Good for Hungary. A small, insignificant state on a peninsula far to the periphery of civilization weathered a second, half-hearted Mongol raid after having previously lost a third of its population and seen its feudal economy devastated after the first invasion. For all of Eurasia, the states that came out the other end of the Mongol invasions were vast departures from the previous states of affairs. From the Khwarezmi to the Safavids through the Ilkhanate, from the Song to the Ming through the Yuan, from the Delhi Sultanate to the Mughal Empire, from the Rus principalities to Moscovy, etc. The Mongols triggered fundamental restructuring developments in all the states they subdued and many they didn't, and the new world economy that they created bypassed traditional structures of power in such a way that mercantilism began the process of replacing feudalism. That is the heart of the events.
The Mongol invasion was 30+,000 strong, as strong or slightly stronger as the Mongol army at Mohi. Not a "half-hearted" affair by any means.
the link implies that actually the Hungarian victory was more fabian tactics, strong defenses and after a bit of wearing down, then a pair of battle field victories and the link stated that losses were due to a combination of attrition from poor supply, skirmishing and 2 battles.
It does not indicate that the Mongols were crushed
It states that the Mongols lost much of their force, and that they never launched a major invasion of Hungary again. BTW, I note you're no longer trying to claim that Europeans never beat Mongols, and are instead reduced to quibbling over what makes a victory "crushing".