States of America, 1867 elections
  • Well okay, it's time for another update on the first President of the post-war Confederate States of America, hopefully in a way that shines light on how they even won the Civil War. I'll add in a wikibox when I get to it after lunch.

    Confederate States of America, 1867 elections

    The anti-partyist ideology of the CSA prevented the formation of effective political parties, but many politicians began coalescing into general political camps. At first, this began as a split between pro-Davis and anti-Davis. However, after anti-Davis forces took a clear majority in the Confederate Congress in the 1865 elections, it quickly became obvious that the opponents of Davis agreed on little.[1]

    One common interpretation is that three distinct camps splintered: one camp dedicated to defending Jefferson Davis, one camp that detested Davis for his violation of states' rights while President, and a third camp outraged at the Treaty of Paris. However, the lack of partyism meant that most politicians belonged to none of these camps, but rather followed primarily localist or cronyist interests. Their only ideological commitment, like almost all other major politicians at the time, was defending the primacy of slavery as the backbone of the nation's political and economic order. Politicians, many of them elected in Unionist regions like Eastern Tennessee or Northern Alabama, were excluded from Congress.

    Contrary to public perception, the politicians protesting against the Treaty of Paris were not all fire-eaters - they actually came equally from all sides of the political spectrum, and many former fire-eaters actually softened their political stances in the aftermath of the devastation of the war. Proslavery was not a meaningful distinction when almost all major politicians were proslavery.

    The 1867 election plunged this entire system into chaos, thanks to the candidacy of the Confederacy's most prominent war hero: Braxton Bragg. Bragg was beloved by Confederate veterans and much of the general public for his smashing victories at Chickamauga and Chattanooga. The surrender of the Army of the Cumberland was wildly considered the worst American defeat of the war.[2] However, Bragg was wildly despised by the Confederate political class, which largely considered those victories a fluke.

    Braxton ran against Alexander Stephens, who represented many political forces opposed to the Davis Administration. Although Davis was widely unpopular, his endorsed candidate, Bragg, easily soared to a landslide victory.

    A last-ditch effort to keep Bragg from the presidency through the electoral college floundered as Confederate veterans marched on the capital (moved back to Montgomery due to paranoia over the USA) to demand the electors follow the popular votes of their state. Bragg denied responsibility over the paramilitaries, but they quickly set a precedent in Dixie politics.
    ---
    [1] Pro-Davis forces barely won in 1863 and 1865 goes worse for them as CSA deaths pile on.
    [2] OTL, Union forces escaped Chattanooga when Grant’s forces relieved the siege. Without his glorious victory at Vicksburg...that didn’t happen. And so a CSA army escapes surrender and a Union army doesn't. And thus Braxton Bragg of all people becomes the CSA’s most prominent war hero.
     
    Last edited:
    Chapter 3 - Napoleonic Diplomacy and the Origins of the Prussian Empire
  • And now for something completely different!

    Napoleonic Diplomacy and the Origins of the Prussian Empire
    Ironically, the greatest winner from the Treaty of Paris may have been the neutral figure who helped the two sides negotiate: the French Emperor, Napoleon III. Not only did he present himself to the world as a monumental diplomatic figure, but he managed to browbeat both sides into accepting the legitimacy of his intervention in Mexico. The American abandonment of Republican Mexico in many ways spelled the death knell for Benito Juarez's cause.

    Although the rise of Prussia seemed exceedingly problematic for Napoleon, abandoning the Mexican project after having just legitimated it in the eyes of the world was also a non-starter. The Luxembourg Crisis of 1867 forced Napoleon's hand. With the imminent threat of a confrontation with Prussia, France quickly needed allies. Austria-Hungary was in theory an ally of the French in this confrontation, especially because the two were so closely linked in Mexico. Napoleon III had totally expected Austro-Hungarian support, but Austria, still smarting from a war with Italy, concluded that it would only support France if the French were able to get the Italians on board. Ultimately as a result, Napoleon III saw no choice but to relent on the Roman Question, promising the Italians that French troops would not return to Rome after their 1866 withdrawal (as part of the 1864 September Convention with Italy, that promised French withdrawal.)

    As humiliating as the Roman withdrawal was, it was deemed potentially less humiliating than a Mexico withdrawal, and an alliance between France, Italy, and Austria-Hungary (the Triple Alliance) was quickly brokered by the anti-Prussian Friedrich Ferdinand von Beust.[1] Bismarck had originally planned on unifying Germany by defeating France in a quick war, isolating it on the continent, and then redirecting its interest outside of Europe. Unfortunately for Prussia, this had happened in reverse. Prussia could not stand up to the Triple Alliance. The three South German states immediately reneged on their secret pact with Prussia against France.

    However, Bismarck was undeterred. Despite widespread revulsion towards him at German newspaper, he accepted France's acquisition of Luxembourg, even while lambasting France as an expansionist Great Power. Newspapers in London and St. Petersburg ran glowing editorials on Bismarck, who the shock of most observers, ended up leading Prussia until his death in 1898. Instead, Bismarck adopted a new political strategy. First, he sought to use German nationalism to sway the South German states, but not with European conflicts, but rather with colonial exploits.[2] The second plank of his foreign policy was diplomatic alignment with Imperial Russia, including subtle support of Pan-Slavism. Both of these would help set the stage for the First World War.
    ---
    [1] The main barrier between an Austro-French alliance was the Italian problem and the main barrier between an Franco-Italian alliance was the Roman problem. Napoleon III defended Pope Pius because he was afraid of backlash from French Catholics, but ITL, he figures defending Emperor Maximilian and triumphing in Luxembourg gives him way more goodwill with the French Right.
    [2] Quite simply, there were no more neighbors Prussia could win a war with. With the possible exception of Imperial Russia, which was Prussia's only plausible ally. The colonial game is the least-bad option remaining to Bismarck.
     
    Last edited:
    Chapter 4 - United States of America, 1868 Elections
  • United States of America, 1868 Elections
    Throughout the war, Abraham Lincoln remained the most popular politician in America. Although Lincoln had won the popular vote convincingly in 1864, the electoral college boiled down to a 120-120 tie (including Lincoln’s 7 electoral votes from Louisiana).[1] Lincoln partisans insisted that he won the popular vote, while McClellan partisans insisted that Louisiana’s electoral votes shouldn’t be counted. To avoid internal strife during a time of war, Lincoln struck a gentleman’s agreement with McClellan, agreeing to concede the race on the condition that McClellan prosecute the war as aggressively as Lincoln did. However, the Lincoln-McClellan pact did not survive McClellan’s assassination. What did survive was Lincoln’s personal reputation as a politician who placed national interest and the Union above his own political career.

    Friends described Lincoln as a deeply demoralized man, regretful over his inability to crush the Confederacy and preserve the Monroe Doctrine in Mexico. However, he was wildly beloved among his party and a draft Lincoln movement took a life of its own. After deep personal deliberation, Lincoln took up the mantle and ran again for President in 1868.

    President Pendleton, who had signed the peace agreement on behalf of an exhausted nation was not widely despised, as a significant minority of Americans favored peace. However, he was remarkably divisive and although renominated by his own party after defeating a furious primary challenge by McClellan supporters, failed to campaign effectively against the beloved Lincoln. The Lincoln/Kelley ticket won a 216-21 electoral vote landslide, losing only Pendleton’s native Ohio.[2]

    Lincoln was not particularly a radical abolitionist. As President, he was more concerned with preserving the Union than abolishing all slavery everywhere. His main concern before the war was simply stopping the spread of slavery. However, his interaction with freedmen after the Emancipation Proclamation hardened his attitudes against slavery.

    In his inaugural address at Washington[3], Lincoln announced his “Good Neighbor” policy. Hoping to quell almost apocalyptic fears in the Confederate States, Lincoln publicly committed to peace and upholding the territorial settlement of the Treaty of Paris. However, he still terrified Southern politicians by announcing a policy of “brotherhood” towards anti-slavery forces in the Confederacy and committing to harboring escaped slaves. Furthermore, he stressed that he would not tolerate any spread of slavery and immediately worked to broker close relations with “free neighbors”, chiefly Imperial Mexico.[4]
    ---
    [1] OTL, Tennessee and Louisiana voted, but Congress disregarded their votes because they weren’t full elections. ITL, Tennessee isn’t under Union control yet, but Louisiana delivers 7 electoral votes to Lincoln. Without Louisiana, McClellan wins 120-113. With Louisiana, the two tie at 120-120. Lincoln could have tried to get Congress to recognize Louisiana’s votes and then choose him as President in the House of Representatives, but he feels that would jeopardize American unity, and concedes instead.
    [2] Lincoln isn’t fighting a war of unity anymore, so he doesn’t need a “team of rivals.” He just opts for a friend and a political ally Senator William Kelley of Pennsylvania.
    [3] The US capital remains at Washington, moving it would be a show of weakness. In contrast, the CS capital is at Montgomery, because Richmond was damaged in the world and they’re more scared of the US than vice versa.
    [4] Lincoln notably wants nothing to do with Spain, as slavery was still legal in Cuba.

    Note: Does anyone have any tips on how to build electoral maps?
     
    Last edited:
    Chapter 5 - The Bragg Administration: Part One (1868-1871)
  • The Bragg Administration: Part One (1868-1871)

    President Bragg remains controversial to this day. He came into office with few to no political allies. Even his Vice President, John Reagan, was only picked because Bragg appreciated his role in having troops transferred from the Army of Northern Virginia to relieve Vicksburg and then to aid him at Chickamauga and Chattanooga.[1] Many issues plagued his administration.

    First was anger in Virginia. Many Virginia politicians were angry at the Confederate government for giving up their claims on West Virginia. However, even they knew there was no way the Confederate government could reclaim that territory. Instead, they used it as a wedge issue to demand compensation from the Confederate government. However, the Confederate government had no funds to spare. Bragg’s undiplomatic manner did not endear Virginians (who didn’t vote for him anyways).

