This is often repeated, but ignores two things. First, the conventional carriers could operate longer-range aircraft, allowing them to avoid poor weather. Second, the analysis is based on USN operating criteria; the RN has always been willing to operate in worse conditions than the USN.
The point is more that conventional carriers aren't a panacea when it comes to Operation Corporate. Yes there are advantages, but there are also trade-offs. Fewer, more complicated aircraft with more intensive maintenance requirements resulting in lower mission availability and sortie rates for example.
Given the size and nature of the theatre I'm not sure I agree with the range argument. There is also a tradeoff with time on station and combat persistence if you are flying from further away. As for weather, SHAR's were descending to land vertically in holes in sea fog, while Veinticinco de Mayo's strike was abandoned due to lack of wind in otherwise ideal conditions. It's not a "worse" thing, it's a flexibility thing, and that opinion was voiced by Royal Navy participants.
Last edited: