Redbeard
Banned
They could only achieve that output with imported machine tool from Lend-Lease. Btw, German production was plagued by Nazi inefficient management. In ww1, they did not suffered much from Nazi-style management but from blockade.
Besides wartime, we should also look at the periods of 1900-1914 and 1919-1938, German chemical and engineering industries significantly outperformed Britain.
Chandler's Scale and Scope had a detailed description of how British engineering industries lagged behind German and American, especially high-tech industries before 1914. Their light, consumer goods and other non-engineering industries performed well and even competed well against the US. But the story was different for engineering and science-based sectors.
The potential of importing important equipment to boost your production is of course an asset of an industry/economy - not an excuse. And no matter how you rank various subjects more or less objectively, the bottom line is what counts, and here British industry served its country much better than the German did to Germany.
And yes German chemical industry was world leading and this went back to napoleons continental blockade prohibiting the import of dyes. You could also find other areas were German industry excelled, but it is far complicated to compare industries and economies than your agenda driven posting shows.
An aspect which has only been superficially touched in this thread is productivity. But it is often assumed that the British were far behind in productivity, especially when compared to the modern Americans or disciplined Germans - and the example of the Liberty ships is often brought forward. And yes the Liberty ships were built in record breaking time, but actually cost much more in money or man-hours to build than a British built ship of comparable capacity. Building things fast is not necessarily the same as building them effectively. In short you could say that on an US yard loads of unskilled workers waited for the materials to pass by while on a British yard the materials waited for the relatively few skilled workers to pass by and work them. In warship construction US ships usually cost much more than comparable British ships (IIRC about factor 2, I'm away from my books). I haven't access to as comprehensive benchmarkings to German productivity, but considering their extensive use of forced and enslaved labour I'm quite sure they would be rock-bottom in a productivity benchmark.
Sure there are a lot of brilliant examples from the German industry, Tigers and Me 262s are indeed fascinating, but actually I'm much more impressed about how the always hard pressed industry utilised obsolescent production lines and designs to produce 2nd rate but good enough materiel. Like turning the Pz III into a very capable StuG III or the Pz 38 into Marders or Hetzers. The British had similar methods but didn't get 2nd rate materiel - they got the Mosquito. The Mosquito originated in a wish to avoid using aluminium (aluminum to USians) and instead utilise the extensive furniture industry which could make wonders in plywood and besides by being spread out in numerous small factories and workshops was quite resilient to bombing. Now that is ingenuity!