    Second was the occasional flight of slaves to the North. The Lincoln administration apprehended slave catchers who tried to follow escaped slaves past the border. Bragg’s idea to kill two birds with one stones was to task underemployed Confederate veterans at the border, allowing slave owners to pay them to have custody of their slaves returned. This solution was wildly unpopular with everyone. The veterans were very poorly compensated and thus often demanded exorbitant prices from the slaveholders. Some hoping to make a quick buck crossed the Union border, which often ended up in them being arrested, as the Treaty of Paris specifically prohibited such border crossings. Nathan Bedford Forrest planned on getting back into the slave-catching game, but after the Treaty of Paris, decided to find new profits by taking his talents and leaving the country completely.[2]

    Third was the terrible economy. King Cotton was far less impressive than Confederate leaders thought. European nations showed little nation in Southron cotton, both because of alternative sources (Egypt, India, etc.) and moral distaste for slavery. The primary export market for cotton...was the United States of America, which tended to apply high tariffs on all exports. Ironically, the Constitution made it very difficult for the CSA to apply countervailing tariffs on American imports. CSA exports tended to be undervalued and imports largely overvalued, creating a severe balance of payments problem and deflationary problems. Persistent Confederate deflation meant minimal economic growth, but ironically spared the CSA most of the fallout from the Panic of 1872. Southron politicians actually took this as a sign of the “inherent superiority” of their economic system, further dooming any reform efforts that could spur any major industrialization.

    Bragg was an even more divisive president than Davis and the party system quickly polarized in reaction during the CSA’s first political crisis. In 1870, the number one state budget expenditure was prosthetics for soldiers. However, with limited revenues, state governments became quite stingy. When President Bragg learned of the shoddy treatment of veterans, he exploded in anger, demanding Congress institute a tariff to ensure better treatment of veterans. In an election year, Bragg cobbled a narrow coalition in favor of such a tariff better funding the army and veteran's support. However, the Confederate Supreme Court (appointed largely by Davis in 1867), narrowly decided 5-4 that parts of the tariff was unconstitutional.

    In Mississippi v. Bragg, the Court noted how the Constitution only allows tariffs to “pay the debts, provide for the common defense, and carry on the Government of the Confederate States.” “Common defense” thus did not include government spending on individuals discharged from service (injured veterans), which was the “proper responsibility of state governments.”

    In fury, President Bragg tried to ram a court-packing scheme through Congress - and when that failed, he declared that he had the right to interpret the Constitution in the capacity of his office - a theory that the executive branch should follow the executive branch’s best constitutional interpretation.[3] He ordered the tariffs collected, regardless. The House, denouncing “Tyrant Bragg”, narrowly impeached him, though no Senate hearing was held. In the Confederacy’s first postwar midterm elections waged on this issue, pro-Bragg politicians won a convincing landslide.

    In a remarkable response after his midterm victory, Bragg then immediately lost much of his popularity by trying to threaten angry state politicians into submission, by signing the Lincoln Protocol to the Treaty of Paris, where the USA agreed that it would not recognize any state seceding from the CSA.[4] Bragg assumed he’d be hailed as a “conqueror of Lincoln” - the Southron press lambasted him instead as “Lincoln’s tyrant stooge.” One angry actor attempted to assassinate Braxton Bragg during a theater event, but missed his shot.
    ---
    [1] OTL, the Confederate cabinet did not listen to Reagan.
    [2] Start the guessing game?
    [3] This is a very extreme interpretation of the theory of "departmentalism."
    [4] Lincoln assumes that if the CSA were to ever abolish slavery, several states would secede in hopes of preserving slavery. He concludes ensuring Confederate territorial integrity would actually hasten the end of the slavery. “Killing slavery with kindness.”
     
    Last edited:
    Chapter 6 - The Origins of Canadian Nationhood
  • The Origins of Canadian Nationhood

    ...President McClellan, as a War Democrat, fought primarily with Republicans not over the conduct of the war (which he pursued relentlessly), but rather over tariffs. He outraged Republicans when he refused to abrogate the Elgin-Marcy Treaty, ensuring free trade between the United States and British North America. Furthermore, in a nod to his Catholic voting base, McClellan failed to crack down on Irish-American raids into Canada (the Fenian raids).[1]

    At the London Conference of 1866, advocates for Confederation were sorely disappointed by the unexpected failure of New Brunswick and Nova Scotia to ratify union, both of cited discontent with Canada’s With Prince Edward Island and Newfoundland also opposing union, the Atlantic colonies seemed opposed to Confederation.

    The rampant Fenian raids however, had inflamed opinion in the Province of Canada[2], especially Protestant opinion. John MacDonald, undeterred, still pushed through with Canadian Confederation, with the Province of Canada going it alone. In 1867, Queen Victoria gave royal assent to the British North America Act, 1867, transforming the Province of Canada into the Dominion of Canada. For a nation that now spans 17 time zones, its origins were surprisingly humble.[3] However, the Manitoba war would soon test the new nation...
    ---
    [1] With no breakdown in trade with the USA and no American purchase of Alaska, a wrench gets thrown into Canadian Confederation. However, stronger Fenian raids ensures that some form of Confederation still happens.
    [2] The Province of Canada includes both OTL Quebec and Ontario.
    [3] This probably sounds way more badass than it actually will be.
     
    Chapter 7 - The Birth of Hohenzollern Spain
  • Sorry for the remarkably long wait. Honestly, don't have a good reason to justify it, I was just a little distracted by my other TL.

    The Birth of Hohenzollern Spain

    ...Napoleon III feared that a Hohenzollern King in Spain would help the Prussians encircle France with friendly regimes. However, he was also aware that his reputation was absolutely shot in the world, with the acquisition of Luxembourg wildly condemned in even the neutral British press. When the Provisional Government offered the Spanish Crown of Leopold of Hohenzollern-Sigmaringen, Napoleon III immediately disregarded his more nationalist advisors and accepted the succession. Although King Leopoldo I of Spain was in theory the most powerful man in Spain, in practice, he promised to both Napoleon III and Juan Prim that he would interfere as little as possible in affairs of state, especially foreign affairs. In practice, Prime Minister Juan Prim ran the country, and his political power expanded after surviving an assassination attempt on both him and King Leopoldo. Prim was shot, but survived. However, King Leopoldo did not.[1] The assassination outraged all elements of Spanish society, as both hardcore Republicans and Carlists deplored regicide. The assassination led to the immediate ascension of the six-year old Guillermo I. Ruling on his behalf was his mother, the Infanta Antónia of Portugal.

    The new regime was immediately confronted with the Cuban crisis. When Carlos Manuel de Céspedes declared in 1868 the end of slavery and declaration of an independent Cuban Republic, the Spanish regime shuddered. However, the victory of the Confederate insurrection would actually help Spain, not the rebels. The Confederacy never actually directly interfered in Cuban affairs as feared (due to Confederate fears of undermining slavery), although hordes of now totally unemployed Confederate veterans offered their services to the Spanish government. Interestingly, one former Confederate general, Thomas Jordan, offered his services free-of-charge to the Cuban rebels. But the Confederate government, fearing that his support for Cuban liberation would fuel opposition to slavery, had him arrested and placed under house arrest. [2] The Spanish government sought to enlist the aid of General Forrest, but he had already been picked up by a stranger employer. Instead, they hired Confederate soldier Champ Ferguson, who had become a pariah in postwar Confederate politics for his various civilian massacres, but still knew a great deal about guerrilla warfare.[3] The easy destruction of the the Cuban rebels by 1872 brought great prestige to Arsenio Martínez Campos, who had earlier faced criticism he was treating the rebels "too lightly."[4] Just as promised, he actually offered offered Céspedes and his supporters amnesty, which tanked his reputation in Spain but helped keep the peace in Cuba. Céspedes agreed to the amnesty even though Campos, at the insistence of Confederate diplomats and advisors, declined to include an abolishment of slavery in the terms of the peace agreement.[5] Campos, who was antislavery, figured there were alternate methods to end Cuban slavery.

    Triumph in Cuba helped Spain deal with its other great crisis of the era, the Carlist uprisings. The Carlists had screamed bloody murder about a "foreign monarch" being established in Madrid. However, the assassination of Leopoldo I weakened the Carlist movement as many bystanders blamed the Carlists (historians are unsure if they were so responsible). Furthermore, the Infanta Antónia was Portuguese, which was much less foreign than her late husband. With the keen understanding of a Portuguese noble, she also vetoed attempts by the liberal government to dismantle local autonomy in Navarre and Catalonia.[6] Finally, the victory in Cuba proved the death knell to the Carlist movement. When Don Carlos proclaimed a rising, his forces were easily dispersed and he was captured immediately, agreeing to relinquish his claim in exchange for a pension and amnesty.

    These dual triumphs helped save the Spanish treasury, which was faltering in the aftermath of the Panic of 1872. Where the state was near-bankrupt in 1872[7], victories in Cuba and at home restored investor confidence in Spain. The government was quickly able to refinance its loans and although the state was still deeply in debt to French, North German, British, and especially American investors (who benefited from the most aggressive national monetary policy in the industrializing world), the finances of Spain became at least stable. Although Spain looked like a doomed basket-case in 1868, by 1873, the future of the nation seemed at least plausibly bright.
    ---
    [1] OTL, he was assassinated in 1870. IITL, the assassins try to hit both Prim and his monarch, and only get Leopoldo I.
    [2] OTL, Thomas Jordan helped train the Cuban rebels.
    [3] OTL, Ferguson was hanged for war crimes, although he probably didn't commit everything he was alleged to do.
    [4] OTL, the war lasted until 1878 and Campos was forced to step down by 1872. Here, Confederate support to Spain, largely motivated by proslavery, ends the war faster.
    [5] The OTL Pact of Zanjon promised an end to slavery by 1888. No such promise was made IITL.
    [6] OTL, this helped motivated many people who supported the Carlists.
    [7] As OTL.
     
