For the US? It’d really depend on how the socialists do- they’d probably be the only ones getting it done, but they also wouldn’t want to lose their base, who might just be the white working-class. In Germany we could go full allegory and have a similar era for German JewsBy the way, when does this TL's civil rights era happen?
Well, we could have a United Baltic Duchy, or there's also BaltoslaviaAnd have we decided on the Baltics yet?
Baltoslavia isn’t a great name. Most of the Balts wouldn’t consider themselves Slavs so yeah. I don’t like the idea but we can do it if you guys do!Well, we could have a United Baltic Duchy, or there's also Baltoslavia
I'm not that big of a fan of the idea myselfBaltoslavia isn’t a great name. Most of the Balts wouldn’t consider themselves Slavs so yeah. I don’t like the idea but we can do it if you guys do!
Same hereI'm not that big of a fan of the idea myself
Well, we could have a United Baltic Duchy, or there's also Baltoslavia
A realistic compromise would be a United Baltic Duchy, excluding BelarusWhat about a Baltic referendum?
I doubt Baltoslavia would be very likely, since Germany wasn’t exactly known for giving locals what they wanted, and even then I doubt that the Balts would want a united state- I don’t know if pan-Baltic identity even existed. (Turanism was more popular in Finland, Turkic countries, Japan, and Hungary). But since you guys seem to like it we will hold a poll.
What about a Baltic referendum?
I doubt Baltoslavia would be very likely, since Germany wasn’t exactly known for giving locals what they wanted, and even then I doubt that the Balts would want a united state- I don’t know if pan-Baltic identity even existed. (Turanism was more popular in Finland, Turkic countries, Japan, and Hungary). But since you guys seem to like it we will hold a poll.
Since this is a 1918 CP victory scenario, Germany is too exhausted to be able to impose anything they want on an unruly Eastern populace. Their priority would be to make sufficient buffer states in the East, and a Litbel would be a stronger buffer than Lithuania or Belarus respectively.What about a Baltic referendum?
I doubt Baltoslavia would be very likely, since Germany wasn’t exactly known for giving locals what they wanted, and even then I doubt that the Balts would want a united state- I don’t know if pan-Baltic identity even existed. (Turanism was more popular in Finland, Turkic countries, Japan, and Hungary). But since you guys seem to like it we will hold a poll.
Actually, my ideas for the points of divergence were-Since this is a 1918 CP victory scenario, Germany is too exhausted to be able to impose anything they want on an unruly Eastern populace. Their priority would be to make sufficient buffer states in the East, and a Litbel would be a stronger buffer than Lithuania or Belarus respectively.
Since this is a 1918 CP victory scenario, Germany is too exhausted to be able to impose anything they want on an unruly Eastern populace. Their priority would be to make sufficient buffer states in the East, and a Litbel would be a stronger buffer than Lithuania or Belarus respectively.
I am fine with LitBel, but I think that the humongous Baltoslavia is unlikely. I doubt that Germany would want any one vassal gobbling up that much territory, and I think that if it was put into place, it would collapse like YugoslaviaI thought of a 1917 CP victory here, but what you say also applies in this scenario. @Hindustani Person , would you then agree to creating Litbel (and Baltoslavia after World War II)? .
Also, @Augenis , what would be a "better" name for Baltoslavia?
I thought 1919?I thought of a 1917 CP victory here, but what you say also applies in this scenario. @Hindustani Person , would you then agree to creating Litbel (and Baltoslavia after World War II)? .
Also, @Augenis , what would be a "better" name for Baltoslavia?