DBWI: Tsarevich Nicholas survives

kernals12

Banned
Russia's line of succession went through lots of chaos in the 1890s. First Nicholas was stabbed and killed by a Japanese police officer in the Otsu incident. Then, Tsar Alexander III died suddenly at 47 in 1894 leaving the throne to his son George. George then succumbed to Tuberculosis in 1899 finally giving us Tsar Michael II who reigned very successfully until his death in 1959. So what if we had Tsar Nicholas II instead?
 
According of some sources tsarevich Nicholas Alexandrovich wasn't very smart and intrested about politics. This might be devastating to Russian Empire when it suffered from several serious problems on early 20th century. Not sure would he even able win Great War on 1913 - 1916 unlike Russia was able do under Michael II.
 

kernals12

Banned
According of some sources tsarevich Nicholas Alexandrovich wasn't very smart and intrested about politics. This might be devastating to Russian Empire when it suffered from several serious problems on early 20th century. Not sure would he even able win Great War on 1913 - 1916 unlike Russia was able do under Michael II.
What about Russia's transition to parliamentary rule?
 

kernals12

Banned
According of some sources tsarevich Nicholas Alexandrovich wasn't very smart and intrested about politics. This might be devastating to Russian Empire when it suffered from several serious problems on early 20th century. Not sure would he even able win Great War on 1913 - 1916 unlike Russia was able do under Michael II.
OOC Is this Great War the same as ours (in which case you have the starting year wrong) or a different one?
 

kernals12

Banned
OOC: Alternate Great War. Bit different from OTL WW1.
OOC: Well, anyone a little bit smarter than Nicky would've realized how stupid it was risking war with Germany over a tiny Balkan state.
 
Last edited:
Top