    Chapter 8 - The Boshin War
  • The Boshin War
    “The Jews fear the Samurai” - Slogan of the Nation of Samurai (1930-1949)

    Before even the ink on the Treaty of Paris had dried, Nathan Bedford Forrest, being largely uninterested in the silly quibbling of Confederate politicians, decided that he had to find new pastures to work in and strike back against the Union. One of the closest international allies of the Union had been, ever since the American admiral Matthew Perry had sailed into Tokyo Bay, was the Tokugawa Shogunate in Japan. The Treaty of Amity and Commerce (also known as the Harris Treaty), stood as testament to this.

    Forrest naturally found his next employer - the Tosa Domain of Japan. The Satsuma domain (and by extension, their close Choshu allies) had already enjoyed British support, while the Shogunate enjoyed the support of France and the United States. The Tosa domain thus stood alone in not having a military expert, and with Forrest on board, they had a cavalry expert. Although the Tosa Domain had a far smaller army than either Choshu or Satsuma, they quickly built up a small, highly trained mounted rifle force under Forrest. In particular, Forrest was interested in Japan, because he was fascinated in Japanese melee weapons (Forrest’s cavalry saber likely killed dozens of soldiers in the American Civil War).

    On January 4, 1868, the Choshu, Satsuma, and Tosa domains formally declared the restoration of the Meiji Emperor to absolute rule. Under Forrest’s suggestions, Tosa, which was less hardline nationalist than Choshu and Satsuma, also sent its cavalry squadron to Kyoto to back up the two larger domains. In an incredible breach of international diplomacy, Forrest decided that he was not going to be stopped by etiquette and miss out on the bloodshed.

    Imperial forces, largely from Satsuma and Choshu, shocked the world as they ambushed and defeated the Shogunal forces outside of Kyoto.[1] They further force shocked the world when Forrest’s cavalry brigade cut off a retrating Shogun Tokugawa Yoshinobu before he could reach Osaka, cutting down most of his guard. With the Shogun himself in custody, Imperial forces declared total victory.[2] In Tosa custody, the Shogun officially surrendered and called on all shogunal forces to step down.[3] Although modern historians universally agree that the Boshin War would have been won by the Imperial side even had Shogun Yoshinobu not been captured by Forrest’s Tosa cavalry, the Tosa cavalry certainly sped up the Imperial victory and both Tosa commanders and their foreign advisor gained international fame for their remarkable act. Forrest in particular, became a folk hero.

    Most foreign nations saw the total defeat of the Shogun and decided to immediately recognize the new government, even though it had made no promises of respecting international harbors and pre-existing treaties.[4] With his newfound prestige in Japan, Forrest advised Tosa to take a more uncompromising stance towards colonial concessions, which aligned Tosa’s opinion with Satsuma and Choshu. Under Anglo-Confederate advisors, the Imperial forces promised to not harm foreigners, but they indicated their desire to abrogate the Harris treaty with America, and by extension, the Ansei Treaties. Both Forrest and the British envoy, Harris Parkes, pushed this did not actually mind since that actually put them as the most privileged trade partner of Japan. Instead, only the Dutch, French, Russians, and Americans were shut out.

    Napoleon III flip-flopped and led the Russians and Dutch in recognizing the Shogunate of Japan as the rightful government of Japan. However, there was no actual Shogun. Instead, a band of Northern domains, chiefly Aizu, recognized Date Yoshikuni as the new Shogun of Japan. A band of Russian, Dutch, American, and French troops quickly arrived in Sendai to help his government. The original plan was Edo, but the capital fell without a shot as Imperial forces advanced simply too quickly. However, Date Yoshikuni didn’t actually really care about the Shogunal cause. The only reason he fought the Imperial forces was to seek amnesty for his father-in-law, Matsudaira Katamori, the daimyo of the Aizu Clan captured in the Battle of Toba-Fushimi. He fought the Emperor not out of ideology, but out of filial loyalty. Similarly, his men shared not anti-Imperial ideology, but loyalty to him and Matsudaira.

    However, the Satsuma and Choshu domains hated Matsudaira, because he had persecuted Choshu and Satsuma activists while serving as the pro-Shogun Military Commissioner of Kyoto. They were loathe to give him amnesty.[5] However, now, Tosa had risen to match Satsuma and Choshu in prestige. Furthermore, the shogunal army, with the Franco-Russo-Dutch expeditionary force, was actually considerably more powerful than the Imperial army. Thus, Tosa made a deal. On the eve of the battle of Sendai, Matsudaira was released safely and Date, thanking the Tosa domain, repudiated his role as Shogun, officially submitting to Imperial rule. Most of the Shogunal army immediately deserted or even switched sides, as the majority was only there out of loyalty. Only the hardcore anti-Imperial idealogues were left, and so Imperial forces were able to carve a narrow, but bloody victory against an isolated, surrounded, and horrifically outnumbered foreign expeditionary force, despite the technological gap.[6]

    The victory shocked the world. Napoleon III was particularly in shock, concluding that the French Army might not actually win a war against Prussia. He decided to cut his losses, as he often did. The failure of the Japanese expedition was also one of many incidents that helped soured Franco-Russian relations, as France was seen to have largely “led” the enterprise. Alexander II started to see the Prussian-dominated North German Confederation as a more reliable partner. The humiliation was one of many reasons why Lincoln would win his 1868 landslide - Lincoln had lambasted the expeditionary force as a doomed imperialistic idea, much like when he stood nearly alone lambasting the Mexican-American War. In contrast, Lincoln did not take Forrest’s bait, deftly negotiating with the Imperial government to have all American POWs returned, with open/friendly trade relations (albeit more equal) quickly reestablished. The Dutch fumed, but had no ability to project force without a major power on their side. However, poisonous relations with Japan would become a future Dutch trend.

    The Tosa domain was in particularly jubilant. It had risen from a third-bit player in a losing alliance into being the most prestigious victorious domain in all of Japan. Gotō Shōjirō and Itagaki Taisuke, the leading figures of the Tosa Domain, was delighted by Forrest’s help. At Forrest’s request, the two of them arranged for Forrest to be given a symbolic pension in koku, as an officially appointed samurai retainer of Yamauchi Toyoshige, Daimyo of the Tosa Domain. Notably, Forrest was now allowed to wear two swords, something he would famously do for the rest of his life (his cavalry sabre and a “requisitioned” Japanese katana), even after almost all samurai special privileges were be abolished (with only outraged Tosa retainers preventing a total abolishment of the symbolic class).[7] Forrest would quickly become a folk hero in the Confederate States, viewed as the man who simultaneously slayed France, Russia, the Netherlands, and of course, the Yankees.
    ---
    [1] This is the OTL Battle of Toba-Fushimi.
    [2] It’s more or less the same battle, except the Shogun is outright captured.
    [3] OTL, this happened OTL in May, 1868. Now, it happens in January, 1868. Obviously, like OTL, many people disobey the Shogun.
    [4] OTL, the Imperial government was only recognized after agreeing to do those things.
    [5] All OTL.
    [6] This all really gives me an “Isandlwana” feel.
    [7] The Tosa domain avoids a total abolishment of the Samurai class, though I guess it symbolically persists. The main difference from OTL is that the OTL Meiji government was dominated by Satsuma and Choshu rerainers, but now it's an even government of all 4 major Imperial clans, adding in Tosa and Hizen.
     
    Last edited:
    Chapter 9 - The Lincoln Administration at Home
  • The Lincoln Administration at Home
    The Lincoln honeymoon didn’t last long. Many Radical Republicans thought the Lincoln Administration was an opportunity to wash away the shame and perfidy of the Pendleton Administration. However, many Republicans quickly found that Lincoln was disturbingly moderate for their tastes.

    The American political spectrum, included Lincoln, was united on finally ending slavery in its last vestiges (Delaware, Missouri, and Kentucky).[1] However, Lincoln advocated emancipated slavery, a cause that was surprisingly important to him as he felt lenient treatment towards slaveholders in those states would highlight the absurdity of the Southern secession.[2] Lincoln hoped that some Southern states might rejoin the Union, though he also believed it would have to be by free will, not force. Although many slaveholders were unhappy, they largely saw Lincoln’s plan as preferable to uncompensated emancipation, and moderate Republicans and border state politicians passed a compensated emancipation bill, largely along the lines of the D.C. bill. Lincoln also encouraged a provision that set aside U.S. government funds for any escaped slaves, who would be considered free and obviously not returned to the CSA. Not soon later, the 13th Amendment was ratified, prohibiting slavery forever.

    Because of slave fugitives, another issue would divide Lincoln's party: the Santo Domingo issue. Lincoln had a favorable opinion towards the annexation of Santo Domingo, largely because he felt that it could be a natural destination for escaped slaves from the Confederate States, including all of the slaves liberated during the Secession War itself. Although he had nothing against settling resettled slaves in the mainland, especially in the new West, he also feared that accepting escaped slaves would create popular resentment, which could eventually lead to the possibility of such a program ending. Lincoln did not want to risk that. Lincoln also didn’t have a very positive view of territorial expansion, but the willingness of the Dominican government itself assuaged those concerns (the local population was quite unhappy, but Lincoln was not made aware of this.) The annexation treaty passed by a narrow vote, completing the American annexation. In contrast, Lincoln politely turned down Russian offers to sell their colony of Aljaska, assuming that it was a useless imperial endeavor designed to put America at odds with the United Kingdom (he was correct about Russian aims).

    Lincoln profoundly realigned the American party system. When he took power in 1869, the Republican Party had nearly wiped out the Democratic Party outside of the border states. Although Lincoln remained popular among most Republicans and most Democrats, some Republicans grew to resent his presidency as a lost opportunity. Opposition to Lincoln spiked at the worst time, with the Panic of 1872[3], especially as under the influence of Vice President Kelley, Lincoln sparked Republican outrage by vetoing the Coinage Act of 1872, which would have ended bimetallism. In addition, when railroads started going bankrupt, Lincoln, a huge supporter of the postwar rail boom, outraged many by having the federal government directly purchase failing railroads, even though Congress had appropriated no money for this act. Worse of all, he purchased the railroads with moneys appropriated for the former border state slaveholders, compensating those slaveholders with shares in the railroads. Although a canny solution that bypassed Congress, it angered pretty much everyone.

