I just don't get why they make threats of nuking everyone all the time! Maybe the leader of Manchuria is compensating for somethingYea. The PRC is also f**king insane as well.
I just don't get why they make threats of nuking everyone all the time! Maybe the leader of Manchuria is compensating for somethingYea. The PRC is also f**king insane as well.
I do think that it would reduce tensions - most likely resulting in the Soviets collapsing, rather than the US. OTL, the main reason the cold war ended was the Indochinese War, the US intervention of which caused massive casualties and student riots across the country. Without the tense world environment, the US won't have the need to intervene directly.WI the first map included neutral: Denmark, East Germany and Bulgaria?
Would a neutral demilitarized zone - through the middle of Europe - reduce tensions during the Cold War?
I read up on this scenario and apparently Yugoslavia is communist, but not allied with the soviets. So.... Cookies if you can get a communist non soviet aligned Yugoslavia without Bulgaria.I think its obvious that ITTL Italy remained neutral. The lack of a Balkan campaign allowed the Jugoslav monarchy to stay in power instead of Tito's communists taking over. That would explain a neutral Austria as well: Italy turns on the Nazis when it becomes convenient and makes it as far as Munich before Goebbels surrenders. Then when Mussolini dies of prostate cancer like OTL a more anti-communist leader joins this "NATO"
????????? You mean that one communist party in New England that tried to secede from the US and terribly failed! What do you mean America couldn't win the cold war? It did! In 1988! World War 2 did not occur in North America.What would be the fate of North America in this timeline? Would there be no Association of New Englander Communes, or People's Republic of Mexico? I honestly can't see the Americans' corrupt government and economy surviving the standoff with the Soviets.
The soviets reformed OTL. Are you from a different TL? The USA won. OF course there is still Manchuria but...I do think that it would reduce tensions - most likely resulting in the Soviets collapsing, rather than the US. OTL, the main reason the cold war ended was the Indochinese War, the US intervention of which caused massive casualties and student riots across the country. Without the tense world environment, the US won't have the need to intervene directly.
????????? You mean that one communist party in New England that tried to secede from the US and terribly failed! What do you mean America couldn't win the cold war? It did! In 1988! World War 2 did not occur in North America.
The soviets reformed OTL. Are you from a different TL? The USA won. OF course there is still Manchuria but...
OOC: Seriously read the rest of the discussion
OOC: Well still, please read previous posts, and please try and make the DBWI make sense and not conflict with itself.((OOC: Was setting it up so US collapses -> England and France take up leadership of NATO, then Soviets collapse and leave Manchuria as a dictatorship, New England as one too... etc.))