Why would Thurmond run?
Without the War there is no reason for the Dixiecrats to ever appear.
I'm assuming Truman still runs on desegregating the armed forces and establishing a civil rights committee. This causes the Dixiecrat's to split from the Democratic party and run Thurmond instead.Why would Thurmond run?
Without the War there is no reason for the Dixiecrats to ever appear.
I'm assuming Truman still runs on desegregating the armed forces and establishing a civil rights committee. This causes the Dixiecrat's to split from the Democratic party and run Thurmond instead.
The sentiments that brought about the Dixiecrats were pretty much a direct result of the War. Millions of men from outside the South rotated through the area with Jim Crow laws. Hundreds of thousands of African Americans rotated through the ETO or New Zealand/Australia, where they were exposed to an entire world without Jim Crow, with millions more venturing out of Deep South to the Northeast, Midwest and West Coast to work in War Plants. The result was a major jump in opposition to Jim Crow among the U.S. and a good deal most "restlessness" among the Blacks of the South.Wait, unless I'm missing something (entirely possible considering I'm new at this), the Dixiecrats existed because of their opposition to civil rights, not because of the war?
The sentiments that brought about the Dixiecrats were pretty much a direct result of the War. Millions of men from outside the South rotated through the area with Jim Crow laws. Hundreds of thousands of African Americans rotated through the ETO or New Zealand/Australia, where they were exposed to an entire world without Jim Crow, with millions more venturing out of Deep South to the Northeast, Midwest and West Coast to work in War Plants. The result was a major jump in opposition to Jim Crow among the U.S. and a good deal most "restlessness" among the Blacks of the South.
The War didn't create the Civil Rights Movement, but it took it from an afterthought to a serious issue. That was what generated the flat out fear driving the Dixiecrats. No War, no fear, no Dixiecrats.
The War didn't create the Civil Rights Movement, but it took it from an afterthought to a serious issue. That was what generated the flat out fear driving the Dixiecrats. No War, no fear, no Dixiecrats.
That'll come eventually. But be warned; I know precious little about British politics.Very interesting. I wonder what's going on in Britain now.
I really like this! Consider me subscribed! (It reminds me of "A Valkyrie Rises over Europe").
Thanks! Glad y'all are enjoying it!Looks good so far keep up the good work!
Just a suggestion, this fellow could rise to more prominence and lead the US space program without Von Braun and his fellow German scientists around.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qian_Xuesen
Also regarding the start of a Nazi space program, if they're determined to be first in the early half of the fifties they could launch a fellow up into space in a modified V2 which Stalin considered in OTL.
https://falsesteps.wordpress.com/2016/03/29/vr-190-stalins-rocket/
Heres also what could be a Nazi equivalent of U2 spy plane. The designer Eugen Sänger was poised to be a rival to Von Braun.
https://falsesteps.wordpress.com/2012/07/10/sanger-bredt-silbervogel/
Another devious plane project that the US would have to prepare against.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amerika_Bomber
Aeronautics could also go in some pretty strange directions ITTL.
Without US involvement in the war a lot runways may have not been built so seaplanes would still be more common for a while longer.
Also I wouldn't put it past people ITTL putting more nuclear into things, like planes.
As this TL goes on, I hope to see how the space program will evolve and as we get into the Fifties, "McCarthyism" with a twist.....
Isn't some sort of "Brown Scare" likely in a Nazis Victorious timeline? That could create a lot of hostility to the Jim Crow laws and make civil rights a much more prominent issue in American politics as Americans don't want their country looking like Nazi Germany. (It's certainly easy to imagine Hubert Humphrey delivering a stemwinder at the 1948 Democratic convention where he compares Jim Crow to the Nuremberg laws.)
Will there be a chapter discussing the German colonization/genocide in Eastern Europe?snip
Possible? Sure.Isn't some sort of "Brown Scare" likely in a Nazis Victorious timeline? That could create a lot of hostility to the Jim Crow laws and make civil rights a much more prominent issue in American politics as Americans don't want their country looking like Nazi Germany. (It's certainly easy to imagine Hubert Humphrey delivering a stemwinder at the 1948 Democratic convention where he compares Jim Crow to the Nuremberg laws.)
Possible? Sure.
Likely? Not so much. A victorious Reich would result in the Camps remaining more rumor than fact for some time. IOTL the British, when presented with reports that detailed the Camps in Poland, made annotations on the reports that they seemed to be exaggerated. None of those reports reached Britain until 1942. In this scenario it is reasonable to assume that the UK was defeated before the initial reporting could be received, and even if it was received the U.S. and UK were not sharing Intel at the level that was true IOTL. This, combined with the reality that the U.S. had virtually no HUMINT coverage anywhere on the Continent, makes the wide distribution of information on the Holocaust while it is still underway much less likely than IOTL.
The Nazi leadership would admit that the Final Solution is complete and the Germanization of the East underway but I don't think they would discuss it in detail like:Would victorious Nazis even bother to try and hide the Holocaust? (It's not like Hitler, Himmler, and Heydrich would feel any sense of shame in what they were doing.)
We gassed 5 million Jews using carbon monoxide and Zyklon B in fake showers in camps in Poland, took their valuables (gold teeth, hair etc) and then cremated their corpses. Also we're starving and working millions of Slavs to death at this very moment. Have a nice day.
Would victorious Nazis even bother to try and hide the Holocaust? (It's not like Hitler, Himmler, and Heydrich would feel any sense of shame in what they were doing.) And even if the Nazis did decide to keep the Holocaust quiet, the Nuremberg Race Laws and Kristallnacht were certainly known to the United States. The American people were well aware that Nazi Germany was a virulently racist regime, which is going to make Jim Crow deeply embarrassing to any Americans that doesn't want his country looking like Nazi Germany.
Also, even aside from the moral case for civil rights, there is also a geopolitical argument. The U.S. government in any Cold War situation with victorious Axis Powers is probably going to have to compete with the Nazis for influence in the Mid-East and with Japan for influence in India. Jim Crow makes the U.S. look little better than Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan and thus greatly damages the U.S. bargaining position with the Mid-East nations and India.
Just something, I don't think that there would be any Liberal young generation in Nazi Germany. Most likely the post war generations would either fall into the "Full-on Waffen-SS Himmler wankfest" generation and " Slightly less Full-on Waffen-SS Himmler wankfest."