    Ironically, although Lincoln was a firm non-interventionist, his easy money policies in an era where almost all other major nations were cutting back on fiscal policy turned America into the chief financier of much of the world. American loans propped up almost every state that sought respite from the emptying out of European loans. Even though the Monroe doctrine died in Mexico against Lincoln's wishes, it seemed he had reestablished it with the power of the dollar. Ironically, one of the states that went most deep into debt from America was Emperor Maximilian's Mexico, which desperately needed funding to stabilize the nation, but found no loans from France incoming.

    As a result of his violations of party orthodoxy, Lincoln was quickly informed by close friends within the Republican Party that he was not likely to be nominated for President. However, he felt the economy was vulnerable and that he was the only one who could shepherd through the nation. He more or less believed in the two-term norm, but he felt there was a bit of wiggle room for non-consecutive terms. He ultimately decided to run on the National Union label for a third election in a row, organizing his own National Union convention.[4] Democratic leaders, eager to attach themselves onto an actually popular politician for the first time since McClellan, declined to hold their own convention, with many prominent Democratic politicians attending the Lincoln Convention. Ultimately, Lincoln agreed to accept a Democrat as his running mate. However, he picked one he had a strong relationship, leading to the National Union ticket of Abraham Lincoln and Francis Blair of Missouri.

    With the economy as the biggest issue of the 1872 elections, Senator John Sherman of Ohio upset the radical Benjamin Wade on a contentious convention floor fight, largely because Sherman was much better liked among his fellow Senators. He then chose George Boutwell of Massachusetts as his running mate, further emphasizing the recession.
    ---
    [1] With the war going worse, uncompensated Maryland emancipation failed, and they passed a compensated emancipation plan instead.
    [2] OTL Lincoln supported compensated emancipation in Washington D.C. and supported it in the border states. The border states rebuffed him, wanting to keep slavery, but in 1869, their position is much worse and they take the Lincoln deal.
    [3] Weakened by the lack of a Franco-Prussian War, but strengthened by the US Civil War being so much worse.
    [4] Similar to what Andrew Johnson did, but people actually attend this NU convention because the President isn't wildly unpopular. Not entirely dissimilar to the Liberal Republicans in OTL 1872. How popular, we'll find out...
     
    Last edited:
    Chapter 10 - American Indian Policy, 1865-1873
  • American Indian Policy, 1865-1873
    President McClellan, knowing that he failed to deal a knockout blow to Lee when given the chance as the General of the Army of Potomac, decided to leave much of the actual war to his generals. He deplored the losses that U.S. Grant took, but was quickly forced to admit that he was effective. What would surprise many at the time is that today McClellan is known not primarily for his role in creating the Army of the Potomac or his role in prosecuting the Civil War, but rather his role in American Indian history.

    Upon McClellan’s ascension to the White House, the nation had hundreds of treaties with Indian tribes and the tendency of both sides to break those treaties often led to war, including wars against the Sioux, Yavapai, Ute, Apache, and Navajo. Lincoln had largely neglected the American West, but with McClellan’s military mind with nothing to actually use it on, he quickly decided to make his impact on American Indian relations. After all, every single troop spent fighting the Indians was one troop that was not fighting the Confederacy.

    McClellan quickly understood the obvious problem behind Indian peace treaty. He realized he was not dealing with someone like himself. American soldiers were clearly signing treaties with Indian tribes that didn’t exactly live in the world of Westphalian nationstates. In some cases, Americans picked random Indians, assumed he was a “chief” and then paid him off to sign on behalf of his “nation”, a phoney treaty that both the settlers and Indians knew was phony. And when the treaty was obviously not followed, one side or the other would scream “perfidy!” McClellan was determined to move past this constantly phoney and fraudulent system.

    After a few conversations with Grant, who supported him, McClellan announced a “policy of peace” that would set the stage for “peace in the South.” It was shorthand for redirecting more troops South. Grant sent him his own staffer, Brigadier Ely S. Parker (also known as Hasanoanda) to serve as his first Commissioner for Indian Affairs. McClellan’s peace policy involved replacing US government officials, especially political appointees, with religious officials whose sole motivation in managing “friendly” Indians was religious, not monetary. [1] These religious officials would presumably teach the Indians American-style Christianity and agriculture. Most controversially, in a nod to his Catholic base, President McClellan explicitly allowed Catholic organizations, including the Jesuits, into his program.[2] Although heavy-handed and oppressive to many of the Natives, these Jesuits would still eventually become some of the fiercest partisans of American Indian interests.[3] Despite that, McClellan actually convinced Congress to allocate a great deal of money to be spent on developing agriculture infrastructure, by convincing them that it was cheaper to bribe Indians than it was to pay for guns. And the Union had more spare money than spare guns.

    To deal with the current wars, McClellan personally managed individualized responses to each region. In Utah, McClellan dispatched a token group of federal troops to the Utah territory in order to place them between Mormon settlers and Chief Black Hawk. To the dismay of the settlers, McClellan had the troops stop their Southern settlement advance, simply because he figured if he left Black Hawk alone, he too would be convinced by McClellan’s Christian Indian model. Utah settlers almost revolted, but were dissuaded by Brigham Young, who publicly supported McClellan’s strategy, and opted instead to sneak secret Mormon missionaries into McClellan's "peace program." In contrast, McClellan took a harder stance against the Sioux, sending a large army to sack Sioux villages and mow down Sioux warriors. Despite that, he quickly agreed to a surprisingly Sioux-friendly treaty at Fort Laramie, figuring that showing the Sioux that the Americans could easily crush them, but giving them most of what they wanted would prevent future wars. When asked if he was worried about angry settlers, McClellan shrugged and said “territories don’t have any electoral votes.”

    McClellan’s new reservations had many problems that would scar American Indians, but most would say that his plan was generally an improvement on the previous policy, a series of haphazard wars and corrupt exploitation of Indians. In general, Presidents Pendleton and Lincoln didn’t particularly like the McClellan doctrine, but they both concluded that it wasn’t worth kicking a beehive over. At the very least, the American west seemed mostly at peace, and none of them wanted war in the headlines after the trauma of the War of Southron Independence.
    ---
    [1] Same as OTL Grant’s Peace Policy, but helped by McClellan actually being temperamentally suited to manage this - he was a cautious and meticulous organizer, traits which serve McClellan well here even if they didn't against Lee.
    [2] Not OTL.
    [3] Similar to Jesuits in large swaths of Latin America.
     
    Last edited:
    Chapter 11 - The 1872 Elections and "Radical Reconstruction
  • The 1872 Elections and "Radical Reconstruction"
    Lincoln’s railroad bailout, while wildly detested in the industrial Eastern states, was celebrated in most states with a railroad. Memories of Lincoln’s support for homesteading made him popular in most of the rural states. In addition, although Lincoln was pro-tariff, he was somewhat less pro-tariff than his Republican opponent. All of these gave Lincoln an unshakeable grasp on the West.

    Similarly, Lincoln was viewed as the friendliest politician in America to the border states. His support for compensated emancipation gained him more or less iron support among the border states, as did his Missouri running mate, Francis Blair. The problem with Lincoln was that in the rest of the country, although Lincoln was still well-liked, they still did see him as the cause of the worst recession in the nation’s history. Even many of Lincoln’s supporters blamed him for the recession. Whereas Lincoln advocates campaigned across the country, the Sherman/Boutwell ticket declined to campaign directly, hoping to make the election a referendum on Lincoln. However, a referendum on Lincoln cut two ways, leading 1872 to be a fight between Lincoln’s personal popularity and “Lincoln’s panic.” In many ways, it was remarkable that Lincoln could retain such popularity even in the midst of such economic turmoil.

    As polls closed election day, it was going to be clear that the race wouldn’t be decided in one day. With 271 electoral votes, there would be no tie - whoever hit 136 electoral votes first would win. Lincoln had clearly won a landslide victory in every Western state and border state, as well as his home-state of Illinois, gaining 98 votes. Sherman edged out comfortable, wins in Maine, New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Vermont, Rhode Island, and Ohio, earning 56 votes.

    In play was New York (with 35 votes!), Pennsylvania (with 29!), as well as Minnesota, Wisconsin, Michigan, Indiana, New Jersey, and Connecticut.

    Next declared was Pennsylvania for Sherman, bringing the total to 98-85..

    Then came Indiana for Lincoln, bringing the total to 113-85.

    Finally, the biggest call of the night came, with New York going for Sherman, bringing the total to 113-120.

    Then came New Jersey for Lincoln, bringing the total to 119-120.

    Then came Wisconsin for Lincoln, bringing the total to 129-120.

    Then Minnesota came in for Sherman, bringing the total to 129-125. With 119 to win, one of the candidates neared victory, with only Connecticut (6) and Michigan (11) left to vote. Interestingly, the electoral votes of Connecticut did not matter, because it would put Lincoln at 135 or Sherman at 131 votes. Thus, Michigan would decide the election.

    Finally, three days after the election, the race was over. Sherman won Michigan by a small, but durable margin, clearing 136. A day later, Connecticut too would decide for Sherman by a mere 493 votes, bringing the final total to 142-129. Lincoln conceded, having ran the fourth and last presidential race of his life. Notably, Lincoln won the popular vote in all four elections. However, he only would win two of those races.

    In his concession speech, Lincoln hoped the best for Sherman and Boutwell. Whereas his first speech had urged McClellan to continue waging the war (which he did), Lincoln urged the country to look to the future rather than relitigate old wounds. However, in looking to the future, Lincoln urged his countrymen not to be seduced by the “false song of imperialism.” In the climax of his speech, Lincoln noted that he had spent his entire life fighting for “liberty, union, and peace”, before admitting that he had “failed with at least one,” but that it was not too late for the other two.

