DBWI: The American Communist Revolutionary War

Ever since Corporate fucks took control of Washington its been nothing but downhill for America ever since the Great War. The Government has forggoten you entirely; thus it must be disposed of immediately! My fellow countrymen it is time to take up arms agianst the damned capitalists and bring back our justice, integrity, and rights that they have stolen from us! We have fought for years but the end is almost here. I will never forget you, the people, because we its workers are America!

Workers Unite!
 
Those "Corporate Fucks" as you call them are probably the best thing that ever happened to us. Sure we may have lost a few freedoms we enjoyed in more chaotic times, but we're much better off. Crime is way down, employment is way up and the military is second to none, so do not come here and try stir things up when they do not need to be.
 
Some of us run these corporations, you know.

And let's face it, you seek to take by force what your skills and efforts do not otherwise allow--a standard of living that you denied yourself by doing drugs, having a child before age 18, dropping out of schooling, or getting a criminal record.

These Communist vermin think that people who take and do not give should somehow be given even more. That we've banned alcohol and drugs, and required everyone to get a tertiary education and flat out refused to pay to incarcerate underworld monsters and terrorists is because this is what makes society the best it can be. A world without losers, welfare recipients and criminal riff-raff.

And you say these things in the face of tried and failed experiments like Josef Stalin's Union of Soviet Socialist Republics and Mao's People's Republic. Stalin enslaved millions, Mao starved millions. And now you take issue with the most productive corporate citizens and top caliber experts who run them because you can offer nothing other than criminality in our world.

People like you need to be taken out an shot. Fortunately, thanks to the 2006 Laws against non-citizens and non-contributors, we are likely to force you into a constructive role for society. The Lay-Skilling process of electrolobotomy should leave as a quiet, charitable laborer for the rest of your days.

Happy Capitalism to You.:D:D:D
CEO "Blue" Max
 
I can't affirm to be an expert in the New Incorporated States, but seen by the other side of the Atlanmtic Your situation seems dire indeed:

Yes, the standard of living of 25 million of americans are costantly improving but what about the other 100 million of non-contributors and the rising millions of the one stripped of theyr citizenship? Electrolobotomy wile not legally assimilable to slavery does actually create a slaveholding like economy: how long will it hold until the slaveholding economy problems will affect Corporate America?
 
Some of us run these corporations, you know.

Makes sense thus far.

And let's face it, you seek to take by force what your skills and efforts do not otherwise allow--a standard of living that you denied yourself by doing drugs, having a child before age 18, dropping out of schooling, or getting a criminal record.
Dear me. Stereotyping. There are people like that, true, but there are more who are out of work etc. due to circimstances.

These Communist vermin think that people who take and do not give should somehow be given even more.
And those who can't? Who've been made redundant, and can't find another job? Sue, there's entrepeneurship, but businesses fail too, especially in the dog-eat-dog corporate world of American business. (It happens here, too, but at least here we have competition laws and the nationalisation option if needs be.*) And the elderly, the infirm, the disabled who cannot work? Where is that? As a Christian, I believe that the rights of those who cannot -not will not**, work or otherwise make meaningful contributions to society should be respected, and I am grateful for both those Christians and others still left in America who try. They are, howeve, few and far between, and are facing an uphill struggle.

That we've banned alcohol and drugs, and required everyone to get a tertiary education and flat out refused to pay to incarcerate underworld monsters and terrorists is because this is what makes society the best it can be. A world without losers, welfare recipients and criminal riff-raff.

No wonder that there are so many terrorists around. You fail to incarcerate them because it's bad business, yet you portray the evil and corrupt West image is quite clearly portrayed to al-Quaida et al. and it's no wonder communism is taking hold in the underclasses. And you let the gangsters thrive, despite penalising the poor folks of the underclass you oppress and disenfranchise needlessly.

And you say these things in the face of tried and failed experiments like Josef Stalin's Union of Soviet Socialist Republics and Mao's People's Republic. Stalin enslaved millions, Mao starved millions. And now you take issue with the most productive corporate citizens and top caliber experts who run them because you can offer nothing other than criminality in our world.

