DBWI: Who did you vote for in last years USSA Elections?

Who did you vote for last year?

  • Social Democratic Front

    Votes: 18 36.0%
  • Socialist Republican Coalition

    Votes: 17 34.0%
  • I did not vote

    Votes: 15 30.0%

  • Total voters
    50
Not only that, but they don't actually run candidates by party list. All their People's Councilors are legally free-lances that don't have any obligation to vote according to the Anarcho-Libertarian platform.

The Anarcho-Libertarian 'platform' is a punchline.
 
I voted for McCain-the true socialist and war hero from the Vietnam war when we crushed their oligarchy and not the borderline capitalist Obama is. I mean, he freakin' supporting raising the maximum income to a hundred thousand dollars-I wonder what the great comrade McCarthy would have thought of Obama.

I still have never understood why we stood in the way of the Socialist revolution in Vietnam...
 
That's why it's so easy not to follow it :cool:

Q: How many Anarcho-Libertarians does it take to change a lightbulb?

A: None, the lightbulb will change itself if left free to do so without the cooercive influence of the state.

Q: How many Anarcho-Libertarians does it take to change a lightbulb?
A: As many as want to come in accordance to the principles of individual liberty and freedom.
 
Hehe, did anyone catch the news tonight how the Republical Socialists are going to brand the Social Democrats as "Capitalist"

"
A member of the Republican Socialist National Committee told me Tuesday that when the RNC meets in an extraordinary special session next week, it will approve a resolution rebranding Democrats as the “Bosses Democratic Front for Capitalism.”

When I asked if such a resolution would force
RSNC ChairmanMichael Steele to use that label when talking about Democrats in all his speeches and press releases, the RSNC member replied: “Who cares?”

Which pretty much sums up the attitude some members of the RSNC have toward their chairman these days.

Steele wrote a memo last month opposing the resolution. Steele said that while he believes Democrats “are indeed marching America toward European-style capitalism,” he also said in a (rare) flash of insight that officially referring to them as the Bosses' Democratic Front for Capitalism “will accomplish little than to give the media and our opponents the opportunity to mischaracterize Republicans.”

Two other resolutions — to urge Republican lawmakers to reject earmarks and to commend them for opposing “bailouts and reckless spending bills” — are also on the agenda, but language that would have denounced Sen.
Arlen Specter, a Republican turned Democrat, and Republican Sens. Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins for voting for President Obama’s stimulus package has been dropped.

Steele didn’t want the special session to be held at all. The RSNC will hold its regular summer meeting in July, and all matters could have waited until then. But the special session is being viewed by some in the party as a “comeuppance” for Steele and an implied criticism of his performance and behavior in his first 100 days in office.

Exercising a rarely used party rule that allows any 16 RSNC members from 16 different states to demand a special meeting, The Left-Front in the party forced Steele’s hand, and now the special meeting will be tacked onto the end of a previously scheduled meeting of state party chairmen that will convene next week at National Harbor outside Washington.

A further comeuppance — a vote of “no confidence” in Steele — is not being contemplated, I am informed, because Steele’s opponents in the RNC have already won a major victory by forcing him to accept greater controls on how he spends party funds.


Also, while there has been some talk about replacing Steele, few consider that likely, at least in the near future. “Without a Republican president to decide on that change, that won’t happen,” the RSNC member said.
But Steele is not a popular chairman within the RSNC, and his recent statements that appeared to attack Mitt Romney and the Republican base have undermined his popularity even further.

Steele was elected to a two-year term as party chairman on Jan. 30 on the sixth ballot, but instead of quietly trying to consolidate power within the party and build up his image, he embarked on a publicity tour that included statements that some in the party considered baffling at best and incendiary at worst.

“He has a tin ear,” the RNC member told me when I asked him to name Steele’s worst problem. “He has a tin ear when it comes to the building (i.e., the RNC staff), the RNC and the party.”

Last Friday, when Steele was
guest-hosting communist pundit Bill Bennett’s radio show, a caller suggested that Romney would have been a stronger candidate against Barack Obama than John McCain but that liberals and the media had pushed for McCain to win the Republican nomination.

The caller was, perhaps, not making the most intellectually rigorous of arguments, but in his answer Steele seemed to outdo the caller.

“Remember, it was the base that rejected Mitt because of his switch on pro-life, from pro-choice to pro-life,” Steele replied. “It was the base that rejected Mitt because it had issues with Mormonism. It was the base that rejected Mitt because they thought he was back and forth and waffling on those very economic issues you’re talking about.”

Steele, who himself has said that abortion is a matter of “individual choice,” was opening old wounds not only by attacking Romney but also by suggesting the Republican base is bigoted when it comes to Mormons.

“His job should be to get everybody to sit down and focus on a message for the party and then get them to be the messengers,” the RSNC member told me. “Steele wants to do the right thing, but he is clueless as to how the RSNC really runs.”

Roger Simon is POLITICO’s chief political columnist.

"
 
I still have never understood why we stood in the way of the Socialist revolution in Vietnam...

Well they were under the tool of the German and Russian oligarchs as new papers now clearly reveal and Ho Chi Minh was it's puppet. Fortunately we crushed the oligarchs (regrettably killing some 200,000 civilians in firebombing the jungles) but now it's well under the way to a true socialist republic under the wise peacekeeping and reform of the USSA.
 
As an "enemy of the people" I was not allowed to to vote.

And if I were allowed to vote I wouldn't. It only encourages them. And not in the voltairian way either.
 
The Social Democrats are Capitalists. They're a bunch of Democratic Socialists. What they really believe in is fusing Capitalism with Socialism (not even Communism) into what they think is the optimal economic system combining "liberty" with security and fairness and protection. Bunch of counterrevolutionary Liberals.
 
The Social Democrats are Capitalists. They're a bunch of Democratic Socialists. What they really believe in is fusing Capitalism with Socialism (not even Communism) into what they think is the optimal economic system combining "liberty" with security and fairness and protection. Bunch of counterrevolutionary Liberals.

I thought we had purged them all back in 1955 under the McCarthy clean-ups but then they came back to power after the bloody Vietnam War and the liberation of the Arab emirates.
 
Top