    In his inauguration address, President-Elect Sherman alluded to Lincoln’s speech, saying that the election was not an excuse to reopen wounds, but rather that had been elected for one task: the radical reconstruction of the American economy. President Sherman would do just as much to realign American politics as Lincoln had.

    SIaUISv.png


    H22A3tS.png
     
    Chapter 12 - The Manitoba War and the Expansion of Canada
  • The Manitoba War and the Expansion of Canada
    The Dominion of Canada was initially conceived of as a "Canadian Confederation", a federal system where all of the crown colonies would retain most of their autonomy. However, as a result of no other colonies joining the Province of Canada, the decision was shortly made after independence for the Dominion of Canada to be styled directly after the United Kingdom as a unitary parliamentary state. A Confederation that included only one province seemed absurd at the time, and MacDonald reluctantly agreed to calls from opponents of a federal system to centralize government. Had the Maritime colonies joined in 1867, they would have very well likely gained much more leverage than they ended up eventually having.

    The first test for the new Dominion of Canada was the acquisition of Rupert's Land from the British crown. The acquisition rapidly shifted the demographics of Canada, thanks to some of the Western territories being heavily settled by Francophone Catholic metis. It was greatly feared that the acquisition of what became to called Manitoba would create a majority-Catholic France. Prime Minister MacDonald ultimately charged ahead with Western expansion, repulsing anti-Catholic Liberals like George Brown. The Conservative Party of Canada was increasingly dependent on the former Parti Bleu politicians of Eastern Canada, and after a brief insurrection in the Red River Colony, MacDonald assuaged their concerns by simultaneously annexing Rupert's Land, establishing representation-by-population, and ensuring Catholic Church autonomy over French-language schools throughout the entire country. Before the annexation of Manitoba, Western and Eastern Canada were both allocated an identical number of seats in Parliament, but after, they were allocated by population, which favored the slightly more numerous Anglophones, but not enough to override the additional seats gained in the new Manitoban lands.

    The response among certain aspects of Canadian society was unbridled rage. MacDonald and much of the Conservative leadership thought his bill was a fair compromise and most Metis in Manitoba stood down immediately thereafter. However, Canadian society largely thought it favored Catholics, sparking further violence. John Christian Schultz's Canadian Party in Manitoba revolted as they saw increasing Francophone immigration from Eastern Canada add to the Metis and threaten their way in life. Thereafter, a variety of radical Orangemen in Manitoba would launch violent attacks on both Canadian government offices and Francophone immigrants, culminating in the 1872 assassination of Prime Minister MacDonald by Orangeman Thomas Scott. These events were often referred to as the "Manitoba War", although they never rose to the level of outright conflict. The Conservatives, left temporarily leaderless in the 1872 election, would go on to narrowly lose the election to Edward Blake's Liberal Party.

    The Liberals, seeking to undo much of the Conservative "compromise" on French language and religion, further pressed for the expansion of Canada, making moves to acquire British Columbia with the knowledge that its population was almost entirely Anglophone. As a result of the planned acquisition (even if stalled by British Columbian objections to Canadian skepticism of a railroad to BC), the demographics of British Columbia would eventually tilt the nation towards parity between French and English speakers. As such, the Parliament of Canada remained remarkably unproductive. With various safeguards of parliamentary protocol that required slightly higher than 50%+1 majorities[1] and deep partisan polarization in Canada, productive legislation was almost never passed. In response to increasing Conservative dependence on French voters, the Liberal Party doubled down on anti-Catholicism instead of expanding its appeal. This meant that although the Liberal and Conservatives parties regularly went in and out of office, neither group was ever able to enact much of its agenda happily. Many in both camps sought to abolish most of the niceties of parliamentary protocol to simply ram their agenda through, but their British overlords quickly iced any such proposals, determined that its new colony should retain "responsible government." In particular, two men grew to dominate the era, often pingponging the office of Prime Minister between the two - George Brown of the Liberal Party and John Rose of the Conservative Party (who narrowly edged out fellower Montrealer D'Arcy McGee in the post-MacDonald leadership elections).
    ---
    [1] Enacted after the implementation of "representation-by-population" to ensure that there'd be no way for Anglophone or Francophone Canadians to unilaterally impose policies on the other.
     
    Last edited:
    Chapter 13 - The Third Japanese Invasion of Korea (1873-1875)
  • The Third Japanese Invasion of Korea (1873-1875)
    Otto von Bismarck always said that “one day the great European War will come out of some damned foolish thing in the Balkans." However, he was wrong. The great European War was not to come out of Southern Germany, the Balkans, or really anywhere in Europe, but rather from arcane ethnic struggles in a part of the world that most Europeans, even the millions dying for it, had never even heard of. To understand the alliance system and the roots of such a conflagration, we turn to the Joseon Dynasty in 1873.

    The Daewongun of Joseon was known as one of the most conservative political figures in Korean history, violently resisting any attempt to open up trade in the same way, hoping not to follow the political example of the supposedly decadent Qing Empire and Tokugawa Shogunate. The vicious Taiping Rebellion and the Boshin Wars had further convinced Joseon court officials that the Daewongun's policies were correct His vicious persecution of Catholic missionaries had sparked a brief French incursion that was defeated. Similarly, when he ordered the entire crew of an American merchant-marine ship killed, President Pendleton sent an American expedition to Korea that was thoroughly defeated, humiliating him and further torpedoing his re-election hopes against Abraham Lincoln. However, violent change was coming to Korea. Like in 1592 and 1597, it would come in the form of violent samurai.

    In Meiji Japan, the attempt by the retainers of the Satsuma and Choshu domains to formally abolish the Samurai class and domains was vociferously opposed by the retainers of the Tosa and Hizen domains. By then, the domains were largely a formality (they turned over all tax income to the Imperial government and operated no armies). Similarly, most privileges of the Samurai class had been eliminated, but they still existed as a distinct class. By 1873, the debate was tearing apart the leaders of the Meiji Restoration.[1] One member of the Satsuma Domain saw a solution to this dilemma. Joseon Korea had refused to recognize the Meiji Emperor as Japan's head of state and had humiliated Japanese diplomatic envoys. He would travel to Japan and allow himself to be killed in an altercation, which would allow Imperial Japan to send a punitive expedition to Korea in order to open up trade and force them to recognize the Meiji Emperor. His arguments eventually won over Itagaki Taisuke, a powerful Tosa retainer, and the government agreed to Saigo's plan.[2] Interestingly, the Tosa adviser Forrest vociferously opposed the idea, claiming it was a terrible idea. He was fired and sent back to his home country, where he mulled around for a few months before finding a new job - trying to become the "Samurai President."

    As Saigo promised, he went to Korea as an envoy, "accidentally" insulted a Joseon court noble, and was beheaded without a fight. The samurai of Japan, especially of his native Satsuma domain (the most militarized former domain, with 15% of its population being samurai).[3] The Meiji government officially eliminated the samurai class, but hired any samurai willing to enlist as a soldier to embark to Korea. The military was largely unharmed from the Boshin War, so Japanese commanders felt confident.[4] Indeed, like the last Japanese invasion in 1592, the Joseon Army was completely off-guard. They had been prepared to fend off minor Western invasions. A typical Joseon strategy was to pepper any Western ships with all of their weaponry as fast as possible, knowing that Western ships would withdraw as soon as they started taking high losses. This strategy did not work against the Japanese, whose response to heavy losses...was to continue advancing with a vengeance. With several British and French built ironclads, the newly formed Imperial Japanese Navy was largely able to keep the waters between Japan and Korea clear. The Joseon Army was relatively small, barely 50,000 strong, in line with the Joseon ideology that the nobility should serve the interests of the peasantry - which necessitated low taxes on the poor and low military spending. This contrasted heavily with the Imperial Japanese Army, roughly 150,000 and trained in modern-style warfare, including the use of Western-made firearms.[5] These numbers were surprisingly similar to the numbers in 1592, when 160,000 Japanese landed to fight a Joseon Army that was only 40,000 strong.

    Korean forces resisted bravely, but were no match for Japanese numbers and training. In a matter of weeks, the Japanese Army had reached the gates of Seoul and the royal family was forced to flee North. Most of Europe looked rather passively - Korea after all, had closed itself off entirely to Western powers. President Lincoln lodged a complaint against the Imperial Japanese government, but President Lincoln generally logged a complaint against all foreign aggression, so this did not deter the Japanese. In Beijing, Qing officials debated fiercely on whether to get involved. Although the Qing Empire had defeated the Taiping and Nian revolts, the war in Xinjiang against Yakub Beg and other Russian proxies was continuing and the Qing state was quite frankly totally bankrupt and in total shambles. The Qing were also quite aware that the Ming intervention in Korea bankrupted the Ming state and allowed the Manchus to invade and establish the Qing. After a debate, it was concluded that they could conclude...if there was a way to gain cheap foreign support. And Qing officials knew just the man.

