authors note: if you think the Union is being ahistorically racist, you should look at the Japanese and Chinese Exclusion Acts (for starters) while the notion of guest workers comes from the need for workers for the citrus groves (already a thing in the late 1870s) and pressure from the Hispanics in New Mexico, Arizona and California (of our timeline). Generally speaking, "Asian" in the context of the Pacific Union is East Asian, as the immigrants from Central, South, and West Asia look superficially 'white" in many cases, or superficially "black" in others. At least as defined by 19th Century bigotry. They are also not coming to the Union very often.
"Whites Only" immigration has an extensive history
Also remember that Oregon made it illegal for African-American people, free or slave, to enter the territory.
Wouldnt France want to take some of the Rhineland?and those territories become part of Hannover (Rhineland), independent as part of the German Confederation (Westphalia), or are annexed by Saxony (Prussian Saxony). Italy too is forced to accept defeat and Veneta remains in Austrian hands. Prussia and its territories are also expelled from the German Confederation.
Wouldnt France want to take some of the Rhineland?
authors note: if you think the Union is being ahistorically racist, you should look at the Japanese and Chinese Exclusion Acts (for starters) while the notion of guest workers comes from the need for workers for the citrus groves (already a thing in the late 1870s) and pressure from the Hispanics in New Mexico, Arizona and California (of our timeline). Generally speaking, "Asian" in the context of the Pacific Union is East Asian, as the immigrants from Central, South, and West Asia look superficially 'white" in many cases, or superficially "black" in others. At least as defined by 19th Century bigotry. They are also not coming to the Union very often.
"Whites Only" immigration has an extensive history
Also remember that Oregon made it illegal for African-American people, free or slave, to enter the territory.
Hello there, this TL seems interesting.....how far will you take it?
Some truth here. That said though, it may not necessarily wise to rely *too* much on real world history: just FYI, I'd like to point out that there are quite a few things about OTL American history that could have turned out rather differently had just one or two more or less things happened(for example, there's really nothing in the historical record that really explains the Chinese Exclusion Act being able to survive until 1943, other than pure happenstance).
(Edit: That said, though, I'll gladly say that, from the look of things now, you're actually doing a fairly decent job keeping things plausible here. Please keep up the great work!)
Oh, and here's another good example of what I was talking about: Oregon's black exclusion law managed to stumble on until 1926 and yet, prior to that, it was almost defeated not once, but twice-particularly in 1905 when only a very small difference could have swung things the other way around.
I would love to see a map just to help visualise the new borders more easily.