Discussion Thread: Marx Goes To America

I was listening to Mike Duncan's excellent Revolutions Podcast today as he described the development of early leftist thinking leading up to the First International as well as detailing the early lives of Marx and Engels up to the First International. It was during this that I came across an idea which I was hoping people might be interested in discussing - particularly those with a proper grounding in early socialist/leftist history.

The idea is in essence this: Following the Revolutions of 1848, Marx was at a distinct low point in his life and was forced into what he believed would be temporary exile in London. He struggled quite a bit during this period as he tried to get by, writing some of his most significant works in this period and fundamentally changing a number of beliefs as a result of disillusionment over the failures of 1848.

So, what if Marx found the funding necessary to bring his family to the United States rather than remaining in London during the early 1850s, where he would quickly find a place in the rapidly growing German-American community of the times. This would bring Marx into contact with American ideological development in the leadup to the American Civil War and, perhaps more importantly, remove him from London prior to the establishment of the First International.

There are two elements to this idea: First of all, Marx in America presents some really interesting possibilities given his OTL involvement in the abolitionist movement, potential for a significant German-language readership allowing him to continue his journalistic activities, experience of the America of the 1850s in all its manifold aspects and much, much more. Marx's ideological framework is likely to see significant divergence from OTL, resulting in a very different Marxism to that of OTL. He is not living in the very heart of the Industrial Revolution, which is likely to have some sort of impact, and will be in contact with an entirely different ideological framework from what he had experience with in Europe. I don't know how all of this would change his thoughts and ideas, but I would really love it if people would join me in a discussion on how Marxism might change as a result of these divergences.

The second element of this idea has to do with what happens with the European leftist movement without Marx to influence it. While Marx's influence was quite limited prior to his role in the First International, the greater distance from Engels will have some sort of impact on the development of their mutual thoughts and neither is likely to secure as great influence on the development of European leftism as a result. What this means is that the First International will likely turn out quite differently without Marx putting his stamp on the formulation and ideological framework of the organization. Again, I don't really have too clear an idea of what the result of all this would be, but I hope people might be interested in discussing it with me.
 
Well my first question is where in america he ends up. No doubt New York will be his first step but that doesn't necessarily mean that he stays there. He might end up in D.C. for a time using the Library of Congress like he did the London public library (itd be interesting if he somehow saved it from the fire that destroyed 2/3rds of its jeffersonian collection in 1851, and got some reward for it).

That said, while he's no longer in the heart global of the industrial revolution like he was in the UK, he did experience it, and by moving to the US he gets a view of how Capital develops in a slightly different sociopolitical environment. America really was the quintessential bourgeois society from its founding, what feudal trappings that had existed where obliterated by the revolution and were only later immitated in apperance by the southern plantation society. He might also get a clearer view of colonialism by examining US treatment of American Indians. So possibly his analysis is a bit more improved.

How things develop in europe is anyone's guess, though i imagine marx and engles would maintain a correspondence and their friendship. I doubt bakunin could really take his place just because of his atrocious antisemitism, but something more anarchist/libertarian leaning is likely.
 
Well my first question is where in america he ends up. No doubt New York will be his first step but that doesn't necessarily mean that he stays there. He might end up in D.C. for a time using the Library of Congress like he did the London public library (itd be interesting if he somehow saved it from the fire that destroyed 2/3rds of its jeffersonian collection in 1851, and got some reward for it).

That said, while he's no longer in the heart global of the industrial revolution like he was in the UK, he did experience it, and by moving to the US he gets a view of how Capital develops in a slightly different sociopolitical environment. America really was the quintessential bourgeois society from its founding, what feudal trappings that had existed where obliterated by the revolution and were only later immitated in apperance by the southern plantation society. He might also get a clearer view of colonialism by examining US treatment of American Indians. So possibly his analysis is a bit more improved.

How things develop in europe is anyone's guess, though i imagine marx and engles would maintain a correspondence and their friendship. I doubt bakunin could really take his place just because of his atrocious antisemitism, but something more anarchist/libertarian leaning is likely.

I think having him in D.C. by 1851, particularly in a position to save the Jeffersonian Collection, would be a stretch on the plausible - but an interesting possibility.

Having him exposed to the US socio-political environment is what I think could really prove interesting. I think the most significant part here is probably that he doesn't have immediate access to Engels. Losing Engels as easy sparring partner would be a significant blow, but access to a new environment would bring a whole host of new influences - as would exposure to the American ideological ferment of the time. I really wonder what his interactions with the abolitionist movement could result in.

I have no doubt that Marx and Engels would stay in touch, but having mid-19th century shipping to contend with and months of waiting between letters is a very different matter from living within easy meeting distance of each other. I don't think Bakunin would fill the void, but I wonder how stuff like the founding charter of the First International and its early work would change from OTL. Without Marx writing much of that stuff, it should take on a significantly different character but I am not sufficiently versed in the primary figures at the time to really understand how it would change.
 
I suspect he becomes an ardent abolitionist and his political philosophies develop along those lines. Without the unique circumstances he was in IOTL he is most likely just another leftist.