    At the time, Charles "Chinese" Gordon was working for the Pasha of Egypt on a provisional basis. However, Gordon was not given a definite offer...yet. Qing officials distinctly remembered that Gordon had turned down all offers of massive financial reward after he helped defeat the Taiping Rebellion. This was a remarkably appealing trait to Imperial officials because the Qing was bankrupt. In general, the Imperial Court no longer had much meaningful authority outside of the capital and had nothing to offer anyone of any worth besides Imperial titles - which is why viceroys like Zuo Zongtang "served" the Imperial Court with armies they raised with their own money (that collected tax revenues on their own, operating a state-within-a-state). After all, it was not truly the Qing who defeated the Taipings, but local "Great Men" who revolted against the Taipings and then declared "fealty" to the Qing Emperor (like the aforementioned Zuo). Gordon also found the Ottoman-Egyptian system in Sudan to be cruel, and disliked his service there. Finally, Gordon was known to be celibate (at least with regards to women) and with no children (and being a foreigner), he seemed unlikely to insert himself into China's political struggles. Thus, the Qing Empire conspired with British diplomats to cloy him a better offer. Gordon wasn't going to be exactly paid in actual money, but he was to be appointed as an Imperial Viceroy, the highest government office in Qing China, in a new position. The three generals of the Northeast Provinces (Fengtian, Jilin, and Heilongjiang) were to serve under the Viceroy of the Three-Northeastern Provinces (or the Northeast Viceroy), Charles Gordon. The other viceroys were to transfer to Gordon control of a portion of each of their private armies in return for "private" funds from prominent British donors. The British foreign minister clearly saw their angle - making the de facto ruler of Northeast China a British man would be a gruesome blow to Russian imperial ambitions. Gordon would be tasked with aiding the Koreans and defeating the Japanese, at which point both the British and Qing expected that he would resign. One Qing official (a Han Chinese) quipped that this was the perfect example of the ancient Chinese practice of "using barbarians to rule over barbarians", at which point all the Manchu in attendance gave him a very nasty look.

    Luckily for Gordon, most of the armies in China were actually consciously or unconsciously modeled after his previous Ever Victorious Army, and although there were few overlaps in actual personnel, he was able readopt the name just for morale purposes. A few weeks later, the roughly 200,000 strong Ever Victorious Army marched across the Yalu River in order to confront the Imperial Japanese Army, which had been sieging the last remnants of the Joseon Army in Northern Korea. The worst-case scenario for Japan had come true. Japan was not actually seeking to conquer Korea - in fact, they hoped for a short-term show of force that would force the Koreans to come to terms and accept their relatively modest war aims (opening up trade and recognizing the Meiji Emperor as Japan's Head of State). What they had not expected was the Daewongun's fanatical reactionary conservatism - he refused to make a single concession even as the entire Joseon state was collapsing, Seoul was in flames, and peasants and civilians were being massacred by out-of-control samurai. And now much to Japan's horror, the Qing had entered the war. Immediately, the Japanese sued for peace, claiming that they could withdraw to the South and split Korea in half. Although many Qing officials wanted to take the peace offer, Gordon rejected it immediately, claiming that he would not stand for anything except the total withdrawal of Japanese troops, claiming that he did not sign up in order to dissect a foreign nation. Japanese officials thought that Gordon's terms would be a horrific humiliation, and resolved to bleed the Qing until they could get a peaceful negotiated settlement.

    Surprisingly, Gordon's foreign background made him the best possible leader against the Japanese for one simple reason - the other viceroys of China weren't interested in sabotaging him. When Gordon requested all four regional fleets to converge in Tianjin, almost all 4 relevant Viceroys were about to veto the order until they realized that it was from Gordon. Gordon was a short-term foreigner, so his triumph probably wouldn't create a rival in the Chinese political sphere. If it had been any other Viceroy, they would vetoed, fearing military triumph would create a powerful rival. With all four Qing regional navies consolidated, Gordon maneuvered large swaths of his army in a surprise landing near the port Gunsan, flanking the Japanese forces and cutting off their supply routes. The Imperial Japanese Navy, not realizing any Chinese naval forces had entered the fray, were shocked. They immediately engaged the Qing Navy in a violent confrontation off the coasts of Southwest Korea. Although the Qing Navy was significantly larger and totally destroyed by the Japanese, enough Japanese ships had been put out of commission as to make it very difficult to supply their army in Korea. This meant that the Japanese army was outnumbered, in hostile foreign lands, and out-of-supplies. Gordon then offered any surrendering Japanese army either free passage out of Korea back to Japan...or employment within his own Ever Victorious Army. The ensuing mass surrender of Japanese army groups to Gordon's Ever Victorious Army was even more of a humiliation for the Imperial Japanese leadership than even the original planned offer. In order to avoid further humiliation, the Japanese leadership threw in the towel.

    Although Japan had been humilaited, it had still defeated the Qing Navy. The peace treaty was surprisingly generous, albeit in ways skewed towards Qing interests. The Qing promised that the Koreans would recognize the Meiji Emperor as head-of-state, because the Qing would recognize the Meiji Emperor as an equal Emperor - and thus by transitive property, the Koreans would recognize Japan. Similarly, as the King Gojong had by-then ascended and the Daewongun's regency had ended, the Qing China agreed that all countries could trade openly with Korea...because Korea would openly trade with Qing China and all countries could openly trade with Qing merchants across the Korean border. These merchants would conveniently all be located in Northeast China. The three individuals ruling the Qing at the time, the Prince Gong, the Dowager Cixi, and the Dowager Ci'an, wanted a quick peace so that they could all bask in the glory. However, the Tongzhi Emperor rejected the peace settlement, declaring that the "defeatist trio" be hounded from Beijing. The three left Beijing in disgrace, but the Tongzhi Emperor then immediately died of smallpox, allowing the peace deal to be signed. The trio were quickly invited back to Beijing, but a week after the next Emperor had been picked. In Japan, the humiliation had totally discredited the war party, leading to the "Iwakura Dictatorship." Interestingly, no Korean representative was included in the Qing-Japan Treaty of Shimonoseki, which did not engender support for the Qing in Korea.
    ---
    [1] OTL, they got rid of all that stuff in 1871.
    [2] This was Saigo's historical suggestion OTL. ITL, he ties it to abolishing the Samurai class, so more people go along with him. ITL, the Tosa domain is also way more prominent, which means the support of Itagaki Taisuke (from Tosa) is worth more.
    [3] The number is OTL - which is why Satsuma was also the poorest and most radical domain in the 1860's - they couldn't pay all their samurai properly!
    [4] The ITL Boshin War is actually a lot less bloody than OTL because the Shogunate falls faster and the war in Tohoku/Hokkaido ends less bloodily than OTL, so the ITL Japanese are also more confident than OTL.
    [5] 120,000 were involved in the Boshin War, so I upped it a bit.
     
    Last edited:
    Chapter 14 - The Bragg Arsenal
  • The Bragg Arsenal
    One of the greatest ironies of the Civil War was that despite Southron claiming that their secession was due to "individual liberty from an oppressive federal government", by any standards, the Southron government actually became significantly larger per person than the federal government of the United States, bringing with it a corresponding higher tax burden. The roots of this go back to the aftermath of the pro-Bragg victory in the 1870 elections. Emboldened with a supposed large majority of supporters, Bragg finally decided to deal with one of the lingering questions of the postwar Confederate period - what to do with the Tredegar Iron Works. During the fall of Richmond, most of the Iron Works had been requisitioned by Northern troops, who by-and-large returned what was left at the end of the war. However, enough had fallen out of disrepair that the Iron Works was thoroughly bankrupt. As a result, the Iron Works remained dormant throughout the entire period between 1868-1871, much to the consternation of entire Confederacy. In many ways, the inability to actually restart the Iron Works was symbolic of the creaky, inefficient nature of the Confederate system.

    Bragg aimed to fix this. After he quickly realized that civilian politicians weren't going to tolerate any government subsidies to get industrialists to start up the Iron Works (it was also unconstitutional, but he didn't particularly care about that) - he found a different solution. Engineers of the Confederate Army were ordered to immediately purchase the shut-down Iron Works on the cheap and start operating them itself. Indeed, almost every major industrial plant of the Confederate States of America in the 19th century would end up directly operated by the government, often through the army or some other department. This stunned Northern observers, who may have made the mistake of taking Southern politicians at their world. Although Southern politicians lambasted Northern industrialists as "big-government tyrants violating states rights", it was not big government they objected to (after all, they wanted a big government to catch fugitive slaves who fled to other states), but rather any government that subsidized a clearly distinct economic class. In the army-operated arsenals, the owner was the state. And at the end of the day, the planter class felt they controlled the state. So they had relatively few objections to the Confederate Army directly operating industrial factories. In addition, it actually had relatively fewer constitutional hurdles, because Bragg could claim that the arsenals were directly related to National Defense. Chastened by Bragg's threat to ignore any negative Supreme Court, the Supreme Court ruled that tariff revenue could be used to fund the Confederate Army in operating these arsenals. This quickly grew to become a major legal precedent in the Confederate States - the "Commander-in-Chief Doctrine", where courts should not review the national defense decisions of the Commander-in-Chief, even if they supposedly infringed on supposed constitutional restrictions.

    Of course, there were true believers in states rights, but they largely opposed Bragg in the midterms and existed as a relatively small minority. Even though the Confederate system supposedly eliminated partisan politics, the members of Congress began to immediately organize into caucuses that oddly resembled political parties. The members who stuck with Bragg and supported his military-industrial complex organized into the "Confederate States Independence Party" (or the "CSIPers"). Opposing the CIPers were true believers in states rights' outraged at his overruling of the courts and his "populism" (the "Constitutional Democrats") and more radicals who favored an end to any government involvement in economy and were disproportionately drawn from the old Fire Eaters (the "True Whigs"). Both opposition parties were thoroughly unpopular among the Confederate electorate, explaining why Bragg remained modestly popular despite a history of rather erratic executive orders and newspaper interviews.

    The nature of the state-run arsenals quickly led to a rather odd-type of industrialization. For one, the Confederacy remained a hostile place to private industrial enterprise, so very light industry emerged outside of those necessary for the heavy industry supply chain. As a result, very little of the prosperity from these state-owned factories actually flowed down to average citizens. On one hand, the Confederacy had a burgeoning industry, on the other hand, the Confederacy remained a predominantly agrarian, impoverished, and illiterate nation where almost all of the wealth was concentrated in a narrow planter class. Interestingly, the "Army First" policy of Bragg ensured that the standing army of the Confederate States was significantly larger than the United States, which had tempted many more radical members of Congress to call for a war to "liberate" the border states, though Bragg never actually listened to them. Being an actual general, he was fully aware of the awesome military power of the Union (and how quickly they could assemble a massive army). In many ways, the "Army First" policy of the Confederacy was a result of a pervasive paranoia towards the Union, not any serious analysis of Union politics, which was largely not war-orientated. If anything, the Confederate-Union border was entirely settled by the Treaty of Paris - where the Confederacy really faced a foreign policy problem was on its border with the Mexican Empire, a growing crisis bungled by Bragg that would soon define the 1873 elections.