Communism failed, and capitalism can provide better results than centrally-planned economies, sure, but moderation in all things is the best policy. Moreover...

People like you need to be taken out an shot. Fortunately, thanks to the 2006 Laws against non-citizens and non-contributors, we are likely to force you into a constructive role for society. The Lay-Skilling process of electrolobotomy should leave as a quiet, charitable laborer for the rest of your days.

you fail where they failed (as did the Nazis and eugenicists before you): social engineering by force.

Happy Capitalism to You.:D:D:D
CEO "Blue" Max

Happy moderation to you,
the_lyniezian.


*OOC: I assume that if America were this bad, the UK might be less likely to follow quite such a laissez-faire approach- it might be viewed as an evil comparible to Communism. Assuming we even get some form of welfare state.

**Though I admit to my shame, I often fall into this category. (OOC: in RL and IC!)
 
Last edited:
I can't affirm to be an expert in the New Incorporated States, but seen by the other side of the Atlanmtic Your situation seems dire indeed:

Yes, the standard of living of 25 million of americans are costantly improving but what about the other 100 million of non-contributors and the rising millions of the one stripped of theyr citizenship? Electrolobotomy wile not legally assimilable to slavery does actually create a slaveholding like economy: how long will it hold until the slaveholding economy problems will affect Corporate America?

I would perhaps argue that comparisons to the CSA, the ancient world etc. (EDIT: not that you mention any explicitly) are a bad idea: do we have any realistic model of a slavelike economy such as that being proposed in Corporate Yankland- an industrialised nation where innovation is (allegedly at least) given a high priority? EDIT: Remember old examples only cover more backward and more agrarian situations, by comparison.
 
Last edited:
Well the need for Revolution is necessary and just. Ever since 1999 with the Seattle Riots and the Genoa Riots of 2001, people are coming to realize the dangers of the excesses of corporate rule. This was followed up in 2002 in Calgary, Alberta (Canada); 2003 in Evians-les-Bains (France); and most recently in Saint Petersburg (Russia) in 2006.

If Communist-Socialism is such a bad thing, one has to wonder why the nations with the fastest growing GDPs since 1994 in the Western Hemisphere are Cuba led by Raul Castro, Venezuela under Hugo Chavez, Mexico under Andrés Manuel López Obrador, Argentina under Néstor Kirchner, Uruguay under Tabaré Vázquez, and Brazil under Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva. The people of all of those countries brought in the governments involved by electoral victories, and not violent political revolutions as in the 1970s and1980s.....
 
Well the need for Revolution is necessary and just. Ever since 1999 with the Seattle Riots and the Genoa Riots of 2001, people are coming to realize the dangers of the excesses of corporate rule. This was followed up in 2002 in Calgary, Alberta (Canada); 2003 in Evians-les-Bains (France); and most recently in Saint Petersburg (Russia) in 2006.

If Communist-Socialism is such a bad thing, one has to wonder why the nations with the fastest growing GDPs since 1994 in the Western Hemisphere are Cuba led by Raul Castro, Venezuela under Hugo Chavez, Mexico under Andrés Manuel López Obrador, Argentina under Néstor Kirchner, Uruguay under Tabaré Vázquez, and Brazil under Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva. The people of all of those countries brought in the governments involved by electoral victories, and not violent political revolutions as in the 1970s and1980s.....
Communism aalways shows growth in the short-term, but they'll crash and burn before long, you mark my words.
 
OOC: Actully this was supposed to be during the Great Depression but its to late for that now I'll just ride this wave wherever it goes.
 
I would perhaps argue that comparisons to the CSA, the ancient world etc. (EDIT: not that you mention any explicitly) are a bad idea: do we have any realistic model of a slavelike economy such as that being proposed in Corporate Yankland- an industrialised nation where innovation is (allegedly at least) given a high priority? EDIT: Remember old examples only cover more backward and more agrarian situations, by comparison.





OOC: Actually I ment of a teorethical model where the irrelevance of near-sllave masses of customers in terms of bargaining power will lead to stagnation of the market, not any historical comparison.
 