But let's make it interesting and say he's important, and combined the ideology of radical Republicans he is in contact with in the United States with parts of what would become Marxism to create a distinctly American working class philosophy. He writes a lot more on solidarity between races and classes while toning down the international aspects. Marxism emerges as a Leftist alternative to Engelism in Europe and these two schools of thought compete for dominance.
 
He writes a lot more on solidarity between races and classes
Careful there, solidarity between races yes, but he's not going to suddenly embrace solidarity between the working classes and the owning class. Solidarity between slaves freedmen and 'white' workers against exploiting classes is definitely on the table though.
 
I suspect he becomes an ardent abolitionist and his political philosophies develop along those lines. Without the unique circumstances he was in IOTL he is most likely just another leftist.

But let's make it interesting and say he's important, and combined the ideology of radical Republicans he is in contact with in the United States with parts of what would become Marxism to create a distinctly American working class philosophy. He writes a lot more on solidarity between races and classes while toning down the international aspects. Marxism emerges as a Leftist alternative to Engelism in Europe and these two schools of thought compete for dominance.

That does sound like an interesting direction to take, although I highly doubt Engels would emerge as a prominent leader amongst the Leftists in Europe given both his family's position as wealthy capitalists and his own reticence towards engaging with the wider leftist community. I doubt he ever achieves anything like the significance of OTL in this scenario.

Careful there, solidarity between races yes, but he's not going to suddenly embrace solidarity between the working classes and the owning class. Solidarity between slaves freedmen and 'white' workers against exploiting classes is definitely on the table though.

The idea of something like RFK's Rainbow Coalition as an ideological construct could be really interesting alongside a strong working-class message. It might not become anything more than fringe within the Republican party for the first couple decades, but it would be a really interesting undercurrent to have running in the Republican Party as we move forward through the Reconstruction Era.
 
I could see Frederick Douglas or replacing Engels as Marx's intellectual sparring partner. It would also be interesting to see the effects of the American religious fundament, less tied to the state apparatus, on Marx's thought.
 
Last edited:
I could see Frederick Douglas or replacing John Brown as Marx's intellectual sparring partner. It would also be interesting to see the effects of the American religious fundament, less tied to the state apparatus, on Marx's thought.
John Brown wasn't really an intellectual, but i can see Douglass and Marx working together. The only big obstacle between them is religion, but i can see them putting that aside at least somewhat.

They also both have amazing facial hair
 
The idea of something like RFK's Rainbow Coalition as an ideological construct could be really interesting alongside a strong working-class message. It might not become anything more than fringe within the Republican party for the first couple decades, but it would be a really interesting undercurrent to have running in the Republican Party as we move forward through the Reconstruction Era.
The biggest long term obstical is to avoid being coopted and marginalized by the mainstream parties, which in america has sadly proven incredibly effective
 
John Brown wasn't really an intellectual, but i can see Douglass and Marx working together. The only big obstacle between them is religion, but i can see them putting that aside at least somewhat.

They also both have amazing facial hair
Meant to type Engels, mindfarted.
 
Marx is SO moving to Milwaukee in this situation. The city was already developing a large German population - many of them 48ers hoping to put their ideals into practice there.

So, this would get Marx not only exposed to American ideals, but also reality along the American frontier. Which could make for some very interesting developments in his thoughts and writings
 
Marx is SO moving to Milwaukee in this situation. The city was already developing a large German population - many of them 48ers hoping to put their ideals into practice there.

So, this would get Marx not only exposed to American ideals, but also reality along the American frontier. Which could make for some very interesting developments in his thoughts and writings

Milwaukee does sound like it could be an interesting place for him to put down roots, but I think it might be more likely that he settles down in New York where he would have Joseph Weydemeyer to rely on and a large German-American readership readily available. That said, I really wonder how Marx would react to the Free-Soilers' wish for a Homestead act and the idea of supporting a large number of smallholders on the frontiers. IOTL Weydemeyer was strongly opposed to it as being detrimental to worker power and would rather have had large-scale agriculture in its stead. Marx taking an early stand on a Farmer-Labor alliance could have some interesting implications and could bring significant support for his ideas in the west.
 
I could see Frederick Douglas or replacing Engels as Marx's intellectual sparring partner. It would also be interesting to see the effects of the American religious fundament, less tied to the state apparatus, on Marx's thought.
That was my thought. Marx might see the American separation of church and state as a means to satisfy the opposition to religious persecution. After all, he was a European Jew (turned atheist) in a very anti-Semitic, church-state OTL environment.
 
Marx is SO moving to Milwaukee in this situation. The city was already developing a large German population - many of them 48ers hoping to put their ideals into practice there.

So, this would get Marx not only exposed to American ideals, but also reality along the American frontier. Which could make for some very interesting developments in his thoughts and writings
It would be a very interesting place for him to end up. Milwaukee will later become the home of "Sewer state socialism" and this tradition could develop even earlier. It's also a huge center for German-Americans, so much so Marx could write entirely in German if he wanted to.

That or Texas would be the most interesting, IMO. It would also be cool to see him apart of the Texas movement to stay loyal to the Union in the Civil War.
 
Top