Different East-German Polish border following WW2

main-qimg-2857414703b78ef171aaf90528b4c9a8.png

How would East Germany keeping the territory that was ceded OTL to Poland exept Southern-East-Prussia affect the development of East Germany and Poland? What is meant by development is the policies, strategies and settlement patterns(urban/rural). How would this affect the relations between these two states and their relations with other states? Might the East-German capital be somewhere else than Berlin?
 
One consequence i imagine is that East Germany would be more rural, while Poland would be more urban.

East Germany being more rural might be poorer than in OTL. While a more urban Poland would be richer.

This changed settlement patter in Poland and East Germany would likely have demographic consequences. Poland might have lower birth rates than in OTL, while East Germany had higher birth rates than in OTL.

Poland would be more concerned about security as their border in the west would be less defensible than their OTL border at the Oder.

East Germany might decide to have their capital more east than OTL. This would be to symbolise their eastward view and to consolidate eastern holdings. Perhaps Stettin could be the capital?

West Germany would be more willing to recognise the border changes earlier. There would also be less opposition from hardliners and nationalists to this change in policy.

During reunification a larger portion of East German population would migrate westward due to there being less urban centers in East Germany. But the East German population would still be larger after this migration than in OTL.

Due to Eastern Germany being bigger, i think it will likely result in greater Soviet influence there than in OTL. This greater Soviet influence would perhaps be the reason for the Soviet's allowing East Germany to maintain some of it's possesions east of the Oder except for East Prussia.

East Germany would be able to lessen emigration to West Germany. This is because a larger portion of the population would live further from the border.
 
Last edited:

Deleted member 1487

Theoretically East Germany would experience less starvation and refugee problems post-war, plus have more access to coal. Poland is going to be worse off economically without the German areas, which were the most infrastructure developed part of their country post-war and later some important mineral deposits were discovered. On top of that they'd be losing East Poland.
poland-economy.jpg


Mineral_deposits_of_Poland-big.jpg


poland_ind_1977.jpg
 
Top