Communism aalways shows growth in the short-term, but they'll crash and burn before long, you mark my words.
And yet, for some reason, it has been the main political driving force behind our trading partners. If Communist Socialism is so bad, why is it our top trading partners are the People's Republic of China under Hu Jintao, India under Darshan Singh Canadian, and the recently reunified Korea under Ban Ki Moon? If Communism is so bad, why do we support those nations with our trade dollars?
 
I dunno, because they're communist in name only? :rolleyes:

Really, all the "real" communist countries have either died smothered in their own rotting ideological carcass, or have shifted over to various free-market systems. Just because they don't bend to European interests doesn't make them communists in practice. (Well India's kind of an exception: America is one of the few countries privileged to have free access into Indian markets, whereas the Europeans are kept out.)
 
Some of us run these corporations, you know.

And let's face it, you seek to take by force what your skills and efforts do not otherwise allow--a standard of living that you denied yourself by doing drugs, having a child before age 18, dropping out of schooling, or getting a criminal record.

These Communist vermin think that people who take and do not give should somehow be given even more. That we've banned alcohol and drugs, and required everyone to get a tertiary education and flat out refused to pay to incarcerate underworld monsters and terrorists is because this is what makes society the best it can be. A world without losers, welfare recipients and criminal riff-raff.

And you say these things in the face of tried and failed experiments like Josef Stalin's Union of Soviet Socialist Republics and Mao's People's Republic. Stalin enslaved millions, Mao starved millions. And now you take issue with the most productive corporate citizens and top caliber experts who run them because you can offer nothing other than criminality in our world.

People like you need to be taken out an shot. Fortunately, thanks to the 2006 Laws against non-citizens and non-contributors, we are likely to force you into a constructive role for society. The Lay-Skilling process of electrolobotomy should leave as a quiet, charitable laborer for the rest of your days.

Happy Capitalism to You.:D:D:D
CEO "Blue" Max

Big words for a damn capitalist. However I am a man of action I Will be fighting for our freedom while you are twiddling your thumbs.
 
I dunno, because they're communist in name only? :rolleyes:

Really, all the "real" communist countries have either died smothered in their own rotting ideological carcass, or have shifted over to various free-market systems. Just because they don't bend to European interests doesn't make them communists in practice. (Well India's kind of an exception: America is one of the few countries privileged to have free access into Indian markets, whereas the Europeans are kept out.)
This seems like a half-hearted attempt to deny the facts. While the traditional Stalinist model of Communism failed, the model created by Deng Xiaoping with an emphasis on a mixed system is actually the model that over 75% of the world's population chooses of its own free will. With the United States, how can we make the claim of a "democratic middle class", when the richest 1% controls over 66% of the country's wealth? Where is the "middle class" when the corporate elite feel that the jobs of the middle class are better served in the People's Republic of China, India, Korea, Brazil and Mexico? When American undermines itself in this fashion, they make revolution inevitable....
 
Communism aalways shows growth in the short-term, but they'll crash and burn before long, you mark my words.

Thats is because those states were opposed to new ideas much like the corporate elite are here in America. Any state that rejects them can only shrivel up and die with time.
 

bard32

Banned
Ever since Corporate fucks took control of Washington its been nothing but downhill for America ever since the Great War. The Government has forggoten you entirely; thus it must be disposed of immediately! My fellow countrymen it is time to take up arms agianst the damned capitalists and bring back our justice, integrity, and rights that they have stolen from us! We have fought for years but the end is almost here. I will never forget you, the people, because we its workers are America!

Workers Unite!

I had to post this twice. However, if it's still here, go to FDR assassinated in
1932.
 
I had to post this twice. However, if it's still here, go to FDR assassinated in
1932.
Well, the Corporate state that we have been under has been a part of American life since the 1934 March on Washington led by General Smedley Darlington Butler against the Socialist policies of President John Nance Garner (D-TX), soon after the death of Theodore Roosevelt's cousin, Franklin (D-NY) at the hands of Giuseppe Zangara in 1933. The subsequent creation of the office Secretary of General Affairs has been a thorn in the side of American reforms since that dreadful day....
 
Top