DBWI: The inca empire is not divided in a Christian north and an Islamic south.

For those of us not versed into Andean history, the religious division of the Tawantinsuyu can be traced back to the Incan civil war: After the death of Huayna Capac and his preferred heir Ninan Coyuchi a civil war broke out between his sons Huascar and Atahualpa (well not immediately but after five years wherein Huascar was the Sapa Inca and Atahualpa was the governor of Quito), whit Huascar sending an army after his brother out of fear he would try to overthrow him.
At first Atahualpa defeated the armies his brother send North and continued into the south however he was defeated into the south in the Battle of Quipaipan and forced to retreat north.

Around the same time Pizarro arrived in the north of the empire, the now desperate Atahualpa offered to fill a large room about 22 feet long and 17 feet wide up to a height of 8 feet once with gold and twice with silver if in exchange Pizarro would not only fight on his side but also recruit more Spanish mercenaries for him. The shock effect of the Spanish guns and horses was enough for Atahualpa to once again turn the tide and march unto Cuzco, however in the same time Huascar was contacted by Moroccan explorers who (together with a large native contingent) crossed the Chaco region from their colonies in Atlantic South America.
The Moroccans then decided to help Huascar (not only for gold but also to spite their Spanish rivals). Though thanks to their (initially) small numbers it was mostly the effects on morale and their knowledge of the Spanish that allowed Huascar to survive.

Thus the Tawantinsuyu ended up divided into a Spanish influenced north and a Moroccan influenced south both of which would eventually be pressured into accepting the religion of their respective overlords.

However what if the Moroccans don't arrive in time and Pizzaro marches with Atahualpa into Cuzco creating an united Christian Tawantinsuyu? What if the civil war ends before the foreigners show up, could they keep their native faith or would they be forced to give it up to ally with one Eastern power against the other? Or perhaps is it possible that the Inca's could be conquered directly (either by a decapitation strike or by using native allies) like happened with the Aztecs (despite them being larger and more united then the Aztecs)?
 
I see it difficult: the Moroccans would have arrived in America sooner or later: it was inevitable.
Perhaps if Morocco had been left, so to speak, "incapacitated" (for example, had it been in a very large economic crisis) perhaps the Tahuantisuyu would have been conquered only by the Spaniards.
 
You would need to butter fly the Moroccans empire would lead to southern and maybe Christian South America too
 
Well, the two separate Spanish and Moroccan colonies in the Andes had each other as bogeyman and thus could deflect local separatists against the other colonial power.

If one power conquered the entire Inca Empire in one piece, they couldn't possibly hold it as one, centralized viceroyalty. It was just too large and populated to be conquered so swiftly and the Quechua resistance lasted for decades as it was.

A wholly Spanish or wholly Moroccan colony in Peru would end up being more of a loose company rule, like the Ottoman Raj in India. Semi-autonomous princely states would be the norm. Eventually it would break free like Japan from the Netherlands.
 
Your terminology is bizarre; Morocco? Why not call it Maghrib like everyone else? Are you one of the Rum, perchance?

Truthfully, Rodrigo Pizarro de Santiago was nothing more than a rabble-rouser who went into business for himself. The discovery of the Al-Gharb by the Andalusi mariner Ibn Sanjul opened up a lot of mercantile and military opportunities for the Maghrawid Kingdom, which at the time was at the height of its power, ruling both Andalus and Mauretania from Fes. Of course, it was the habit of the Maghrawids to hire ghilman and halqa to do a lot of their dirty work, particularly the pacification of the Mexica. The easy way to avert this is to have Emir Al-Mu'izz hire anyone in the world other than Pizarro's gaggle of Christian mercenaries. Pizarro only had a few hundred men, but it was enough that he could break off from Tashfin ibn Al-Mu'izz's greater army and ally with one side in the fitna of the Tawantinsuyu. Just have Pizarro left in the Northern Kingdoms with the rest of the Rum and bring along some more Amazigh horsemen instead, and you likely get a Muslim Tawantinsuyu simply through trade ties.

I mean, the other easy way to do this is to have the Rum succeed at what they call the Reconquista - e.g. a timeline where the Andalus is Christian and Maghrib doesn't have the benefit of Andalusi urbanites and intellectuals to power its eventual rise to economic power.

Maybe something like the Almoravids collapsing to a less moderate and urbanized force than the Maghrawids. You could do that by wanking someone like a religious fanatic; someone like Ibn Tumart, maybe, who was said to be a real rabble-rouser and a Mahdist claimant before he died prematurely and his followers split into little factions. But it'd have to be someone really crazy - something like a radical movement not only sponsoring Zahiri as the dominant madhhab within Maghrib and Andalus, but rejecting the idea of dhimmi, thus both infuriating the predominant Maliki followers among the faithful and compelling most of the Christians within the Andalus to flee to the north and join the Rum and the Firanj in their attempts to drive out the Muslims. As it is, the Maghrawids were acceptable to both Andalusis and the Amazigh clans; replacing them with someone extreme and unacceptable opens up fissures which a suitably strong North can exploit.
 
Last edited:
Top