    An outgoing President Bragg was thoroughly pleased with his own presidency, simply because the country had not melted down like many had predicted. The reaction among other Confederates was more mixed. Regardless, one of the last actions in Bragg's presidencies was to rename the Tredegar Iron Works into the Bragg Arsenal, a move which drew instant ridicule from all of his political opponents, but which was to stand throughout history.
     
    Last edited:
    Chapter 15 - The End of the Mexican Civil War
  • The End of the Mexican Civil War
    By 1869, support for Benito Juarez's rebellion against the Imperial government was flagging. Napoleon III's diplomatic triumphs in helping end the American Civil War and "winning" the Luxembourg Crisis against Prussia with the assistance of Habsburg Austria gave Habsburg Mexico a remarkable shot in the arm. As French forces arrived in greater numbers than ever, several more pragmatic liberals began to defect from Juarez's rebellion, seeing the only hopes for any kind of future Mexican liberalism in cozying up to the relatively moderate Mexican Emperor. When Maximilian offered amnesty terms to Benito Juarez, Juarez sent him back the severed head of his envoy. However, the wily general Porfiro Diaz, widely respected for several victories against Imperial forces, and for being captured and escaping Imperial custody multiple times, decided that the war was truly hopeless. He threw in the towel by having his personal troops arrest Juarez, and sending his brutalized corpse directly to Mexico City. Emperor Maximilian was reportedly disgusted at the spectacle, but nevertheless accepted what was clearly meant to be a peace offer.

    The Civil War had left Mexico a wreck. However, the reconstruction of Mexico saw no shortage of foreign powers willing to help. The newly inaugurated President Abraham Lincoln appeared to be willing to make amends with the Emperor for his previous support for Benito Juarez, and Maximilian I was advised by his French backers that drawing closer to America was probably a better bet than drawing closer to the Confederacy, which was largely an exporter of raw materials, not an importer. In what shocked and horrified Confederate diplomats, Emperor Maximilian brought back to life the old McLane–Ocampo Treaty that had died during the start of the American Civil War. The new treaty, the Rosencrans-Almonte Treaty, offered US troops and ships free passage through Mexico in exchange for regular payments from the US to Mexico, reciprocal tariffs (which largely benefited Mexico), and the right for Americans to construct a railroad across the Isthmus of Tehuantepec that would link ports in the Gulf of Mexico and Pacific Ocean together. Although the railroad proved totally unworkable and went bankrupt, President Lincoln notably bailed out the project during the end of his term as President, causing the project to continue. The US-Mexico entente further freaked out Confederate planners, who realized that the Union now possessed the power to strike at the Confederacy from all sides if it so choosed.

    President Lincoln's easy money policies in the wake of the Panic of 1872 totally altered the US-Mexico relationship. With interests so low for borrowers, Emperor Maximilian became one of the top borrowers of American funds. He borrowed both enough to start a railroad building spree similar to that Lincoln had overseen and to refinance all of his loans with the French, paying off all of the French loans with American loans with lower interest rates. As reconstruction of the country continued, it seemed that Emperor Maximilian's Mexico would quickly become a much more successful version of the economic model that the Confederacy attempted to create. Like the Confederacy, Mexico was largely an exporter of raw materials to the international market. However, unlike the Confederacy, Mexico would quickly find itself graced with a remarkably large network of railroads bringing goods straight from the giant Haciendas to various ports, shipping goods to the United States, Canada, Britain, France, Prussia, and other industrialized countries. Great wealth flowed into Mexico during this process, although most of it was either reinvested back into infrastructure.

    Mexican politics quickly became dominated by Miguel Miramón of the Conservatives and Porfirio Diaz of the Liberals and although it became clear that both actually grew to dislike the Emperor, they both supported his actual agenda. The Conservatives saw "Maximilian-ism" as good for the land-owning elite and the Liberals saw his project of railroad modernization as bringing Mexico into a new future. On social issues, Maximilian largely but not entirely sided with the conservatives. Most of the privileges of the Catholic Church were restored, a centralized government with little local autonomy was established, and Roman Catholicism declared the official state religion. Besides that however, Maximilian showed relatively interest in pushing demands from the church to say for example, re-confiscate land that had been confiscated from the Church. Although he took the side of the Conservatives and the Church on most symbolic issues, he spent no political capital re-litigating their past grievances. This helped build some sort of rapport with Porfirio Diaz, who in theory led the opposition but largely agreed with Maximilian's agenda.

    Although Maximilian's policies created incredible social inequality, some radicals praised him after he threatened to fire his Prime Minister Miramon after Miramon attempted to order the newly formed Countryside Police (tasked with defending trade routes from bandits) to murder peasants who protested low wages and poor conditions, especially land confiscations that often happened as a result of Maximilian's drive to build more railroads and telegraph lines. Maximilian wasn't concerned with revolutionizing the position of peasants, but he deplored the idea that his Imperial Guard would be used to brutalize peasants for simply expressing their opinion. Saying something akin to "let them shout", he vetoed further attempts to use violent political repression against peasants, a caution that proved largely correct at first when the staid two-party system in Mexico (the Miramon-Diaz Axis) largely shut out other political forces, allowing Maximilian's policies to continue unhindered. However, the Imperial Guard continued to brutalize any peasants caught vandalizing or sabotaging railroad projects, which quickly grew despised for often confiscating peasant land in order to ferry goods from the large haciendas to the international markets.
     
    Last edited:
    Chapter 16 - The Birth of Mittelafrika and Death of Wilhelm
  • The Birth of Mittelafrika and Death of Wilhelm
    In 1876, Otto von Bismarck, aware that the Belgian King Leopold II was gathering funds to try to hire an expedition to the Congo, had no intention of letting such a large prize go. Admittedly, the Congo was widely considered by almost everyone to be a malarial hellhole. And Bismarck himself thought most colonial projects were a stupid waste of money, unlike Leopold II. However, he had to admit they were rather prestigious, which would help in wooing the Southern German Kingdoms with the power of German nationalism. In addition, unlike Leopold II, Bismarck had the entire support of the German government behind anything he wanted. As a result, he could easily outbid Leopold. However, Bismarck was also a keen diplomat and he knew it would be difficult for a rather large power to take such a large swath of land. Instead, Bismarck approached Leopold II personally, pointing out that the Prussian government could easily outbid Leopold II on anything he wanted to buy. Bismarck presented Leopold with an offer - the Prussian government would cover 50% of the costs of anything King Leopold II wanted and in exchange, any colonial gains by King Leopold II would shared 50/50 in a condominium with the King of Prussia in his personal capacity. If Leopold did not take this offer, Bismarck threatened to outbid on anything else. Leopold agreed, and the International African Association was founded, 50% owned by King Leopold II of Belgium and 50% owned by King Wilhelm I of Prussia.
    Otto von Bismarck had four goals in governing the Kingdom of Prussia - defeating the Socialists, defeating the Catholics (mostly in the Rhine and Polish territories), wooing the Southern German Kingdoms of Baden, Wurtemburg, and Bavaria, and cultivating good relations with Imperial Russia. Unfortunately for him, many of those goals were somewhat at odds.

    In 1870, the North German Federation had residents. Roughly 24.7 million in Prussia and 6.7~ million more in the rest of the Federation. Of those 31.4 million North Germans, only 5.4 million were Catholics. Although Prussian statisticians desperately tried to underplay the Polish numbers, Catholic numbers in Prussian proper were a pretty good marker for Polish ethnicity. As a result, of those 5.4 million Catholics, 2.4 million were Poles.[1] Citing the relatively low percent of German Catholics, Bismarck repeatedly tabled discussions in the Imperial Diet that would in his speeches, would "spark a culture war," worried that any such culture wars would alienate the Southern German states.[2] After all, the influence war against (Catholic) Austria-Hungary in the South German Kingdoms was going to be doomed if Prussia was viewed as anti-Catholic. He didn't however, spin actual compromises, but rather simply pushed discussions to the future. However, he took a very different attitude to the Poles.

    Otto von Bismarck was a committed bigot against Poles, privately musing that the extermination of the Poles would eventually become a historic necessity. Ironically, it would be the Polish expulsions that would upend hurt Bismarck's career. In 1878, a doctor in Posen by the name of Karl Nobiling used a shotgun to spray Wilhelm I repeatedly with a shotgun while he was passing by Nobiling's apartment balcony.[3] Wilhelm I was gruesomely injured and Bismarck, claiming that Nobiling was partly Polish, immediately fanned the incident and decided to finally tackle the "Polish problem."

    Under Bismarck's orders, Prussian troops began expelling thousands, perhaps even tens of thousands Poles on the Russian border into Russia, often violently and brutally.[4] Outrage immediately flared in Russia itself where Pan-Slavism was becoming more popular, and Russia openly threatened retaliations against Prussia, including against German colonists in the Baltics. With King Wilhelm I deeply in fear that Prussia would find itself totally surrounded by enemies, Russia being the only conceivable ally of Prussia, Bismarck agreed that this would have to stop. After an epochal conservation with Wilhelm I, who was now convinced he was dying, the two decided that Bismarck would quietly step down from his position as Chancellor.

    Although Bismarck would remain Foreign Secretary of Prussia and Minister-President of Prussia, he was demoted to Vice-Chancellor, limiting his dominance of the entire cabinet. Under Bismarck's rule, it was illegal for cabinet members to communicate directly with the King of Prussia/President of the North German Confederation. That rule had to be abolished. Knowing that the Russians blamed "Prussianism" for the Polish expulsions, Bismarck also agreed under pressure it was best to minimize the open dominance of Prussian politicians over the government (rather, covert dominance was preferable). Bismarck left the Polish affair deeply unhappy, but not out of the game yet. This was at least the stated motivation.

