Did Mycenaeans Fear Hittite Invasion?

So, yesterday I was watching Troy on SciFi cuz, you know, I was feeling nostalgic for all those post-Gladiator action films that were clunky big budget and didn't use so much CG.

Well there was one off-hand line that I hadn't noticed until this viewing that got me thinking. When discussing wether the Greeks should retreat, Nestor mentions that if the Greeks left, it would make them look weak, and how long before the Hittites invaded.

So, this isn't a question of could the Hittites have invaded. We know they couldn't, and even if they could, they wouldn't because they were more focused on Syria. But instead, this is a question of did the Mycenaean Greeks think that the Hittites could and would invade given the chance? In the same sort of way you hear Americans talking about China invading, did the Bronze Age Greeks fear an Anatolian invasion, possibly as a motivating factor for aggression in the Aegean and consolidation in Ahhiyawa under one of the few High Kings the Hittite Emperor called "Brother"?

I understand this is a highly conjectural question, and I doubt there would be any evidence one way or the other, but what do you think?
 
We really have no bloody way to know. What we know about the Myceneans from contemporary sources is precious little - essentially a relatively small number of tablets which are largely understood as being accounting reports. There is some recent scholarship that sees more into them - religious writings, mostly related to sacrifices - but it's not widely accepted, and even if this view is correct, it says almost nothing about your question.
Hittite texts hint at a confluctual relationship with the Achaeans - but they are only rarely mentioned in the Hittite documents, so that they can pretty safely be considered a relatively minor concern from the Hittite perspective.
Later Greek tradition does not mention the Hittites AT ALL - which hardly suggests anything like a widespread fear (unless we assume it was SO widespread to lead to some taboo - fascinating but unprovable and unlikely).
So, we don't know, but my limited understanding of the very scant available evidence points to "probably not".
 
Last edited:
As Falecius said, we'd expect to hear more of invasion scares if these were a major thing in Greece. Also, there's the logistic argument: there was simply no way, given communications and logistical technologies in the Late Bronze Age, that a country based in eastern Anatolia would be able to conquer a country a thousand miles to the west and lying across a sea, especially since the Hittites never seem to have had a particularly tight control over the Turkish Aegean coast. Whilst countries do sometimes have irrational panics about things that are highly unlikely to happen, I don't think that fear of such an obviously implausible scenario could have been maintained for very long.
 
Top