    In reality, the biggest motivation was that Wilhelm I believed he was dying. Bismarck and Wilhelm desperately tried to get the Crown Prince Frederick excluded from government, concerned that the liberal Anglophile would ruin North Germany. If Frederick came into power, he could simply fire Bismarck and replace him with some "liberal toadie", who could thus establish total control over the North German government. To prevent that, Bismarck had to "lay low." Wilhelm I sought a Chancellor that would present a cleaner image than Bismarck without changing the actual power structure. Rudolf von Gneist, a mostly-conservative jurist, was actually one of Frederick III's favorite scholars as a result of his favorable works on British law. Bismarck had a remarkably friendly conversation with the Crown-Prince, wishing him the best, telling him that he was resigning, and that he would be replaced by Rudolf von Gneist. Frederick largely took the meeting very well, convinced himself that Bismarck was "turning over a new leaf." Otto von Bismarck also indicated that like Frederick, he opposed the proposed "Anti-Socialist" laws in the Diet, agreeing with Frederick that there was no proof the Socialists were involved in the assassination attempt. This convinced Frederick of Bismarck's sincerity, though many historians believe Bismarck was largely motivated by his belief that the Socialists would be a thorn in Frederick's side.

    Shortly after the appointment of von Gneist, Wilhelm I of Prussia died of his wounds, bequeathing to many of his closest advisers and friends a strictly classified will. Shortly after, Frederick I of Prussia was crowned King of Prussia, accepting also his post as President of the North German Federation, and apparently 50% over this strange project in Africa.
    ---
    [1] I'm using these as my estimates. http://www.tacitus.nu/historical-atlas/population/germany.htm
    [2] No Kulturkampf...for now.
    [3] OTL, Karl failed, and supposed Socialist links were used to justify anti-Socialist laws.
    [4] The Polish expulsions were OTL and played a role in deteriorating Russo-German relations.
     
    Last edited:
    Chapter 17 - The Socialist Empire and Second Avignon Papacy
  • The Socialist Empire and Second Avignon Papacy
    The Italian invasion of Rome came as a shock to Napoleon III. He had not expected the Italians to occupy Rome with such force. Neither had the Italian government, who had not expected Garibaldi to invade with such gusto. The shock of the invasion just as Pius IX was preparing for the First Vatican Council forced Pius IX to immediately cut short the council, as priests around the world reacted angrily against Italy. Although Emperor Napoleon III had secured an Austro-Italian alliance that cut short Otto von Bismarck's plans against France, it had come a horrific domestic cost. Even his wife, the Empress Eugenie, turned against the Emperor. Much of the French Catholic right turned against Napoleon III. Abroad, Napoleon III was the broker of peace in the Americas, savior of Mexico, and the first Napoleon to actually hold onto any territorial gains in Europe. But at home, he was a domestic political outcast, as both the left and the right spurned him. In the summer of 1872, Napoleon III became too ill to govern, as he became beset by several gallstones that doctors could not remove easily. The Empress Eugenie and most of his cabinet insisted that he abdicate and he did, allowing his eldest son Napoleon IV to ascend the throne with the ambitious agenda of a youthful man.

    Although Napoleon IV was heavily inclined to marry Queen Victoria's youngest daughter, Princess Beatrice, for both personal and diplomatic reasons, Queen Victoria was loath to let her youngest daughter leave London - and she hated the idea of her having to convert to Catholicism to marry the devoutly Catholic Napoleon IV. Instead, diplomatic concerns led Napoleon III to push his son into one of Europe's most surprising and consequential marriages. On a good-will trip to Bavaria (hoping to pull the nation away from the Prussian orbit), the then-prince Napoleon met Princess Therese of Bavaria, the only daughter of Prince Luitpold of Bavaria, the relatively pro-Prussian uncle of King Ludwig of II, who was considering Ludwig's withdrawal from public life in 1871, the most powerful man in Bavaria (the French hoped this would peel Luitpold off, since he apparently was very worried about his daughter's marriage prospects). Luckily for French diplomacy, the two royals actually hit it off over a shared fascination with foreign lands - Napoleon IV was fascinated in Africa[1] and Therese had already traveled extensively in North Africa and the Middle East, including French Algeria. Empress Eugenie more or less approved of anyone from a presumably conservative Catholic state. Napoleon III approved for diplomatic reasons, The marriage was a bit scandalous as the Prince was married in late 1872 (with Napoleon III on his deathbed) at only the age of 16 (to the 22-year old Therese), but this was largely accepted for diplomatic necessity.

    Under the influence of the three most powerful people in France (Emperor Napoleon IV was only 16 upon ascending the throne), the Empress Mother Eugenie, Empress Therese, and Prime Minister Émile Ollivier. Napoleon IV's 1873 Constitution of France amended his fathers earlier Constitution to bring "democracy" to the nation, although in strange ways, influenced by those three people in his life. First, France was converted to a semi-federal system, with over a dozen regions granted some degree of self-governance, including minority regions such as Corsica, Alsace, and Luxembourg. This brought great outrage among the left-Republicans, who quickly became some of Napoleon IV's greatest enemies. Second, the Senate was reformed into a semi-elected house, with its members chosen every 6-years (same cycle as the lower house) from the provincial governments, heavily favoring the countryside. Third, control of France's executive cabinets was vested not in the Emperor, but in the Prime Minister. Under the demand of Empress Eugenie, Napoleon IV inserted a clever provision where that the French Emperor would appoint the Prime Minister, who could be replaced by any individual whom a majority of the elected lower house voted for. The Constitution of 1873 was wildly hailed in Britain as France's adoption of a British-style constitutional monarchy. But there were large differences.

    The Prime Minister had a feeling what wildly unpopular plan would also be introduced with the support of both the women in Napoleon IV's life. The reactionary Eugenie and egalitarian Therese actually agreed on a plan, helping overrule Ollivier's objection. Therese, having traveled extensively in French Algeria, was not a particular fan of the colonial authorities. Eugenie was concerned with building her son's power and not a fan of the whole democracy thing at all. However, the two agreed on a fateful decision - the decision to abolish the Code de l'indigénat in Algeria. Gaining the support of Minister of Justice Adolphe Crémieux (who only really supported the Jewish provisions), both Jewish and Muslims in Algeria were granted French citizenship and most notably, the right-to-vote, even as Muslism remained under Islamic law. The pied-noir representatives responded with outrage and also joined with the left-Republicans to campaign against the new Constitution. The rationale of Eugenie and the conservatives was not any concern for the Arabs, who they viewed as little more than animals, but rather a belief that Muslim participation in parliamentary democracy would discredit it and prevent the formation of any absolute majority coalition in parliament, which would allow the Emperor to rule-by-decree forever.

    Indeed, they were proven right. In a national referendum, the Constitution only won 54-46, as respective landslides in Algeria (against) and the minority regions (for) canceled each other out, as the countryside only narrowly outvoted Paris, likely only because of lots of ultramontane language inserted by Eugenie. As expected, first post-1873 parliament produced a total mess of a parliament, including extremely uncooperative Arab Muslim representatives. As a result, there was no choice for Napoleon IV to reappoint Ollivier, who found himself governing by decree with both Eugenie and Therese looking over his shoulder.

    A devout Catholic, he shared the horror that his mother and most of the French right shared at the "captivity" of Pope Pius IX. In 1871, some Italian liberals tried to reconcile with the pope, but anti-clerical liberals voted down the "Act of Guarantees" narrowly in the Italian Parliament.[2] He was aware that the Pope intended to leave Rome - but he just didn't have any good places to go. The Austrians didn't want to further alienate the Italians, with their foreign being laser-focused in opposing Prussia. Otto von Bismarck actually considered hosting the Pope in Cologne as a power play, but Wilhelm I vetoed it. Spain was...not stable enough. And Napoleon III was not going to flip-flop. Luckily for the Pope, Napoleon IV had very different opinions. Siding with his ultramontane mother Eugenie, he was outraged at Italy's treatment of the Pope. Napoleon IV invited Pope Pius IX to France, where in a lavish ceremony, he welcomed the Pope to Avignon, where he announced the end of the "Captivity of Rome." Pius IX issued an encyclical condemning the new Italian state as idolatrous and satanic, calling on all Italian Catholics to both refuse to vote and cooperate with the Italian State besides the bare minimum required to comply with law (and not face personal consequences). Napoleon IV, taking the stage, gave a speech about a new political order in France: France had advanced past the stage of the "Liberal Empire". Inspired by various works by the widely read Wilhelm Emmanuel von Ketteler, Bishop of Mainz, and various other clergy, Napoleon IV gave a speech about the new "Catholic, Socialist Empire", citing Catholic principles embodied in his Constitution, from subsidiarity (the semi-federal system), democracy (the semi-elected Senate), anti-secularism (State Catholicism and even Islamic law in Algeria), and a "new course", where the French Empire and the Catholic Church would guarantee "class harmony", not "class war" with a new, anti-Marxist Socialist creed. Most of the Black Nobility followed Pius IX to Avignon.

    The Italian government responded in outrage, cutting off diplomatic ties with the French Empire. Hostile anti-clerical crowds pillaged the Vatican City, smashing/burning art and buildings including the Statue of David and the Sistine Chapel. The government fell and Italy pulled out of the Triple Alliance between Austria, Italy, and France, opening up overtures to Russia and Prussia instead. At home, Crispi instituted an authoritarian laicite policy, closing down Catholic schools and seizing the wealth of the church. Peasant resistance quickly skyrocketed, as tax revenues plunged and government buildings suffered arson attacks almost daily. Relations further plunged as French Catholic newspapers constantly published lurid and largely false tales of anti-Catholic violence in Italy, leading armies to be mobilized on both sides of the Alps.
    ---
    [1] OTL, he was so interested in Africa, he was killed by Zulus.
    [2] OTL, this narrowly passed.
     
    Last edited:
    Top